
5 huge ways Trump can make civil service great again
In many ways, the Founding Fathers were the original civil servants. They were the start-up founders who inspired generations to work on behalf of the American dream long before there was an institutionalized civil service – later formalized by the Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883 and bolstered by Theodore Roosevelt's leadership as commissioner of the U.S. Civil Service Commission (the modern predecessor of today's Office of Personnel Management, which I have the privilege to lead).
Across two and a half centuries since our nation's founding, public servants have heeded the clarion call of the noblest of missions: from forming our nation after the American Revolution to ultimately cementing our supremacy during the Cold War by literally shooting for the moon via the Apollo program. These bold entreaties inspired the nation's best and brightest to embrace public service.
For over 50 years since the Apollo landing, however, the public's interest in civil service has plummeted back down to earth. Many Founding Fathers such as Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were polymaths who chose to focus their genius on creating the best government the world had ever seen. But if Alexander Hamilton, our first Treasury secretary, were alive today, he likely would be working in Silicon Valley or Wall Street, instead of in the federal government.
First, the mission – since the days of moonshots, the federal workforce has not been asked to "dream big" or innovate. Instead, they have been tasked with managing small problems, preserving the status quo and protecting against the downside at all costs.
Second, incentives – power and prestige derive from the size of an agency's headcount and budget. In all cases, more is better.
Third, the lack of a high-performance culture – a focus on equity over merit and job stability over accountability.
Fourth, treating technology as a second-class citizen – instead, the answer to most problems has been more headcount.
Fifth, an arms-length relationship with the private sector that fails to create partnership, particularly when it comes to attracting talent in critical areas.
First, Trump has no shortage of moonshots to transform America's economic future – winning in artificial intelligence, unleashing American energy, revolutionizing financial technology with cryptocurrencies, reindustrializing the heartland, making America healthy again, and the list goes on. Inspiring missions inspire great minds who want to be a part of something truly transformational.
Second, changing the incentives that ultimately drive civil service behavior. If we give employees permission to take "measured" risks, to think from first principles, to be willing to pilot new ideas with the understanding that we won't score a 100%, to make operational efficiency and stewardship of taxpayer dollars a first-class citizen, we can change behavior. Let's reward creativity, continuous improvement and doing more with less; power should no longer derive from organizational bloat, but rather from financially sound outcomes.
Third, we can create a high-performance culture. We must disproportionately reward those who create the most value for the taxpayer and remove employees from the organization who aren't able to respond to performance improvement guidance. No more "peanut buttering" of annual evaluations and bonuses to achieve equity goals; we should instead demand excellence.
But if Alexander Hamilton, our first Treasury secretary, were alive today, he likely would be working in Silicon Valley or Wall Street, instead of in the federal government.
Fourth, make the adoption of technology a key tenet of success. The government should be a leading testing ground for new technologies, rather than the last bastion of mainframe computers. Eliminate the "not invented here" bias that pervades government adoption of technology; we don't need to build bespoke applications when third parties have superior solutions.
Lastly, embrace the private sector to partner on talent. We can build out public-private exchanges, secondment opportunities, and higher education pathways to ensure that the government gets access to the best and brightest. Of course, many people may ultimately choose to spend the majority of their careers in the private sector, but they can still contribute to success in the public sector.
