‘Not a political statement': West Ada controversy spurs ‘positivity' in Boise schools
Boise educators — along with other participating community members — took to social media on Monday to post photos of themselves wearing shirts depicting the message and image from a sign that West Ada leaders said broke school policy because it wasn't 'content neutral and conducive to a positive learning environment.'
West Ada has faced backlash since it became public that the district told Sarah Inama, a 35-year-old world civilization teacher at Lewis and Clark Middle School in Meridian, to remove two signs from her classroom in February.
One sign read, 'Everyone is welcome here,' above hands of different skin tones.
Another read, 'In this room, everyone is welcome, important, accepted, respected, encouraged, valued,' with each word highlighted in a different color.
Inama briefly took them down, before returning them to their previous places.
'There's nothing wrong with (the messages),' Inama told the Idaho Statesman. 'It's not a personal opinion. It's not a political opinion. I am really skeptical of what type of differing view is trying to be protected here.'
Community members responded by creating T-shirts out of the sign's image, and thousands were purchased.
Boise resident Angela Voll created a Facebook event asking everyone to wear the shirt Monday and share a photo.
'If you've purchased an 'Everyone Is Welcome Here' shirt, we encourage you and your children to wear it proudly on this day,' Voll's event page read. 'Let's fill our schools, workplaces, and communities with a visible reminder that inclusion matters.'
Boise School District spokesperson Dan Hollar told the Statesman that its staff participated as a 'visible reminder to our community of our commitment to welcoming and serving all students, regardless of their background, identity, or beliefs.'
'This message is not a political statement — it's a reflection of our core values. We are here to teach and support every student who walks through our doors. We strive to provide a safe, secure and supportive learning environment where each and every student can learn, grow and thrive.
'We felt it was important to publicly reaffirm these values, especially in light of the conversations currently happening in our state and across our nation. Our intention was not to criticize another district, but to remind our own community that we are committed to creating schools where every student feels like they belong and are supported in their learning.'
Teachers from schools across Boise posted photos of themselves donning the shirts or hanging similar signs on Monday, including staff at Trail Wind Elementary, Riverglen Junior High, Koelsch Elementary, Hawthorne Elementary, Centennial High, Boise High, North Junior, Adams Elementary, Liberty Elementary and Rolling Hills Public Charter School.
Borah High School's staff also participated, even posting a video of its staff posing in various ways while wearing their shirts.
Chris Stewart, the man who led the creation of the shirts, now wants to make a standing event in which people wear the shirts on the first Monday of every month.
'It's a simple way to keep the message going and growing,' Stewart posted on social media. 'Keep posting your photos and using the hashtags — this movement has already sparked so much positivity, and this will help it grow even more organically. Let's officially make the first Monday of every month 'Everyone Is Welcome Day.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
17 hours ago
- Miami Herald
‘Provocative' sign at Oregon church opposes Alligator Alcatraz. It goes viral
A Protestant church in a suburban part of Oregon has gone viral for a sign promoting the church's views about a new migrant detention facility located more than 3,000 miles away. 'It shouldn't need to be said, but Alligator Alcatraz is in opposition to the teachings of Christ,' the Clackamas United Church of Christ in Milwaukie said in a July 18 Facebook post citing the sign. Since opening earlier this month in the marshy Florida Everglades region, Alligator Alcatraz — named after a notorious federal prison off the coast of San Francisco — has drawn mixed reviews. Democrats and immigrant-rights activists have criticized it, calling it inhumane, while Republicans view it as safe and necessary for national security. McClatchy News reached out to the Rev. Adam Ericksen, pastor of CUCC on July 23 but did not receive an immediate response. Church goes viral with latest sign The church led by Ericksen — part of a socially liberal Protestant Christian denomination that emphasizes unity — is known in the community for its signs, even featuring a calendar with photos of previous signs for sale on its website. 'We put up provocative messages up on the sign because I think that the gospel is provocative,' Ericksen told KATU. But the latest sign mentioning Alligator Alcatraz is their 'most viral to date,' according to a July 22 Facebook post by the church. The sign garnered attention from Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, who shared a photo of it and asked 'What's your reaction to this sign?' in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. Ericksen said the sign was 'meant to challenge,' KATU reported. 'If the United States actually wanted to be a Christian nation, we would be loving our neighbors, including our undocumented neighbors, our queer neighbors, as we love ourselves,' he told the outlet. Milwaukie is about a five-mile drive southeast from Portland, Oregon. More to know about Alligator Alcatraz The migrant detention center, which opened July 1, was transformed from an abandoned Florida airport in eight days, the Miami Herald reported. It is expected to hold up to 5,000 people awaiting deportation, authorities told CNN. During a tour of the facility in July, President Donald Trump — who's posted on social media about a desire to reopen Alcatraz in San Francisco — said it was an 'amazing job.' But some, including lawmakers, medical officials and activists, have spoken out and even filed lawsuits against the facility. 'They are essentially packed into cages, wall-to-wall humans, 32 detainees per cage,' Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat for Florida's 25th Congressional District, said after touring it, CNN reported. Families of the detainees have also spoken out against the conditions in the facility, according to the outlet.
