Hong Kong at Maritime Crossroads: New Studies Reveal Unprecedented Opportunity for Kickstarting the Blue Economy
The reports—Port 1.0 to Port 2.0 (HKUST), Blue Finance for a Blue Economy (ADMCF), and Valuing the Invaluable Blue (WWF-Hong Kong)—all agree that the city has a unique opportunity in this moment, wherein:
Global shipping reforms are creating openings for blue finance leadership
are creating openings for blue finance leadership Port redevelopments can integrate ecological and economic value
can integrate ecological and economic value Marine ecosystems, long undervalued, are essential to regional prosperity and resilience
Global shipping reforms – IMOs net zero emission and carbon pricing mandate will force fleet upgrades, fuel transitions and new financial risks. In parallel, the UN has announced an ambitious biodiversity framework to be achieved by 2030. Hong Kong, itself, is striving to re-assert itself as a maritime powerhouse. This alignment, the authors propose, creates an unprecedented opportunity to transform the city into Asia's sustainable blue economy leader. At the heart of this transformation lies 'Port 2.0' – a visionary reimagining of Hong Kong's waters as a multifunctional interface that connects sea, land, city, technology and people, and serve as platforms for innovation, environmental stewardship and civic life.
ADVERTISEMENT
'What makes this moment truly extraordinary is how these elements intersect with Hong Kong's unique advantages. Our world-class financial ecosystem can mobilise the billions needed for maritime decarbonisation. Our strategic location positions us as the natural hub for green shipping business in Asia. And our existing port infrastructure provides the ideal testing ground for innovative solutions.' said Christine Loh, Chief Development Strategist, Institute for the Environment at HKUST and author of the paper 'From Port 1.0 to Port 2.0: Hong Kong's Next Leap to Evolving a Blue Economy Vision'.
Hong Kong's status as the world's third-largest capital hub gives it unmatched potential to pioneer blue finance. As ADMCF's Blue Finance report highlights, instruments such as blue bonds can mobilise capital to facilitate port decarbonisation, sustainable aquaculture and marine eco-tourism—transforming the city into Asia's premier blue economy hub, aligning marine protection with economic prosperity. In 2023 there was a surge in blue bonds followed by continued growth in 2024, and Asia was the largest issuing region—led by China.
'If Hong Kong were to issue blue bonds, this would not only signal the city's commitment to improving its status as a leading international maritime hub but also accelerate the growth of blue finance, ensuring a future where economic prosperity and marine resilience go hand in hand,' said Kate Martin, the report's lead author and sustainable finance consultant with ADMCF.
This untapped potential aligns with the groundbreaking research in Valuing the Invaluable Blue. The WWF-commissioned study by the Chinese Academy of Sciences has, for the first time, quantified the staggering monetary value of the Greater Bay Area's coastal ecosystems—revealing a Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) worth RMB 4.9 trillion, equivalent to over 35% of the GBA's GDP, with 73% contributed by marine ecosystems.
'This valuation demonstrates our marine ecosystems' critical, yet often overlooked, economic contributions,' said Lydia Pang, Head of Oceans Conservation at WWF-Hong Kong. 'From climate regulation to disaster mitigation, these natural systems provide services worth over one-third of our regional GDP – services that should be factored into development decisions and anchor blue economy planning,' she said. 'What's more, our study shows that Hong Kong is uniquely positioned to adopt this ecosystem accounting framework. With strong data foundations, policy alignment, and technical readiness, we can localise and institutionalise marine GEP accounting to guide planning, investment, and conservation.'
ADVERTISEMENT
The authors' combined focus on a blue economy vision integrates port development with marine conservation, biodiversity, climate resilience, recreation and the responsible use of ocean resources. It builds on China's decades of marine policy leadership, where comprehensive frameworks – from ocean GEP systems to blue finance instruments – have laid the foundation for sustainable maritime development.
'The window to developing a sustainable blue economy and to establish ourselves as the global leader in sustainable maritime commerce is open now, but won't remain so indefinitely.' Said Sophie le Clue, CEO at ADMCF. 'The question isn't whether we can seize this opportunity, but whether we will.'
