Project 2025 author Paul Dans will challenge Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham in South Carolina
Dans told The Associated Press the Trump administration's federal workforce reductions and cuts to federal programs are what he had hoped for in drafting Project 2025. But he said there's 'more work to do,' particularly in the Senate.
'What we've done with Project 2025 is really change the game in terms of closing the door on the progressive era,' Dans said in an AP interview. 'If you look at where the chokepoint is, it's the United States Senate. That's the headwaters of the swamp.'
Dans, who is set to formally announce his campaign at an event Wednesday in Charleston, said Graham has spent most of his career in Washington and 'it's time to show him the door.'
Challenging the long-serving Graham, who has routinely batted back contenders over the years, is something of a political long shot in what is fast becoming a crowded field ahead of the November 2026 midterm election that will determine control of Congress.
Trump early on gave his endorsement of Graham, a political confidant and regular golfing partner of the president, despite their on-again-off-again relationship. Graham, in announcing he would seek a fifth term in the Senate, also secured the state's leading Republicans, Sen. Tim Scott and Gov. Henry McMaster, to chair his 2026 run. He has amassed millions of dollars in his campaign account.
Other candidates, including Republican former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer, a wealthy developer, and Democratic challenger Dr. Annie Andrews, have announced their campaigns for the Senate seat in an early start to the election season, more than a year away.
Graham, in an appearance Sunday on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' did not discuss his reelection campaign but fielded questions on topics including his push to release 'as much as you can' from the case files on Jeffrey Epstein, something many of Trump's supporters want the government to do.
Dans, an attorney who worked in the first Trump administration as White House liaison to the office of personnel management, said he expects to have support from Project 2025 allies, as well as the ranks of Trump's supporters in the state who have publicly tired of Graham.
After Trump left the White House, Dans, now a father of four, went to work at the Heritage Foundation, often commuting on weekdays to Washington as he organized Project 2025. The nearly 1,000-page policy blueprint, with chapters written by leading conservative thinkers, calls for dismantling the federal government and downsizing the federal workforce, among other right-wing proposals for the next White House.
'To be clear, I believe that there is a 'deep state' out there, and I'm the single one who stepped forward at the end of the first term of Trump and really started to drain the swamp,' Dans said, noting he compiled much of the book from his kitchen table in Charleston.
Among the goals, he said, was to 'deconstruct the administrative state,' which he said is what the Trump administration has been doing, pointing in particular to former Trump adviser Elon Musk's work at the Department of Government Efficiency shuttering federal offices.
Dans and Heritage parted ways in July 2024 amid blowback over Project 2025. It catapulted into political culture that summer during the presidential campaign season, as Democrats and their allies showcased the hard-right policy proposals — from mass firings to budget cuts — as a dire warning of what could come in a second Trump term.
Trump distanced himself from Project 2025, and his campaign insisted it had nothing to do with his own 'Agenda 47.'
Dans is launching his campaign with a prayer breakfast followed by a kick-off event at a historic venue in Charleston.
___
Kinnard reported from Chapin, South Carolina, and can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Intercept
2 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Trump Prepares to Revoke Lifesaving Abortion Care for Veterans
President Donald Trump appears poised to institute an abortion ban for hospitals run by the Department of Veterans Affairs — escalating his war on reproductive health care by revoking veterans' access to abortion. The Office of Management and Budget concluded its review last week of a Veterans Affairs rule titled Reproductive Health Services, clearing the way to implement it at the VA. Experts believe the rule is a reversal of a Biden-era policy of the same name which ended the agency's ban on abortion counseling for veterans and allowed for VA providers to offer abortion services in limited circumstances, such as rape, incest, or endangerment of a pregnant person's life or health. If the policy is overturned, hundreds of thousands of veterans in states with abortion bans could lose access to abortion care and counseling. Sarah Baker, the digital director for the Center for Reproductive Rights, said the change appears to be 'the first nationwide abortion ban that Trump is supporting and putting in place.' The new rule has not yet been published, and until it is, experts can't be certain what exactly is in it. The VA did not respond to The Intercept's request for comment. But Rachel Fey, vice president of policy and strategic partnerships at the reproductive and sexual health advocacy organization Power to Decide, said that based on the Trump administration's posture and explicit calls in Project 2025 to reverse the Biden policy, she expects one of two outcomes. 