Ancient humans made tools from animal bones 1.5 million years ago
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The bone tools were 'probably used as a hand axe' – a handheld blade that's not mounted on a stick – for butchering dead animals, he said.
Advertisement
Such a blade would be handy for removing meat from elephant and hippo carcasses, but not used as a spear or projectile point. 'We don't believe they were hunting these animals. They were probably scavenging,' he said.
Some of the artifacts show signs of having been struck to remove flakes more than a dozen times, revealing persistent craftsmanship.
The uniform selection of the bones – large and heavy leg bones from specific animals – and the consistent pattern of alteration makes it clear that early humans deliberately chose and carved these bones, said Mírian Pacheco, a paleobiologist at the Federal University of Sao Carlos in Brazil, who was not involved in the study.
The bones show minimal signs of erosion, trampling, or gnawing by other animals — ruling out the possibility that natural causes resulted in the tool shapes, she added.
The bone tools date from more than a million years before our species, Homo sapiens, arose around 300,000 years ago.
Advertisement
At the time the tools were made, three different species of human ancestors lived in the same region of East Africa, said Briana Pobiner, a paleoanthropologist at the Smithsonian's Human Origins Program, who was not involved in the study.
The tools may have been made and used by Homo erectus, Homo habilis, or Paranthropus boisei. 'It could have been any of these three, but it's almost impossible to know which one,' said Pobiner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tax bill would send an iconic Smithsonian spacecraft to Texas
The Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum could lose the iconic Discovery space shuttle to Houston if a pair of Texas senators get their way. President Donald Trump's massive tax and immigration bill passed the Senate on Tuesday with language effectively ordering the shuttle's move to Texas. It would set aside $85 million to transport Discovery and construct a home for it at Space Center Houston, the official visitor center for NASA's Johnson Space Center - which itself oversaw more than 100 shuttle launches over three decades. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. But the Smithsonian, which has housed the shuttle at its Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Northern Virginia since 2012, estimated that the true cost would be north of $300 million. That includes the cost of the transfer, the new facility to house it, prep for an alternative museum display at the Smithsonian and other related costs. The House approved the bill on Thursday afternoon, and Trump is expected to sign it into law. More than a dozen years ago, NASA chose the final resting places of Discovery and its three siblings after the agency ended the space shuttle program. Notably, none of the four winning sites were in Texas - a decision that was decried as a 'snub' by 16 members of Texas's congressional delegation at the time and continues to rankle the state's Senate Republicans, Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who backed the new provision. Cornyn said in a statement that he looks 'forward to welcoming Discovery to Houston and righting this egregious wrong.' Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Cornyn called the Smithsonian's cost estimate 'purposefully overblown,' adding that 'an outside vendor skilled at moving military equipment like tanks, military aircraft larger than a space shuttle, and the shuttle mock-up has estimated the total cost to be between $5-$8 million.' That cost estimate, the spokesperson said, includes transporting the shuttle from the Smithsonian to a barge, the trip on the barge to Houston (via the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico) and the transfer from the barge to Space Center Houston. Others, including former astronauts, said moving Discovery from its current home in the D.C. suburbs doesn't make sense - in large part because the highly modified Boeing 747 originally used to transport the shuttles piggyback-style is no longer available. When the shuttle arrived at the Smithsonian by air in 2012, preparations for the transfer took nearly a year. 'I'm not even sure how this could be accomplished,' John Grunsfeld, a veteran of five shuttle flights who served as NASA's chief scientist, said in an email to The Washington Post. Discovery's voyage to the Smithsonian museum in 2012 was relatively simple compared with the journeys of other shuttles, in part due to the facility's proximity to Washington Dulles International Airport. In Los Angeles, 400 trees were cut down to clear a path for the last leg of Endeavour's trip to the California Science Center. 'I'm not even sure exactly how they would go about transferring it all the way to Houston without that airplane,' said Garrett Reisman, a former astronaut who flew on the Discovery and called the proposal 'ludicrous and unnecessary.' Democrats in Congress have echoed those criticisms as the bill has progressed, and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) unsuccessfully sought to strip the space-shuttle language from the bill. A spokesperson for NASA declined to comment. A document circulated among some members of Congress by the Smithsonian, and viewed by The Post, cites a cost estimate by the former NASA program manager who coordinated the 2011 relocation of the entire shuttle fleet. The document said the cost to transport Discovery to Houston would be about $35 million by air and ground or $40 million by barge and ground. The Smithsonian also said in a statement that given the 'extremely complex and difficult' move, the threat of damage to the spacecraft would be 'significant.' 