‘Bandits' kidnap more than 50 people in northwest Nigeria: Security source
'Armed bandits' targeted the village of Sabon Garin Damri in Zamfara state Friday, the report said, the latest attack in a region where residents in rural hinterlands have long suffered from gangs who kidnap for ransom, loot villages and demand taxes.
The report said this was the first 'mass capture' incident in the Bakura local government area this year, 'the recent trend of mass captures in Zamfara has been concerning,' noting 'a shift in bandit strategy toward more large-scale attacks in northern Zamfara.'
A Zamfara police spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.
Nigeria's 'banditry' crisis originated in conflict over land and water rights between herders and farmers but has morphed into organized crime, with gangs preying on rural communities that have long had little or no government presence.
The conflict is worsening a malnutrition crisis in the northwest as attacks drive people away from their farms, in a situation that has been complicated by climate change and western aid cuts.
Last month, bandits in Zamfara killed 33 people they had kidnapped in February despite receiving a $33,700 ransom, while three babies died in captivity, officials and residents told AFP.
Bandit-extremist cooperation
Since 2011, as arms trafficking increased and the wider Sahel fell into turmoil, organized armed gangs formed in northwest Nigeria, with cattle rustling and kidnapping becoming huge moneymakers in the largely impoverished countryside.
Groups also levy taxes on farmers and artisanal miners.
Violence has spread in recent years from the northwest into north-central Nigeria.
Two weeks ago, Nigerian troops killed at least 95 members of an armed gang in a shootout and airstrikes in the northwest state of Niger.
But the military is overstretched. While improved cooperation between the army and air force has aided the fight, analysts say, airstrikes have also killed hundreds of civilians over the years.
Bandits, who are primarily motivated by money, have also increased their cooperation with Nigeria's extremist groups, who are waging a separate, 16-year-old armed insurrection in the northeast.
The recent emergence of the Lakurawa group in the northwest has worsened violence in the region.
Governments of affected states have been forced to recruit anti-extremist militias fighting the militants in the northeast to assist in countering the bandits.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
World ‘cannot act surprised,' says UN expert who warned last year of starvation in Gaza
LONDON: A UN expert who raised the alarm over deliberate mass starvation in Gaza a year and a half ago said governments and corporations 'cannot act surprised' now at the escalating humanitarian catastrophe in the territory. 'Israel has built the most efficient starvation machine you can imagine,' Michael Fakhri, the UN's special rapporteur on the right to food, told The Guardian newspaper on Monday. 'So while it's always shocking to see people being starved, no one should act surprised. All the information has been out in the open since early 2024. 'Israel is starving Gaza. It's genocide. It's a crime against humanity. It's a war crime. I have been repeating it and repeating it and repeating it; I feel like Cassandra,' he added, referencing the Greek mythological figure whose accurate prophecies were ignored. In a recent alert, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification warned that 'the worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out' in Gaza. Fakhri was one of the first to sound the alarm about the crisis. In February 2024, he told The Guardian: 'We have never seen a civilian population made to go so hungry so quickly and so completely; that is the consensus among starvation experts. Intentionally depriving people of food is clearly a war crime. Israel has announced its intention to destroy the Palestinian people, in whole or in part, simply for being Palestinian. This is now a situation of genocide.' The following month, the International Court of Justice acknowledged the risk of genocide and ordered Israel to ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid, including food and medicine. In May, following an investigation by the International Criminal Court, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the country's defense minister at the time, Yoav Gallant, became the first individuals formally accused by an international court of deliberate starvation, a war crime. A group of UN experts, including Fakhri, declared famine in Gaza in July 2024 after the first deaths from starvation were reported. Fakhri also published a UN report documenting Israel's long-standing control over food supplies in Gaza, a stranglehold that meant 80 percent of Gazans were aid-dependent even before the current siege started. Despite this, little action has been taken to stop what Fakhri described as a systematic campaign by Israeli authorities. 'Famine is always political, always predictable and always preventable,' he said. 'But there is no verb to famine. We don't famine people, we starve them — and that inevitably leads to famine if no political action is taken to avoid it. 'But to frame the mass starvation as a consequence of the most recent blockade is a misunderstanding of how starvation works and what's going on in Gaza. People don't all of a sudden starve, children don't wither away that quickly. This is because they have been deliberately weakened for so long. 