‘Jaja's African Hair Braiding' deftly blends comedy and conflict
From left: Ashley Aldarondo, Dru Sky Berrian, and MarHadoo Effeh.
Nile Scott Studios
Advertisement
They include Bea (Crystin Gilmore), an immigrant from Ghana who had entered into a green card marriage with a man from her church and dreams of opening her own salon; Miriam (MarHadoo Effeh), from Sierra Leone, who had to leave her young daughter behind when she immigrated to the US; Aminata (Kwezi Shongwe), originally from Senegal, who is caught in a turbulent marriage but seems to be vacillating on whether or not to end it; Ndidi (Catia), originally from Nigeria, who yearns to return to her home country and resume her acting career; and Jennifer (Hampton Richards), a customer who wants to be a journalist and is a model of forbearance, no matter how long it takes to braid her hair.
Advertisement
But the most compelling figure onstage at the Roberts Studio Theatre is one of the quietest: Marie, the 18-year-old daughter of the mostly unseen Jaja, an immigrant from Senegal. A valedictorian of her high school class, Marie is an aspiring writer who is running the shop for her mother. In Dru Sky Berrian's wonderfully precise, largely inward performance, we become aware not just of Marie's smarts and ambition but also of her anxiety — the submerged fears of someone who can sense the ground shifting beneath her.
'Jaja's' is comedic until it isn't. Bioh doesn't entirely finesse the transition to wrenching drama, as the play takes a sudden hairpin turn with a development quite literally torn from the headlines.
But narrowly defined structural cohesion matters less by that point than your degree of emotional investment — and it's likely to be high — in the fates of Bioh's characters.
In broad strokes, the late-in-the-play development in question does cast an illuminating retrospective light on much that came before it. You understand the precariousness of circumstance that underlies — or generates — the extravagantly expressive, seize-the-day spirit manifested by most of the salon's stylists and customers.
In Williams, 'Jaja's' has a director who is clearly on Bioh's wavelength. Over the past decade-plus, Williams has displayed a knack for untangling the most difficult dramatic knots until she achieves lucidity. She's brought that skill to a varied palette of works that have been epic or intimate or somewhere in between, with a partial list including
Advertisement
Williams has repeatedly marshaled the collective force of a large cast while also ensuring that individual faces and voices are seen and heard, and in 'Jaja's' she does it again.
Jaja, the salon's owner, an immigrant from from Senegal, is unseen for most of the play, but MaConnia Chesser makes her brief appearance a memorable one. On this day, Jaja is slated to be married at City Hall to a white man, of whom daughter Marie does not approve. (Jaja's dress is just one piece of the excellent work done by costume designer Danielle Domingue Sumi).
Chesser's Jaja appears to be indomitable, but seeming and being are two different things. In the hair braiding salon, the employees and the customers, whatever their different personalities, are defined by their humanity. The same cannot be said of those whose goal is to turn their lives upside down.
JAJA'S AFRICAN HAIR BRAIDING
Play by Jocelyn Bioh
Directed by Summer L. Williams
Presented by SpeakEasy Stage Company. At Roberts Studio Theatre, Calderwood Pavilion, Boston Center for the Arts. Through May 31. Tickets start at $25. 617-933-8600, SpeakEasyStage.com
Don Aucoin can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
4 days ago
- Boston Globe
From Christopher Columbus to Alex Trebek, Trump is spending millions on statues of ‘American heroes' while slashing arts funding
It's a typically grandiose plan from a former real estate mogul who has Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The statues must be 'lifelike or abstract or modernist' representations of 'historically significant Americans," according to Advertisement They will be displayed in a yet-to-be-named 'site of natural beauty' with a stated deadline ofJuly 4, 2026. It was a highly ambitious timetable given the deadline to submit Advertisement Artists can receive as much as $200,000 per statue, which can be in marble, granite, bronze, copper, or brass. The project already had $34 million from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts, and received another $40 million in Trump's massive domestic policy bill approved on Thursday. The funneling of so much money into the statue garden while other arts projects have lost support has 'outraged' Representative Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat and leading congressional advocate for the arts. 'I think this is illegal for the president to transfer funds that were already granted to arts agencies all over the country to use for a project of his own making and his own purpose that wasn't approved by any broader authority,' she told the Globe. 'It's just his big idea of what he wants to do.' Urbanity Dance, a Boston non-profit contemporary dance company, was told in early May that a $15,000 grant from the NEA was being canceled, even though they had already completed the performance the grant was meant to support. The message said the NEA would now 'prioritize' other projects, including those that 'celebrate the 250th anniversary of American independence.' 