
Is your superannuation balance higher than your postcode average?
The 2282 postcode topped the Hunter list with a median of $117,397, which encompasses Eleebana, Lakelands, and Warners Bay.
The superannuation data is for the 2022-23 financial year, which the ATO recently released as part of its taxation statistics.
The 2291 postcode of Merewether, Merewether Heights and The Junction was the second highest with $109,785, followed by 2305, which includes Kotara East, New Lambton, and New Lambton Heights, at $104,886.
Wangi Wangi rounded out the top four at $103,837.
Despite ranking at 23rd for median, the 2300 postcode for Newcastle, Newcastle East, Cooks Hill, Bar Beach, and The Hill topped the list for average superannuation at $317,597.
University of Newcastle Associate Professor of finance Mia Pham said this was an example of income inequality.
"The 2300 covers inner-city Newcastle, and we can see that this area has a diverse mix of professionals, and we also have students, renters, and retirees," she said.
"So the fact that it ranks high in average superannuation, but low in median tells us there's a wide gap between the top and the bottom.
"It could be that a few individuals have very large super balances. For example, older professionals or those people that have a high income and it can skew the average upward."
The 2291 postcode was second-highest for average at $310,451, while Salamander Bay and Soldiers Point's postcode of 2317 was third highest at $248,851.
Low-socioeconomic areas like Windale were on the other end of the scale. The 2306 postcode had a median superannuation of $17,467 and an average of $51,658.
Associate Professor Pham said factors such as average income, employment and age played a role in an area's superannuation spread.
"Many residents may work in casual or part-time roles, which don't always come with consistent super contribution," she said.
"Areas with a younger population have less time to accumulate the super."
The 2308 postcode, made up entirely of the University of Newcastle campus, had a median super of $1220 and an average of $12,160.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents also face systemic barriers to wealth building, Associate Professor Pham said.
"Another thing is the culture and social factor, because some people, let's say, the migrant population, they may have a lower balance because they just recently joined the workforce," she said.
The option to access superannuation during the pandemic was also more commonly used by people who were on lower incomes or in financial distress, creating a further divide, Associate Professor Pham said.
She said the impact of withdrawing super early may be larger than people expect.
"So let's say if a person withdraws about $20,000 at the age of 30, and if that money had stayed and earned a 7 per cent annual return, it could have rolled to over $150,000 by the age of 60, and by the age of 67, it's going to be more than $200,000," she said.
"So you can see that's a huge shortfall and it's entirely due to missing out on decades of compounding.
"I think early withdrawal was something people had to do, but it's going to be a really high price that they have to pay later in life and especially for those who already face the financial disadvantages."
The Association of Super Funds Australia recommends couples need $690,000 to comfortably retire on, while single people need $595,000.
That number assumes the person owns their home and receives some support from the age pension.
Associate Professor Pham said it also varied depending on different factors. For example, people in regional areas may need less than those in capital cities.
The estimate has increased from $500,000 for a single and about $580,000 for a couple 10 years ago.
Associate Professor Pham believed there should be more financial literacy to educate people about superannuation and address economic inequality.
"Many people do not understand how superannuation works," she said.
"They may not understand about the tax benefit of voluntary contributions or the compounding power of the investment.
"Sometimes they just consider super as set and forget. Studies show that many people don't know that the super fund they belong to performed very poorly, and they never change the fund."
The federal government has recently introduced initiatives to help bridge the gap, such as a tax on high-value accounts and a superannuation guarantee on parental leave.
Associate Professor Pham said those initiatives would make a difference, but that she would also like to see more regulation that encouraged employees to make voluntary contributions, particularly those on lower incomes.
Four Hunter postcodes have a median superannuation of more than $100,000, and a surprising area has topped the list, according to recent Australian Tax Office data.
The 2282 postcode topped the Hunter list with a median of $117,397, which encompasses Eleebana, Lakelands, and Warners Bay.
The superannuation data is for the 2022-23 financial year, which the ATO recently released as part of its taxation statistics.
The 2291 postcode of Merewether, Merewether Heights and The Junction was the second highest with $109,785, followed by 2305, which includes Kotara East, New Lambton, and New Lambton Heights, at $104,886.