'The State of Israel itself has used food as a weapon since its creation. It can and does loosen and tighten its starvation machine in response to pressure; it has been fine-tuning this for 25 years.' Netanyahu continues to deny such accusations, stating last week that 'there is no policy of starvation in Gaza.' But aid agencies, including UNICEF, say malnutrition has surged since March this year, when Israel reimposed a total blockade on the territory following the collapse of a ceasefire agreement with Hamas. In May, Israel and the Trump administration backed the creation of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a private logistics group that replaced hundreds of established UN aid hubs with just four distribution sites secured by private contractors and Israeli troops. On June 1, 32 people were reportedly killed trying to obtain food at the foundation's sites, followed by more than 1,300 others since then. 'This is using aid not for humanitarian purposes but to control populations, to move them, to humiliate and weaken people as part of their military tactics,' said Fakhri. 'The GHF is so frightening because it might be the new militarized dystopia of aid of the future.' The GHF has dismissed reports of deaths at its sites as 'false and exaggerated statistics,' and accuses the UN of failing to cooperate. 'If the UN and other groups would collaborate with us, we could end the starvation, desperation and violent incidents almost overnight,' a spokesperson for the foundation said. The deaths from starvation are in addition to at least 60,000 Palestinians reported killed by Israeli air and ground attacks since the conflict between Israel and Hamas began in October 2023. Researchers say the true death toll is likely to be higher, though international media and observers remain barred from entering Gaza. Fakhri and other UN officials have urged governments and businesses to take concrete steps, including the introduction of international sanctions and the halting of arms sales, to stop the violence and famine. 'I see stronger political language, more condemnation, more plans proposed, but despite the change in rhetoric we're still in the phase of inaction,' he said. 'The politicians and corporations have no excuse; they're really shameful. 'The fact that millions of people are mobilizing in growing numbers shows that everyone in the world understands how many different countries, corporations and individuals are culpable.' The UN General Assembly must step in to deploy peacekeepers and provide escorts for humanitarian aid, Fakhri added. 'They have the majority of votes and, most importantly, millions of people are demanding this,' he said. 'Ordinary people are trying to break through an illegal blockade to deliver humanitarian aid, to implement international law their governments are failing to do. Why else do we have peacekeepers if not to end genocide and prevent starvation?' Special rapporteurs are part of what is known as the special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council. They are independent experts who work on a voluntary basis, are not members of UN staff and are not paid for their work.
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Bangladesh witnesses detail violence in ex-PM trial
DHAKA: Witnesses in the trial of Bangladesh's fugitive ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Monday detailed horrific violence and denial of medical treatment, speaking on the eve of the anniversary of her ouster. Hasina, 77, fled Bangladesh by helicopter on Aug. 5, 2024, after weeks of student-led protests against her rule. She has defied court orders to return from India to attend her trial on charges amounting to crimes against humanity, over the deadly crackdown on the uprising. Up to 1,400 people were killed between July and August 2024, according to the UN. • Sheikh Hasina, 77, fled Bangladesh by helicopter on Aug. 5, 2024, after weeks of student-led protests against her rule. • She has defied court orders to return from India to attend her trial on charges amounting to crimes against humanity. Philosophy student Abdullah Al-Imran, 25, said his left leg had been blasted 'wide open' by gunshot during the protests, describing how it had been left 'barely attached to the rest of my body by a thin layer of skin.' Imran told the court how, when Hasina visited the hospital ward where he was recovering, he told her he had been shot by the police. He said he overheard Hasina give the order of 'no release, no treatment,' referring to injured protesters. 'I didn't understand the meaning of the order at first, but later I did — as my surgery was repeatedly delayed,' Imran said, adding he was not given the right antibiotics, and his parents were blocked from moving him to a private hospital. 'My leg started to rot,' he said, and showed the court his still bandaged leg. Prosecutors have filed five charges against Hasina — including failure to prevent mass murder — which amount to crimes against humanity under Bangladeshi law. Hasina is on trial in absentia alongside two other accused, her former Interior Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, also a fugitive, and ex-police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, who is in custody and has pleaded guilty. Hasina is defended by a state-appointed lawyer, but she has refused to accept the authority of the court. Another witness on Monday described how she was blinded in one eye when police fired at close range, the third to give evidence detailing the brutality of the crackdown. The trial continues, although no hearing will be held on Tuesday, which has been declared a public holiday to mark the one-year anniversary of Hasina's downfall. Mohammed Yunus, the 85-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner leading the caretaker government, is due to release a slate of democratic overhauls.
