
Eight thoughts from Sabres GM Kevyn Adams' NHL Draft week news conference
Advertisement
Among the questions facing Adams over the next week and beyond:
• What happens with JJ Peterka, the 23-year-old winger who is a restricted free agent and is reportedly unhappy in Buffalo?
• Will Bowen Byram, also a restricted free agent, still be with the Sabres on opening night?
• Will Alex Tuch, entering the final season of his contract, sign an extension once he's eligible on July 1?
• Will anybody else be moved off this roster as the team tries to stop a league-record playoff drought at 14 seasons?
Ryan McLeod, Jack Quinn, Devon Levi and Jacob Bernard-Docker are all restricted free agents. Mattias Samuelsson's cumbersome contract has also become a talking point.
All those roster decisions have made the NHL Draft almost an afterthought for the Sabres. They've had plenty of high picks over the last 14 years. Their roster is among the youngest in the NHL. Their prospect pool, while not as strong as a few years ago, isn't a problem. That's why Adams made it clear during his pre-draft news conference on Tuesday that the league knows he's 'open for business' when it comes to possibly trading the No. 9 pick for proven NHL help.
But whether or not they make the pick is just one piece of what should be a busy offseason for Adams and the Sabres. Here are some thoughts on what we heard from Adams and assistant GM Jerry Forton during a 30-minute media availability on Tuesday.
1. What happens with Peterka is one of the most intriguing stories in the entire league. If Peterka is moved, it will be a blockbuster trade. Adams declined to say whether or not Peterka asked to be traded. Adams said there is 'a lot of misinformation' out there on the Sabres in general, but didn't get into many specifics.
'I don't think it's probably productive or beneficial for me to get into specifics on our players right now,' Adams said. 'This is a time of year when there's so much going on, and there's probably a lot of misinformation out there. I guess I would leave it at that. We have a plan that we came out of the end of the season with.'
The Peterka situation probably wasn't part of that plan. The Sabres didn't come into the summer trying to trade Peterka. They still don't seem keen on the idea, but that hasn't stopped teams from calling. Given the value Peterka would hold in a trade, they'd be foolish not to listen to offers. The possibility that Peterka is unhappy in Buffalo also puts stress on the situation. Adams has previously spoken about wanting players who want to be in Buffalo. But he has to hold his ground, to an extent, too.
Advertisement
'I think it's important to have people in your organization, players, coaches, staff who believe in what you're doing and want to be here for the right reason,' Adams said. 'I'm sure I've said this before, but I'll say it again: Paying someone more money hoping that will make them happy isn't usually a recipe for success. You have to have players who buy into and believe in what you're doing and wake up every day in Buffalo excited to be a Sabre. I think that's important.
'In saying that, are there hard conversations at times where players are frustrated with things? Absolutely. That's part of the relationship building I believe in from my job through the coaches, having those conversations. There are hard days, too, where players are frustrated or I'm frustrated. But that doesn't mean you wake up and a player is frustrated that day, so you trade him. My point in saying all that is getting players to believe in what we're doing is critically important. Having me be transparent with them on why we're doing things, decisions we're making, have them part of the equation of helping me with the right answers, and then also, they need to perform. If they perform, that's a win-win for them and us.'
The next week could be critical for Adams to prove to the roster that the Sabres have a serious shot to ice a playoff team next season.
2. Adams and Tuch's agents met at the NHL Scouting Combine. Adams said Tuesday he believes Tuch wants to be in Buffalo, and he knows how much of a priority he is to the organization. Adams needs to make sure the contract offer matches those words, because the Sabres can't afford to have uncertainty hanging around Tuch entering the final season of his contract. He's too important on and off the ice.
3. Adams said any report that the Sabres are considering buying out Samuelsson is 'ridiculous.' He added, 'We never had that conversation once.' Buying out Samuelsson isn't a slam-dunk decision, but the idea that the Sabres have never had that conversation seems odd. Adams went out of his way to mention that. This is the last year they can buy him out for a third of his remaining contract before he turns 26. Because of injuries and inconsistent play, Samuelsson hasn't come close to living up to the $4.285 million cap hit he has for the next five seasons. If the Sabres wanted to move on from Samuelsson, they'd probably prefer to trade him, which could explain why Adams wanted to shoot down the buyout talk. Either way, the Sabres haven't lost faith in the oft-injured defenseman who recently turned 25.
Advertisement
4. At this point, Adams wouldn't say whether the Sabres' coaching staff will return intact. He said Lindy Ruff would need to be comfortable with any addition to the staff and that Ruff has had conversations with some potential assistants around the league. All of Buffalo's assistants are under contract for next season, so it sounds like any change to the staff would be an addition rather than a replacement.
