&w=3840&q=100)
How Iran conflict has exposed Trump-Gabbard differences
The Iran-Israel conflict has exposed a growing rift in the White House.
On the one hand you have US President Donald Trump – who has claimed that he is his own best advisor.
And on the other you have Tulsi Gabbard, the US Director of National Intelligence.
But what happened? How are the two divided?
Let's take a closer look:
What happened?
As the war between Iran and Israel escalated , Trump on Tuesday rushed back to America from the G7 Summit being held in Canada.
Trump claimed that Iran was 'very close to having a nuclear weapon'.
Read Israel Iran conflict live updates
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Iran cannot have nuclear weapon,' he added.
He also took to social media to call on the citizens of Tehran to leave the city.
'I just want people to be safe," he added, telling reporters he wanted a 'real end' to the conflict, rather than merely a 'ceasefire.'
Trump also demanded an 'unconditional surrender' from Iran.
Trump's remarks put him in in line with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's assessment that Iran was set to acquire a nuclear weapon 'imminently' and that Israel's very survival was at stake.
'If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time', Netanyahu said. 'It could be a year. It could be within a few months'.
However, Western agencies including that of the United States have contradicted this assessment.
Gabbard, testifying at a House Intelligence Committee hearing in March, said as much.
Tulsi Gabbard at the Faith & Freedom Coalition's Road to Majority Conference in Washington, D.C., on June 21. (Photo: Reuters)
The US intelligence community ' continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorised the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003', Gabbard said. 'We continue to monitor closely if Tehran decides to reauthorise its nuclear weapons program'.
Confronted with Gabbard's remarks while flying back, Trump was dismissive.
'I don't care what she said,' the US President said. 'I think they were very close to having one.'
Gabbard tried to do damage control, saying that Trump 'was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March. Unfortunately too many people in the media don't care to actually read what I said'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A senior White House official claimed the two weren't really split.
'There's a distinction. Just because they don't have one does not mean that they don't want to build one,' the official said.
A spokeswoman for Gabbard said she was 'on the same page' as Trump and blamed 'too many people in the media' for misinterpreting her remarks.
The White House is also trying to tamp down on the issue.
White House spokesperson Steven Cheung claimed the president 'has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team' and insisted that 'efforts by the legacy media to sow internal division are a distraction that will not work.'
Vice President JD Vance also claimed that she was 'an essential member' of team Trump.
'Tulsi Gabbard is a veteran, a patriot, a loyal supporter of President Trump, and a critical part of the coalition he built in 2024,' Vance said in a statement.
Not on the same page
But Gabbard and Trump clearly aren't on the same page – and haven't been for a while.
Gabbard took to social media on June 10 to write that the 'political elite and warmongers' are 'carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers' — and that the world is 'on the brink of nuclear annihilation.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The video, which was widely circulated in the White House, seemingly incensed Trump.
So much so that he even mused about doing away with the position of Director of National Intelligence.
Gabbard has long been a sceptic of US intervention in West Asia and of the intelligence agencies she now heads – precisely why Trump appointed her to the job.
Iranian flag flutters in the wind. Image used for representative purpose/AFP
Trump himself has spoken out against being against US interventions around the world and has signalled that he wants to pursue a far more isolationist agenda.
The Trump-Gabbard divide also speaks to a wider briefed in the Maga world.
'Why was Gabbard not invited to the Camp David meeting all day?' asked Steve Bannon, the chief of the Maga isolationist wing, wondered about the high-level meeting Trump held with his cabinet on Sunday.
'You know why … This is a regime change effort,' Carlson responded.