Wangi Wangi rounded out the top four at $103,837.
Despite ranking at 23rd for median, the 2300 postcode for Newcastle, Newcastle East, Cooks Hill, Bar Beach, and The Hill topped the list for average superannuation at $317,597.
University of Newcastle Associate Professor of finance Mia Pham said this was an example of income inequality.
"The 2300 covers inner-city Newcastle, and we can see that this area has a diverse mix of professionals, and we also have students, renters, and retirees," she said.
"So the fact that it ranks high in average superannuation, but low in median tells us there's a wide gap between the top and the bottom.
"It could be that a few individuals have very large super balances. For example, older professionals or those people that have a high income and it can skew the average upward."
The 2291 postcode was second-highest for average at $310,451, while Salamander Bay and Soldiers Point's postcode of 2317 was third highest at $248,851.
Low-socioeconomic areas like Windale were on the other end of the scale. The 2306 postcode had a median superannuation of $17,467 and an average of $51,658.
Associate Professor Pham said factors such as average income, employment and age played a role in an area's superannuation spread.
"Many residents may work in casual or part-time roles, which don't always come with consistent super contribution," she said.
"Areas with a younger population have less time to accumulate the super."
The 2308 postcode, made up entirely of the University of Newcastle campus, had a median super of $1220 and an average of $12,160.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents also face systemic barriers to wealth building, Associate Professor Pham said.
"Another thing is the culture and social factor, because some people, let's say, the migrant population, they may have a lower balance because they just recently joined the workforce," she said.
The option to access superannuation during the pandemic was also more commonly used by people who were on lower incomes or in financial distress, creating a further divide, Associate Professor Pham said.
She said the impact of withdrawing super early may be larger than people expect.
"So let's say if a person withdraws about $20,000 at the age of 30, and if that money had stayed and earned a 7 per cent annual return, it could have rolled to over $150,000 by the age of 60, and by the age of 67, it's going to be more than $200,000," she said.
"So you can see that's a huge shortfall and it's entirely due to missing out on decades of compounding.
"I think early withdrawal was something people had to do, but it's going to be a really high price that they have to pay later in life and especially for those who already face the financial disadvantages."
The Association of Super Funds Australia recommends couples need $690,000 to comfortably retire on, while single people need $595,000.
That number assumes the person owns their home and receives some support from the age pension.
Associate Professor Pham said it also varied depending on different factors. For example, people in regional areas may need less than those in capital cities.
The estimate has increased from $500,000 for a single and about $580,000 for a couple 10 years ago.
Associate Professor Pham believed there should be more financial literacy to educate people about superannuation and address economic inequality.
"Many people do not understand how superannuation works," she said.
"They may not understand about the tax benefit of voluntary contributions or the compounding power of the investment.
"Sometimes they just consider super as set and forget. Studies show that many people don't know that the super fund they belong to performed very poorly, and they never change the fund."
The federal government has recently introduced initiatives to help bridge the gap, such as a tax on high-value accounts and a superannuation guarantee on parental leave.
Associate Professor Pham said those initiatives would make a difference, but that she would also like to see more regulation that encouraged employees to make voluntary contributions, particularly those on lower incomes.
Four Hunter postcodes have a median superannuation of more than $100,000, and a surprising area has topped the list, according to recent Australian Tax Office data.
The 2282 postcode topped the Hunter list with a median of $117,397, which encompasses Eleebana, Lakelands, and Warners Bay.
The superannuation data is for the 2022-23 financial year, which the ATO recently released as part of its taxation statistics.
The 2291 postcode of Merewether, Merewether Heights and The Junction was the second highest with $109,785, followed by 2305, which includes Kotara East, New Lambton, and New Lambton Heights, at $104,886.
Wangi Wangi rounded out the top four at $103,837.
Despite ranking at 23rd for median, the 2300 postcode for Newcastle, Newcastle East, Cooks Hill, Bar Beach, and The Hill topped the list for average superannuation at $317,597.
University of Newcastle Associate Professor of finance Mia Pham said this was an example of income inequality.
"The 2300 covers inner-city Newcastle, and we can see that this area has a diverse mix of professionals, and we also have students, renters, and retirees," she said.