5. Last month, the Sabres added former Blue Jackets GM Jarmo Kekäläinen as a senior adviser. Adams said what excited him most about Kekäläinen is that he wants to work. Adams got a lot of calls about what a good person Kekäläinen is. Kekäläinen will be based in Columbus but will be in Buffalo frequently. Notably, associate GM Jason Karmanos is based in Pittsburgh. Two of Buffalo's most experienced front office members aren't based in Buffalo. It's not entirely unusual around the league, but worth noting given the pressure Adams and the team are under.
6. When it comes to the Sabres' goalie picture, Adams again expressed confidence in both Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen and Levi.
'I believe in my core that both of them are going to be excellent National Hockey League goaltenders,' he said.
Adams added that he's open to adding at the position and that Levi's NHL timeline is 'up to him,' and how he performs.
7. Forton said he sees a drop-off in the first round after the first five to seven players on the board. He noted that trading up in the first round, historically, is difficult. That could leave the Sabres hoping the right player falls to No. 9. Forton spoke highly of defensemen Radim Mrtka and Kashawn Aitcheson. Aitcheson is the more physical of the two. Forton said there aren't many players across junior hockey, college hockey or Europe who play the game with the 'old-school' mentality that Aitcheson does. Mrtka, a right-handed defenseman, has what Forton described as a 'very unique package to be able to move the way he does at 6-foot-6.'
8. Neither Forton nor Adams mentioned much about any glaring needs the Sabres have in their prospect pool. But Forton did address the notion that players who play with physicality and toughness might be more valued around the league after the way the Panthers have played on their way to winning two straight Stanley Cups.
Advertisement
'There's always recency bias,' Forton said. 'What we try to do is look at our whole prospect pool. It's more about our prospect pool than it is our NHL team when we're drafting. If there are players who are close in certain pockets of the draft and we're maybe lacking something in our prospect pool that we think is ideal for down the road at the NHL level, we might lean one way or another. But we're not going to jump off the list to take a lesser player.'
The Sabres do have a bit of a need for more of those types of players in their prospect pool. But it might not make sense to address that with the No. 9 pick unless Porter Martone or Brady Martin fall to nine. Aitcheson would fit that mold, too.
(Photo of JJ Peterka, Alex Tuch and Ryan McLeod: Bill Wippert / NHLI via Getty Images)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Today in Chicago History: ‘Black Sox' acquitted, but ultimately banned for life from baseball
Here's a look back at what happened in the Chicago area on Aug. 2, according to the Tribune's archives. Is an important event missing from this date? Email us. Weather records (from the National Weather Service, Chicago) High temperature: 101 degrees (1991) Low temperature: 51 degrees (1985) Precipitation: 5.63 inches (1885) Snowfall: Trace (2015) 1921: Eight White Sox players had been charged with throwing the World Series. Despite earning the nickname the 'Black Sox,' the men were acquitted by a jury that deliberated just 2 hours and 47 minutes. Chicago White Sox players conspired to throw the 1919 World Series. Here's how the Tribune covered it. A day after their acquittal, however, baseball Commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis ruled that the players allegedly involved — Joe Jackson, Eddie Cicotte, Oscar Emil 'Happy' Felsch, Chick Gandil, Frederick William McMullin, Swede Risberg, Buck Weaver and Lefty Williams — would be banned for life from organized baseball. 1990: Chicago White Sox rookie Frank Thomas knocked in the winning run in his first major-league game. The Sox beat the Milwaukee Brewers 4-3 during the opener of a doubleheader at County Stadium. In addition to future Hall of Famer Thomas, the Sox's lineup also included two of their No. 1 draft picks: Alex Fernandez (1990) and Robin Ventura (1988). 2001: Chicago Public Library launched its 'One Book, One Chicago' initiative. The first book on the list: 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee — Mayor Richard M. Daley's favorite. Vintage Chicago Tribune: Pelé, Hamm, Beckham, Rapinoe, Messi and more. When soccer's big names came to play 2009: Brazilian soccer star Marta made her professional debut in the United States with her Los Angeles Sol team, which lost in a match against the Chicago Red Stars at Toyota Park in Bridgeview. Subscribe to the free Vintage Chicago Tribune newsletter, join our Chicagoland history Facebook group, stay current with Today in Chicago History and follow us on Instagram for more from Chicago's past. Have an idea for Vintage Chicago Tribune? Share it with Kori Rumore and Marianne Mather at krumore@ and mmather@ Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where to watch WWE SummerSlam 2025 Night 1: Live stream, start time full card for first night of pro wrestling event
