Morgan Stanley's Q2 profit rises
In trading, equities revenue surged 23 percent, while jumped 9 percent in fixed income, Morgan Stanley said on Wednesday. Institutional Securities, which houses the bank's Wall Street operations, posted revenue of $7.6 billion in the second quarter, compared with $7 billion, a year ago.
'Institutional Securities saw strength and balance across businesses and geographies. Wealth continues to deliver,' CEO Ted Pick said in a statement. The investment bank posted net income of $3.5 billion, or $2.13 per share, for the three months ended June 30. That compares with $3.1 billion, or $1.82 per share, a year earlier. Rival Goldman Sachs' profit jumped in the second quarter, as turbulent markets lifted equities trading revenue. JPMorgan Chase also beat Wall Street estimates for second-quarter profit on strong investment banking results a day earlier. Citigroup also reported a windfall from trading and investment banking.
Dealmaking rebounded at the end of the quarter as some companies looked past tariff uncertainty and gained confidence to carry out IPOs, mergers and acquisitions. Industry executives held up that optimism this week, anticipating that deals and stock market listings will pick up in the second half of the year. Investment banking revenue declined 5 percent in the quarter. Advisory revenue slid to $508 million, compared with $592 million, a year ago.
Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick has maintained a positive view for the year, telling investors in June that deal discussions were persistent and ramping up. It earned the fourth-highest investment banking fees among global banks in the first half of the year, according to Dealogic data.
Among prominent deals in the quarter, Morgan Stanley advised Elon Musk's xAI on a $5 billion debt raise and a separate $5 billion strategic equity investment. It also advised TJC on the $5 billion sale of Silvus Technologies to Motorola. The concern about US tariff policies has also abated since Trump's initial 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2 spurred market volatility. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
4 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
What happens next in US court battle over Trump's tariffs?
WASHINGTON: A federal appeals panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of US President Donald Trump's argument that a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets gave him the power to impose tariffs. Regardless of how the court rules, the litigation is almost certainly headed to the US Supreme Court. Here is what you need to know about the dispute, which Trump has called 'America's big case,' and how it is likely to play out in the months ahead. What is the case about? The litigation challenges the tariffs Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. It centers around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. Trump has said that trade imbalances, declining manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs justified the tariffs under IEEPA. A dozen Democratic-led states and five small US businesses challenging the tariffs argue that IEEPA does not cover tariffs and that the US Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. A loss for Trump would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled late Thursday. Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his economic plan, arguing they will promote domestic manufacturing and substitute for income taxes. What's the status of the litigation? The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Thursday in the case. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench. The Federal Circuit has not said when it will issue a decision, but its briefing schedule suggests it intends to move quickly. Meanwhile, the tariffs remain in effect after the Federal Circuit paused a lower court's ruling declaring them illegal. Will Trump's tariffs be blocked if he loses in court? A Federal Circuit ruling would almost certainly not end the litigation, as the losing party is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Federal Circuit rules against Trump, the court could put its own ruling on hold while the government appeals to the Supreme Court. This approach would maintain the status quo and allow the nine justices to consider the matter more thoroughly. The justices themselves could also issue an 'administrative stay' that would temporarily pause the Federal Circuit's decision while it considers a request from the Justice Department for more permanent relief. Is the Supreme Court likely to step in? The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case appealed to it, but it is widely expected to weigh in on Trump's tariffs because of the weighty constitutional questions at the heart of the case. If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6. The Supreme Court could rule before the end of the year, but that would require it to move quickly. How might the supreme court rule? There is no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Joe Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of 'vast economic and political significance' except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. The justices in other cases, however, have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs. Can importers seek refunds for tariffs paid? If Trump loses at the Supreme Court, importers are likely to seek refunds of tariffs already paid. This would be a lengthy process given the large number of anticipated claims. Federal regulations dictate that such requests would be first heard by US Customs and Border Protection. If that agency denies a refund request, the importer can appeal to the Court of International Trade. There is precedent for tariff refund requests being granted. Since May, CBP has been processing refunds to importers who inadvertently overpaid duties because of