It remains to be seen if Gabbard remains in her post if the US goes to war with Iran.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The DOGE inspired bill that could break—or cement—Trump's govt overhaul
In the early hours of Thursday morning, US Vice President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote that advanced one of the most contentious pieces of legislation in President Donald Trump's second term – a $9 billion federal spending rollback pitched as a return to fiscal sanity. The bill, now before the House, is the first major victory for Trump's embattled Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, a cost-cutting crusade born of Silicon Valley bravado and steered until recently by Elon Musk. The legislation slashes funding for foreign aid, public broadcasting, and what the White House calls 'politicized bureaucracy.' Roughly $8 billion will be withdrawn from international aid and development programs, while another $1.1 billion is set to disappear from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a longtime Republican target that helps fund NPR and PBS. Vance defended the cuts as necessary to 'restore fiscal sanity' and eliminate 'ideologically slanted' or inefficient programs that no longer served national interests. The Trump administration argues that such sacrifices are necessary to restore fiscal discipline. Supporters insist the bill trims fat, not muscle. But humanitarian groups and international health advocates warn of consequences far more severe: disrupted vaccination programs, halted food aid shipments, shuttered water projects, and damaged diplomatic relationships. 'This could cripple efforts to fight preventable disease,' one aid official said, 'and leave America looking callous.' Even some within the GOP have expressed quiet discomfort with the method, if not the mission. Senator Lisa Murkowski described the process as 'agonizing,' voicing concern about the impact on rural health care in her state. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell also broke ranks, voting with Democrats. This may be a pyrrhic win for DOGE, the once-feared government efficiency team created by Musk. Since Trump returned to office, DOGE has been granted unprecedented authority to fire employees, shred contracts, and cancel funding streams. At its peak, DOGE promised to slash $2 trillion from the federal budget. That number has since been revised down to $150 billion. But the team's trajectory has been anything but smooth. According to The Wall Street Journal and Politico, at least eight senior DOGE staffers have quit, been sidelined, or had their contracts terminated following Musk's acrimonious departure from the White House. Once considered Trump's 'first buddy,' Musk has become an unpredictable critic. Meanwhile, Trump himself has begun to show signs of DOGE fatigue. 'I would have done it differently, a little bit, maybe,' he told a Cabinet meeting. That came after a string of social media attacks on Musk, including calling him a 'TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks.' Inside government buildings, the Musk imprint is fading. Where once there were armed guards and restricted floors, there are now empty cubicles and elevator buttons with no special markings. Many of Musk's reforms, particularly efforts to gut federal agencies and programs like DEI initiatives, have been blocked by courts or reversed by Congress. Others simply collapsed under their own weight. Yet DOGE has not entirely disappeared. Former DOGE operatives have been embedded in departments like Energy, Interior, and the EPA, where they continue to quietly influence policy. 'The mission of eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse is part of the DNA of the federal government,' said White House spokesman Harrison Fields, 'and will continue under the direction of the president, his cabinet, and agency heads.' Still, the president is pressing forward with his cost-cutting vision – if now on his own terms. The House must pass the bill by Friday to meet the procedural deadline. If it does, it will head to Trump's desk for a signature he's all but guaranteed to give. The DOGE initiative may be bruised, but its ethos of slash-and-burn austerity, repackaged in legislative form, appears poised to succeed.
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Nine Deadly Scenarios After US Attack On Iran's Nukes Which May Reshape Middle East
Last Updated: Is peace going to descend on the Middle East, or is the stormy sea of unending turmoil going to get redder and wider? In the Iran-Israel conflict, America does not any longer have the gun to Iran's head. With the airstrikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, it has pulled the trigger. What is going to be the impact of this in the region and the world? Is peace going to descend on the Middle East, or is the stormy sea of unending turmoil going to get redder and wider? Let us examine a dropdown of scenarios. First, the Ayatollah Ali Khameini regime may fall. Israel, and now the US, are not just targeting nuclear, ballistic missile, and military infrastructure. They are going for the symbols of the regime, have assassinated almost the entire military leadership, driven Khameini himself to a secret bunker, and bombed places like the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Second, the assassination of Khameini is not off the table. Israel has taken out a major chunk of his team, Trump said the US knew where he was hiding, and asked if the US would back a possible Israeli hit, US