"So the fact that it ranks high in average superannuation, but low in median tells us there's a wide gap between the top and the bottom.
"It could be that a few individuals have very large super balances. For example, older professionals or those people that have a high income and it can skew the average upward."
The 2291 postcode was second-highest for average at $310,451, while Salamander Bay and Soldiers Point's postcode of 2317 was third highest at $248,851.
Low-socioeconomic areas like Windale were on the other end of the scale. The 2306 postcode had a median superannuation of $17,467 and an average of $51,658.
Associate Professor Pham said factors such as average income, employment and age played a role in an area's superannuation spread.
"Many residents may work in casual or part-time roles, which don't always come with consistent super contribution," she said.
"Areas with a younger population have less time to accumulate the super."
The 2308 postcode, made up entirely of the University of Newcastle campus, had a median super of $1220 and an average of $12,160.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents also face systemic barriers to wealth building, Associate Professor Pham said.
"Another thing is the culture and social factor, because some people, let's say, the migrant population, they may have a lower balance because they just recently joined the workforce," she said.
The option to access superannuation during the pandemic was also more commonly used by people who were on lower incomes or in financial distress, creating a further divide, Associate Professor Pham said.
She said the impact of withdrawing super early may be larger than people expect.
"So let's say if a person withdraws about $20,000 at the age of 30, and if that money had stayed and earned a 7 per cent annual return, it could have rolled to over $150,000 by the age of 60, and by the age of 67, it's going to be more than $200,000," she said.
"So you can see that's a huge shortfall and it's entirely due to missing out on decades of compounding.
"I think early withdrawal was something people had to do, but it's going to be a really high price that they have to pay later in life and especially for those who already face the financial disadvantages."
The Association of Super Funds Australia recommends couples need $690,000 to comfortably retire on, while single people need $595,000.
That number assumes the person owns their home and receives some support from the age pension.
Associate Professor Pham said it also varied depending on different factors. For example, people in regional areas may need less than those in capital cities.
The estimate has increased from $500,000 for a single and about $580,000 for a couple 10 years ago.
Associate Professor Pham believed there should be more financial literacy to educate people about superannuation and address economic inequality.
"Many people do not understand how superannuation works," she said.
"They may not understand about the tax benefit of voluntary contributions or the compounding power of the investment.
"Sometimes they just consider super as set and forget. Studies show that many people don't know that the super fund they belong to performed very poorly, and they never change the fund."
The federal government has recently introduced initiatives to help bridge the gap, such as a tax on high-value accounts and a superannuation guarantee on parental leave.
Associate Professor Pham said those initiatives would make a difference, but that she would also like to see more regulation that encouraged employees to make voluntary contributions, particularly those on lower incomes.
Four Hunter postcodes have a median superannuation of more than $100,000, and a surprising area has topped the list, according to recent Australian Tax Office data.
The 2282 postcode topped the Hunter list with a median of $117,397, which encompasses Eleebana, Lakelands, and Warners Bay.
The superannuation data is for the 2022-23 financial year, which the ATO recently released as part of its taxation statistics.
The 2291 postcode of Merewether, Merewether Heights and The Junction was the second highest with $109,785, followed by 2305, which includes Kotara East, New Lambton, and New Lambton Heights, at $104,886.
Wangi Wangi rounded out the top four at $103,837.
Despite ranking at 23rd for median, the 2300 postcode for Newcastle, Newcastle East, Cooks Hill, Bar Beach, and The Hill topped the list for average superannuation at $317,597.
University of Newcastle Associate Professor of finance Mia Pham said this was an example of income inequality.
"The 2300 covers inner-city Newcastle, and we can see that this area has a diverse mix of professionals, and we also have students, renters, and retirees," she said.
"So the fact that it ranks high in average superannuation, but low in median tells us there's a wide gap between the top and the bottom.
"It could be that a few individuals have very large super balances. For example, older professionals or those people that have a high income and it can skew the average upward."
The 2291 postcode was second-highest for average at $310,451, while Salamander Bay and Soldiers Point's postcode of 2317 was third highest at $248,851.
Low-socioeconomic areas like Windale were on the other end of the scale. The 2306 postcode had a median superannuation of $17,467 and an average of $51,658.
