Trump hails $550 billion agreement with Japan as ‘largest trade deal', claims US to gain 90% profits
Donald Trump
announced what he described as a breakthrough trade agreement with
Japan
, following months of stalled negotiations and tariff threats.
'We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made. Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits. This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it,' Trump posted on
Truth Social
.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Data Science
PGDM
MCA
CXO
Project Management
Healthcare
Product Management
Data Analytics
Digital Marketing
Technology
healthcare
MBA
others
Operations Management
Others
Finance
Degree
Public Policy
Artificial Intelligence
Leadership
Management
Data Science
Cybersecurity
Design Thinking
Skills you'll gain:
Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation
Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques
Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis
Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI
Duration:
8 Months
IIM Kozhikode
Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence
Starts on
Jun 26, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Interpretation
Programming Proficiency
Problem-Solving Skills
Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT MSc in Data Science
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
Later that evening, at a reception with Republican lawmakers at the
White House
, he repeated the scale of the agreement.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You
Mobility Scooter | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
'I just signed the largest trade deal in history; I think maybe the largest deal in history with Japan. They had their top people here, and we worked on it long and hard. And it's a great deal for everybody,' he said.
What the deal includes
According to CNN, the agreement introduces a 15% reciprocal tariff on Japanese goods entering the US. Japan, in turn, will open its markets to key American exports such as cars, trucks,
rice
, and agricultural products.
Live Events
'Perhaps most importantly, Japan will open their Country to Trade including Cars and Trucks, Rice and certain other Agricultural Products, and other things. Japan will pay Reciprocal Tariffs to the United States of 15%,' Trump said in another Truth Social post.
He did not specify how the $550 billion investment would be structured, nor how profits would be calculated. No official documentation outlining the deal has yet been released by either side.
Trump closed his remarks by calling the moment 'a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan.'
Rice and Cars: Key points of disagreement
Trade in rice was one of the more contentious topics in negotiations. Just weeks ago, Trump had written, 'They won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' again on Truth Social.
Japan imported $298 million worth of US rice last year, and $114 million between January and April of this year, according to CNN. But American exporters have long complained about the difficulty of entering Japan's market. A 2021 report by the Office of the United States Trade Representative under then-President Joe Biden stated, 'Japan's highly regulated and non-transparent system of importation and distribution for rice limits the ability of US exporters to have meaningful access to Japan's consumers.'
Cars were another sticking point. Earlier this month, Trump remarked, 'We didn't give them one car in 10 years.' However, data from the
Japan Automobile Importers Association
shows Japan imported 16,707 American-made vehicles in 2024.
Tensions before the deal
Both sides had signalled frustration with the drawn-out process. In June, when asked about a deal's prospects, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, 'They're tough. The Japanese are tough.'
In early July, Trump sent a formal letter to
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba
threatening a 30% tariff on Japanese goods if no deal was reached by 1 August. That followed a 24% reciprocal tariff placed earlier this year, which had been paused for 90 days from April amid global market unrest.
The clock ticking towards August gave talks a renewed urgency. The Japan agreement was one of three trade announcements Trump made on Tuesday, alongside pending deals with the
European Union
and others.
Japan's cautious response
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has not confirmed the full terms of the agreement.
'As for what to make of the outcome of the negotiations, I am not able to discuss it until after we carefully examine the details of the negotiations and the agreement,' Ishiba told reporters on Wednesday.
Japan's chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, posted on Facebook that he had visited the White House with the caption 'Mission accomplished.'
Back home, Ishiba faces political pressure after his Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in Japan's upper house over the weekend. The party had already lost control of the more powerful lower house last year, leaving Ishiba's leadership on unstable ground.
Market reactions and expert views
Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 rose by 2% on Wednesday morning, buoyed by investor optimism. Shares in
Toyota
, Nissan, and Honda climbed after Japanese broadcaster NHK reported that tariffs on Japanese carmakers might be reduced.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who met with Ishiba in Tokyo days before the announcement, struck an optimistic tone.
'A good deal is more important than a rushed deal, and a mutually beneficial trade agreement between the United States and Japan remains within the realm of possibility,' Bessent posted on X.
Mary Lovely, a trade expert at the Peterson Institute, told CNN, 'The 'deal' relieves Japan of the 25% tariff threat and puts it potentially in a competitive position vis a vis similar US suppliers. The US is unlikely to sell many cars and trucks… from the US. Agricultural liberalisation (is) a win for Japanese consumers, assuming they are willing to try excellent California rice.'