President Trump is ushering in a Golden Age for America by reforming the government bureaucracy to work for the American people. We will make the civil service great again. The future of our nation depends on it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
10 States That Will Benefit Most From SALT Deduction Cap Increase
President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill that passed in Congress in July 2025 included a provision to raise the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap to $40,000 from the previous $10,000. 'An additional $30,000 in deductions could amount to about $10,500 in annual tax savings for such homeowners, assuming a 35% federal marginal tax rate,' senior economist Jake Kimmel said in an email. broke down the 10 states and 10 metropolitan areas with the highest percentage of properties with taxes over $10,000, that stand to really benefit from the SALT cap increase. Find Out: Read Next: Top 10 States With Highest Share of Properties Taxed Over $10,000 NJ 39.9% NY 25.9% CT 19.4% CA 19.3% MA 18.4% NH 16.3% DC 15.6% IL 13.7% TX 12.4% RI 9.3% Learn More: Top 10 Metros With Highest Share of Properties Taxed Over $10,000 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 47.9% New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 47.8% San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 40.9% Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT 39.3% Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY 37.5% Trenton-Princeton, NJ 35.8% Nantucket, MA 35.5% Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 32.0% Jackson, WY-ID 28.7% Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 28.1% Presumably, these areas will benefit the most from the SALT deduction cap increase. 'The winners of this deduction will most definitely be the middle- to upper-middle-class earners of high-tax states,' said Tasha Preisner, managing partner at DeMar Consulting Group. But, even if you fall into this category, there are important considerations before you jump to begin itemizing deductions again. The Return of Itemizations for Some Taxpayers The Big Beautiful Bill also brings about an increase in the standard deduction up to $15,750 for single taxpayers and $31,500 for joint filers. This is still less than the SALT cap, which means it might make sense for some taxpayers to itemize in 2025. 'Many homeowners stopped itemizing their taxes after the 2017 TCJA [was introduced] … and the standard deduction was expanded, giving little incentive for itemization,' Preisner said. 'These homeowners will likely start itemizing again.' But itemizing requires careful tax prep, saving receipts and potentially seeking the help of experts. 'More taxpayers will be turning to professionals to help them with their tax planning and tax preparation rather than doing it themselves,' Preisner predicted. Tax Planning To Maximize Deductions The SALT cap deduction increase phases out as income rises, with anyone earning $600,000 or more subject to the $10,000 cap. Preisner said this may change how some wealthier individuals handle tax planning. 'Those that earn close to the phase-out limit will structure their 'on-paper' income to show income that is less than the MAGI to be able to qualify for the extra deductions. It may discourage taxpayers from making Roth conversions, [taking] capital gains or taking extra bonuses,' she said. Even those who aren't on the fence, income-wise, might change their behavior to maximize their itemized deductions. 'This is going to revive interest in taxpayers giving to charities and keeping their medical receipts as these deductions add to the SALT deductions, increasing their overall itemized deduction capacity,' she said. Real Impact on Real Estate Preisner said the change has potential to affect the real estate market in high-tax areas, as well. 'It may influence taxpayers' relocation decisions to higher-taxed areas,' she said. 'It may also encourage real estate purchases in 2025 through 2029 but dampen the housing market in 2030 when the cap drops back to $10,000.' More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs This article originally appeared on 10 States That Will Benefit Most From SALT Deduction Cap Increase Sign in to access your portfolio


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war
Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman admitted that his party had gotten it wrong about President Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that, so far, the U.S. trade war is 'going well.' Asked by Fox News Digital whether he thought the Trump administration was winning the trade war, Fetterman responded, 'Absolutely.' Advertisement 'I'm a huge fan of Bill Maher, and I mean, I think he's really one of the oracles for my party, and he acknowledged it, it's like, hey, he thought that the tariffs were going to tank the economy, and then he acknowledged that it didn't,' said Fetterman. 