Fact check: Reform UK migrants claim and minister's inflation mix-up
Has Labour 'allowed the biggest influx of migrants in British history'?
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice MP claimed in a newspaper column a few weeks ago that 'the statistics show without a doubt that this Labour government has allowed the biggest influx of migrants in British history'.
It's not clear which figures Mr Tice was basing this claim on – we've asked him and Reform UK, and haven't had a response. But the statistics we've been able to check – both those available at the time Mr Tice made his claim, and those published since – don't appear to support it.
And when we asked Oxford University's Migration Observatory about Mr Tice's claim, it told us: 'We cannot identify any data that support the assertion that the current government has been responsible for the biggest influx of migrants in British history, and we are unclear how Mr Tice came to this conclusion.'
Mr Tice referred only to 'migrants' and did not specify that he was talking about any particular group of migrants, but some on social media have suggested he intended to refer solely to Channel crossings, which have been at record levels this year and hit the headlines again this weekend after almost 1,200 migrants were recorded as arriving via small boat on Saturday.
Between January 1 2025 and April 27 2025 (the day Mr Tice's article was published), government statistics show 9,885 migrants were detected crossing the English Channel in small boats, and between January 1 and May 31 this figure was 14,812.
Both these figures are higher than for equivalent periods in other years going back to 2018, when statistics for this measure began. But they don't support the claim Mr Tice made – firstly because they only refer to a small proportion of all migrants, and secondly because they don't cover Labour's full time in office.
In the time between Labour forming a government on July 5 2024 and April 27 2025, 33,127 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel on small boats, according to government statistics. This isn't a record – the equivalent total between July 5 2022 and April 27 2023 was 38,600.
In terms of overall migrant numbers, there are various different sets of data, but one of the most commonly cited is the estimate of long-term international migration published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
The most recent such figures cover the year to December 2024, when 948,000 people are estimated to have moved to the UK. (Over the same period 517,000 people left, so total net migration that year is estimated to have been 431,000.)
These figures can't tell us exactly how many have arrived under Labour, as they cover roughly six months of the last Conservative government and the first six months of Labour. The next set of figures, which will cover the year ending June 2025 and are expected to be published in the autumn, will more reliably tell us about the change under Labour.
But overall the figures for 2024 were significantly down on the year before. In the year ending December 2023 around 1,326,000 people were estimated to have moved to the UK – a record high. (And 466,000 people left, so net migration that year was an estimated 860,000.)
Net migration is estimated to have reached a record high of 906,000 in the year ending June 2023, when 1,320,000 people moved to the UK and 414,000 people left.
So while the ONS migration estimates can't tell us specifically what the change in the number of immigrants coming to the UK has been under Labour, they appear to suggest that the 'biggest influx' of migrants on record so far took place under the previous Conservative government.
The Migration Observatory believes this is the case, telling us: 'Data clearly show that the 'biggest influx of migrants in British history' took place under the previous administration.'
School standards minister mixes up inflation and interest rates
Speaking about the cost of living in an interview on Friday, school standards minister Catherine McKinnell MP claimed 'we've seen inflation coming down'.
That's not what the latest inflation figures show, however, and the Department for Education has since told us she'd intended to refer to interest rates.
While the Bank Rate – which is set by the Bank of England to influence the interest rates charged by banks – is currently one percentage point lower than it was when Labour came into government on July 5 2024, inflation (the change in prices for goods and services over time, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, or CPI) is higher than it was when Labour entered government.
In the 12 months to June 2024 – the last full month of the previous Conservative government – inflation stood at 2%, while in the 12 months to July 2024 – the month Labour formed a government – it was 2.2%. As of April 2025, annual CPI inflation was 3.5%, 0.9 percentage points higher than the previous month's figure. Other commonly used measures of inflation show similar trends.