Hashtag: #ADMCapitalFoundation
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Europe scrambles to avert 30% US tariffs as stocks slide across sectors
European firms called on trade negotiators to redouble efforts to strike a deal with Washington after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened a 30% tariff on EU imports from August, with no mention of hoped-for special treatment for cars or spirits. Trump on Saturday said he planned to impose the higher tariff rate on imports from Mexico and the European Union from August 1, mounting pressure on Brussels to scramble for a deal to avert a potential massive blow to the bloc's economy. The move sparked a slide in European autos and alcohol stocks on Monday, while regional food makers said the 30% rate, if imposed, would be "disastrous." "The escalating tariff conflict with the USA poses a serious threat to many German companies," said Volker Treier, head of trade at Germany's DIHK chamber of commerce, urging ministers to quickly seal a deal. "Tough negotiations are now needed to avert a collapse of transatlantic trade. Only a united Europe can effectively defend its economic interests." Carmakers' shares slipped, with Volkswagen, Fiat-to-Jeep owner Stellantis, Renault, BMW , Mercedes-Benz and Porsche all down around 1-2%. The threatened 30% tariff is "separate from all sectoral tariffs," Trump wrote in a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, implying a 27.5% duty on autos, in effect since April, would still stand. Uncertainty The announcement of the additional possible tariff adds more uncertainty into one of the world's biggest trade partnerships, with some $975.9 billion of two-way goods trade last year, USTR data show. Mercedes-Benz said in a statement that an agreement was "crucial for the future economic success of both markets" in Europe and the United States, and for parties involved to work "intensively and as quickly as possible on a trade agreement." Shares in other major European firms exposed to the United States were also largely down. Pernod Ricard, maker of Jameson whiskey, was down 1.5%, while cognac maker Remy Cointreau sank 4%. Rival Diageo, where sales of Canadian whisky and Mexican tequila drive its U.S. business, bucked the trend, up over 0.5%. French luxury powerhouse LVMH dropped 1.5%, while consumer goods firm Nestle, Procter Gamble and Reckitt Benckiser were down less than 1%. "The biggest problem with the current tariff policy is the lack of a stable, predictable tariff framework," said Pal Skirta, analyst at Metzler Equities, adding it made business planning and operations "significantly more complex" and costly.
Zawya
7 hours ago
- Zawya
Why Trump's push for a 1% Fed policy rate could spell trouble for US economy
U.S. President Donald Trump says the Federal Reserve should set its benchmark interest rate at 1% to lower government borrowing costs, allowing the administration to finance the high and rising deficits expected from his spending and tax-cut bill. Trump should be careful what he wishes for. A Fed policy rate that low is not typically a sign that the U.S. is the "hottest" country in the world for investment, as Trump has said. It is usually a crisis response to an economy in serious trouble. The U.S. economy isn't in that kind of trouble now. But with near-full employment, ongoing economic growth and inflation above the U.S. central bank's 2% target, the super-low interest rates Trump seeks could easily backfire if investors in the $36 trillion Treasury market saw such a move as meaning the Fed had caved to political pressure and cut rates for the wrong reasons. Congress tasked the Fed with maintaining stable prices and full employment, not making deficit spending cheap, and slashing rates in the current environment could well reignite inflation. "I am not necessarily convinced that ... if the Fed tomorrow decided we are cutting to 1%, that this would have the traditional impact on long-term interest rates. The bond market fear would be that inflation would reignite and essentially we would have a loss of Fed independence and a de-anchoring of inflation expectations," said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon. Though there is "scope to ease" from the current 4.25%-4.50% range, it is nothing like the magnitude of cuts Trump envisions, he said. Daco, noting the unemployment rate is 4.1%, the economy is growing around 2% and inflation is about 2.5%, said: "From a data perspective there is not anything to suggest the need for an immediate and substantial lowering." IS 1% NORMAL? A 1% Fed policy rate has not been uncommon in the last quarter of a century, but is no sign of good times, coinciding with joblessness of 6% or higher. Former President George W. Bush governed at a time when the rate was 1%. It occurred shortly after the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 and at the end of a string of Fed rate cuts following the dot-com crash and the September 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S. Former President Barack Obama inherited a near-zero Fed policy rate when he took office in January 2009. He also inherited a global financial crisis. Trump himself got the same near-zero interest rate treatment from the Fed in the last months of his first term in the White House - when the COVID-19 pandemic shut down the economy. WHAT THE FED CONTROLS, AND DOESN'T While hugely influential, the Fed has limited tools to influence the economy in normal times. U.S. central bankers meet typically eight times a year to set what is called the federal funds rate. Only banks borrow overnight at that rate, but it is a benchmark for other credit, influencing everything from corporate debt to home mortgages, consumer credit cards, and Treasury yields. Perhaps as importantly, it shapes expectations about where rates are headed. While closely correlated with the Fed's policy rate, those other rates are not set directly by the central bank. There's always a spread, including for what's been top of mind for Trump: the interest rate on U.S. Treasuries. SUPPLY, DEMAND AND RISK Global trading across