Reform is a one-man personality cult, says Welsh Tory leader
Opinion polls have suggested a four way split among most voters, with the latest poll indicating that Plaid Cymru had the most support at 30%, with Reform on 25%, Labour 18% and the Tories 13%. Reform came second in 13 Welsh seats at the last general election but failed to win any MPs.It has yet to pick someone to be the party's main spokesperson or leader, and has not announced who might stand for the party.
In his second speech to the conference in Llangollen, Millar is expected to "address the idea that the answer to Labour is to vote Reform".He will say: "I share many of your concerns about unsustainable levels of immigration, the impact of net zero on energy bills and jobs and the woke agenda."But wagging a finger and shouting about these things from the side-lines is easy."Reform have utterly failed to offer any real, serious, costed or deliverable solutions for the problems they spout about."Nor have they been honest about the public about the limitations of the Senedd's powers to address some of these issues."
There is "clear blue water between the Welsh Conservatives and Reform", he will say, in a reference to the phrase "clear red water" used to explain the difference between Welsh and Westminster Labour under the late first minister Rhodri Morgan."They are a one-man personality cult – we Welsh Conservatives are a united team."They are a limited company – we are a professional political party."And where they offer slogans – we offer serious solutions."Millar will attack Plaid Cymru, saying the party has been "joined at the hip" with Labour for years."Labour failures are Plaid failures," he's expected to say, calling Labour "clapped out".As the second party in the Senedd, the Conservatives are keen to present themselves as a government in waiting ahead of the next election.But the party has polled in fourth place in recent opinion polls.The next Senedd will introduce a new system that will better reflect how people voted in the result. That means that, without a surprise result, it is likely that two or more parties would need to work together to help form the next Welsh government.That could be either through a coalition or a more informal agreement.
On Friday Millar said he would be willing to work with "anyone" to get Labour out of power, not ruling out working with Plaid Cymru or Reform.He laid out a series of policies including a promise to bring down NHS waiting times and reinstate home economics in schools.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Angela Rayner to put 'BANTER POLICE' in your office: Watch what you say by the water cooler! Workers' rights Bill pressures firms to spy on 'inappropriate' conversations
has been accused of plotting to censor workplace banter by deploying a network of spies in businesses across the country. Under new laws drawn up by the Deputy Prime Minister, firms will be pressured into bankrolling 'diversity officers', whose jobs would include protecting staff from the content of overheard conversations. Last night, the Tories warned that the so-called 'banter police' would have a 'chilling effect' on businesses already struggling under the weight of high taxes and excess regulation under Labour. Under Ms Rayner's Employment Rights Bill, employers must try to protect their staff from harassment by third parties. It means, for example, that a worker could take an employer to tribunal if they feel jokes or banter they overhear was offensive on grounds such as race, sex or religion if their bosses didn't do 'all they could' to prevent it. That is likely to lead to firms taking on more diversity officers to monitor what people are saying to help them prove they had taken sufficient steps to protect their workers. The Bill fails to stipulate any ring fence allowing the expression of opinions on political, moral, religious or social matters – which the Tories said they would have insisted upon. Ms Rayner's legislation also paves the way to greater unionisation in the workplace, which companies fear will take Britain back to the dark days of the 1970s, making it more burdensome to employ workers and leaving the firms vulnerable to ruinous strikes. The Bill requires bosses to give trade union representatives time off for matters 'relating to equality in the workplace' – further adding to costs, and to the number of potential busybodies monitoring speech. Ms Rayner's political opponents point out that she has received thousands of pounds in donations from unions which will benefit from the legislation. Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'Employers are already bleeding out because of Labour's war on business, and this will make matters much worse. Pressuring private firms to hire diversity officers to pursue woke agendas has so far gone under the radar – but it will be the final nail in the coffin for many. 'Innocent office banter will be spied on by wokerati thought police. These banter tsars will have a chilling effect in workplaces. 'We can already see in Rayner's own Whitehall department how taxpayers are footing the bill for this divisive political agenda. With her personally bankrolled by the unions, this is clearly a grubby deal that feathers both nests.' The number of employment tribunal claims relating to 'banter' in the workplace rose by 45 per cent in 2021 alone, and bosses fear the new legislations will cause this to spiral even faster. The changes would be a boon for outfits such as Inclusive Employers, which offers 'banter workplace training'. It states: 'Banter, when unchecked, can escalate into harmful behaviour, including bullying, harassment, and discrimination... Harmless banter can quickly cross the line and lead to more serious issues.' The new laws will also roll back moves by the last Conservative government to stop Whitehall spending taxpayers' money on 'diversity, equality and inclusion' initiatives. Central to the plans are the repeal of Tory trade union laws which will reduce the threshold for strike action and make union funding of the Labour Party automatic. It will also end zero-hours contracts, strengthen redundancy and flexible working rights and allow companies to be taken to employment tribunals even if the employees concerned do not want to sue. The laws will make it far easier for unions to infiltrate workplaces and to operate even if just 2 per cent of the staff join. The Bill says: 'Introducing explicit protections from third-party harassment will ensure that victims can be confident that they have recourse to legal redress if their employer has not taken all reasonable steps to protect them'. A government spokesman said: 'The Employment Rights Bill will not affect anyone's right to lawful free speech, which this Government stands firmly behind. 'Upsetting remarks do not fall within the definition of harassment. 'We are strengthening workplace protections to tackle harassment and protect employees from intimidating and hostile abuse as well as sexual harassment.' A government source added: 'Courts and tribunals will continue to be required to balance rights on the facts of each case, including the rights to free expression.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Even poorest OAPs face paying income tax in new stealth raid on state pension - in Labour plans that could come as early as next year