This isn't the first time we've seen government ministers confuse interest rate and inflation figures. Earlier this year we fact checked the Prime Minister and Home Office minister Seema Malhotra MP after they both wrongly claimed interest rates had been at 11% under the previous government. As Ms Malhotra later made clear in an edited post, the 11% figure actually referred to the peak rate of CPI inflation in 2022.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Israel and US recall teams from Gaza truce talks, US says Hamas not showing good faith
JERUSALEM/CAIRO - Israel and the United States recalled their delegations from Gaza ceasefire talks for consultations on Thursday, with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff accusing the Palestinian militant group Hamas of failing to act in good faith in the talks. It marked the latest setback in efforts to secure a deal that would bring a ceasefire to Gaza, secure the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas, and bring respite to Palestinians suffering a sharply worsening humanitarian crisis. Witkoff said mediators had made a great effort but "Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith". "We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza," he wrote on X. There was no immediate reaction from Hamas. An Israeli official with knowledge of the talks said Hamas' response to the latest ceasefire proposal "does not allow for progress without a concession" by the group but that Israel intended to continue discussions. Both Israel and Hamas are facing pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal following almost two years of war, with the humanitarian situation inside Gaza deteriorating and Israelis worried about the conditions in which hostages are being held. Dozens of people have starved to death in Gaza the last few weeks as a wave of hunger crashes on the enclave, according to local health authorities. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the suffering and starvation in Gaza was an "unspeakable and indefensible" humanitarian catastrophe and called on Israel to urgently let in aid. "While the situation has been grave for some time, it has reached new depths and continues to worsen. We are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe," Starmer said in a statement. He will hold an emergency call with French and German partners on Friday to discuss what could be done to "stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need," he said. The Gaza health ministry said two more people had died of malnutrition. The head of Shifa Hospital in Gaza City said the two were patients suffering from other illnesses who died after going without food for several days. Earlier in the day, there had been some apparent signs of progress in the mediation. A senior Hamas official told Reuters that there was still a chance of reaching a ceasefire deal but it would take a few days because of what he called Israeli stalling. A senior Israeli official had been quoted by local media as saying the new text was something Israel could work with. But, Israel's Channel 12 said a rapid deal was not within reach, with gaps remaining between the two sides, including over where the Israeli military should withdraw to during any truce. Witkoff's team did not immediately respond to a request to explain the Hamas demands that led to his withdrawal of the U.S. negotiators. The Hostages Families Forum, representing the family members of those held in Gaza, expressed concern at the recall of the Israeli team. "Each day that passes endangers the hostages' chances of recovery and risks losing the ability to locate the fallen or gain vital intelligence about them," it said. Pepper spray fired at aid site Women going to fetch aid for their families on Thursday said U.S. contractors organising distribution asked them to come to pick up goods and then fired tear gas and pepper spray at them. "The Americans said "go, go", and then said no, get back. They sprayed us with pepper spray so we went away. Five minutes later they shot tear gas at us ... is this American humanitarian aid?" said Mervat al-Sakani. Asked for comment, a spokesperson for the aid organisation - the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation - said a limited amount of pepper spray was used 'to prevent civilian injury due to overcrowding', adding that GHF 'didn't want people to get hurt.' The spokesperson said women-only aid distribution had been "a major success" overall. GHF, a U.S.-and Israeli-backed organization, began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May. The U.N. has called the GHF's model unsafe and a breach of humanitarian impartiality standards, which GHF denies. The U.N. rights office said on July 15 it had recorded at least 875 killings within the preceding six weeks in the vicinity of aid sites and food convoys in Gaza - the majority of them close to GHF distribution points. Most of those deaths were caused by gunfire that locals have blamed on the Israeli military. The military has acknowledged that civilians were harmed, saying that Israeli forces had been issued new instructions with "lessons learned". Israel, which cut off all supplies to Gaza from the start of March and reopened it with new restrictions in May, says it is committed to allowing in aid but must control it to prevent Hamas diverting it. Israel says it has let in enough food for Gazans, and blames the United Nations for being slow to deliver it; the U.N. says it is operating as effectively as possible under conditions imposed by Israel. The war began when Hamas killed some 1,200 people and took 251 hostages in its October 7 attacks on Israel, according to Israeli tallies. Israel has since killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to Gaza health authorities.

Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Britain Cruises Toward a Tax Iceberg
British lawmakers this month rebuffed even modest reforms to the welfare state. Now they'll have to figure out how to pay for all the spending they want and, well, hang onto your wallets. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in early July caved to the biggest rebellion he's faced to date from lawmakers in his own Labour Party. They resisted small tweaks to eligibility for disability benefits, which since Covid have covered a growing number of people who aren't disabled in any traditional sense. Scrapping the welfare reform, as Mr. Starmer did, will cost some £3 billion a year. This followed a string of spending handouts Mr. Starmer made to Labour interest groups such as generous pay increases for public-employee unions. Mr. Starmer is facing a £20 billion budget hole, but there's been no backbench rebellion in Parliament about that. If no one wants to trim the British state, someone will have to pay for it. Investors seem skeptical about chipping in, to judge from elevated yields on U.K. government bonds. Mr. Starmer's cantankerous backbenchers think 'the rich' can be taxed more heavily, preferably via a wealth tax. One idea popular on the left is a 2% tax on assets above £10 million.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Will Ghislaine Maxwell tell the truth to investigators?
As Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche meets with Ghislaine Maxwell in Florida, a central question is whether Jeffrey Epstein's longtime accomplice will tell the truth. Before and after Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking minors in 2021, prosecutors and the judge who oversaw the case said that Maxwell made multiple false statements. 'The defendant's willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct, including some of the conduct charged in the Indictment, strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes,' prosecutors wrote in a motion arguing that Maxwell should be jailed pending trial. Prosecutors added that Maxwell also lied when she was given a chance to acknowledge her actions in a 2016 civil suit.' When the defendant was given the opportunity to address her conduct with minors in the context of a civil suit, she lied repeatedly,' they wrote. Maxwell's attorneys said at the time that 'the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed.' They added, 'There were no 'crimes' concealed by Ms. Maxwell's answers.' After Maxwell was found guiltyof recruiting, grooming and trafficking multiple teenage girls for Epstein,JudgeAlison Nathannoted that Maxwell had not accepted responsibility for her crimes. 'Ms. Maxwell today acknowledged the courage of the victims, talked about the pain and anguish they expressed, to some extent acknowledged the pain and suffering,' Nathan said. 'What wasn't expressed was acceptance of responsibility.' Jack Scarola, a lawyer who represents roughly twenty Epstein victims, said that Maxwell's history of mendacity shows that any investigator who questions her must be thoroughly prepared. 'It is apparent to us that approaching an interview casually will be a complete waste of time,' he said. Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus,did not respond to a request for comment. In a statement to NBC News earlier this week, Markus said, 'Ghislaine will always testify truthfully. We are grateful to President Trump for his commitment to uncovering the truth in this case.' New Hampshire house Maxwell attempted to hide her whereabouts from FBI agents before she was arrested in 2021, according to a daughter of the late British publishing magnate Robert Maxwell, was livingin a 4,300-square-foot timber-frame house on a 156-acre property in rural New Hampshire. Records showed that it was purchased for a little more than $1 million by an anonymous limited liability corporation the previous year. After the agents moved past a security guard hired by Maxwell, they saw her peering out a window from inside the house. After Maxwell did not respond to knocks on the door, agents broke down the door and entered, according to court documents. During an FBI search of the residence, they found one of Maxwell's phones wrapped in tinfoil. Prosecutors called that a haphazard and ineffective way to try to thwart law enforcement cell phone surveillance. After her arrest, Maxwell did not state the liquid assets at her disposal, as required by her bail application, according to accounts at an English bank with 'maximum values totaling well over $2 million.' But she did not disclose a Swiss bank account with an approximate balance of $4 million. Prosecutors wrote, 'to the extent the defendant now refuses to account for her ownership of or access to vast wealth, it is not because it does not exist, it is because she is attempting to hide it.' Civil case deposition After her arrest, Maxwell was also charged with two counts of perjury due to false statements she made in a deposition under oath in the 2016 civil case. Prosecutors alleged that Maxwell lied when she said she was not aware of Epstein's efforts to recruit underage girls for sex. Maxwell also lied when she claimed she was unaware of anyone 18 years or younger being on Epstein's properties, they said. And Maxwell lied when she denied that she had sexual contact with other women while with Epstein, and that Epstein had sex toys. After prosecutors secured a conviction against Maxwell, they declined to move forward with a court-ordered trial on the perjury charges. Legal experts say that cooperating witnesses who have previously lied can still be effective witnesses if there is evidence that corroborates their claims. Their credibility can also be boosted if they give a compelling reason for why they lied. Whether prosecutors, lawmakers and the public find Maxwell credible will likely not be known for weeks. After her meeting with Deputy Attorney General Blanche on Thursday, Maxwell is scheduled to be deposed by members of the House Oversight Committee on August 11 th.