
A Key Gauge Signals Waning Demand for US Dollar in $7.5 Trillion Market
A measure of demand in the $7.5-trillion-a-day foreign-exchange market is catching the attention of Wall Street, pointing to diminished appetite for the US dollar even during market turbulence that would otherwise send investors flocking to the greenback.
Analysts at a handful of banks including Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. all point to recent shifts in so-called cross-currency basis swaps — a gauge of how much it costs to exchange one currency for another beyond what would normally be implied by borrowing costs in the cash markets. As demand for a particular currency increases, that extra cost or premium rises, and likewise declines or even can go negative when appetite isn't as strong.
These analysts note that when markets melted down in April following US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement, the preference for dollars as measured by basis swaps was relatively minor and short-lived. Meanwhile, demand for other currencies such as the euro and yen has grown. That stands in sharp contrast to previous scrambles for safety over the last two decades, such as the onset of the pandemic, which saw the dollar command a premium in global funding markets for a sustained period.
Over time, this waning preference for dollar liquidity, particularly relative to the euro, could ultimately make it more expensive to borrow Europe's common currency relative to the greenback — presenting a challenge for the US currency at a time when its preeminent position in world finance is facing growing doubts.
'Recent cross-currency basis movements suggest investors have less appetite to buy dollar-denominated assets and more appetite to buy those denominated in euro and yen,' the Morgan Stanley team including Koichi Sugisak and Francesco Grechi wrote in a June report. In fact, the US tariff impact appeared to be 'triggering a temporary withdrawal from dollar assets,' the Morgan Stanley analysts wrote.
The cross-currency basis matters because it effectively sets the price of long-term, foreign-exchange hedging for companies and investors the world over. It's also an indication of the shifting trends in vast flows of assets between economies and asset classes.
Already, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is down more than 8% this year — the measure's worst start to a year since the gauge launched two decades ago. The focus on basis swaps comes at a time of a broader questioning of the US currency's role as a haven, against a backdrop of both policy uncertainty associated with the Trump administration as well as the nation's fiscal outlook in the years ahead.
Of course, geopolitical risks still abound that show persisting demand for dollar assets in times of stress. The dollar briefly touched a three-week high on Monday as oil prices climbed following the Israeli and US strikes on Iran; Treasuries have also rallied alongside other global debt amid the Middle East tensions.
But the Wall Street analysts are more focused on enduring shifts in global capital flows over a longer time horizon.
'Generally the theme that's linked to the cross-currency basis is: Are investors, particularly in Europe, repatriating money from the US?' Guneet Dhingra, the head of US interest-rate strategy at BNP Paribas SA, said in an interview. 'Our view at BNP is that there is definitely a fair bit of cross-border flow, particularly from the US to Europe.'
At Goldman Sachs, Simon Freycenet and Friedrich Schaper argued that the unwind of the European Central Bank's balance sheet will likely persist beyond the Federal Reserve's own quantitative tightening efforts. Combined with Europe's positive net international investment position — especially compared to the US, which is the world's major international debtor — these dynamics should support the tightening of euro funding relative to the dollar over time.
'The modest currency base moves in the wake of 'Liberation Day' are notable, likely also reflecting the absence of a dash for dollars amid a more resilient global financial system than before,' Freycenet and Schaper said.