Vice President JD Vance said, it is 'up to the Israelis". Third, if the Ayatollah regime indeed falls, it does not guarantee peace. In fact, the vacuum could be filled by ideological hardliners in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) or the Iranian military. The prospect of an Iraq 2.0 — with ISIS-like actors running amuck — is looming in Iran now, some analysts claim. In spite of the western agencies' support for a prominent Opposition figure like US-based Reza Pahlavi — the son of the ousted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi — he does not enjoy broad popularity inside Iran. A major reason is because Pahlavi wants the restoration of the warm ties which existed between his late father and Israel and to upturn the Islamic Republic's refusal to recognise Israel as a nation. Monarchists want such a reconciliation to be termed the 'Cyrus Accords', after the ancient Persian king who is credited with freeing the Jews from Babylon. The other challenger group is the People's Mujahedin (MEK), whose leader Maryam Rajavi told the European Parliament recently: 'The people of Iran want the overthrow of this regime." But most of the other Opposition dislikes the MEK and many Iranians distrust it for supporting Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war. Fourth, Iran could resume nuclear talks. This is despite Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi posting on X right after the US bombings: 'Last week, we were in negotiations with the US when Israel decided to blow up that diplomacy. This week, we held talks with the E3 (group of European ministers)/EU when the US decided to blow up that diplomacy." Iran has made it clear that the scenarios may not necessarily work out for the US-Israel-West alliance. Speaking in Istanbul, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi cautioned on Sunday that his country has 'a variety of options". Fifth and a distinctly possible outcome could be that of Iran retaliating. Mapping possibilities, James M. Acton, the chair and co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told The New Yorker: 'The first one is immediate Iranian retaliation. Iran has many short-range ballistic missiles that can reach American bases and American assets in the region. Israel has not particularly targeted that infrastructure. It's been primarily focussed on Iran's longer-range missiles that can reach Israel. So I'm expecting to see some pretty dramatic attempted retaliation by Iran, and I think that puts enormous pressure on the President to respond again." According to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the US maintains a presence at 19 sites across the region, with eight of those considered by analysts to have a permanent US presence. As of June 13, the CFR estimated 40,000-odd US troops were in the Middle East. In 2020, an Iranian missile attack on a US garrison left more than 100 soldiers with crippling brain injuries. Sixth, the escalation could see IRGC activate its much-weakened but existing proxies across Iraq, Yemen, and Syria which have previously attacked US assets in the region. Israel has brought Hezbollah and Hamas on their knees, but Houthis are a less organised ragtag militia still capable of much harm. Seventh, Iran has moved to block the Strait of Hormuz. It could affect the whole of commercial shipping in the Gulf. The narrow strait connects the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, and flows out into the Arabian Sea. Major oil producers like Iran itself, Saudi Arabia, and UAE depend on the Strait of Hormuz to access the open seas. The strait is in the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. A blockage will dramatically affect the world's oil trade and prices. Interestingly, the Strait of Hormuz accounts for 50 per cent of China's total oil supplies and only 5 per cent of America's, according to some estimates. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China to ask Iran to not shut down the Strait. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil. If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's an economic suicide for them if they do it," Rubio told Fox News. About 20 million barrels of oil flow through the strait each day, according to the US Energy Information Administration. Eighth, Iran may restart its nuclear programme. 'In the slightly longer term, I believe it's very likely that Iran's going to reconstitute its nuclear program. I think Iran is likely to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and thus kick out inspectors," Acton has been quoted saying in The New Yorker. Iran had a batch of highly enriched uranium once believed to be stored in tunnels underneath Isfahan. While Iranians have claimed that they have removed it, none can say for sure. Ninth, with its nuclear sites bombed, Iran could make its nuke set-up portable and thus, more ominous. Components for building centrifuges which were being monitored when the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) under Barack Obama's 2015 nuclear deal. Trump pulled out in 2018. So, these parts are no longer being monitored. If the highly enriched uranium and the centrifuge components are small, it means they are portable, Acton avers. They can be moved around the country and be easily hidden. top videos View all And that could be the worst scenario born ironically out of the US-Israel attempt to stub off Iran's nuclear challenge. In all these, one outcome seems clear: the war in the Middle East is still not over. Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Donald Trump's Tantrums & Lies