an array of markets ultimately determines those other rates. A foreign pension fund's demand for Treasuries or mortgage-backed securities, for instance, influences what Americans pay for a mortgage or the U.S. government pays to finance its operations. Supply and demand are critical. U.S. government debt supply is determined by spending and tax levels set by the president and Congress. The federal government typically spends more each year than what it receives in tax collections and other revenue, and Treasury covers that annual deficit with borrowed money, issuing securities due in as few as 30 days to as long as 30 years. All things equal, larger deficits and more accumulated debt mean higher interest rates. Deficits and debt are expected to rise following the passage in Congress earlier this month of Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." On the demand side, the U.S. enjoys a privileged position that holds down government borrowing costs since it is still considered a relatively risk-free investment with plenty of supply, deep and well-functioning markets and a history of strong institutions and legal norms. Current returns above 4% are particularly attractive for large pension funds or retirees who want income while being assured their investment is safe. But, like any borrower, the U.S. government must pay a premium for the risk an investor takes on. Locking up money in a 10-year Treasury note means other opportunities are foregone. Rates of interest, inflation and economic growth may all change in that span, and investors want compensation for those risks. With the Fed policy rate as a starting point, all of those factors are piled on in the form of a "term premium." Intangibles, like trust in a country's institutions, also matter. When Trump's threats to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell intensified in April, yields rose and the president backed off - a sign that global markets have an important vote in central bank independence. IS FED POLICY OUT OF LINE? Trump recently sent Powell a handwritten note with a list of central bank rates and penciled in where he thought the Fed's policy rate should be, near the bottom. U.S. central bank policymakers say it would be risky to cut rates until it is clear that Trump's new tariffs - many already imposed and more still to come - aren't going to stoke inflation. Central bankers often refer to policy formulas or rules that relate their inflation target to incoming and forecasted economic data to point to an appropriate interest rate. None suggest a Fed policy rate as low as Trump wants. (Editing by Dan Burns and Paul Simao)
Zawya
7 hours ago
- Zawya
Oman's tourism sector contributes over $5bln in 2024
Muscat: The tourism sector's contribution to the national economy rose to RO2.12 billion by the end of 2024, compared to RO1.75 billion in 2018, representing a growth rate of 3.2 percent, according to the latest data released by the National Center for Statistics and Information. The sector's contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) rose to RO2.7 billion, compared to RO2.3 billion in 2018, reflecting the overall impact of tourism as an engine of growth. Salim bin Mohammed al Mahrouqi, Minister of Heritage and Tourism (MHT), said that the positive indicators achieved by the tourism sector in 2024, such as the increase in visitors to the country, are the result of government policies supporting economic diversification, as well as integration with various government agencies, which has played a key role in creating an attractive investment and accelerating the pace of delivery of tourism projects. He underlined the Ministry's commitment to adopting innovative promotional policies, expanding partnerships with the private sector, and developing tourism products and services to meet visitor aspirations and enhance the tourist experience. Spending Total spending on tourism in the Sultanate of Oman rose to RO1.02 billion in 2024, compared to RO960 million in 2018. Direct value added by the tourism grew by 5.3 percent, RO1.09 billion, compared to RO799.7 million in 2018, and it demonstrated the integration with sectors such as transportation, hospitality, retail, and culture. Incoming visitors The Sultanate of Oman received around 3.8 million visitors in 2024, of which 68.2 percent were overnight visitors and 31.8 percent were same-day visitors. Total tourism spending by these visitors amounted to RO989 million, with an average per capita expenditure of RO253.8. Need for facilitating travel between Gulf countries The data showed that more than 55 percent of incoming visitors were residents of the United Arab Emirates, underscoring the importance of enhancing land connectivity and facilitating travel between Gulf countries. International visitors European visitors accounted for 16 percent of the total visitors, compared to Asian nationalities (13.2 percent), indicating the effectiveness of the promotional campaigns launched by the Ministry in cooperation with overseas offices. Lesiure destination As for reasons for coming to the Sultanate of Oman, Leisure topped the list with 70.2 percent, followed by visiting relatives and friends (17.9 percent), and shopping (5 percent). The average length of stay ranged between 5 and 6 nights, with a total of 14.8 million tourist nights, confirming the ability of destinations in Oman to attract visitors for longer periods. Regarding accommodation patterns, hotel establishments have witnessed a growth in demand, enhancing the feasibility of investing in tourism facilities, particularly in governorates witnessing development in the tourism infrastructure, such as Dhofar, Musandam, and Al Dakhiliyah. The number of outgoing visitors was 8.1 million, spending a total of RO1.8 billion, with an average per capita expenditure of RO218.5. This reflects the volume of domestic spending on outbound tourism and opens the way for developing initiatives to enhance tourism. 2022 © All right reserved for Oman Establishment for Press, Publication and Advertising (OEPPA) Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