'We think either they would roll back the exceptions to an extremely narrow set that mimics the Hyde Amendment,' Fey said, referring to a law that bars federal funds from being used for abortion care except in cases of rape, incest, or to save a person's life. (The Hyde Amendment does not allow exceptions to preserve a person's health in non-fatal circumstances, as the Biden rule does.) Or, Fey said, another possibility is 'just striking [the Biden rule] entirely and saying abortion is not allowed in any circumstances at the VA.' The Biden administration implemented the Reproductive Health Services rule for the VA in 2024, two years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Though the rule only allows VA hospitals to provide abortions in extreme circumstances, it was designed to provide basic protections in states that moved quickly to institute abortion bans. Read Our Complete Coverage Over half of all women veterans of reproductive age in the U.S. live in states where abortion is banned or likely to be banned, according to analysis from the National Partnership for Women & Families. 'So that's 345,000 women veterans that live in states that have banned or are likely to ban abortion,' said Jaclyn Dean, director of congressional relations, reproductive health, at the National Partnership for Women & Families. 'For many of the women veterans living in any of those 12 states with total abortion bans, the VA is the only place that they can get abortion care. So you can expect those people to lose abortion care in cases of rape, incest, in the life and health of the pregnant person.' In that climate, Fey stressed, even narrowing the exceptions could be devastating. 'What we've seen in states like Texas and Idaho is women coming close to death, suffering the loss of future fertility sometimes, suffering long-term disability because they were not given the standard clinical care they needed when they needed it,' Fey said. 'That's what we're talking about when we get to a life exception versus a health exception.' Rep. Maxine Dexter, D-Ore., who co-authored a letter in April opposing the rule change along with 130 House Democrats, said reversing the Biden rule was a 'betrayal.' 'As a physician, I trained at the VA, where a sign at the entrance read: 'The price of freedom is visible here.' Our veterans sacrificed everything for this country, and in return, we promised them the best care possible,' Dexter wrote in a statement to The Intercept. 'For Trump to reinstate a complete ban on abortion care and counseling at the VA – even in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life or health of the mother — is an utter betrayal of that promise.' Veterans also face unique health risks related to pregnancy, said Baker with the Center for Reproductive Rights. 'Pregnancy is just riskier for veterans,' said Baker, 'because of the different health risks that they face, higher rates of sexual assault, higher rates of PTSD … and the higher [rates of] other chronic conditions.' And restricting or cutting off access to abortion would only compound the additional barriers to accessing quality health care that veterans already face, Fey noted. 'Serving in the U.S. military is often a way out of poverty for a lot of people in this country, and because of systemic racism, a disproportionate number of the people looking for that way out are Black and brown women when they serve in the military,' said Fey. 'When we talk about reproductive health care in this country, the harms don't fall equally.' The Trump administration has been steadily chipping away at policies put in place by President Joe Biden to protect access to reproductive health care. In June, Trump rescinded guidance from the Biden administration that directed hospitals under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act to provide stabilizing treatment to patients in medical emergencies — including abortion care. 'It's all part of this larger plan of extremists to ban abortion wherever they can and to interfere with people's personal medical decisions,' said Dean. 'They're weaponizing control over veterans' health care, instead of doing what's actually best for our country's veterans, which is giving them the health care that they need.'
