Electricity transmission charges spark debate across Scotland
These 'TNUoS charges' (Transmission Network Use of System) total approximately £4.4billion per year.
The regulatory background to all of this is complex. Indeed, the Court of Appeal, which has plenty of experience with difficult and complex matters, has described the system as being of 'byzantine complexity'. And this matters, because TNUoS charges raise extremely important questions for renewable energy projects, both now and in the future.
The system is designed to ensure that each generator pays a level of TNUoS charges that reflects how much it costs them to use the network, as this incentivises them to use it efficiently. Electricity generators therefore pay a locational charge as part of their TNUoS costs, which reflects the cost of electricity being added to the grid at different geographical points.
As a result, a renewable energy project in the north of Scotland, which can generate a lot of energy but is far away from the places where most of it is consumed, might pay more than its counterparts in England and Wales. The rules also include a process to be used when a company wants to change its transmission charges: it has to propose amendments to the underlying regulatory code documents, and these proposals are then assessed by the regulator, Ofgem. Several such proposals are currently progressing through the system.
For Ofgem, the decisions are difficult. Amendments can have significant consequences for electricity generators (depending on their business model, type of generation, and physical location), and the regulator needs to weigh up many difficult and competing issues.
For example, should charges be even more closely linked to location? This would provide an incentive to shift generation away from areas where grid capacity is low, but in practice that means discouraging new investment in renewable energy projects and potentially even threatening the UK's net zero ambitions.
The mere possibility of such changes is already having an impact on renewable energy projects throughout the UK, both those that are planned and those that are already in operation.
And generators also face the prospect of another challenging development: wide-ranging changes to the process by which generators can access and connect to the grid. It all creates uncertainty for those developing and investing in renewable energy projects.
Ofgem recognises the need for strategic reform to transmission charging, including improvements to the current TNUoS system. It has also acknowledged that charges can be unpredictable, and that this may hinder investment decisions. In May 2022, it created the TNUoS Task Force, with a brief to focus on making transmission charges more stable and predictable.
The Task Force has modelled several different options, including both fixing and flexing TNUoS charges, but these ideas have yet to be implemented in a meaningful way.
At a time when the focus really needs to be on clean energy deployment, the consistency, predictability and overall fairness of UK transmission charges are issues which need to be resolved in short order if we are to keep progress moving in the right direction.
■ Shepherd and Wedderburn is headline sponsor of All-Energy, the UK's largest renewable and low-carbon energy exhibition and conference, taking place
in Glasgow on 14–15 May 2025. Visit the All-Energy hub at www.shepwedd-allenergy.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
4 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Centrica calls for new customer ban on rival Octopus amid row over Ofgem rules
Chief executive Chris O'Shea claimed it was 'criminal' that Ofgem has not stepped in to take action against three firms that are understood to have failed to meet financial resilience targets – with Britain's biggest energy supplier Octopus among them. He demanded that the regulator stops the suppliers from taking on new customers, claiming that Ofgem is not properly enforcing the rule that came into force earlier this year. This could leave the sector at risk of another possible future wave of firms going bust, similar to that seen in the 2021-22 energy crisis, he warned. On announcing half-year results, Mr O'Shea said: 'Ofgem is not applying its own rules. 'They're increasing the risk of systemic failure in the market.' He said it was 'criminal' that Ofgem is putting the industry in a 'situation where that could happen again'. 'It's simply about protecting customers and asking the regulator to enforce its own rules,' he added. Ofgem has not revealed which suppliers have failed the test, but Octopus – which supplies more than seven million households – has confirmed it did not meet the targets for capital adequacy by the April 1 deadline. It said it has, however, agreed a plan with Ofgem to reach the target, which means it is not in breach of the rules. An Octopus Energy spokesperson said: 'This is yet more naked self-interest from British Gas. 'They would do well to obsess about their customers rather than their rivals. They added: 'We fully comply with Ofgem's rules and our resilience meant we not only thrived through the energy crisis but bailed out Bulb – saving British billpayers billions.' Ofgem also confirmed that firms that have agreed a plan to meet resilience targets are not breaching its rules and therefore do not need to have sanctions put on them, such as being banned from taking on new customers. A spokesperson for Ofgem said: 'Our financial resilience controls are clear that where a supplier is not meeting the capital target but has a credible and agreed plan in place that is not a breach of the rules. 'Capitalisation plans come with restrictions and controls. We expect suppliers to deliver on those plans and adhere to their restrictions and are monitoring closely.'