Goldman ultimately sees potential for the euro to become more expensive than the dollar in the cross-currency basis swap markets — a rare phenomenon over the last two decades.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Dear Mr Japan? Trump's tariff letter opener sparks mockery and memes on social media
US President Donald Trump US President Donald Trump is once again the center of a social media storm, this time because he made a mistake about Japan. Trump sparked a meme storm after referring to Japan's prime minister as 'Mr. Japan' during an interview about trade tariffs. Critics and comedians didn't miss a comment quickly became meme fodder online, drawing snark, satire, and eye-rolling from social media users everywhere. As negotiations between the two countries continued, President Donald Trump suggested maintaining 25% tariffs on Japanese automobiles. If a trade agreement is not reached, a series of higher duties will take effect in less than a his tariff pause expires early next month, Trump told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo he would be sending out letters, citing Japan as an example. When describing the letter, Trump seemed to improvise rather than naming Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, whom he met at the White House in February, as per a report by the HuffPost. ALSO READ: Backstory you didn't know: Israel's Mossad was inside Iran's nuke program for years which set stage for strikes 'Dear Mr. Japan: Here's the story,' Trump said during a Fox News interview that aired Sunday. 'You're going to pay a 25% tariff on your cars.'His threat of a 25% tariff drew criticism, since most Japanese cars sold in the U.S. are made fact that the US imports "millions and millions" of Japanese automobiles while Japan imports relatively few from American automakers, he claimed, is "unfair." 'They won't take our cars,' Trump said, adding that Japan could make up the difference by buying other American goods, like oil.'Now, we have oil. They could take a lot of oil. They could take a lot of other things,' in reference to ways Japan could lower the US trade deficit, he Trump has stated in the past that his tariffs are an attempt to encourage businesses, including foreign ones, to boost their output in the stated in January that his message to all businesses worldwide is straightforward: Come manufacture your product in America, and we will offer you some of the lowest taxes in the the threat of new tariffs is unlikely to affect Japanese automobiles sold in the United States because the great majority of them are already produced fictitious letter to Japanese leaders, which began, "Dear Mr. Japan," was what enraged people on X:One user tweeted, 'Dear Mr Japan? Trump doesn't know what or who he is talking about.'Other user stated on X, 'For the millionth time:(1) "We" don't give Japan cars - private companies make and endeavor to sell them. And private Japanese individuals, not "Japan," have been decling to buy them.(2) Japan pays US tariffs with the money given by American citizens when they buy those cars.' Dear Mr Japan? Trump doesn't know what or who he is talking about — Barbara Comstock (@BarbaraComstock) June 29, 2025 If President Biden started a sentence with "Dear Mr. Japan," Republicans would never shut up about it and "25th Amendment" is all they'd be talking about. This is fucking INSANE. — BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ (@mmpadellan) June 29, 2025 Fact: Japan manufactures more cars in US than it imports to US. Japan has some $700 billion invested in US, employs close to 1 million Americans. Ignorance is strength. — Robert Manning (@Rmanning4) June 29, 2025 BREAKING: Trump has no clue who the Prime Minister of Japan is so he calls him 'Mr. Japan' in the interview. How can you negotiate with somebody if you don't know their name? — Trump Lie Tracker (Commentary) (@MAGALieTracker) June 29, 2025 For the millionth time:(1) "We" don't give Japan cars - private companies make and endeavor to sell them. And private Japanese individuals, not "Japan," have been decling to buy them. (2) Japan pays US tariffs with the money given by American citizens when they buy those cars. — Michael Hausam (@MPHaus) June 29, 2025 Did Donald Trump actually say "Mr. Japan"?Yes, while discussing car tariffs, he appeared to forget Japan's Prime Minister's name, saying, "Dear Mr. Japan." Will Donald Trump's proposed tariffs affect Japanese cars? Not much, most Japanese cars sold in the United States are already manufactured here, so the tariff threat may have a limited impact.