'It was something we had come to rely upon over the years in order to produce community-based dance, which is really our focus,' Urbanity founder and director Betsi Graves said. The money was meant to help fund a March 28 dance performance with high school students from Boston Arts Academy that Graves described as 'all about standing up for others, especially in the face of cruelty and bully behavior.' Advertisement 'We received the offer, we put on the show that we said we were going to do, and then we had the rug pulled out from they don't even know what city they're going to be bringing [the sculpture garden] to yet?' Graves said. 'To hurt neighborhood community arts organizations to be able to fulfill a request from one person, or those closest to him, feels incredibly ego-fulfilling and selfish.' Trump unveiled the statute garden during 'Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities,' Trump said, standing in front of the mountain's carved faces of presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt. He described the statute garden as 'a new monument to the giants of our past...a vast outdoor park that will feature the statues of the greatest Americans to ever live.' In addition to an The order specifically named an eclectic group of 31 —among them Washington, Lincoln, abolitionist Frederick Douglas, World War II hero Audie Murphy, and the Wright Brothers, with the task force adding to it. Advertisement It also said that non-Americans such as Christopher Columbus (who never set foot in what is now the United States) were eligible if they 'made substantive contributions to America's public life or otherwise had a substantive effect on America's history.' That opened the door to the Canadian-born Trebek, Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman, and French general Marquis de Lafayette, who all made the final list. The goal was 250 statues for America's 250th birthday, but the NEH is working off list has not been updated publicly since. Some choices are controversial. They include Columbus, whose explorations helped launch colonization in the Americas; President Andrew Jackson, who forced Native Americans to march hundreds of miles from their land to open it up for US settlers; and automotive pioneer Henry Ford, who publicly espoused antisemitic views. 'There are lots of people on this list who would refuse to be in the same room with one another,' said Kirk Savage, a University of Pittsburgh art history professor who studies American monuments. 'But they're being, in a sense, conscripted into this project because of somebody else's idea of what America is supposed to look like in 2026.' He also foresaw logistical problems, including the 'unbelievably quick' July 4, 2026, timetable, the 'low ball" maximum $200,000 price per statue, and the undetermined location and installation process. 'As an art historian, I was kind of shocked at the lack of detail in the call for proposals,' he said. 'The artists are designing statues without knowing where they're going to be located.' Advertisement The governor of The project moves forward as the NEA has 'They've broken all these contracts at the NEA and the NEH that were going to legitimate small groups in every single state that really benefit each of our communities,' Pingree said. 'It's just repurposing the funds because he thinks it's a good idea.' This spring, Lee Blake, president of the New Bedford Historical Society, was about to notify people who had been accepted into the society's program funded by a $180,000 NEH grant when she learned it had been cancelled. The money would have underwritten an educational program for 80 teachers, mostly from waterfront communities, about the maritime underground railroad that ran through New Bedford. The historical society first received NEH funding for the program 15 years ago, Blake said. Now that money could go to a garden in a single location instead of a history course that reaches innumerable communities. 'You're going to have this hero park. How are people going to get there?' she said. 'It's not like it's democratic and spread throughout the country. It's going to become a tourist place where only a few people are going to be able to afford to go.' Advertisement Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
Casey Sherman's latest true crime narrative puts readers in the jury box
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The result is ' Advertisement Unlike some of the prolific author's other books, this one presents both sides of the case against Carman without rendering a verdict. Advertisement 'I really put the reader in that jury box,' says Sherman, who notes that readers themselves seem deadlocked. 'When I read the online reviews they split — some people think Carman's a criminal mastermind, other people think that he was targeted for his disorder.' (Carman was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder as a boy; Sherman points out that his characteristic monotone and flat affect caused some to view him as evasive or emotionless.) These It's this mystery at the heart of the story that makes it memorable, Sherman says. 'Readers have approached me and said, 'I'm still thinking about this case and this book weeks after I read it.'' Casey Sherman will read at 7 p.m. Monday, July 7, at the in Barnstable. And now for some recommendations ... There's something spellbinding about a book that blends significant research with a deeply personal voice, and two brilliant examples are coming out this week. One is ' Advertisement And then there are the summer novels that entrance us and introduce us to different worlds. In Charlotte Runcie's ' Kate Tuttle edits the Globe's Books section. Kate Tuttle, a freelance writer and critic, can be reached at
Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
What would Edward R. Murrow think of CBS parent company caving in to Donald Trump?
