Trump administration cut more than $1.8 billion in NIH grants
That's according to an analysis published Thursday in JAMA, which relies on data from the Department of Health and Human Services' Tracking Accountability in Government Grants System.
The analysis offers the most comprehensive look to date at how much NIH funding has been slashed since the Trump administration kickstarted a massive effort to reduce what it sees as waste and inefficiency in federal spending.
Some grants were temporarily reinstated due to court orders as new terminations were being issued, so the data is still in flux, said Michael Liu, an author of the study and a student at Harvard Medical School. Nevertheless, the HHS grant tracker is still the most accurate, real-time dataset available, he said.
Between February 28 and April 8, the administration terminated nearly 700 grants across 24 NIH institutes and centers focused on subjects such as aging, cancer, child health, diabetes, mental health and neurological disorders.
'These cuts were not spread evenly,' Liu said. 'Namely, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities was hit the hardest. About 30% of all of its funding was cut. That's 10 times more than the average.'
President Donald Trump's new budget proposal would eliminate all funding for the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities next year, and refers to the institute as 'replete with DEI expenditures.' His executive order in January called for an end to programs focused on diversity, equity and inclusion.
The proposal also calls for an overall reduction in NIH funding, lowering next year's budget to $27 billion — a roughly $18 billion cut that would eliminate gender-focused research and research on climate change. The administration plans to prioritize research on chronic disease and other epidemics.
Most of the terminated NIH grants so far had been allocated to research projects, but around 20% were early career grants for fellowships, training or career development. Larger grants were more likely to be terminated, according to the analysis, though it's unclear from the data whether they were directly targeted.
'These larger grants are usually funding big clinical trials and big research centers,' Liu said. 'Closing the lights or stopping patients from receiving medications or interventions is potentially incredibly disruptive.'
Liu said the analysis also suggests that terminated grants were uniformly disruptive to public and private institutions.
Among grant recipients, Columbia University received the most terminations — 157 in total, according to the analysis. The Trump administration has targeted Columbia with funding cuts, citing 'the school's continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students' following large pro-Palestinian protests on the university's campus. Columbia laid off 180 staff members earlier this week who had been working on federal grants impacted by the cuts.
'Columbia's leadership continues discussions with the federal government in support of resuming activity on these research awards,' top university officials wrote in a letter to the Columbia community. 'We are working on and planning for every eventuality, but the strain in the meantime, financially and on our research mission, is intense.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
13 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Time to park our fears over Trump and use trip to smooth relations with UK
Record View says Trump won't be President forever - so we must play a long-term game to secure a key international relationship. Nobody should be surprised that President Trump's trip to Scotland will generate protests throughout the country. Now in his second term, Trump is a menace who has caused chaos at home and abroad. His inability to accept defeat to Joe Biden in 2020 undermined US democracy and his support for the January 6th insurrectionists was nauseating. He callously undermined President Zelensky on live TV and his fawning over Vladimir Putin is disgusting. The fact he is a convicted felon is another justification for Scots to take to the street. But we also have to separate the man from the office he holds. Scotland and the UK have strong ties with the US going back centuries. The UK and the US have fought wars together and share security intelligence in a way that keeps both countries safe. Trump was elected by over 70 million Americans and we must respect that. Furthering our economic interests is another reason for Keir Starmer and John Swinney to meet Trump. His tariffs are akin to a wrecking ball and if positive relations with Trump reduce the levies, so be it. Starmer seems to have the ear of the President and using leverage with him on Gaza and Ukraine would be sensible. Trump is a difficult man with a volatile temper who doesn't like being challenged. But the UK is adept at soft power and the five-day trip should be used to smooth relations with the UK, not aggravate them. He won't be President forever so we must play a long-term game to secure a key international relationship. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sort out compo The eye-watering sums paid out by Police Scotland in employment tribunal cases should give cause for concern at a time when it's strapped for cash and making savings. The non-disclosure agreements signed by both parties just adds to the air of secrecy surrounding these claims. The robust nature of police work means there will always be staff grievances and complaints from the public. However Scotland's opposition parties are right to raise concerns that monies paid in compensation mean less cash for frontline policing and crime fighting. While the Scottish Police Federation, which represents most of the claimants, says the force needs to act quicker when they come to it with complaints. The Scottish government in turn insists it brought in new legislation to improve the complaints system. Politicians and police should get round the table and fix this once and for all. We are sure the public would not complain about that.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump targets Ivy League colleges after $220M Columbia deal
