logo
Call to end postcode lottery in children's social care after Sara Sharif tragedy

Call to end postcode lottery in children's social care after Sara Sharif tragedy

Independent19-06-2025
The Government has been urged to end the postcode lottery in children's social care after the tragic death of Sara Sharif.
Sara was just 10 years old when she was murdered in her own home by her father and stepmother in 2023, despite being known to social services her whole life.
Liberal Democrat peer Lord Mohammed of Tinsley has tabled amendments to the Children's Wellbeing And Schools Bill that aim to give a 'basic level of protection' to every child.
The former youth worker told the House of Lords on Thursday: 'Every child, no matter where they live or what challenges they face, should be guaranteed a basic level of protection.'
One of his amendments, dubbed Sara's Law, would introduce national standards for accessing and receiving support through 'children in need plans' to help reduce regional variations in the type, frequency and duration of support provided.
A second amendment would establish the Child Protection Authority, a body that would work to improve child protection practices, advise Government and the sector, and conduct inspections.
Lord Mohammed told peers: 'Neither of these proposals are theoretical. Both are urgent responses to real-world system failures, failures that we have seen repeated with devastating consequences across our country…
'We cannot ignore the repeated failures of the current framework.
'The names of Sara Sharif, Arthur Labinjo-Hughes and Star Hobson will remain etched in our nation's conscience for years to come.
'Each of these children were known to professionals. Each was failed by a system that saw the risk, but lacked the clarity, coordination and accountability to prevent harm.'
Section 17 of the Children's Act 1989 places a duty on local authorities to safeguard and promote the welfare of children 'in need', those whose health or development would suffer without additional support.
However, thresholds are set at a local level, which results in a 'stark regional disparity', Lord Mohammed added.
He told peers: 'In the absence of a national threshold or quality standards, this power is deployed in a deeply inconsistent way…
'It creates a system in which access to help is determined, not by a child's vulnerability, but by their postcode.'
He added that the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) found that existing child protection mechanisms are 'fragmented, inconsistent and insufficiently accountable'.
The former MEP concluded: 'This isn't about removing local flexibility levels, it's about setting a national baseline for protection so that a child's right to support is not dependent on what they have.'
Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza has declared her support for the national thresholds proposed by Lord Mohammed, a move that aligns with her own recommendations.
Dame Rachel said ahead of the debate: 'Sara Sharif died when she became invisible to local services.
'All the warning signs were missed – a history of domestic abuse, bruises on her body, being removed from school – because her circumstances did not warrant help or support from professionals in Surrey, despite having been known to the local authority since birth.
'As the Children's Wellbeing And Schools Bill returns to Parliament, I urge peers to support the proposed amendment to set national thresholds for triggering an assessment by social care, ending the postcode lottery in children's social care that is putting young lives at risk.
'I also urge them to take this opportunity to give children equal protection from assault, which Sara was cruelly denied.
'My own research shows alarming variation in how and when different areas step in to protect and support a vulnerable child – no child's safety should be determined by inconsistent local decisions.
'The time to act is now, and this amendment is a huge step forward in making sure no child slips through the net.'
Responding, education minister Baroness Smith of Malvern said: 'Prescriptive national criteria with automatic referrals would risk narrowing the cohort of children, actually limiting local flexibility in providing support.'
She said the existing legislation on providing services to children in need gave local authorities discretion.
Lady Smith added: 'A danger of being specific in the way suggested here is that groups are left out, narrowing the cohort who receive support, exactly in fact, what the amendment is seeking to avoid.'
The minister also insisted that there was national guidance to local areas on safeguarding children.
She added: 'This Government is absolutely committed to protecting children from significant harm, providing the right support at the right time, and ultimately improving outcomes so that all children can thrive.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says
UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says

LONDON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Britain's online safety law risks suppressing free speech due to its heavy-handed enforcement, social media site X said on Friday, adding that significant changes were needed. The Online Safety Act, which is being rolled out this year, sets tough new requirements on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and X, as well as sites hosting pornography, to protect children and remove illegal content. But it has attracted criticism from politicians, free-speech campaigners and content creators, who have complained that the rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. Users have complained about age checks that require personal data to be uploaded to access sites that show pornography, and more than 468,000 people have signed an online petition calling for the act to be repealed. The government said on Monday it had no plans to do so and it was working with regulator Ofcom to implement the act as quickly as possible. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said on Tuesday that those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators". Elon Musk's X, which has implemented age verification, said the law's laudable intentions were at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. "When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'," it said in a statement. "It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made." X said the timetable for meeting mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight, and despite being in compliance, platforms still faced threats of enforcement and fines, encouraging over-censorship. It said a balanced approach was the only way to protect liberty, encourage innovation and safeguard children. "It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK," it said. A UK government spokesperson said it is "demonstrably false" that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. "As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression," the spokesperson said. Ofcom said on Thursday it had launched investigations into the compliance of four companies, which collectively run 34 pornography sites.