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dear Mr Japan? Trump's tariff letter opener sparks mockery and memes on social media
Donald Trump's recent interview sparked controversy after he addressed Japan's prime minister as "Mr. Japan" while discussing trade tariffs. This comment quickly became a meme online, drawing criticism and satire. Trump's threat of a 25% tariff on Japanese cars also faced scrutiny, considering most Japanese cars sold in the U.S. are manufactured there. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Donald Trump mention tariffs on Japanese cars? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How did people react online? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Dear Mr Japan? Trump doesn't know what or who he is talking about undefined Barbara Comstock (@BarbaraComstock) June 29, 2025 If President Biden started a sentence with "Dear Mr. Japan," Republicans would never shut up about it and "25th Amendment" is all theyundefinedd be talking about. This is fucking INSANE. undefined BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ (@mmpadellan) June 29, 2025 Fact: Japan manufactures more cars in US than it imports to US. Japan has some $700 billion invested in US, employs close to 1 million Americans. Ignorance is strength. undefined Robert Manning (@Rmanning4) June 29, 2025 BREAKING: Trump has no clue who the Prime Minister of Japan is so he calls him 'Mr. Japan' in the interview. How can you negotiate with somebody if you don't know their name? undefined Trump Lie Tracker (Commentary) (@MAGALieTracker) June 29, 2025 For the millionth time: (1) "We" donundefinedt give Japan cars - private companies make and endeavor to sell them. And private Japanese individuals, not "Japan," have been decling to buy them. (2) Japan pays US tariffs with the money given by American citizens when they buy those cars. undefined Michael Hausam (@MPHaus) June 29, 2025 FAQs US President Donald Trump is once again the center of a social media storm, this time because he made a mistake about Japan. Trump sparked a meme storm after referring to Japan's prime minister as 'Mr. Japan' during an interview about trade tariffs. Critics and comedians didn't miss a comment quickly became meme fodder online, drawing snark, satire, and eye-rolling from social media users negotiations between the two countries continued, President Donald Trump suggested maintaining 25% tariffs on Japanese automobiles. If a trade agreement is not reached, a series of higher duties will take effect in less than a his tariff pause expires early next month, Trump told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo he would be sending out letters, citing Japan as an example. When describing the letter, Trump seemed to improvise rather than naming Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, whom he met at the White House in February, as per a report by the HuffPost.'Dear Mr. Japan: Here's the story,' Trump said during a Fox News interview that aired Sunday. 'You're going to pay a 25% tariff on your cars.'His threat of a 25% tariff drew criticism, since most Japanese cars sold in the U.S. are made fact that the US imports "millions and millions" of Japanese automobiles while Japan imports relatively few from American automakers, he claimed, is "unfair." 'They won't take our cars,' Trump said, adding that Japan could make up the difference by buying other American goods, like oil.'Now, we have oil. They could take a lot of oil. They could take a lot of other things,' in reference to ways Japan could lower the US trade deficit, he Trump has stated in the past that his tariffs are an attempt to encourage businesses, including foreign ones, to boost their output in the stated in January that his message to all businesses worldwide is straightforward: Come manufacture your product in America, and we will offer you some of the lowest taxes in the the threat of new tariffs is unlikely to affect Japanese automobiles sold in the United States because the great majority of them are already produced fictitious letter to Japanese leaders, which began, "Dear Mr. Japan," was what enraged people on X:One user tweeted, 'Dear Mr Japan? Trump doesn't know what or who he is talking about.'Other user stated on X, 'For the millionth time:(1) "We" don't give Japan cars - private companies make and endeavor to sell them. And private Japanese individuals, not "Japan," have been decling to buy them.(2) Japan pays US tariffs with the money given by American citizens when they buy those cars.'Yes, while discussing car tariffs, he appeared to forget Japan's Prime Minister's name, saying, "Dear Mr. Japan."Not much, most Japanese cars sold in the United States are already manufactured here, so the tariff threat may have a limited impact.


NDTV
34 minutes ago
- NDTV
UK Export Of F-35 Parts To Israel Was Lawful, Court Rules
London: Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, was lawful, London's High Court ruled on Monday. Al-Haq, a group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, had taken legal action against Britain's Department for Business and Trade over its decision to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended some arms export licences last year. The United Kingdom had assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law, in relation to humanitarian access and the treatment of detainees, as the basis for its decision. But Britain decided to "carve out" F-35 licences, with the government saying suspending those licences would disrupt a global programme that supplies parts for the aircraft, with a knock-on impact on international security. Any such disruption would "undermine U.S. confidence in the UK and NATO", the Ministry of Defence said. Al-Haq argued at a hearing last month that the decision was unlawful as it was in breach of Britain's obligations under international law, including the Geneva Convention. But the High Court dismissed the group's challenge in a written ruling.