Labour was last night accused of betrayal after it was revealed that everyone on the full state pension will be forced to pay income tax as early as next year – even if they have no other income. Millions of Britain's poorest pensioners face being dragged into an 'old-age tax trap' as Chancellor Rachel Reeves desperately attempts to fill a growing black hole in the public finances. The extraordinary prospect, which threatens to spark a 'grey revolt' among furious older voters, arises because the personal allowance – the level at which income becomes taxable – is stuck at £12,570 at least until 2028. But the state pension, which pays 12.9 million men and women over the age of 66 up to £11,973 a year, is on track to breach that limit before then because of higher-than-expected growth in wages – especially in the public sector. Under the triple-lock system, the state pension increases by the rate of inflation, annual earnings growth or 2.5 per cent – whichever is the highest. If average earnings continue to grow at their current rate of 5.2 per cent, next year's state pension will rise above the income tax threshold for the first time since it was introduced more than a century ago. This will force pensioners who rely entirely on the state pension to pay the basic tax rate of 20 per cent on any amount above the personal allowance limit. The exact figure will be confirmed later this year. The hardest hit will be those who retired after 2016 and have paid a full 35 years of National Insurance contributions. Last night Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, a campaign group for pensioners, accused Labour of a 'mean approach' and betraying the triple lock pledge it made at last year's election. 'If triple lock increases start being taxed it obviously is a betrayal because Labour promised to keep the triple lock at the existing formula for the whole of this Parliament. It's a rather sneaky way round of undermining the triple lock.' It comes days after Ms Reeves was seen openly crying while sitting next to Keir Starmer in the House of Commons. An extraordinary Government U-turn over welfare reform last week, in the face of a Labour backbench rebellion, has blown a £5 billion black hole in the Chancellor's financial plans. Combined with weak economic performance, Ms Reeves may have to impose further punishing tax hikes, possibly as high as £30 billion, later this year. Mr Reed accused the Treasury of an 'anti-pensioner approach'. He said pensions minister Torsten Bell called for the triple lock to be phased out when he ran the Resolution Foundation think-tank. Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride last night told The Mail on Sunday: 'Labour have shown where their priorities lie. Last winter, they deprived millions of vulnerable pensioners of their winter fuel payments. 'Next year they will start taxing people who rely on the state pension as their only income in retirement.' He added: 'At the election last year the Conservatives promised to protect the state pension from being dragged into tax – Labour chose not to match that commitment. 'They claim to be protecting pensioners through the triple lock, but this stealth tax will erode its value.' It is thought the pensioner 'tax trap' could hit Labour at the polls. More than 126,000 older people signed a petition urging Ms Reeves to stop pensioners reliant on the state pension being dragged back into the tax system.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Ex-Archbishop of Wales says retiring painful amid Bangor cathedral crisis
The former Archbishop of Wales has told the BBC that his decision to retire was the right one for himself and the to BBC Radio Cymru's Bwrw Golwg, Andrew John said the decision had affected him."It has been very painful and my mental health has suffered in a way I've never experienced before, but that's a consequence of having to make big decisions," he announced he was retiring with immediate effect just over a week ago after the publication of the summaries of two critical reports mentioned "a culture in which sexual boundaries seemed blurred", excessive alcohol consumption, as well as governance and safeguarding weaknesses at Bangor Cathedral. While there is no suggestion the archbishop behaved inappropriately, the church's representative body had said there must be a "change in leadership, procedures and governance in the Diocese of Bangor".After the publication of the summaries, he had faced criticism and calls to stand down, with calls for an independent inquiry into the archbishop, who will also step down as Bishop of Bangor next month, said he had little choice but to go."Being present at the meeting and [to] have people more or less calling for your resignation was like being in a nightmare," he said."I know the people who were in that meeting."I don't think I had a chance to explain the changes we've made and how complicated things are, but having heard from them I don't want to be a problem for them either."I think it's a good decision for the future." He said he did not feel he had the opportunity to emphasise the improvements which had already been made and regretted not being more open with the press to explain what was former archbishop said it was difficult, given the church needed to show whistleblowers it was treating what they said in said he did not know about the "drinking culture" around the choir in Bangor Cathedral."The idea that they went out after important services, that they went out until late saddens me," he said."It gives a bad impression of the diocese. It was a shock to hear about heavy drinking in the diocese."He said allegations of people making inappropriate jokes around children were "unacceptable" and that changes in culture were acknowledged financial mismanagement had been a problem and that a "lot of mistakes had been made".But said he was not unhappy that about £20,000 had been spent on two trips to Rome and one to Dublin."I'm not unhappy, because the diocese decided to have those three trips," he said."It's not extravagant with 20 people travelling." 'These things happened under my watch' He admitted he had not paid enough attention to the cathedral, but said that was down to his role as archbishop, which meant taking on wider asked what his biggest regret was, he said not ensuring there was a structure in place in the cathedral to deal with some of the issues and that he had been part of the problem."It pains me that these things happened under my watch and I'll have to live with that," he said."Bangor is a fantastic diocese."The damage done to the diocese, because I didn't pay enough attention to problems, is a burden I'll carry."He said he thought change would take years, but that the church would have to work together to ensure that change said he did not feel he had been mistreated, but added he had been shocked by some of the comments directed towards him on social media."It's been very difficult to see what people are saying on social media."I'm a bishop and a leader in the church, these things have happened during my tenure, so it's only right to give someone else the opportunity to take responsibility for the future."