Arab News
12 hours ago
- Arab News
Saudi Arabia leads the way in push for two-state solution
Anyone following developments in the Middle East will have noticed a clear surge in Saudi Arabia's engagement with the Palestinian cause since Oct. 7, 2023. This momentum goes beyond a political or humanitarian position; it reflects a strategic vision. The Kingdom has reinforced this commitment by sponsoring international conferences, building broad alliances with partner nations, and providing critical funding for food and medical supplies to Palestinians in both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Saudi efforts have evolved steadily from vocal advocacy to leading a political process aimed at establishing an independent Palestinian state, strengthened by a strong partnership with European nations. The international conference on the two-state solution, held in July at the UN headquarters in New York, and co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France, brought together representatives from more than 125 countries. The summit aimed to initiate a clear political process to end the war in Gaza and advocate for the recognition of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, in line with UN resolutions. The conference adopted a declaration presenting a comprehensive framework with clear, time-bound measures. These included an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, the transfer of administrative control to the Palestinian Authority, and the deployment of a temporary international mission under UN supervision to help stabilize the situation. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan highlighted that 'these outcomes offer a comprehensive set of proposals encompassing political, humanitarian, security, economic, legal, and strategic dimensions,' forming 'a practical and actionable framework for implementing the two-state solution and securing lasting peace and security for all.' He called on 'all UN member states to endorse the final declaration before the conclusion of the upcoming General Assembly session in September.' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot urged all nations to view the conference as a critical turning point in advancing the two-state solution and ending the war in Gaza. He emphasized the urgent need to cease attacks on civilians and to pursue a path toward lasting and sustainable peace. The international conference on the two-state solution was a critical turning point. Hassan Al-Mustafa Saudi Arabia's active diplomacy has firmly underscored that normalization with Tel Aviv will not take place unless Israel ends its occupation of Palestinian territories and commits to a serious, credible peace process. This unequivocal position was clearly stated by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman before the Saudi Shoura Council in September 2024, when he declared: 'The Kingdom will not waver in its tireless efforts to establish an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, and we affirm that the Kingdom will not enter into diplomatic relations with Israel without that.' The international conference achieved several key strategic objectives, most notably reviving global momentum for the two-state solution following years of diminished focus and the war in Gaza since October 2023; reaffirming the legitimacy and authority of the Palestinian Authority; and establishing a clear link between normalization and a concrete political framework. In essence, peace and normalization are now firmly tied to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, laying the foundation for lasting peace in the Middle East. Another major political achievement — long a source of concern for Israel and a point of unease for the US administration — has been the momentum gained in pushing key European countries toward recognizing the state of Palestine. France is set to lead this initiative in September, along with other nations, such as Ireland, Portugal, and the UK. The conference also firmly linked the peace process to halting settlement expansion, rejecting the illegal annexation of Palestinian land, and ending violence against Palestinian civilians. This stance was underscored by the explicit use of the term 'terrorism' to describe the violent attacks carried out by extremist settlers against unarmed Palestinians and their property. This summit was not a reiteration of past initiatives, but rather a unified political declaration to redefine the negotiating framework and establish a new political and legal balance of power. It stood in direct opposition to Israel's policies, which have dismantled previous regional dynamics through the use of force, starvation, and forced displacement. For the first time in decades, the two-state solution has been advanced outside the framework of traditional American dominance, under the joint sponsorship of Saudi Arabia and France. This shift highlights the growing diplomatic influence of the Middle East, which has succeeded in rallying influential European nations and establishing lasting strategic partnerships. The underlying message is unmistakable: Israel can no longer rely exclusively on US protection to sideline Palestinian demands. Negotiations have shifted. They are no longer defined by a stark imbalance between a militarily dominant power and a counterpart relying solely on the strength of international law and moral legitimacy. France's decision to recognize a Palestinian state in September is not a mere symbolic gesture, but a significant shift with serious implications, which explains Israel's concern. Paris is breaking away from the traditionally passive or hesitant European stance, most notably that of Germany, and is instead embracing a more assertive and proactive diplomatic approach. France is working to solidify its role as a key interlocutor, an alternative actor, and a 'parallel mediator' to the US. While an imbalance of power and influence remains — and Washington continues to play a central role in Middle Eastern affairs — this shift in French diplomacy reinforces the emergence of a multipolar approach to conflict resolution. It also places growing pressure on Israel to acknowledge that its occupation is no longer seen as legitimate or acceptable in the eyes of the Western world, especially as its image among broad segments of the European public is now deeply tarnished by associations with violence and bloodshed. What lies ahead? Politically, pressure on Israel is set to intensify, especially if France proceeds with its recognition of the state of Palestine and is followed by other countries, notably the UK. Diplomatically, we can expect active Saudi engagement in international forums to support new resolutions on Palestine, along with renewed efforts in Washington to convince President Donald Trump's administration that a credible peace process serves the interests of the US, the Middle East, and even Israel. Without such engagement, the region risks descending further into chaos and hostility, fostering generations without hope. • Hassan Al-Mustafa is a Saudi writer and researcher interested in Islamic movements, the development of religious discourse and the relationship between the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Iran. X: @Halmustafa
