Edinburgh academics strike over £140m funding cuts
The strikes are intended to disrupt the university's annual Open Day, where prospective students and their families will visit the Old College campus.
Additional pickets are set to be carried out between 8-12 September as students return from the summer holidays.
Bosses at the university aim to reduce spending by £140m. (Image: Newsquest) Sophia Woodman, president of the Edinburgh University UCU branch, said: 'Taking strike action is the very last thing UCU members at Edinburgh want to do but the decision of the principal to press ahead with huge cuts and the refusal to rule out compulsory redundancies has simply left us no choice.
'University staff are worried about the future and whether they'll have a job this time next year. We are striking on Open Day to sound the alarm about the future of research and teaching at the university, because we care deeply about the quality of education we provide to our students.
Woodman added: 'Staff are stunned to see university senior management pressing ahead with plans to spend vast sums on public relations consultants and increase spending on buildings while cutting the staff who teach students and carry out world leading research. Even at this late stage it's not too late for the university to rule out the use of compulsory redundancies and end this dispute.'
Read more:
'It was clunky at best': Edinburgh University pulls 'don't be snobs' guidance
Edinburgh University could cut 1750 staff jobs, claims union
Edinburgh University at risk of lawsuit over policy to make all toilets mixed-sex
University principal Peter Mathieson, who recently told MSPs he was not sure how much money he made, has also come under fire.
Asked by Education Committee convenor Douglas Ross to confirm his salary, Mathieson was unable to do so, quipping: 'I don't carry that figure round in my head. I recognise that I'm very well paid.
'You could pay the senior team of the University of Edinburgh nothing and that would make largely no difference to the size of the expenditure challenge we face.'
UCU General Secretary Jo Grady UCU General Secretary Jo Grady has also hit out at the chief executive, who makes around £418,000 a year.
She said: 'Peter Mathieson has been warned often enough about the impact his cuts will have on staff, students and the university's reputation but the refusal not to rule out compulsory redundancies means that the fault for this strike going ahead lies firmly at his door.'
A University of Edinburgh spokesperson said: 'Open Day is a hugely important event in our calendar, and we are delighted to be welcoming thousands of potential students to our campus. Visitors will get a taste of what classes might be like, see accommodation options as well as experiencing the city itself.
"While we respect colleagues' right to take part in industrial action, we are doing our utmost to keep any disruption to a minimum and have endeavoured to keep those planning to attend well informed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
University of Bristol jobs at risk amid lower student numbers
University staff who teach language and communication skills to international students say their jobs are at risk under "devastating" new redundancy 45 members of University of Bristol's Centre for Academic Language and Development (Cald) staff are being threatened with compulsory redundancy. A university spokesperson said the cuts were in response to a declining number of students, to which they must "adjust staffing levels and resources accordingly".They added "ongoing talks" were in progress with colleagues at the University and College Union (UCU) to help "mitigate any impact on our students". Staff within the department help both international and home students at the university to develop their academic language, literacy and communication skills. The university runs courses and programmes for students at all levels and from a wide variety of backgrounds, whether or not English is their first language. The UCU argues there is "no sound operational or financial rationale" for the cuts to the added the compulsory redundancy scheme relied on projected, not actual, student numbers for the next academic year. 'Changing demand' A University of Bristol spokesperson said: "We continue to have a pipeline of applicants for this programme, but at lower numbers than several years ago. "This is no reflection on the quality of the education provided by the team but for the International Foundation Programme (IFP) to remain sustainable, we need to respond to changing demand." The union's regional official Nick Varney said: "These job cuts would not only be devastating for the staff involved, but will leave the remaining staff over-stretched and damage students' academic experience."Taking compulsory redundancies off the table, and focusing on viable alternatives, would end this dispute."He called upon Vice-Chancellor Evelyn Welch to reverse the "unfair, ill-thought out and financially unjustifiable plans" or face potential strike open letter against the cuts to university management has gained more than 900 signatures.
