logo
Tariffs on Brazil Could Leave Coffee Drinkers With a Headache

Tariffs on Brazil Could Leave Coffee Drinkers With a Headache

Getting a daily caffeine fix could become more expensive.
President Trump's plan to impose a 50 percent tariff on all imports from Brazil starting next month would drive up the price of coffee, whether it's served in cafes or brewed in the kitchen.
Such a tariff would put more pressure on the coffee industry as prices have peaked globally this year. Droughts in Brazil and Vietnam, two of the biggest coffee exporters to the United States, have resulted in smaller harvests in recent seasons, driving up prices.
Consumers are already paying more at the grocery store. At the end of May, the average price of one pound of ground roast coffee in the U.S. was $7.93, up from $5.99 at the same time last year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Note: Data is through May, the latest available month, and reflects ground, caffeinated coffee sold in a can or plastic container.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
By The New York Times
Mr. Trump's pledge to place tariffs on Brazil's imports is partly in retaliation for what he considers a 'witch hunt' against his political ally, the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for attempting a coup.
More than 99 percent of the coffee Americans consume is imported from South America, Africa and Asia. Last year, the United States imported 1.6 million metric tons of both unroasted and roasted coffee, according to the Agriculture Department.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bitcoin's Rally Enters 'Crisis Mode' Territory
Bitcoin's Rally Enters 'Crisis Mode' Territory

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bitcoin's Rally Enters 'Crisis Mode' Territory

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) blazes past $123,000 as U.S. debt concerns ignite safe-haven demand. The world's leading cryptocurrency shattered its prior all-time high this week, surging from about $107,000 at the end of last week to a fresh peak above $123,000. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NBIS. That $10,000 leap in days helped drive July's gain to 14%, in line with historical first-half momentum noted by Carson Group strategist Ryan Detrick. Trading expert Keith Alan pointed to a textbook Cup and Handle pattern and mounting U.S. deficit fears after May's $316 billion shortfall as key drivers behind the rally. Investor angst over swelling Treasury issuance and mounting calls for Fed Chair Jerome Powell's resignation has compounded pressure on the U.S. dollar. With inflation data due later this week and political tension heating up, Bitcoin's one trillion-dollar market and gold are both catching bids. At the same time, altcoins are stirring: Ethereum jumped nearly 20% last week to reclaim a price above $3,000 as Bitcoin's dominance slipped below 65%, hinting at the start of an altseason. Why it matters: As traditional yields rise and the dollar weakens, digital assets are translating systemic risk into price momentum, making Bitcoin a barometer for broader market angst. Investors will eye June's Consumer Price Index release later this week for clues on whether the crypto rally can sustain its crisis mode momentum. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds
Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds

CBS News

time13 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds

Democratic officials from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration on Monday seeking to restore access to billions of dollars in frozen education funding. The states lost out on funding for after-school and summer programs, teacher training, English language learners and support for the children of migrant farmworkers, among and other initiatives, as part of the June 30 freeze on more than $6 billion that the states say was allocated by Congress. In a complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, lawyers for the states said the decision to freeze the funds had caused "chaos." The suit named as defendants Education Secretary Linda McMahon, President Trump and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget. "States already have planned for the upcoming academic year — which is set to start in weeks in many areas — in reliance on the billions of dollars that are now frozen," they wrote. "The budgets for many local educational agencies (LEAs) have already been approved and staffing plans have been developed so that LEAs can perform their responsibilities for the impacted programs." California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a press release that the funding freeze was done "with no rhyme or reason." His office said the freeze is blocking $939 million in funding for California alone. "Taken together with his other attacks on education, President Trump seems comfortable risking the academic success of a generation to further his own misguided political agenda," Bonta said. "But as with so many of his other actions, this funding freeze is blatantly illegal, and we're confident the court will agree." The latest legal fight between Democratic state officials and the federal government comes as Mr. Trump has promised to dismantle the federal Department of Education, an ambition supported by McMahon. A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked an executive order to unwind the department in May. The Education Department did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the lawsuit. The states joining Monday's legal action are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. Many of the states are also parties to litigation filed earlier this year contesting layoffs at the federal agency and the White House's efforts to rollback diversity programming.

Meta's New Superintelligence Lab Is Discussing Major A.I. Strategy Changes
Meta's New Superintelligence Lab Is Discussing Major A.I. Strategy Changes

New York Times

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Meta's New Superintelligence Lab Is Discussing Major A.I. Strategy Changes

Meta's newly formed superintelligence lab has discussed making a series of changes to the company's artificial intelligence strategy, in what would amount to a major shake-up at the social media giant. Last week, a small group of top members of the lab, including Alexandr Wang, 28, Meta's new chief A.I. officer, discussed abandoning the company's most powerful open source A.I. model, called Behemoth, in favor of developing a closed model, two people with knowledge of the matter said. For years, Meta has chosen to open source its A.I. models, which means it makes the computer code public for other developers to build on. Closed models keep their underlying code private. Meta executives have long argued it is better for the technology to be built in public so that A.I. development will move faster and be accessible to more developers. Any move toward a closed A.I. model would be a philosophical change at Meta as much as a technical one. Meta has won plaudits from developers for open sourcing its A.I. models and one of its top A.I. executives, Yann LeCun, had said 'the platform that will win will be the open one.' This year, the Chinese A.I. company DeepSeek released an advanced A.I. chatbot thanks in part to Meta's open source code. Meta had finished feeding in data to improve its Behemoth model, a process known as 'training,' but has delayed its release because of poor internal performance, said the people with knowledge of the matter, who were not authorized to discuss private conversations. After the company announced the formation of the superintelligence lab last month, teams working on the Behemoth model — which is known as a 'frontier' model — stopped running new tests on it, one of the people said. The superintelligence lab's discussions are preliminary and no decisions have been made on potential changes, which would need sign-off from Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's chief executive. Meta could keep its open source A.I. models while prioritizing a closed model. If these scenarios happen, they would be a significant shift for the company as it tries to stay competitive in the A.I. race against rivals like Google, OpenAI and Anthropic. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store