logo
Archaeologists Found a Stunningly Preserved 5,000-Year-Old Mummy—in a Garbage Dump

Archaeologists Found a Stunningly Preserved 5,000-Year-Old Mummy—in a Garbage Dump

Yahoo02-05-2025
An archaeological site that used to be a garbage dump has revealed the extraordinarily preserved mummy of an elite woman from the ancient Caral civilization of Peru.
The woman was buried with luxury grave goods and a headdress that distinguished her as a member of the aristocracy.
This find shows that, despite previous evidence proving rulers were men, women were allowed to hold high social rank in Caral society.
In ancient Peru, those of high rank were buried with both treasures and dignity—so why were the mummified remains of a noblewoman languishing in a garbage dump for decades?
The site where the mummy was found this past December had not always been covered in trash. She was buried in Aspero, once a scared site in the city of Caral, which rose around 3,000 BC. Caral emerged from the fertile Super Valley and flourished around the same time as other illustrious ancient civilizations such as Mesopotamia, China and Egypt. It even boasts a pyramid to rival the towering Step Pyramid of Djoser in Saqqara. It only became a dump in the 1960s until it later turned into an archaeological site in the 1990s.
Archaeologist David Palomino, who led the excavation on this site, is convinced that even tough most rulers in Caral society were men, this woman was had to be a member of the elite. The find shows that women could hold high social positions. She was shrouded in several layers of fabric, wore a headdress made of twisted threads to show her status, and was covered with a mantle of blue-and-gold macaw feathers. Among her grave goods were a stone bowl, a straw basket and a toucan's beak, but what was really exceptional about this mummy is her state of preservation.
'This is an exceptional burial due to the preservation of skin, hair and nails, a rare condition in this area, where usually only skeletal remains are recovered,' said the culture ministry of Peru in a press release.
Whoever this woman was in life, preliminary analysis has shown that she was about five feet tall and somewhere between the ages of 20 and 35 at the time of death, though what caused her death remains unknown. She joins the 'Lady of the Four Tupus' as another female elite burial unearthed in Caral. While only skeletal remains of this individual, known for being buried with four brooches carved into the shapes of animals, remained, she is another example of an aristocratic woman from the same region and time period.
Like the newly discovered Caral woman, the Lady of the Four Tupus was covered in layers of shrouds and went to the afterlife with luxury grave goods. The bone brooches placed at her shoulders were howler monkeys and exotic birds with chrysocolla eyes. Around her neck was an impressive string of mollusk shell beads crowned with a spondylus, or spiny oyster, shell. Her head was also bound, another indicator of wealth and status. Whether the newer mummy had her head bound has not been determined yet.
Something curious about the Lady of the Four Tupus was that, despite her having been part of the top echelon of society, her bones give away signs of hard physical labor. Caral thrived from fishing and agriculture. This could mean that even the elites of the city were not exempt from work, hardly the stereotypical picture of ancient royals and aristocrats at the height of leisure, fanned and fed by their loyal servants. Further analysis may be able to tell whether the woman found beneath the former garbage dump also had an obligation to do some sort of labor.
'A multidisciplinary team is currently investigating aspects related to health, death, diet, and the origin and use of the recovered objects,' the culture Ministry of Peru also said.
Caral, which was inhabited by the Norte Chico people, was around for four millennia before the rise of the Inca Empire and saw no outside influence. It might even be the oldest known city in the Americas. Some archaeologists suggest its splendor ended because of internal strife or political upheaval, which is difficult to prove. Why it was abandoned without any evidence of being conquered is still a mystery.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside the secret plan to relocate a wayward B.C. grizzly bear
Inside the secret plan to relocate a wayward B.C. grizzly bear

Yahoo

time17-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Inside the secret plan to relocate a wayward B.C. grizzly bear