'Any time you transport any kind of museum object of that size, there's always a threat of damage, one way or another,' said Edward McManus, a former conservator at the National Air and Space Museum, who opposes the transfer. The move by the Texas senators, who originally proposed a separate bill in April to transfer the space shuttle, sets up a fight between two of the most prominent aerospace education centers in the country - a battle that at least some in the space community find harmful. 'I would much rather see that money invested in NASA's science program,' Reisman said, especially given how sharply the White House wants to cut the agency's research funding. 'If you're going to cut that and then cough up hundreds of millions of dollars into this for what is essentially a political mission - two senators who are concerned only about what's best for their state and not what's best for the country - I find that to be just a travesty.' For the Smithsonian, the potential transfer of a key installation would be 'unprecedented,' a spokesperson said in a statement. 'Discovery's presence at the Smithsonian is part of the Institution's core function as a research facility and object library.' But at Space Center Houston, which would construct a building to accommodate the shuttle, news that it could soon house the spacecraft is a point of deep honor and pride. 'It's part of the DNA of our region,' said William Harris, the president and CEO of the museum. Having the space shuttle 'holds a special meaning for people from Houston.' As the site of the Johnson Space Center, the city has played a central role in NASA's space programs since the agency was founded in the early 1960s. 'Houston has long stood at the heart of America's human spaceflight program, and this legislation rightly honors that legacy,' Cruz said in a statement. Related Content Newlywed detained by ICE freed after 141 days and two deportation attempts The Met opens a dazzling wing of non-European art Appeals court seems likely to back Trump's deportations under wartime law
Gizmodo
10 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Ted Cruz's Bid to Reclaim Space Shuttle Discovery Could Cost $400 Million
At a time when money is too tight for NASA's science exploration endeavors, Texas senators are willing to pour millions into a risky process to relocate the Space Shuttle to Houston under the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill. President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, which passed the Senate on Tuesday, includes a provision to move the Space Shuttle Discovery from the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum in Virginia to Space Center Houston. The Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act was added to the Senate's version of the bill as part of an additional $10 billion in funding for NASA. The bill sets aside $85 million to relocate the Shuttle and build a facility in Houston to house it, but the Smithsonian argues it would cost somewhere between $300 and $400 million to move the massive spacecraft across the country, according to the Houston Business Journal. The Smithsonian also raised concern that the Shuttle could be damaged during the relocation process given the 'extremely complex and difficult' move. The Discovery Relocation Act was first introduced by Texas Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn in April, calling on NASA and the Smithsonian to develop a plan to relocate Discovery. It provided no less than $5 million to move the Shuttle to its new home, and the remaining $80 million will go toward building its new display facility at Space Center Houston. Space Center Houston is the official visitor center for NASA's Johnson Space Center, home to mission control for the Space Shuttle program. All launches took place at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, but more than 100 Shuttle missions were managed from Houston. Discovery made its inaugural flight on August 30, 1984, and completed a total of 39 missions over the span of 27 years. Discovery was the first Shuttle to return to flight after both the Challenger and Columbia disasters in 1988 and 2005, respectively, leading recovery missions that breathed new life into the iconic program. Discovery also launched the Hubble Space Telescope in 1990 and helped in the assembly of the International Space Station. For the past 13 years, Discovery has been on display at the Smithsonian. Three other Shuttles are also on display in different parts of the country; Enterprise is at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in New York; Atlantis is at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida; and Endeavor is currently being set up for display at the Samuel Oschin Air and Space Center in Los Angeles. Considering its long history with spaceflight, Houston feels left out and wants a Shuttle of its own. After the Shuttle program ended in 2011, NASA selected the museums to display the retired spacecraft. NASA called on museums and science centers across the country to apply to host one of the Shuttles, and its selection criteria were based on national significance, ability to properly house the spacecraft, resources, and geographic distribution. Not everyone was happy, and the agency's process was highly scrutinized. At the time, 16 members of the Texas delegation wrote a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, referring to the selection process as the 'Houston Shuttle Snub.' However, NASA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) reviewed the agency's selection process and found no wrongdoing. 'We found no evidence that the White House, politics, or any other outside force improperly influenced the selection decision,' James Mitzelfeld, OIG investigative counsel, said in a video statement at the time. The Texans are still not happy, it seems. 'There's no question the Smithsonian is a national treasure, but it doesn't hold all the treasures that America has to show,' Cornyn said during a press conference on June 20, collectSPACE reported. 'It would be nice if there were more to go around, but since there are only four, we are going to get the one that we should have gotten back in 2010.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
'Killer bees' spreading and killing across the US. Are they in Georgia?