Japan remains one of the US's most important trading partners. It was the fifth-largest source of imports in 2024, shipping $148 billion worth of goods to the US. These included cars, auto parts, and industrial machinery.
Meanwhile, the US exported $80 billion worth of goods to Japan, including oil, pharmaceuticals, and aerospace technology.
Japan is also the largest foreign holder of US debt, owning $1.1 trillion in Treasury securities. That gives Tokyo some leverage in negotiations, though it is also balancing trade ties with China, its biggest trading partner.
The new deal follows a 2019 expanded trade pact between the two countries, which came into effect in 2020 and allowed more goods to move duty-free. Tuesday's announcement suggests a shift toward more aggressive tariff-based policy under Trump, who continues to press allies to reduce trade with China.
With the August 1 deadline looming, attention now turns to the full release of terms and how Japan will formally respond. The White House has yet to issue an official fact sheet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship restrictions in third ruling since high court decision
A federal judge on Friday (July 25, 2025) blocked the Trump administration from ending birthright citizenship for the children of parents who are in the U.S. illegally, issuing the third court ruling blocking the birthright order nationwide since a key Supreme Court decision in June. U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin, joining another district court as well as an appellate panel of judges, found that a nationwide injunction granted to more than a dozen States remains in force under an exception to the Supreme Court ruling. That decision restricted the power of lower-court judges to issue nationwide injunctions. The States have argued Mr. Trump's birthright citizenship order is blatantly unconstitutional and threatens millions of dollars for health insurance services that are contingent on citizenship status. The issue is expected to move quickly back to the nation's highest court. Lawyers for the government had argued Mr. Sorokin should narrow the reach of his earlier ruling granting a preliminary injunction, arguing it should be 'tailored to the States' purported financial injuries.' 'The record does not support a finding that any narrower option would feasibly and adequately protect the plaintiffs from the injuries they have shown they are likely to suffer,' Mr. Sorokin wrote. Mr. Sorokin acknowledged his order would not be the last word on birthright citizenship. Mr. Trump and his administration 'are entitled to pursue their interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and no doubt the Supreme Court will ultimately settle the question,' Mr. Sorokin wrote. 'But in the meantime, for purposes of this lawsuit at this juncture, the Executive Order is unconstitutional.' The administration has not yet appealed any of the recent court rulings. Mr. Trump's efforts to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily will remain blocked unless and until the Supreme Court says otherwise. An email asking for the White House's response to the ruling was sent on Friday. A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a ruling earlier this month prohibiting Trump's executive order from taking effect nationwide in a new class-action lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante in New Hampshire had paused his own decision to allow for the Trump administration to appeal, but with no appeal filed in the last week, his order went into effect. On Wednesday (July 23, 2025), a San Francisco-based appeals court found the President's executive order unconstitutional and affirmed a lower court's nationwide block. A Maryland-based judge said this week that she would do the same if an appeals court signed off. The justices ruled last month that lower courts generally can't issue nationwide injunctions, but it didn't rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class-action lawsuits and those brought by States. The Supreme Court did not decide whether the underlying citizenship order is constitutional. Plaintiffs in the Boston case earlier argued that the principle of birthright citizenship is 'enshrined in the Constitution,' and that Mr. Trump does not have the authority to issue the order, which they called a 'flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands of American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage.' They also argue that Mr. Trump's order halting automatic citizenship for babies born to people in the U.S. illegally or temporarily would cost States funding they rely on to 'provide essential services' — from foster care to health care for low-income children, to 'early interventions for infants, toddlers, and students with disabilities.' At the heart of the lawsuits is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision. That decision found that Mr. Scott, an enslaved man, wasn't a citizen despite having lived in a state where slavery was outlawed. The Trump administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship.