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Joe Rogan says Trump admin is 'trying to gaslight you' over Epstein scandal
Podcaster Joe Rogan, who endorsed President Donald Trump on the eve of the 2024 election, called the administration's refusal to release more information about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein a "line in the sand." Rogan's comments on his widely popular podcast "The Joe Rogan Experience" aired July 25, and come as the controversy over the Epstein investigation continues to dog the administration and the Republican party. "This one's a line in the sand," Rogan said, while discussing the scandal with guest Mike Baker, a former CIA officer. "We thought Trump was going to come in and a lot of things were going to be resolved − we're going to drain the swamp, we're going to figure everything out." "You have this one hardcore line in the sand that everybody had been talking about forever and then they're trying to gaslight you on that," Rogan said. Is Trump in the Epstein files? Before Bondi's reported alert, here is where he appeared The latest: Ghislaine Maxwell says she is willing to testify, under these conditions The Trump administration has dealt with uproar, including from the president's Republican and MAGA base, over the Department of Justice's announcement in early July that it won't release its files on Epstein, a former financier and convicted sex offender who died while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking in 2019. The president and many of his allies have spent years claiming Democrats had suppressed evidence of an alleged Epstein "client list," believed to contain high-profile names involved in sex trafficking and a wider child abuse conspiracy. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in March she had a "truckload" of Epstein files to review and potentially release, further stoking expectations. The DOJ announced July 7 its investigation found no evidence of the supposed client list and no evidence to charge others in Epstein's 2019 death, concluding he died by suicide. Jeffrey Epstein timeline: How the Florida case led to15 more years of sex abuse Backlash over Epstein comes from MAGA base − and the podcast scene Trump's former friendship with Epstein, along with several years of conjecture flamed by many MAGA allies, has only heightened discord among the president's supporters, in a scandal that has been rife with conspiracy theories and suspicion from the start. A Reuters/Ipsos poll taken July 15-16 found 69% of Americans believe the federal government is hiding details about Epstein's clients. Rogan is just the latest Trump-friendly podcaster and comedian to come out against the administration's handling of the scandal, joining in similar refrains of outrage from fellow conservative and conservative-leaning figures like Theo Von, Tim Dillon, Tucker Carlson and Andrew Schulz. More: Popular podcaster criticizes JD Vance over past Epstein comments: 'What changed?' In a social media post July 16, Von, whose podcast and social media channels have millions of subscribers, recirculated a clip of a former interview with Vance in which the then-candidate appeared to agree to release alleged files about the criminal investigation into Epstein. Von wrote: "Yeah, what changed?" The commentators and comedians are commonly lumped together within the so-called "manosphere," a corner of media channels that cater to predominantly male audiences and lean anti-establishment to conservative. Rogan's podcast is the most popular on Spotify, reaching millions of people per week, and his 2024 endorsement is often credited with helping turn out male voters for then-candidate Trump in the November election. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans Introduce Nearly 20 Bills Based on a Conspiracy Theory
Republicans across the country are working hard to pass bills banning something that the fringe corners of the internet told them to be afraid of: weather modification. Weather modification refers to geoengineering processes such as solar radiation modification and cloud-seeding that are used to counter the effects of global warming and drought, respectively. These processes have been woven into right-wing conspiracy theories that the government is able to control the weather, and MAGA lawmakers—fearful that the Democrats could rule the heavens and summon a deluge to wipe them out—have started to take action. Republican lawmakers in nearly 20 states have introduced legislation to prevent weather modification. Some of the laws allude to 'chemtrails,' a conspiracy theory that planes aren't leaving 'contrails' of condensation in the atmosphere but are spreading chemicals on an unsuspecting public. In two states, Florida and Tennessee, those bills have passed and been signed into law. In July, right-wing concerns about weather modification reached a new fever pitch. Earlier this month, Environmental Protection Agency head Lee Zeldin announced an effort to 'compile everything we know about contrails and geoengineering' and release it to the public. Days later, Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tim Burchett introduced the Clear Skies Act, a bill that would levy steep penalties for anyone who 'knowingly conducts weather modification,' including geoengineering, cloud seeding, solar radiation modification, and the release of aerosol to 'influence temperature, precipitation, or the intensity of sunlight.' After Hurricane Helene struck the southeast United States in October, Greene boosted the right-wing conspiracy theory that the Biden administration had used weather manipulation to target Republican areas ahead of the U.S. general election. 'Yes they can control the weather,' Greene wrote in a post on X at the time. 'It's ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can't be done.' The theory of weather control is not only outrageously anti-science but based on an explicitly antisemitic conspiracy theory—though that's something Greene has never shied away from in the past. In fact, she added to the conspiracy theory with her now-infamous 'Jewish space lasers' comment. Greene isn't actually worried about manmade impact on the environment; after all, she's got no problems with fossil fuels. Rather, she's latched onto conspiracy theories about how weather can be controlled by those in power. Meanwhile, Greene said she saw a kind of 'funny hypocrisy' from the environmentalists who oppose pollution but not weather manipulation. In interviews, Greene and Burchett said that the impetus for their legislation was concerns of constituents. Burchett admitted that the issue 'was in the realm of the conspiracy theorists' but had 'taken on a little bit more mainstream.' 'You have one group that says it's real, and the other group says, 'You're a lunatic,' that it doesn't exist,' he said. 'If it doesn't exist,' Burchett added, 'then you don't have anything to worry about.' While weather modification does exist, it can't be weaponized as Greene has implied. Several states have programs for cloud seeding—a decades-old technology that helps to induce rain—including California, Nevada, Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and North Dakota. Solve the daily Crossword