As people continue to mourn the loss of a wayward grizzly on an island off the B.C. coast, many are left wondering why the bear wasn't relocated to avoid what some say was its certain fate. In fact, despite the province's repeated claims that the bear had already been moved twice and thus wasn't a good candidate for relocation, a secret plan to transport him to a remote location was in place. "We had a very well thought-out plan and everybody on standby," said Erik Blaney, the shíshálh Nation's acting manager of lands and resources. "He would have been living his best life up there." That plan was laid to rest when conservation officers investigated a report that the grizzly had been shot and wounded, and then discovered its carcass earlier this week. Some local residents were shocked to find out about the relocation plan, given conservation officers' previous claims it would be impossible. Others think the bear could still be alive if they had been given information about the plan. But Blaney says social media and the misinformation that often comes with it made that impossible. Blaney, a legislator with the Tla'amin Nation, says the plan that he had hatched nearly three weeks ago was eventually approved by the province, with some minor changes. Details were kept under wraps and only shared with a handful of people. Some Texada Island residents — many of whom had asked for weeks for the bear to be relocated — are wondering why they weren't made aware of it. "It's unfortunate that the community wasn't [informed]," said Texada Island resident Daniel Cammiade. "[If we had] I think that it's quite possible that the bear would still be alive." Calls for relocation The five-year-old male grizzly was first spotted on Texada Island on May 25. Texada residents say the island is a predator-free community, and many were worried about the bear's presence. While some called for peaceful coexistence with the bear, many others wanted it relocated for its safety and their own. "It seems like things were left in the community's hands — a community that was not used to dealing with bears," Cammiade said. The B.C. Conservation Officer Service repeatedly told CBC News the bear wasn't a good candidate for relocation because it had already been relocated twice, but also said there was no "kill order" for the animal. Solution hatched By the end of June, Blaney's plan had been hatched. Working with the shíshálh, Homalco and Tla'amin nations, he wanted to trap the bear and move it to Bute Inlet, on Homalco territory, where it could live with other coastal grizzlies and be far enough away that it couldn't swim back. "I've worked up there for many years now and it's a pretty hard trek to get into town," Blaney told CBC News. "And there's plentiful salmon runs where we were going to drop them off and a really good pink salmon run expected this year." But the province didn't sign off on that plan. Blaney said the province told him that what they were asking was outside current policy — and that to capture and move the bear without a permit could lead to charges under the Wildlife Act. Change of plans Without informing the public, the province changed its mind. Speaking with CBC's On the Island guest host Kathryn Marlow Wednesday morning, Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship Randene Neill confirmed that the plan was approved almost two weeks ago. "We had a meeting with the local nation there, the Homalco Nation, in partnership with the shíshálh Nation as well, who came up with a really robust, clear plan about how they wanted to translocate it in partnership with the Grizzly Bear Foundation," said Neill, who is also the MLA for Powell River-Sunshine Coast. "After talking to all of our specialists and our team, we agreed to try this translocation." Blaney says the nations worked with provincial officials to remind them that the shíshálh and Tla'amin nations are self-governing, and the province had an obligation to work with them to manage their wildlife resources. "They can't just do the old paternalistic land and resource management around us or without us. Those decisions actually need to be made by the self-governing nations," he said. Kept a secret The exact plan was kept secret, Blaney says, in order not to compromise any of the details. Blaney didn't want people hindering relocation efforts by posting about the trap's location on social media. Texada Island residents had created a Facebook group to post information about the bear, including its location. He says getting the right trap to Texada Island had already been delayed because of a claim on social media that the bear had been shot last week. That led officers to reroute the trap to Pemberton to relocate a bear in that area, Blaney says, and it took days to move the animal and get the trap back to Texada. Blaney says the trap was ready to go Tuesday morning, the day conservation officers announced the bear had been shot. Later that morning, the grizzly was found dead. "We had six staff ready for deployment and the plan in place, helicopter on standby," he said. It was too late. The bear's death is still under investigation.

Roman-era mosaic panel stolen during Second World War returns to Pompeii
Roman-era mosaic panel stolen during Second World War returns to Pompeii

Yahoo

time15-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Roman-era mosaic panel stolen during Second World War returns to Pompeii

A mosaic panel on travertine slabs, depicting an erotic theme from the Roman era, was returned to the archaeological park of Pompeii on Tuesday, after being stolen by a Nazi German captain during the Second World War. The artwork was repatriated from Germany through diplomatic channels, arranged by the Italian Consulate in Stuttgart, Germany, after having been returned from the heirs of the last owner, a deceased German citizen. The owner had received the mosaic as a gift from a Wehrmacht captain, assigned to the military supply chain in Italy during the war. The mosaic — dating between mid- to last century BC and the first century — is considered a work of 'extraordinary cultural interest', experts said. Gabriel Zuchtriegel, director of the Archaeological Park of Pompeii and co-author of an essay dedicated to the returned work, said: 'It is the moment when the theme of domestic love becomes an artistic subject. 'While the Hellenistic period, from the fourth to the first century BC, exulted the passion of mythological and heroic figures, now we see a new theme.' The heirs of the mosaic's last owner in Germany contacted the Carabinieri unit in Rome that is dedicated to protecting cultural heritage, which was in charge of the investigation, asking for information on how to return the mosaic to the Italian state. Authorities carried out the necessary checks to establish its authenticity and provenance, and then worked to repatriate the mosaic in September 2023. The collaboration with the Archaeological Park of Pompeii was also key, as it made it possible to trace it near the Mount Vesuvius volcano, despite the scarcity of data on the original context of its discovery, the Carabinieri said. The panel was then assigned to the Archaeological Park of Pompeii, where, suitably catalogued, it will be protected and available for educational and research purposes. 'Today's return is like healing an open wound,' Mr Zuchtriegel said, adding that the mosaic allows to reconstruct the story of that period, the first century AD, before Pompeii was destroyed by the Vesuvius eruption in AD 79. The park's director also highlighted how the return by the heirs of its owner signals an important change in 'mentality', as 'the sense of possession (of stolen art) becomes a heavy burden'. 'We see that often in the many letters we receive from people who may have stolen just a stone, to bring home a piece of Pompeii,' Mr Zuchtriegel said. He recalled the so-called 'Pompeii curse,' which, according to a popular superstition, hits whoever steals artefacts in Pompeii. The world-renowned legend suggests that those who steal finds from the ancient city of Pompeii will experience bad luck or misfortune. That has been fuelled over the years by several tourists who return stolen items, claiming they brought them bad luck and caused tragic events.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store