Fox News
20 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump weighs in on Bryan Kohberger's plea deal ahead of crucial Idaho murders sentencing
President Donald Trump waded into the "vicious" Idaho student murders case Monday with a post on Truth Social about Bryan Kohberger's upcoming sentencing, saying he hopes the judge requires some kind of explanation at Wednesday's hearing for the slayings of "four wonderful young souls." When Kohberger pleaded guilty earlier this month, he gave no motive or explanation while admitting to the home invasion stabbing deaths of four college students. "While Life Imprisonment is tough, it's certainly better than receiving the Death Penalty but, before Sentencing, I hope the Judge makes Kohberger, at a minimum, explain why he did these horrible murders," Trump wrote. "There are no explanations, there is no NOTHING." Trump echoed public surprise about the unexpected plea deal, which spares Kohberger from the potential death penalty in exchange for admitting to the crimes. He is expected to receive four consecutive terms of life imprisonment with no chance of parole, plus another 10 years, and has waived his right to appeal and to seek a sentence reduction. Critics have questioned why the deal didn't require him to explain himself. And the appeal waiver does not mean he won't have any chance to appeal, according to Judge Steven Hippler, who cited a Supreme Court case, Garza v. Idaho, that found defendants who waive their rights to appeal may still have a right to appeal. "People were shocked that he was able to plea bargain, but the Judge should make him explain what happened," Trump added. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Kohberger pleaded guilty to all charges on July 2, about two months before he would have gone to trial in Boise, Idaho. At the hearing, he admitted to sneaking into the off-campus home at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho, and killing four University of Idaho students inside, some of whom were asleep. The victims were 21-year-olds Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, as well as 20-year-olds Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. They were all killed around 4 a.m. on Nov. 13, 2022. Kohberger was studying for a Ph.D. in criminology at Washington State University, about 10 miles away over the state line. Goncalves' family posted on their Facebook page that the president's remarks left them wowed. "Absolutely shocked," the family wrote. "Kaylee, Maddie, Xana, Ethan – you have always mattered so much. You are so loved & your nature, your light, your entire being is so bright & visible." Kohberger could have faced capital punishment, and Idaho had recently taken steps to bring back the firing squad as a result of difficulties with lethal injection as a viable option. The victims' families were split over the plea deal, with some welcoming a chance to move past the murders. Goncalves' family, notably, had been hoping for the most severe punishment and pleaded with the judge to at least require an explanation before accepting the deal. According to court documents, DNA from a knife sheath left at the crime scene matched Kohberger's, and cellphone data placed him near the victims' house multiple times before the killings. Surveillance footage also captured a white Hyundai Elantra in the area. Kohberger's official sentencing is scheduled for Wednesday morning.
The Hill
20 hours ago
- The Hill
Trade group asks Supreme Court to limit Mississippi's social media law
An internet trade group asked the Supreme Court Wednesday to block Mississippi from enforcing its age-verification law against nine major social media platforms. NetChoice asked the justices for an emergency intervention after the 5 th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week without explanation lifted a block that had protected platforms like Facebook and Instagram from the new requirements. 'In a one-sentence order, the Fifth Circuit upended the First Amendment rights of Mississippi citizens seeking to access fully protected speech across social media websites,' NetChoice wrote. The existing block had prevented Mississippi from enforcing the law against nine NetChoice members covered by the law: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, X, Snapchat, Reddit, Pinterest, Nextdoor and Dreamwitdth. Justice Samuel Alito, who by default handles emergency requests arising from the 5 th Circuit, ordered Mississippi to respond within a week. Alito could then act on the request alone or refer it to the full court for a vote. Mississippi's law requires social media companies to verify users' age and require minors to have express consent from a parent or guardian to use the platform. Covered websites must also work to mitigate minors' exposure to harmful material, and violations carry a $10,000 fine. It was originally set to go into effect on July 1, 2024, the same day the Supreme Court decided NetChoice's First Amendment challenges to Florida and Texas laws that regulate social media companies over accusations of political censorship. The Florida and Texas disputes involve what is known as a facial challenge, meaning NetChoice argues the laws are unconstitutional across the board. The Supreme Court's decision sent the cases back to lower courts with guidance for how to analyze the laws. In Mississippi, however, the judge's most recent injunction did not block the state's law facially. An appointee of the younger former President Bush, U.S. District Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden only blocked the state's law as applied to NetChoice's members, which involves a different First Amendment analysis. NetChoice argued the 5 th Circuit's lack of explanation in lifting the judge's order is sufficient reason on its own for the Supreme Court to intervene. And regardless, the trade group says the block is needed to protect free speech as the litigation progresses. 'Yet, in stark contrast to the two extensively reasoned district court opinions in this case, the Fifth Circuit's order (entered less than an hour after Respondent submitted a reply brief) explains nothing. This is particularly troubling in the context of a decision with sudden and sweeping implications for accessing fully protected speech,' NetChoice wrote in the application.