Associate Professor Pham said factors such as average income, employment and age played a role in an area's superannuation spread.
"Many residents may work in casual or part-time roles, which don't always come with consistent super contribution," she said.
"Areas with a younger population have less time to accumulate the super."
The 2308 postcode, made up entirely of the University of Newcastle campus, had a median super of $1220 and an average of $12,160.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents also face systemic barriers to wealth building, Associate Professor Pham said.
"Another thing is the culture and social factor, because some people, let's say, the migrant population, they may have a lower balance because they just recently joined the workforce," she said.
The option to access superannuation during the pandemic was also more commonly used by people who were on lower incomes or in financial distress, creating a further divide, Associate Professor Pham said.
She said the impact of withdrawing super early may be larger than people expect.
"So let's say if a person withdraws about $20,000 at the age of 30, and if that money had stayed and earned a 7 per cent annual return, it could have rolled to over $150,000 by the age of 60, and by the age of 67, it's going to be more than $200,000," she said.
"So you can see that's a huge shortfall and it's entirely due to missing out on decades of compounding.
"I think early withdrawal was something people had to do, but it's going to be a really high price that they have to pay later in life and especially for those who already face the financial disadvantages."
The Association of Super Funds Australia recommends couples need $690,000 to comfortably retire on, while single people need $595,000.
That number assumes the person owns their home and receives some support from the age pension.
Associate Professor Pham said it also varied depending on different factors. For example, people in regional areas may need less than those in capital cities.
The estimate has increased from $500,000 for a single and about $580,000 for a couple 10 years ago.
Associate Professor Pham believed there should be more financial literacy to educate people about superannuation and address economic inequality.
"Many people do not understand how superannuation works," she said.
"They may not understand about the tax benefit of voluntary contributions or the compounding power of the investment.
"Sometimes they just consider super as set and forget. Studies show that many people don't know that the super fund they belong to performed very poorly, and they never change the fund."
The federal government has recently introduced initiatives to help bridge the gap, such as a tax on high-value accounts and a superannuation guarantee on parental leave.
Associate Professor Pham said those initiatives would make a difference, but that she would also like to see more regulation that encouraged employees to make voluntary contributions, particularly those on lower incomes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
ATO reviews decision to dump Keating tax bill
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has said it will review a decade-old decision to write off penalties and interest related to a tax dispute with an investment company owned by former prime minister Paul Keating. The decision follows an ABC Four Corners report last week that revealed the details of the write-off of the penalties and general interest charge (GIC) in Keating's favour in 2015, which was described as unusual by the media group. 'We note concerns raised in the segment about GIC remission for a high-profile taxpayer, which we take seriously,' the ATO said in a statement. 'We are following up to ensure all processes were correctly adhered to.' The statement did not refer to Keating by name. Last week, an ATO spokesman said it was unable to comment on specific taxpayers, due to obligations under taxpayer confidentiality laws. Keating has been contacted for comment. Loading The penalties and interest bill relate to the sale of a successful investment by Keating's company in Australian audio group Lake Technology, which was sold to US group Dolby Laboratories in 2004 at a valuation of $23 million. Keating was a major investor, along with ad man John Singleton. According to the ABC report, the interest and penalties bill was issued after the ATO discovered in 2012 that one of Keating's companies, Brenlex, had not reported profits from a Lake Technology share sale and owed $446,000 in tax.

The Age
9 hours ago
- The Age
ATO reviews decision to dump Keating tax bill
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has said it will review a decade-old decision to write off penalties and interest related to a tax dispute with an investment company owned by former prime minister Paul Keating. The decision follows an ABC Four Corners report last week that revealed the details of the write-off of the penalties and general interest charge (GIC) in Keating's favour in 2015, which was described as unusual by the media group. 'We note concerns raised in the segment about GIC remission for a high-profile taxpayer, which we take seriously,' the ATO said in a statement. 'We are following up to ensure all processes were correctly adhered to.' The statement did not refer to Keating by name. Last week, an ATO spokesman said it was unable to comment on specific taxpayers, due to obligations under taxpayer confidentiality laws. Keating has been contacted for comment. Loading The penalties and interest bill relate to the sale of a successful investment by Keating's company in Australian audio group Lake Technology, which was sold to US group Dolby Laboratories in 2004 at a valuation of $23 million. Keating was a major investor, along with ad man John Singleton. According to the ABC report, the interest and penalties bill was issued after the ATO discovered in 2012 that one of Keating's companies, Brenlex, had not reported profits from a Lake Technology share sale and owed $446,000 in tax.