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Scottish gender critical academic trained in security 'duck and cover' manoeuvres at universities
Universities have allowed the suppression of free speech and enabled violence and harassment of gender critical academics, a new report has found. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... One Scottish academic has told how she was compelled to step down from a charity over fears the Scottish Government would cease its funding due to the association with her. Professor Sarah Pedersen, from Robert Gordon University, who also endured no-platforming and aggression from students, said the charity's Edinburgh head office said it was afraid funding would be pulled. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK government-commissioned report by Professor Alice Sullivan is a companion piece of research to a report earlier this year that found health boards, rape crisis services and police in Scotland had failed to record accurate data on sex and gender. Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen. The report, 'Barriers to research on sex and gender', features personal accounts from UK academics, including those from the University of Edinburgh and Robert Gordon University. They give evidence that those who have challenged the theory that sex is always less important than gender identity have been bullied, harassed and blocked from career progression. In what is described as the most extensive research of its kind conducted in the UK, Prof Sullivan has collected and analysed evidence on the impact of a 'hostile culture' that has developed in university campuses over the past decade. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Researchers investigating vital issues have been subjected to sustained campaigns of intimidation simply for acknowledging the biological and social importance of sex,' Prof Sullivan, professor of sociology at the UCL Social Research Institute, said. 'When fundamental issues cannot be investigated or debated openly, this undermines our academic institutions, it hurts individuals and it compromises the integrity of research. 'The suppression of research often harms the very groups that activists claim to support.' Prof Pedersen said she was 'taken aback' by the number of research participants who wished to remain anonymous, demonstrating the 'chilling effect' of discrimination against gender critical academics. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She thought 'long and hard' about whether or not to go on the record, but said she was supported by Robert Gordon University, which has encouraged 'academic freedom throughout'. Speaking to The Scotsman, Prof Pedersen described her involvement at a situation at the University of Edinburgh, which became notorious because of an attack on the feminist writer Julie Bindel. Prof Pedersen was on the panel alongside Ms Bindel and said that, before the event, the six participants were given a one-hour security briefing. In what the academic said was an unprecedented step, the group was trained in 'duck and cover' manoeuvres and how to exit the stage should they be attacked. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'One of the panellists was so frightened she went out and threw up,' Prof Pedersen said. 'And then, of course, Julie was attacked and I only found out about that as I was walking by myself late at night down to Waverley Station, so that was really frightening.' Prof Pedersen said the same crowd of activists shouting have been seen at various university events she had undertaken. The professor had written a book about the website Mumsnet and she faced attempts to have her blacklisted. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That was brutal, to be frank with you,' she said, describing people who had never met her or read the book demanding she be removed from panels and events. In some cases, the campaign was successful and invitations were rescinded, Prof Pedersen said. Students at the university put together a 'dossier' of 'evil things' she was alleged to have done, including retweeting a social media post from the gender-critical former Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont. In the report are other accounts of the personal and professional impact of universities tolerating and encouraging the behaviour of a small minority of staff. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Campaigns are often co-ordinated through LGBT+ networks, which are embedded in management EDI structures, the report found. One of the most difficult scenarios involved Prof Pedersen being invited to step down from the charity she chaired. The organisation's umbrella body in Edinburgh said that Scottish Government funding might be pulled due to the charity's association with her. 'I'm not sure how credible a concern that was in reality, but I think the fact that it was the head office in Edinburgh that told our committee this made it credible,' she said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It certainly made me feel that I could not continue in my role, because if we didn't get funding, and if the charity had to close or reduce its services, then I would feel tremendously guilty.' Prof Sullivan has made 20 recommendations to the government and academic institutions to defend high-quality research and protect individual academics from professional and personal attack. One of the routes to improvement, Prof Pedersen said she believed, would be a sense of leadership on the issue from the Scottish Government. 'Keir Starmer came out firmly with a position a couple of days ago, but we've not had that lead from John Swinney,' she said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'And I think that until that happens, things will continue to stall.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment. A UK government spokeswoman said: 'We are taking strong action to protect academic freedom and free speech, which are fundamental to our world-leading universities. 'This includes introducing new duties on universities to ensure they are robust in promoting and protecting free speech on campus. 'It also comes alongside the firm steps the Office for Students is already taking, through fines and new guidance, to ensure universities remain beacons of academic freedom.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A Universities UK spokeswoman said: 'We agree that universities must protect and defend academic freedom and freedom of speech.' The organisation added: 'These are complex issues. In practice universities are bound by law to protect the free speech of individuals who have very different views on contentious topics.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