Summer may be close to ending, but WWE looks to keep the party going. MetLife Stadium hosts night one of SummerSlam. Here's how to watch night one of WWE SummerSlam, including streaming options, start time, and more. Where to watch WWE SummerSlam 2025 Night 1 Streaming:Peacock (U.S) WWE's PLE events are available on Peacock. You can also watch past events in WWE history on Peacock. From WrestleMania 1 to last year's event. Old WCW matches and ECW pay-per-views, Peacock has it all. WWE SummerSlam 2025 Night 1 start time Date: Saturday, August 2 Time: 6 p.m. ET | 3 p.m. PT Location: MetLife Stadium - East Rutherford, New Jersey The first night of SummerSlam will be at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on August 2. The events starts at 6 p.m. ET. CM Punk looks to win WWE gold for the first time in years when he challenges Gunther for the World Heavyweight Championship. Jade Cargill looks for her first WWE singles title when she challenges Tiffany Stratton for the WWE Women's Championship. Raquel Rodriguez and Roxanne Perez defend the WWE Women's Tag Team Championship against the odd team of Charlotte Flair and Alexa Bliss. Meanwhile, Several feuds look to get settled at SummerSlam. Roman Reigns teams with his family, former Bloodline member Jey Uso, against Bron Beakker and Bronson Reed. With Seth Rollins out of action due to injury, Reigns returned to help Jey against Seth's muscle. Jelly Roll is the latest celebrity to get into wrestling. The singer teams with Randy Orton to take on Drew McIntyre and YouTuber Logan Paul. Also on the card, the red-hot Karrion Kross has been the devil on Sami Zayn's shoulder for months. The two finally compete against one another on a massive PLE. WWE SummerSlam 2025 Night 1 fight card Gunther (c) vs. CM Punk for the World Heavyweight Championship Tiffany Stratton (c) vs. Jade Cargill for the WWE Women's Championship The Judgment Day (Raquel Rodriguez and Roxanne Perez) (c) vs. Charlotte Flair and Alexa Bliss for the WWE Women's Tag Team Championship Roman Reigns and Jey Uso vs. Bron Beakker and Bronson Reed Randy Orton and Jelly Roll vs. Drew McIntyre and Logan Paul Sami Zayn vs. Karrion Kross


New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
NASCAR Cup Series at Iowa odds, predictions: Kyle Larson, Ryan Blaney, Christopher Bell favored. How likely is an upset?
The NASCAR Cup Series is in Iowa this weekend, with just four races left before the playoffs commence. Drivers on the points bubble will be extra hungry for a win to clinch their playoff spot, and hoping that another new winner doesn't emerge from the field to push the cut line down. There's a lot to unpack about the Iowa race, the standings, the controversies around the playoff format and more. So, ahead of Sunday's race, we're bringing those questions, as we always do, to our resident NASCAR experts, Jeff Gluck and Jordan Bianchi. Take it away, guys! We've talked about Bubba Wallace a lot — what a thrilling way to see him finally clinch a win! Can you frame this from a historic standpoint for NASCAR and a career standpoint for Wallace? How much of an upset was this? Jeff: It feels like it was an upset simply in the sense that the Brickyard 400, barring some fluky weather or fuel-saving situation, was going to be about the best of the best on the top teams. And ultimately, you had a second-tier team (23XI Racing) with its B driver (instead of Tyler Reddick) beating everyone straight up — then holding off Kyle Larson on two overtime restarts when Wallace could have choked it away. When you consider Wallace had never won a regular-season race at all (his two victories came during the playoffs when he was a non-playoff driver), let alone one of NASCAR's crown jewels, this felt pretty significant for a driver who has been trying to break through. Advertisement Jordan: There's always pressure, but when you drive for a team co-owned by Michael Jordan, that pressure is amplified considerably. Then, when you factor in that Wallace hadn't won in 100 races, all while teammate Tyler Reddick has won multiple times and nearly the 2024 championship, Wallace needed that victory in a big, big way. And that he won at Indy of all places, and in the manner that he did, only enhances his accomplishment. This was huge. Now the perhaps-unanswerable: Do you think he pushed through a mental block with this win? Should we expect a better trajectory/focus? (Jeff said in early June that 'Maintaining track position up front and avoiding miscues are the two areas Wallace's No. 23 needs to improve upon.') Jeff: Wallace has been very vocal about his own confidence issues and mental weaknesses, which he has been working on over the years. Even after Indianapolis, Wallace said he spent the last 20 laps telling himself he couldn't get it done; at times, he can be his own worst enemy. But after a moment like Sunday, you would think going head-to-head with the best and not coughing it up — I personally thought he would lose the race once his lead was erased and it was headed to an overtime restart against Larson — has to be a major boost for his psyche. Next time he's in a clutch situation like that, he'll know for sure he can execute and deliver a win. Jordan: You'd think out-dueling Larson on multiple late-race restarts would give Wallace all the confidence in the world. It should. But a similar sentiment existed in 2022 when he won at Kansas, seemingly sticking it to all the naysayers. Then he went another 100 races between victories. So while Indianapolis should be a launching pad to bigger, sustained success, let's see what happens going forward. Nonetheless, let's again acknowledge how impressive Wallace was on Sunday in earning a win he certainly deserved. You wrote about a NASCAR playoff