ABC News
12 hours ago
- ABC News
ATO to review processes around decision to cancel ex-PM's company's $950k tax bill
The Australian Taxation Office has moved to allay fears powerful individuals are given special treatment, saying it will review how it made a decision to wipe almost $1 million in penalties and interest from a company owned by former prime minister Paul Keating. "We are following up to ensure all processes were correctly adhered to," the ATO said in a statement following Monday night's Four Corners program. Four Corners revealed an abrupt about face from the tax office in 2015, which followed three years of negotiations and came after a formal payment notice for $953,000 was issued to Mr Keating's company. The decision was unusual because, for most taxpayers, formally challenging such a ruling on a so-called general interest charge (GIC) would typically require them to contest the matter in the Federal Court. "We note concerns raised in the segment about GIC remission for a high-profile taxpayer, which we take seriously," the ATO's statement said. "Where concerns are raised, we aim to respond through appropriate channels, including internal review, independent oversight, and, where necessary, improvements to our systems and processes. "The public rightfully expects the highest standards of integrity, fairness and accountability from us, and we take matters raised in the segment seriously." Jason Harris, a professor of corporate law at Sydney University, said the decision to waive the interest and penalties charge had the potential to undermine public trust in the tax system. "We have an example of someone very famous seemingly getting a special deal without any explanation and that should be a matter of public concern, even outside of tax," he said. "If we had a former PM getting a waiver on a driver's licence fee we should be equally concerned. There should be transparency." The tax debt was discovered in 2012 when the tax office realised that a company owned by Mr Keating had not reported profits from a 2004 share sale. While the company, Brenlex Pty Ltd, later paid the $446,000, the ATO then demanded more than $600,000 in interest and penalties that had accrued in the eight years since the sale occurred. The negotiations stretched over three years, during which time Mr Keating's advisers asked for the debt to be written off via a tax rule called a "commissioner's discretion". Mr Keating's advisers sought the exemption because the former prime minister mistakenly believed Brenlex had paid the tax and had "inadvertently failed to advise his directors" of the sale, the advisers told the tax office. Professor Harris said a commissioner's discretion was generally applied when a taxpayer had experienced some form of unfairness, such as bad advice from an accountant, or where there had been a significant event in their life, such as the death of a loved one. He said the reason Mr Keating's advisers gave — that he had forgotten he had not complied — did not pass muster. "It's outrageous," he said. In April 2015, the ATO issued Mr Keating a statutory demand for payment of the bill, which by then had grown to $953,396. Ten days after a final letter from Mr Keating's advisers, the tax office decided to cancel the debt in full. "I am able to confirm that the GIC and Late Lodgement Penalties … have been remitted in full," a tax official wrote. "Consequently the balance of the account has been reduced to nil and the amount payable as stated in the Creditors Statutory Demand is no longer owed." The email provided no reasons for the tax office's abrupt about face after three years of resisting the arguments of Mr Keating's financial advisers. The principal tax adviser at Australia's Institute of Public Accountants, Tony Greco, said the decision to waive Mr Keating's GIC appeared unusual on its face. "From a normal perspective, forgetting to pay your tax wouldn't be a strong case for remission of the GIC," he said. "More information needs to be provided to see whether they [the tax office] acted within their discretion." Professor of taxation law at UNSW, Michael Walpole, cautioned that not enough was known about Mr Keating's matter to be able to draw any firm conclusion. Speaking generally, he said it was desirable that, as long as they relied on the appropriate protocols, the tax office be able to reach settlements with taxpayers. The ATO told Four Corners in a statement last week that "inadvertently overlooking" the need to pay tax was generally not valid grounds on which to cancel GIC. "However, there may be instances where GIC is remitted when a taxpayer inadvertently overlooks the requirement to lodge a form or make a payment, depending on the individual circumstances of the taxpayer," the ATO said.