Powys County Times
4 days ago
- Powys County Times
Centrica calls for new customer ban on rival Octopus amid row over Ofgem rules
The boss of British Gas owner Centrica has called for rival Octopus to be banned from taking on new customers as it accused the UK's energy watchdog of failing to uphold its own rules. Chief executive Chris O'Shea claimed it was 'criminal' that Ofgem has not stepped in to take action against three firms that are understood to have failed to meet financial resilience targets – with Britain's biggest energy supplier Octopus among them. He demanded that the regulator stops the suppliers from taking on new customers, claiming that Ofgem is not properly enforcing the rule that came into force earlier this year. This could leave the sector at risk of another possible future wave of firms going bust, similar to that seen in the 2021-22 energy crisis, he warned. On announcing half-year results, Mr O'Shea said: 'Ofgem is not applying its own rules. 'They're increasing the risk of systemic failure in the market.' He said it was 'criminal' that Ofgem is putting the industry in a 'situation where that could happen again'. 'It's simply about protecting customers and asking the regulator to enforce its own rules,' he added. Ofgem has not revealed which suppliers have failed the test, but Octopus – which supplies more than seven million households – has confirmed it did not meet the targets for capital adequacy by the April 1 deadline. It said it has, however, agreed a plan with Ofgem to reach the target, which means it is not in breach of the rules. An Octopus Energy spokesperson said: 'This is yet more naked self-interest from British Gas. 'They would do well to obsess about their customers rather than their rivals. They added: 'We fully comply with Ofgem's rules and our resilience meant we not only thrived through the energy crisis but bailed out Bulb – saving British billpayers billions.' Ofgem also confirmed that firms that have agreed a plan to meet resilience targets are not breaching its rules and therefore do not need to have sanctions put on them, such as being banned from taking on new customers. A spokesperson for Ofgem said: 'Our financial resilience controls are clear that where a supplier is not meeting the capital target but has a credible and agreed plan in place that is not a breach of the rules. 'Capitalisation plans come with restrictions and controls. We expect suppliers to deliver on those plans and adhere to their restrictions and are monitoring closely.'
Rhyl Journal
4 days ago
- Rhyl Journal
Centrica calls for new customer ban on rival Octopus amid row over Ofgem rules
Chief executive Chris O'Shea claimed it was 'criminal' that Ofgem has not stepped in to take action against three firms that are understood to have failed to meet financial resilience targets – with Britain's biggest energy supplier Octopus among them. He demanded that the regulator stops the suppliers from taking on new customers, claiming that Ofgem is not properly enforcing the rule that came into force earlier this year. This could leave the sector at risk of another possible future wave of firms going bust, similar to that seen in the 2021-22 energy crisis, he warned. On announcing half-year results, Mr O'Shea said: 'Ofgem is not applying its own rules. 'They're increasing the risk of systemic failure in the market.' He said it was 'criminal' that Ofgem is putting the industry in a 'situation where that could happen again'. 'It's simply about protecting customers and asking the regulator to enforce its own rules,' he added. Ofgem has not revealed which suppliers have failed the test, but Octopus – which supplies more than seven million households – has confirmed it did not meet the targets for capital adequacy by the April 1 deadline. It said it has, however, agreed a plan with Ofgem to reach the target, which means it is not in breach of the rules. An Octopus Energy spokesperson said: 'This is yet more naked self-interest from British Gas. 'They would do well to obsess about their customers rather than their rivals. They added: 'We fully comply with Ofgem's rules and our resilience meant we not only thrived through the energy crisis but bailed out Bulb – saving British billpayers billions.' Ofgem also confirmed that firms that have agreed a plan to meet resilience targets are not breaching its rules and therefore do not need to have sanctions put on them, such as being banned from taking on new customers. A spokesperson for Ofgem said: 'Our financial resilience controls are clear that where a supplier is not meeting the capital target but has a credible and agreed plan in place that is not a breach of the rules. 'Capitalisation plans come with restrictions and controls. We expect suppliers to deliver on those plans and adhere to their restrictions and are monitoring closely.'