Foreign criminals are vanishing from our courts and reoffending under fake names, ex-prosecutor claims
Foreign criminals are vanishing from our courts and reoffending under fake names, ex-prosecutor claims

The Sun

time28 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Foreign criminals are vanishing from our courts and reoffending under fake names, ex-prosecutor claims

FOREIGN criminals are vanishing from British courts mid-trial and reoffending under fake names, a former top prosecutor has claimed. Reform UK 's rising star Laila Cunningham, who recently quit the CPS, said illegal migrants are slipping through the cracks and warned Britain is now 'importing crime'. 2 2 The mother-of-seven and London councillor is now leading Nigel Farage's national crime campaign - having defected from the Tories. Speaking to The Sun, Ms Cunningham said overstayers and undocumented migrants often used 'long lists of aliases' to dodge justice - with some simply vanishing during trial. Recalling a shocking case, she said: 'He robbed a woman coming off the Eurostar, took her suitcase and left. He was an illegal asylum seeker, the mitigation is that he can't work. "So they ordered what you call a probation report. And they said, we are going to adjourn it until after lunch. He never came back, and he is untraceable. "And this happens all the time." Explaining how others simply lie about their age to stay in the country, she added: "I have had a guy with literally a receding hairline, white hairs, and he said he's 16. And then you have to argue in court if he really is 16. Legal Aid pays for an age assessor and he keeps committing crimes. "I definitely think that if you do commit a crime, your asylum application should be denied immediately." Ms Cunningham also said she felt forced out of the Crown Prosecution Service after speaking publicly about grooming gangs, a lack of policing, and her decision to join Reform. She revealed bosses raised three complaints, including that she had spoken critically about parts of the Muslim community. The Westminster councillor said: 'I said that Muslim communities have really let Muslims down. And I said, 'But I am Muslim. It's just me speaking in a personal capacity.'' Her comments come as Ministry of Justice figures show 1,731 foreign nationals are now in UK prisons for sex crimes - up nearly 10 per cent in a year. A total of 10,722 foreign offenders and suspects are currently behind bars - the highest figure in over a decade - costing the taxpayer an estimated £580 million annually. Backing 30,000 more police, zero-tolerance policing and automatic deportations, Ms Cunningham added: 'Criminals have to fear the law again. 'The old parties sold us out - Reform is the only one putting British people first.' A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said: "Councillor Cunningham resigned from her position as a CPS prosecutor.' They also stressed Ms Cunningham quit before HR action was initiated.

Police pay rise only ‘worth price of a Big Mac per shift'
Police pay rise only ‘worth price of a Big Mac per shift'

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Police pay rise only ‘worth price of a Big Mac per shift'

Front-line police officers have attacked their Government-backed pay rise as worth no more than the 'price of a Big Mac per shift'. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, announced the 4.2 per cent rise, which is marginally above the current inflation rate of 4.1 per cent, on Friday. It will increase the starting salary of a police constable by £1,256 to £31,163 a year, raise an established constable's annual pay package up to £50,257 and chief superintendent's wages up to £98,500 a year. The rise, recommended by an independent review body and accepted by the Government, is above the 2.8 per cent proposed by ministers in December, for which police forces budgeted. However, police union bosses said the pay award 'barely treads water', with inflation currently at 4.1 per cent, although it welcomed the Government's decision to reject police chief constables' calls for a pay rise of just 3.8 per cent. However, Brian Booth, the deputy national chairman of the Police Federation, said: 'After more than a decade of real terms pay cuts, this award does little to reverse the long-term decline in officers' living standards or address the crisis policing faces. 'A pay rise worth the price of a Big Mac per shift won't stop record levels of resignations, record mental health absences, or the record number of assaults on officers.' 'Significant cost for council taxpayers' Matthew Barber, the police and crime commissioner for Thames Valley, said it was at the higher end of the public sector awards, outside the health sector, which was a welcome increase for officers who did one of the most dangerous jobs in public service. However, it would still mean a 'significant' extra cost for council taxpayers because it was not being fully funded by the Government despite an extra £120m from the Home Office to cover the shortfall between 2.8 per cent for which forces had budgeted and actual 4.2 per cent increase. Ms Cooper said: 'Our brave police officers work day and night, often making enormous sacrifices, to keep us safe. This government is proud to back them in doing so and today's pay award is a clear signal of our gratitude, and our determination, to ensure they are properly rewarded for their service. 'Policing is the bedrock of a secure Britain and our Plan for Change. We are committed to investing in the frontline and supporting officers who work every day to tackle crime, keep our streets safe and protect our communities.' In addition to the headline pay rise, the Government is also increasing on-call, away from home, and hardship allowances by £10. London weighting will be boosted by 4.2 per cent, reflecting the demands placed on officers in the capital. The Home Office said the pay rise underscored Ms Cooper's commitment to investing in the frontline and supporting officers, and delivering the Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee. Measures in the guarantee include a 13,000 uplift in neighbourhood police officers by the end of the Parliament, a named, contactable officers for every neighbourhood, police patrols in busy areas at peak times, such as town centres and new career pathways.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store