committee this week, noting that, at one point, the playoff format seemed certain to change for next year, but now it may not. One question: Is anyone in NASCAR still in favor of keeping the current one-race championship format? Jeff: There are certainly some on the TV side, the racetrack side and perhaps a few in the driving corps who like the format as-is and don't want to change it. I've spoken to them, at least privately. The argument is that the current format maximizes drama and excitement and forces drivers to step up, and they think it has created incredible moments (which is fair). But when it came time for anyone to vouch for it in the second meeting of the playoff committee in May, no one raised their hand to make their case for retaining it. That's not to say no one likes it privately, just that no one in the room spoke up for it. Advertisement In June, I did a poll on X that received more than 30,000 votes, and only 8.5 percent of fans voted in favor of keeping the current format. You can see the results here. Similarly, NASCAR Hall of Famer Mark Martin did a poll, and only 7 percent voted for that option. Among fans, I'd confidently say it is the least desirable option — and that opinion is shared by the majority of the committee. The bottom line is the one-race format hasn't felt credible enough as a championship, and the playoff committee members are seeking a way to add more legitimacy to such an important part of the sport. Jordan: (Pours a drink. Then another. Long sigh.) The current playoff format deserves to be thoroughly dissected and examined. And if, from that, a better playoff format can be conceived, then wonderful. But to sit there and say with broad strokes that this format is primarily about luck and diminishes the championship feels a bit disingenuous. Last year, Joey Logano rose to the occasion when it mattered the most, effectively willing himself to the championship. Yet, instead of praising this as would've likely happened had it been a fan-favorite driver, he's cast as an 'undeserving champion' by a large swath of people. That's ridiculous. And if you look back on the history of this format, a valid case can be made that the eventual champion in most years was deserving. How likely is it that this race puts a new race winner in the playoffs? Jeff: I would have said the Brickyard only had a 20 percent chance or less — and I was wrong — so I'll go with 30 percent for Iowa. It's the second time NASCAR has raced at Iowa Speedway, but look at last year's inaugural race: Ryan Blaney dominated and won it, Larson led 80 laps and William Byron, Chase Elliott and Christopher Bell all finished in the top four. No surprises there. That said, we haven't seen a track like Iowa yet this season — it's sort of a hybrid short track — so you can't count out a surprise driver hitting on something. But I don't think it's very likely at all, personally. Jordan: Unlikely. Expect a repeat winner on Sunday as Iowa is just not the kind of track conducive to producing an upset. When the checkered flag waves, bet on a familiar face celebrating in victory lane. Advertisement Who do you like to win this Sunday? Jeff: Before I looked at the odds, I thought I was going to have a sneaky little pick for you: Christopher Bell. Then I realized he is already the No. 3 favorite (+475), just behind Blaney and Larson (who are tied at +450). So I guess my pick isn't exactly going out on a limb. I just thought, given Bell's two self-spins while racing for the lead at Dover two weeks ago and then his huge gaffe at Indianapolis that cleaned out Zane Smith, maybe bettors would have soured on Bell a bit. After all, he's gone winless since winning three straight races (Nos. 2-4 of the season) — which seems like a lifetime ago. But Bell is a terrific short-track racer, and he won at Phoenix, which is probably the closest thing we've seen to Iowa so far this year. So I'll go with him. Jordan: Having broken out of his mid-summer swoon, Kyle Larson is back to having a consistent presence toward the front of the field. He was fast at Dover two weeks ago and nearly won last week at Indy. He's long due for another win, and Iowa is the place it happens, setting up a late-push run to the regular-season championship. Who is a long shot you like? Jeff: Shout it from the rooftops: Ricky Stenhouse Jr. at +15000. The long-shot talk heading into the Iowa race last year was about Stenhouse, who once won three straight Iowa races during his Xfinity Series days. Then at the inaugural Iowa Cup race, Stenhouse went out and finished fifth — his only top-five finish on a paved non-superspeedway in the last three-plus seasons. Heck, Stenhouse is +350 to even finish in the top 10 at Iowa. Sometimes drivers just click with certain tracks, and it feels like Iowa could be one of those for Stenhouse. Jordan: Ty Gibbs is listed at +4400, which is too high for a driver at a top organization that has had speed to win a handful of races this summer. The same applies to Alex Bowman, who's at +5000. Neither of these drivers is a likely winner on Sunday, but it certainly wouldn't be a shock if it happened. And for a deep sleeper, go with Erik Jones (+20000). He and his Legacy Motor Club team have been much improved to the point that he's both qualifying and racing better, and if he can get a little luck, Jones could turn some heads. Betting/odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Kyle Larson: James Gilbert / Getty Images)