'So, for me,' he went on, 'it seems like the E.U. thing has been going well, and I guess we'll see how it happens with China.' This comes as Trump is increasing the tariff on Canada from 25% to 35% beginning on Friday, after the U.S. neighbor to the north failed to help curb the imports of fentanyl and other illicit drugs. The White House noted that Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to increase the tariff in an effort to hold Canada accountable for its role in the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. Advertisement 3 Sen. John Fetterman admitted Democrats are wrong about President Trump's tariffs, claiming that the trade war is 'going well.' AP Additionally, Trump signed another executive order on Thursday to modify the reciprocal tariff rates for some countries to further address the United States' trade deficits. The action reflects Trump's efforts to protect the U.S. from foreign threats to national security and the economy by securing 'fair, balanced and reciprocal trade relationships,' the White House said. Earlier this year, Trump announced an additional 10% tariff on all countries as well as higher tariffs for countries the U.S. has large trade deficits with. Advertisement The tariffs became effective on April 9. Since then, Trump and his team have since made several trade deals with several countries. The U.S. struck a deal with the European Union in which the EU agreed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and make new investments of $600 billion by 2028. The EU also agreed to accept a 15% tariff rate. Advertisement The U.S. also made a deal with Japan, which agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S. to rebuild and expand core American industries. 3 President Trump has raised the tariff rate on Canada from 25% to 25%. / MEGA Japan also agreed to further its own market to U.S. exports, and like the EU, Japan agreed to a baseline 15% tariff rate. However, many Democrats are digging in their heels against Trump's tariffs strategy, saying the negative effects are still on the horizon. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., forecast that, despite the increased revenue, 'within a few weeks or months, you'll start seeing significant increases in most things you buy. And also, you will see disruption in terms of a lot of our industries, because they're not able to access product or supply.' 'When you have across-the-board tariffs, it does operate like a national sales tax, and I think people are going to be more and more hurt,' predicted Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. 'This is the president who said he was going to come in and reduce prices. Prices are going to rise, and they're going to rise more over time,' said Van Hollen. Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that 'Donald Trump may beat his chest and say, 'Man, I made him take a 15% tariff or 25% tariff,' but also understand that every one of those trading partners is now looking hard all around the rest of the world to find other customers, because Donald Trump is signaling loud and clear that the United States under Donald Trump is not a reliable trading partner. And that's not good for any of us.' Advertisement Warren also claimed that Trump's tariffs are the reason the Federal Reserve has not lowered U.S. interest rates. 3 Fetterman still remains isolated from his party, taking Trump's side in the trade war, as many Democrats argue that negative effects are still on the horizon. AP 'Jerome Powell said last month that he would have lowered interest rates back in February if it hadn't been for the chaos that Donald Trump was creating over trade. And the consequence has been that American families have, for six months now, been paying more on credit cards, more on car loans, more home mortgages, all because Donald Trump has created chaos,' she said. Meanwhile, Republicans whom Fox News Digital spoke with urged the president to double down on his tariff strategy. Advertisement 'I think it's exactly the right approach. It's what I have been urging the president to do, and I think the successes he's winning are big wins for America,' said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. In response to Democrats still predicting economic fallout because of the tariffs, Cruz sarcastically remarked, 'I'm shocked, shocked that Democrats are rooting for the economy to do badly under President Trump.' 'It'd be nice if some Democrats would put their partisan hatred for Trump aside and actually start working together for American workers and American jobs. Unfortunately, I don't see a whole lot of Democrats interested in doing that right now,' said Cruz. Advertisement Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., while agreeing that the tariffs have been successful, voiced that he hopes the goal is to ultimately achieve reciprocal zero percent tariffs between the U.S. and its trade partners. 'Clearly, the president got a good deal from one perspective. The Europeans just caved, they did. Fifteen percent tariffs on them, zero on us, commitment to invest in our country. But the part of the deal I like the most, the E.U. and the president agreed that a whole bunch of goods would be tariff-free. That is, no American tariffs and no E.U. tariffs. It's called reciprocity, and ideal reciprocity is zero on both sides,' he explained. 'That's what I would like us to achieve in all the trade deals,' Kennedy explained. 'Let the free enterprise system work. May the best product at the best price win. That, to me, would be the perfect situation.' Fox News Digital's Greg Wehner contributed to this report.


Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Smithsonian to restore Trump to impeachment exhibit ‘in the coming weeks'
The Smithsonian said on Saturday that it would restore information about President Donald Trump's two impeachments to an exhibit in the National Museum of American History 'in the coming weeks.' The Washington Post reported on Thursday that in July, the museum removed a placard describing Trump's impeachments and reverted the exhibit to how it looked in 2008. That display says that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal' — Andrew Johnson, Richard M. Nixon and Bill Clinton.