X-Sense Link+ Pro Smart Smoke Alarm reviewed
The compact and lightweight design makes installation easy, even for those less handy. It comes with all necessary mounting tools and doesn't require complex setup.
One standout feature is the alarm's ability to verbally notify users of both the smoke detection and its specific location. This makes exiting a home safer as you can potentially avoid a fire area.
By linking with the SBS50 base station, you can connect multiple alarms throughout your home. If one goes off, they all do. This synchronized warning system ensures faster response times for everyone in the household, no matter where they are.
The companion app notifies you immediately when smoke is detected, even if you're not home. It also lets you run remote tests, check battery levels and hush false alarms from your phone.
READ MORE
Built with a long-life photoelectric sensor, the alarm is made to last for up to a decade. It also features a replaceable battery with an impressive five-year lifespan.
Night mode allows you to disable the bright green LED indicator during specific hours. This is perfect for light sleepers.
The system can support up to 50 X-Sense devices making it ideal for larger areas to cover.
Bad points?
No built-in heat detector means you'll need to purchase an additional device for the kitchen.
Best for ...
Homeowners seeking a scalable, smart smoke alarm system with strong remote features and voice alerts.
Avoid if ...
You're looking for a simple, budget smoke alarm without additional bells and whistles.
Score: 9/10
X-Sense Link+ Pro Smart Smoke Alarm, £79.99 (amazon.co.uk)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Meta, X and LinkedIn appeal unprecedented VAT claim by Italy
MILAN, July 21 (Reuters) - U.S. tech giants Meta (META.O), opens new tab, X and LinkedIn have lodged an appeal against an unprecedented VAT claim by Italy that could influence tax policy across the 27-nation European Union, four sources with direct knowledge of the matter said on Monday. This is the first time that Italy has failed to reach a settlement agreement after bringing tax cases against tech companies, resulting in a fully-fledged judicial tax trial being launched. According to the sources, this came about because the case went beyond agreeing on a settlement figure and sought to establish a broader approach focused on how social networks provide access to their services. Italian tax authorities argue that free user registrations with X, LinkedIn and Meta platforms should be seen as taxable transactions as they imply the exchange of a membership account in return for a user's personal data. The issue is especially sensitive given wider trade tensions between the EU and the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Italy is claiming 887.6 million euros ($1.03 billion) from Meta, 12.5 million euros from X and around 140 million euros from LinkedIn. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, Elon Musk's social network X and Microsoft's (MSFT.O), opens new tab LinkedIn filed their appeals with a first instance tax court after mid-July, when the deadline for responding to a tax assessment notice issued by Italy's Revenue Agency in March passed. According to several experts consulted by Reuters, the Italian approach could affect almost all companies, from airlines to supermarkets to publishers, who link access to free services on their sites to users' acceptance of profiling cookies. It could also eventually be extended across the EU where VAT is a harmonised tax. In a statement to Reuters, Meta said that it had cooperated "fully with the authorities on our obligations under EU and local law". It added that the company "strongly disagrees with the idea that providing access to online platforms to users should be subject to VAT". LinkedIn said it had "nothing to share at this time". X did not respond to a request for comment from Reuters. It is uncertain whether a full trial of the matter, which involves three levels of judgement and takes an average of 10 years, will go ahead. Following discussions with the three companies, Italy is preparing as a next step to seek an advisory opinion from the European Commission, the sources said. The Italian Revenue Agency will have to prepare specific questions, which the Economy Ministry will then send to the EU Commission's VAT Committee, which meets twice a year. Rome aims to submit its questions for the meeting scheduled to be held by early November, in order to receive the EU's comments in time for the following meeting in spring 2026. Italy's Economy Ministry and Revenue Agency declined to comment. The EU Commission's VAT Committee is an independent advisory group. While its assessment will be non-binding, a "No" could prompt Italy to halt the case and ultimately drop the criminal investigation by Italian prosecutors, according to the sources. The dispute is one of several between Europeans and U.S. Big Tech. On July 11 Reuters exclusively reported that Meta would not be tweaking its pay-or-consent model further despite the risk of EU fines. According to a Financial Times report on July 17, the European Commission has stalled one of its investigations into Musk's platform X for breaching its digital transparency rules while it seeks to conclude trade talks with the U.S. ($1 = 0.8588 euros)
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Musk's X says it won't cooperate with 'politically motivated' French probe
PARIS, July 21 (Reuters) - Elon Musk's social media platform X on Monday accused French prosecutors of launching a "politically-motivated criminal investigation" that threatens its users' free speech, denying all allegations and saying it would not comply with the probe. Earlier this month, Paris prosecutors stepped up a preliminary probe into X for suspected algorithmic bias and fraudulent data extraction, enlisting police to investigate alleged wrongdoing by the company or its executives. "Based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech," the social network posted on its Global Government Affairs account. "For these reasons, X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do." In the blistering attack, X also said the probe had been instigated by Eric Bothorel, a French lawmaker, who had accused "X of manipulating its algorithm for 'foreign interference' purposes, an allegation which is completely false". The Paris prosecutors' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Bothorel. Musk, a former ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, has accused European governments of attacking free speech and has voiced support for some of the region's far-right parties. The French probe could deepen a rift between Washington and European capitals over what sort of discourse is permitted online, with senior officials from Trump's administration alleging the censoring of right-wing voices around the world. X said Paris prosecutors had requested it hand over "recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform", for analysis by researchers David Chavalarias and Maziyar Panahi, who it said had both exhibited "open hostility towards X", calling into question the impartiality of the investigation. Panahi denied any involvement in the investigation. "My name was mentioned by mistake, based on my previous research projects with David Chavalarias, none of which have ever had any hostile intent toward X," he said in an email. "The fact my name has been mentioned in such an erroneous manner demonstrates how little regard they have for the lives of others ... I will not hesitate to pursue legal action for defamation should I receive any form of hate speech." Chavalarias did not immediately respond to a request for comment. X also chafed at the fact that it was being investigated under organised crime charges, which it said would grant the police measures including wiretapping its employees' personal devices. Pavel Durov, the Russian-born founder of the Telegram messaging app, is also under judicial supervision in France after being arrested last year and placed under formal investigation for alleged organised crime on the app. He denies guilt. Early in July, Musk responded "true" to a post on X in which Durov said the French "bureaucrats" investigating X were "waging a crusade against free speech and tech progress".
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Musk's X denies French allegations of fraudulent data extraction, algorithm abuse
July 21 (Reuters) - Elon Musk's social media platform X said on Monday it denied all allegations made by French authorities over manipulation of its algorithm and "fraudulent data extraction," adding that it has not acceded to the demands made in a French criminal investigation. "French authorities have requested access to X's recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform in order for several 'experts' to analyze the data and purportedly 'uncover the truth' about the operation of the X platform," X said, adding that they denied the demands since they "have a legal right to do."