His administration's unprecedented deal with Columbia University in New York City has put many of its Ivy League peers in a tough spot. To shake the target off its back and unpause research funding, Columbia agreed on July 23 to pay fines of more than $220 million (and signed on to a sprawling list of other concessions related to admissions, academics and hiring practices). The accord has unnerved leaders at college campuses across the country. "This has opened up a Pandora's box," said Scott Schneider, an attorney and expert in higher education law. Read more: The details of Columbia's extraordinary $220 million deal with Trump, explained Trump, who has halted billions in research grants to a slew of schools, has said he envisions the Columbia deal as the first of many such agreements. His education secretary, Linda McMahon, called it a blueprint for other institutions to follow. Read more: After $220 million Columbia deal, Trump promises more to come "Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public," she said in a statement. While it's unclear whether the agreement has set a new precedent, the Trump administration is pushing for other colleges to pay similar types of fines, a White House official confirmed to USA TODAY. Some onlookers, including Larry Summers, a former president of Harvard, have lauded the deal. He called it an "excellent template" for resolutions with the administration. But critics such as Brendan Cantwell, a higher education professor at Michigan State University, believe the short-term benefits of conceding to broad demands from the Trump administration are not worth the long-term implications of redefining the relationship between the federal government and higher education. Still, he understands the arguments of people like Summers. When colleges choose to fight, he acknowledged, "individual people are going to be hurt." "And maybe that's an unacceptable cost," he said. Trump's other deal: the University of Pennsylvania Columbia isn't the only Ivy League school to strike a deal with the Trump administration this summer. On July 1, the University of Pennsylvania, the president's alma mater in Philadelphia, entered into an agreement ending a civil rights investigation brought by the U.S. Department of Education. In February, the agency accused Penn of violating Title IX, the primary sex discrimination law governing schools, when it allowed Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, to compete in 2022. By March, professors were told their research projects had lost funding. The school's president said $175 million in grants and programs had been jeopardized. As part of the deal, the White House said it would restore Penn's research funding. In return, the university apologized to cisgender athletes who swam against Thomas. The university also agreed to ban transgender women from sports. (Trans women athletes have been banned from competing on women's teams at National Collegiate Athletic Association schools since February, when new rules were imposed, although the NCAA's policy permits trans men to compete in men's sports.) Read more: Lia Thomas, Title IX and $175M -- why Penn struck a deal with Trump Weeks after the deal was announced, many Penn faculty members remain in limbo, unsure about which grants have been revived. "Nobody really knows what was cut and what was restored," said Jonathan Zimmerman, a professor who studies the history of education at the university. "It feels like the theater of the absurd." Harvard keeps fighting Harvard, unlike the other Ivy League campuses immersed in similar conflicts, has continued to battle the Trump administration in court. At a key hearing in Boston on July 21, the university's lawyers urged a federal judge to force the White House to restore billions in funding for the school. Harvard has asked the judge to reach a decision by Sept. 3. But the White House's attacks on Harvard have extended far beyond money for research: The Trump administration has threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status, tried to ban its ability to enroll international students, warned its accreditor, and considered placing a lien on the university's assets. All the while, Trump has hinted he believes Harvard may still be open to coming to a deal. Other colleges in limbo Of the eight schools that make up the Ivy League, only two - Dartmouth College in New Hampshire and Yale University in Connecticut - have avoided targeted federal funding freezes. At Cornell, the government paused more than $1 billion. At Brown, it froze $510 million, and at Princeton it stopped more than $210 million. Asked whether their university leaders were negotiating with the Trump administration to restore their funding, spokespeople for Brown, Cornell and Princeton declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment. Additional agreements with those schools (and others) could happen before the start of the year, according to Robert Kelchen, a higher education professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Trump, plagued by heightened attention to the president's reported ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, may be looking for ways to change the narrative, Kelchen said. And some schools might feel incentivized to resolve funding problems before students - and protests - return to campus for the fall. "The whole Epstein thing really has the potential to swamp the administration," he said. "They want victories they can point to." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
TikTok ban: App goes dark if China doesn't agree to US deal
"If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." When asked if the potential agreement is a part of current trade talks with China, Lutnick said it was being discussed, but "not officially." "You can't really go meet somebody and not bring up the topics that are open," Lutnick said during the interview. "It's not officially a part of it, but unofficially, of course, it's going to be discussed. Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on July 24. TikTok: Trump signs executive order delaying ban on TikTok - again When could TikTok go dark in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold from ByteDance is Sept. 17. Trump signed an executive order, the third of its kind, to extend the deadline in June. Why could TikTok get banned? TikTok's future in the United States has been up in the air for months. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden. For years, some government officials have been concerned that TikTok is a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. Three times now, Trump has signed executive orders that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