Edinburgh university 'most financially entangled' in UK to Israel
The UN special rapporteur on Human Rights in the occupied Palestinian territory, Francese Albanese, has published her latest report exploring corporate complicity with the genocide in Gaza The University of Edinburgh investments are analysed in the report and according to the special rapporteur, they are in violation of international law, human rights and the 1948 Genocide Convention. READ MORE: Palestine Action block entry to weapons manufacturer ahead of proscription challenge The report explains that "many universities have upheld ties with Israel despite the post-October 2023 escalation" and goes on to detail that among the "many British examples," the University of Edinburgh is "among the most financially entangled". It states: "One of many British examples, the University of Edinburgh holds nearly £25.5 million (2.5 per cent of its endowment) in four tech giants – Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and IBM314 – central to the Israeli surveillance apparatus and the ongoing Gaza destruction. "With both direct and indexed investments, the University ranks among the most financially entangled institutions in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. "The university also partners with firms aiding Israeli military operations, including Leonardo S.p.A. and Ben-Gurion University, through the AI and Data Science Lab at Ben Gurion University, sharing research that directly links it with assaults on Palestinians." Action taken by Palestine Action at Leonardo's Edinburgh factory (Image: Supplied) Another point adds: "The analysis in the present report only scratches the surface of the information received by the Special Rapporteur, who acknowledges the vital work of students and staff in holding universities to account. "It casts a new light on global crackdowns on campus protesters: shielding Israel and protecting institutional financial interests appears a more probable motivation than fighting alleged antisemitism." READ MORE: Frankie Boyle and Tilda Swinton call for Labour not to ban Palestine Action In conclusion, the report states: "While life in Gaza is being obliterated and the West Bank is under escalating assault, this report shows why Israel's genocide continues: because it is lucrative for many. By shedding light on the political economy of an occupation turned genocidal, the report reveals how the forever-occupation has become the ideal testing ground for arms manufacturers and Big Tech – providing boundless supply and demand, little oversight, and zero accountability – while investors and private and public institutions profit freely. "Too many influential corporate entities remain inextricably financially bound to Israel's apartheid and militarism. "Post-October 2023, when the Israeli defence budget doubled, and at a time of falling demand, production and consumer confidence, an international network of corporations has propped up the Israeli economy. Blackrock and Vanguard rank among the largest investors in arms companies pivotal to Israel's genocidal arsenal. "Major global banks have underwritten Israeli treasury bonds, which have bankrolled the devastation, and the largest sovereign wealth and pension funds invested public and private savings in the genocidal economy, all the while claiming to respect ethical guidelines." 'What kind of institution do we want to be?' A senior lecturer has anonymously spoken to The National about the report, calling out leadership for ignoring staff and students who have highlighted the same concerns as the UN through votes, letters, and encampments on campus. "It's not just the 'bad' students and staff asking the questions," they said, "for almost two years, the EUSA [Edinburgh University Student Association] team and the academic senate, have been in both in favour of total divestment from the companies mentioned in the report. "And the main anti-racist networks on campus have asked for divestment based on evidence — part of which was used in the UN special rapporteur's report." READ MORE: 'Not my King!': Protesters gather as royal family visits Edinburgh In May last year, 549 staff at the university signed a letter demanding that the university sever ties with Israel, expressing solidarity with the pro-Palestine student encampment set up on campus grounds. A number of encampments at the university: multiracial, multi-religious – Palestinians, Jews, and others – have been asking for action, while the university has continuously said it is "reviewing our approach to responsible investments". The university has already frozen additional purchases of stocks in Amazon and Alphabet—just two of the several companies mentioned in the UN report, but staff say this is not enough. "That's a de facto acknowledgment that we are putting money into companies which may be complicit in human rights violations and breaches of international law, including the 1948 Genocide Convention," the lecturer said. They questioned: "But after that acknowledgment, how can you continue? "How can you keep money in existing stocks in companies that are directly complicit with war crimes, human rights violations, and violations of the Genocide Convention? "It doesn't make any sense. If you freeze, you freeze everything. You don't just freeze additional purchases while continuing to profit from existing investments. "That's not how business and human rights work." READ MORE: Scots back independence as Keir Starmer's popularity at record low, new poll finds The lecturer said they wanted to "make clear" that the majority of their colleagues "have expressed support for divestment" because of the evidence in the UN report already. "When we said it, we were dismissed as partisan," they said. "Now, the UN is saying the same thing. "So the university has to ask: what kind of institution do we want to be?" They added: "The university has to decide where it stands. I don't think our legal services can rubber-stamp dismissals of evidence from key international institutions. At the very least, suspend investments. Say: 'The money smells — we stop until things are clear'. "Denial of action is denial of genocide. Senior leadership are watching the same Palestinians being killed — it's on the BBC, it's everywhere. You don't need to scavenge through social media to know what's happening. "So, the choice is clear: Denial and lack of accountability or standing up for international law. "UN special rapporteurs are the 'gold standard' — to use Kofi Annan's phrase. They are the key independent experts, part of the UN system, working with and for the UN." The University of Edinburgh has been approached for comment.