You can chalk up a lot of its popularity to its star, George Clooney, who plays the legendary newsman and who wrote the play with Grant Heslov, based on But no doubt some measure of the success of the play is also rooted in its relevance and resonance today. Advertisement Murrow enhanced his credibility, and that of CBS, and showcased journalistic and personal courage by exposing McCarthy's anti-communist witch hunt as a reckless abuse of civil liberties and civility. Murrow wouldn't back down in the face of McCarthy's threats or pressure from his corporate bosses after the loss of a major network sponsor. Given all this, one has to wonder what Murrow would make of the decision by Paramount, CBS' parent company, to Advertisement Trump's lawyer had claimed Trump suffered 'mental anguish' from a '60 Minutes' interview last October of then-Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump's Democratic opponent in the presidential election. Trump and his lawyers maintained the editing of the interview made Harris appear more coherent and intelligent than she really is, that it amounted to false advertising, or deceptive trade practices. Trump attorney Edward Andrew Paltzik said that beyond the mental anguish the interview caused Trump, it misled voters and led them to pay less attention to him and his regular assertions on Truth Social. How Counselor Paltzik would prove this in a court of law where there are, unlike on Truth Social, rules of evidence would have made for some entertaining lawyering. Alas, we'll never know. While CBS and Paramount initially came out swinging, insisting Trump's case was entirely without merit, the beancounters had the final say, as they are wont to do. Paramount caving isn't very surprising, if still very depressing. Paramount chair and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone had made it clear she favored a settlement. Surely, her position had nothing to do with the fact that the Meeting with shareholders Wednesday, George Cheeks, Paramount's co-CEO, Somehow, Mr. Cheeks did not find the time to mention the word principle. My only surprise is that he didn't try to suggest the capitulation constituted a bargain, given that Advertisement In a statement announcing the settlement, Paramount executives went to great length to portray their actions as somehow not amounting to a capitulation, pointing out that, aside from paying Trump's legal fees, the $16 million goes not to Trump but the fund to build his presidential library. Oh, and they were not required to apologize to Trump. They might want to apologize to Murrow's memory and current 60 Minutes correspondents and viewers. In May, those CBS is hardly the only media giant to turtle in its shell rather than stand up to a bully. Last year, ABC's parent company, Disney, agreed to donate $15 million to Trump's presidential library rather than go to trial after Trump sued them for defamation. Trump's claim was based on the fact that ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos had said on air that Trump had been found liable for rape when he was actually found liable for sexual abuse. At the time, media law experts had warned that Disney's capitulation to Trump would embolden him and others to file dubious lawsuits against media companies that would rather settle than go all the way to trial. One month later, So, if you're keeping score at home, Trump has taken $56 million off craven media companies who don't have the guts to take him on in court. He'd be a fool to not keep suing. Advertisement US Senator Elizabeth Warren has likened these payoffs to bribes. She wants US Senator Ed Markey called Paramount's settlement 'a blow to journalistic independence.' US Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont didn't pull any punches. 'It is a dark day for independent journalism and freedom of the press, an essential part of our democracy,' Sanders said. 'It is a victory for a president who is attempting to stifle dissent and undermine American democracy.' Congress can investigate all it wants. Nothing will change until the big media companies care more about their audiences than their shareholders. Meaning nothing will change. All this on the eve of July 4th, when we celebrate our country's independence, an independence that was underwritten by a free press which today is demonstrably less free that it was just a year ago. Good night, and good luck. Kevin Cullen is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at