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Birthright Order Blocked Again in Fresh Legal Setback
President Donald Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship was blocked nationwide for the third time in less than a month, the latest sign that a US Supreme Court decision restricting 'universal injunctions' is having little impact on the dispute. The injunctions set up what is likely to be yet another set of appeals that could reach the Supreme Court, which has largely backed Trump in his broad crackdown on immigration. The justices haven't yet taken up the question of whether Trump's birthright citizenship order is constitutional. A federal judge in Boston ruled on Friday that an injunction pausing Trump's order nationwide is the only way to offer full protection to the Democratic-led states the filed the suit. The judge said his actions are in line with the Supreme Court's findings. US Judge Leo Sorokin said in his ruling that he could not narrow his injunction in part because Justice Department lawyers hadn't offered useful details about how such a ruling would work. 'With stakes this high, the court simply cannot adopt the defendants' blasé approach to the details and workability of a more limited injunction,' the judge said. A nationwide injunction protecting all affected babies was granted in a class-action suit in New Hampshire on July 10, while a federal appeals court this week upheld a similar block in a suit brought by four Democratic-led states. The new ruling comes in a suit brought by 18 states. A judge in a separate class-action suit is weighing another potential injunction. The Fight Over Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order: QuickTake Trump's order would restrict citizenship to babies with at least one parent who is a US citizen or green card holder. Critics say it violates a provision of the Constitution that grants citizenship to virtually every baby born in the US. The government says the directive closes a loophole that encourages illegal immigration. Trump's order was initially put on hold nationwide months ago in three separate cases. But the Supreme Court on June 27 paused those orders after ruling that judges generally can't issue nationwide injunctions that block federal policies outright. The justices returned the cases to the lower courts to weigh whether their injunctions needed to be narrowed or amended so that they provide relief only to the people or groups that sued. Sorokin held a hearing on the matter earlier this week. The Supreme Court's opinion, hailed as a major victory by the Trump administration, hasn't stopped judges from finding that broad injunctions against the president's birthright citizenship order are still necessary to protect US-born children of migrants while the cases proceed. In their request to maintain a nationwide injunction, the Democratic-led states said the Supreme Court's finding on so-called universal injunctions 'has no bearing on this case.' The states argue that a nationwide injunction is the only way to prevent harm that they say would be caused by allowing the executive order to take effect in some states, creating a chaotic patchwork of citizenship. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Investors eye possible US-Europe trade deal as deadline looms
NEW YORK, July 26 (Reuters) - Investors are hopeful a potential trade deal between the U.S. and European Union could bring more certainty to markets ahead of next Friday's tariffs deadline. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was set to meet U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday in Scotland after EU officials and diplomats said they expected to reach a framework deal this weekend. Trump on Friday said there was a 50-50 chance or perhaps less that the U.S. would reach a trade agreement with the EU. Trade tensions between the U.S. and Europe may have provided some investors with a rationale to be cautious, said Sameer Samana, head of global equities and real assets at the Wells Fargo Investment Institute. "It's one of our largest trading relationships... So if that last piece falls into place, then you've probably got at the margin more people that have to get back in the markets," Samana said. "It's been a source of uncertainty that will go away." A deal would likely include a 15% baseline tariff on all EU goods entering the U.S. and probably a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum, the officials and diplomats said. Optimism over easing trade tensions broadly has helped push U.S. stocks to record highs. Trump's April 2 "Liberation Day" announcement of sweeping global tariffs sent stocks plunging in the immediate aftermath, due to spiking fears about a recession that have since faded. Still, investors have been bracing for increased volatility heading into August 1, which the U.S. has set as a deadline for raising levies on a broad swath of trading partners. The EU is facing U.S. tariffs on more than 70% of its exports - 50% on steel and aluminum, 25% on cars and car parts and a 10% levy on most other EU goods, which Trump has said he would hike to 30% on August 1. Hopes for a deal with Europe rose after Trump struck a trade agreement with Japan earlier in the week. "The deal with Japan and the likely one soon with the EU are especially important given both are major U.S. trading partners, together accounting for about a quarter of all goods imports," analysts at Capital Economics said in a note on Friday. In the agreement with Japan, the country's auto sector, which accounts for more than a quarter of its U.S. exports, will see existing tariffs cut to 15% from levies totaling 27.5% previously. An agreement that also lowers EU auto tariffs to 15% "would be no small deal" for the region as well, as about 10% of its shipments to the U.S. are in the same category, Capital Economics said. Investors over the weekend were also watching for developments on trade between the U.S. and China. Officials from the two countries plan to meet in Stockholm next week to discuss extending an August 12 deadline for negotiating a deal. (Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf; Editing by Alden Bentley and Edward Tobin)