First big claim that President Trump made was to have successfully mediated between Bharat and Pakistan during the week-long conflict to avert a nuclear war. The two countries fought a limited war following daylight murder of 26 tourists in Pahalgam of Jammu and Kashmir by ISI-sponsored terrorists in April 25, 2025. Yesterday, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi categorically debunked President Trump's falsified claims from White House and outside. Neither was there any mediation, dialogue, nor intervention by President Trump to pause the armed conflict. Instead, 'Operation Sindhoor' was paused only at specific and desperate request of Pakistan military establishment through regular channels of communication after Bharat pounded its airbases deep. In fact, Trump had gone ahead and tweeted to claim his leadership role in dissuading the South Asian neighbours from going to a major nuclear war. Yesterday, President Trump went a step further and pointed out that international media did not write about his 'stellar role' as peacenik between the arch-rivals. On the contrary, in his 35-minute telephonic conversation with Trump, Modi unambiguously stated that the latter had no role whatsoever. Indian foreign office 'readout' by Secretary Vikram Misri clearly dismissed in the most certain terms any mediation by President Trump. What's laughable is that Donald Trump repeated his bombastic claim from the Oval Office that he stopped the war even after getting an 'earful' from Modi. Second big claim of President Trump that trade deal between India and US was used as leverage to bring around Prime Minister Modi. Again, this has been outright dismissed by India. President Trump's suggestion that trade deal in the works between India and US leveraged to prevent a larger war was again billed as 'preposterous' and 'untrue'.To drive home India's unambiguous position on war with terror-infested Pakistan, Modi firmly and politely declined Trump's invite to stop over in Washington DC for a chat citing 'prior commitments'. One cannot recall if American President's invite was ever declined by Indian leadership in the past. Few things have been stated crystal clear to President Trump in the telephonic conversation whether he liked it or not. India will not and never accept mediation with Pakistan. This is key articulation of the country's policy as part of its 'strategic autonomy' framework. Yet another point made was that funding, sponsoring and abetting terrorism will now on be considered war against India and not proxy war. And hence, Bharat reserves the right to hit back in a manner it deems fit. Thirdly, Jammu & Kashmir is non-negotiable, integral to India, and only discussion could be on areas under illegal occupation of Pakistan. In last few weeks, India exercised maximum restraint in not taking on President Trump's claim either directly or indirectly. Yesterday's phone call between the two leaders reflected clarity in articulation of India's position. In parallel, General Asim Munir of Pakistan getting close to White House, having a closed-door lunch with President Trump is something that clearly indicates complete disruption in US foreign policy under Republican Presidency. Reports that President Trump promised hitherto denied defence technologies to Pakistan for using its territory to strike against Iran have their own implications. Old foreign policy hands have an independent analysis on the chain of events including President Trump's claims that have been eventually denied by Indian Foreign Secretary Misri. Entire rule book in diplomatic niceties has been consigned to dustbin by President Trump and his bunch of policy advisors from corporate world while dealing with presidents and prime ministers. Hosting General Asim Munir has its own nuances and messaging for sure. President Trump seems to have realized that General Munir could be deployed to push the American agenda in Asia. Using Pakistani airbases and army entry – exit points across 1000-kilometre-long border with Iran will only expand the war theatre between Israel and Iran. Courting Pakistan at most critical junctures has happened even in the past. Hence, Trump – Munir lunch may not have come as a big surprise for some Indian security hawks. Also, Donald Trump may be looking at a defunct and rudderless Pakistan as 'potential market' for clinching transactional business deals as well as go down in human history with a 'Nobel Peace Prize' courtesy Islamabad's leadership. One big suspicion is that American deep state may be playing dirty against Prime Minister Modi's decisive leadership as it had attempted to deny his re-election for a third consecutive term. Cosying up of Pakistan military establishment with Republican White House may have come after a successful trade deal hammered out by Trump and Chinese Communist Party's iron-fisted President Xi Jinping. In ultimate analysis, President Trump comes out as an 'undependable ally' for anyone including Bharat. Disruptions in equations with friends and foes may be treated with equanimity by the slippery Trump administration. Rising American societal unrest that has begun to show up in demonstrations and protests may only deepen threatening the very idea of 'United States of America'. American deep state and Left aligned lobbies entrenched over decades are bound to exploit the churn to their advantage. In the process, there's huge possibility of President Trump getting cornered. In the process, Trump may lose out on India.