Africanized honey bees, often called "killer bees," are now found in 13 states and are slowly spreading northward, attacking people, livestock, and pets along the way. Recently, a Texas man mowing his property died after a bee attack and three people were taken to the hospital, and hikers in Arizona ran a mile to get away from an agitated hive. According to the Smithsonian, to the naked eye, killer bees are generally identical to typical honey bees. The main differentiator is the danger level. While both bees have the same venom level, Africanized bees are much more sensitive to potential threats and send out way more bees to attack. Killer bees were first imported to the Americas in 1956, bringing them to Brazil with the idea of cross-breeding them with local populations of honey bees to increase honey production. Since then, the Smithsonian says they have killed about 1,000 people. As mentioned before, it's the number of attackers that give Africanized bees their danger. University of Florida Professor of Honey Bee Research Jamie Ellis said "If I'm working around one of my European honey bee colonies and I knock on it with a hammer, it might send out five to ten individuals to see what's going on. They would follow me perhaps as far as my house and I might get stung I did the same thing with an Africanized colony, I might get 50 to 100 individuals who would follow me much farther and I'd get more stings. It's really an issue of scale." The Georgia Beekeepers Association says, as of 2022, yes and no. Africanized bees were found in Albany (Dougherty County) in 2010 and in Brainbridge Decatur County in 2011. It's also worth mentioning, in 2024, killer bees were detected in two northern Alabama counties neighboring Georgia, according to the Metro Atlanta Beekeepers Association. While they are not considered wide spread or established in Georgia, the GBA says all honey bee colonies should be treated with caution and respect. Whether or not a colony of bees is Africanized or not, if you see one on your property, do not try to take care of it on your own. Call a professional to handle it. If multiple bees start coming after you, experts say to just run away as fast as you can't. Don't jump in water and don't swat with your arms. You may also want to pull your shirt up around your nose and mouth to protect against stings that could cause swelling of your airway. If you have a big enough property and/or a hive doesn't present an immediate danger to people or pets, there is reason to leave it alone. Scientists who study bees say they hold a lot of promise for overall honey bee health because they're more pest and disease resistant and are very genetically diverse. That's important because honey bees play a critical role in agriculture and the environment and have been subject to large die-offs in the past two decades. Breeding and even gene manipulation could result in better – and gentler – bees. It can take more than 1,000 stings to actually kill someone. But, one sting can be very bothersome and could still cause health issues if you're over sensitive or allergic. Here are some tips from the American Academy of Dermatology: Remove the stinger. If the stinger remains in your skin, remove it by scraping over it with your fingernail or a piece of gauze. Never use tweezers to remove a stinger, as squeezing it can cause more venom to release into your skin. Wash the sting with soap and water. Apply a cold pack to reduce swelling. However, if the swelling moves to other parts of your body, such as your face or neck, go to the emergency room immediately, as you might be having an allergic reaction. Other signs of an allergic reaction include difficulty breathing, nausea, hives, or dizziness. Consider taking over-the-counter pain medication. Bee, wasp, and hornet stings are painful. Painkillers like acetaminophen or ibuprofen can help relieve the pain. Always follow the directions on the label and use the correct dose. Elizabeth Weise of USA Today contributed to this article. Miguel Legoas is a Deep South Connect Team Reporter for Gannett/USA Today. Find him on Instagram @miguelegoas and email at mlegoas@ This article originally appeared on Savannah Morning News: 'Killer bees' in Georgia? A look at their danger, benefits, history