tariff 'stacking' — where multiple overlapping tariffs are applied to the same imports. And in the 1990s, after the Court of International Trade struck down a tax on exporters that was being used to finance improvements to US harbors, the court set up a process for issuing refunds. That decision was upheld by both the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Would a courtroom defeat unravel Trump's trade deals? Trump has used the threat of emergency tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from trading partners. A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future negotiations. The White House, however, has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit. Some legal experts say a loss for Trump at the Supreme Court would not impact bilateral trade agreements the US has already inked with other countries. Others say that the trade deals alone might not provide sufficient legal authority for taxes on imports and may need to be approved by Congress. — Reuters
Arab Times
14 hours ago
- Arab Times
Global markets mostly gain after Wall Street tumbles following poor US jobs report
BANGKOK, Aug 4, (AP): Global shares advanced Monday after Wall Street had its worst day since May following the release of weak US jobs data. France's CAC 40 added 0.8% in early trading to 7,609.44, while the German DAX rose nearly 1.0% to 23,702.42. Britain's FTSE 100 edged up 0.4% to 9,108.28. US shares were set to drift higher with Dow futures up 0.6% at 43,951.00. S&P 500 futures rose 0.6% to 6,302.75. Markets in Asia had already reacted on Friday to US President Donald Trump's announcement late Thursday of sweeping tariffs on imports from many US trading partners. The new import duties are set to take effect on Thursday. The signs of trouble on the US economic horizon have raised hopes that the Federal Reserve may relent and cut interest rates, analysts said. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index lost 1.3%, bouncing back from bigger losses earlier in the day to finish at 40,290.70. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong jumped 0.9% to 24,733.45, while the Shanghai Composite index climbed nearly 0.7% to 3,583.31. In South Korea, the Kospi surged 0.9% to 3,147.75. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was nearly unchanged at 8,663.70. Investors' worries about a weakening US economy deepened after the latest report on job growth in the U.S. showed employers added just 73,000 jobs in July. That is sharply lower than economists expected. The Labor Department also reported that revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. "The labor market, once a pillar of resilience, is now looking more like a late-cycle casualty, as soft data begin to replace soft landings in market discourse,' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. Trump's decision to order the immediate firing of the head of the government agency that produces the monthly jobs figures raised concern over whether there might be interference in future data. The surprisingly weak hiring numbers led investors to step up their expectations the Fed will cut interest rates in September. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.21% from 4.39% just before the hiring report was released. That's a big move for the bond market. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which more closely tracks expectations for Fed actions, plunged to 3.68% from 3.94% just prior to the report's release.
Kuwait Times
a day ago
- Kuwait Times
‘Win-win' and still pushing: Reactions to Trump tariffs
PARIS: Some nations reacted with relief Friday after US President Donald Trump announced tariffs that in some cases were lower than threatened, and delayed by a week to August 7. But others — including Switzerland and chip powerhouse Taiwan — still hope to negotiate lower rates, and uncertainty remains over transshipments and levies on Japanese cars. Trump's announcement does not cover export giant China — currently in negotiations on a trade deal ahead of an August 12 deadline. Here is how some other economies reacted: Canada Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government was 'disappointed' by Trump's decision to increase US tariffs on Canadian goods to 35 percent. Trump's order cited Canada's failure to stop fentanyl entering the United States. Carney outlined Ottawa's efforts to crack down on fentanyl and to increase border security. He said sectors of Canada's economy including lumber, steel, aluminium and automobiles were 'heavily impacted by US duties and tariffs'. Switzerland The government of Switzerland — a major US trading partner — expressed 'great regret' at the 39-percent tariff rate, despite its 'very constructive position' in talks. It said it 'still hopes to find a negotiated solution' to the dispute over the US trade deficit with Switzerland. South Africa South Africa will use the week-long delay of 30-percent tariffs to 'negotiate as strongly and as hard as we can' to avoid the penalty and save jobs, President Cyril Ramaphosa told reporters. South Africa has offered to import liquefied natural gas and some US agricultural products, the trade ministry said this week. It said South African firms have also committed to investing in US mining and metals-recycling industries and to pursuing joint investment in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and agri-machinery. Thailand The 19-percent levy for Thailand and Cambodia — fresh from border clashes that killed over 40 people — is a let-off from the threatened 36 percent. Thailand called it a 'major success' and a 'win-win approach aimed at preserving Thailand's export base and long-term economic stability'. Cambodia Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, called it 'the best news for the people and economy of Cambodia to continue to develop the country'. The major manufacturer of low-cost clothing for Western brands was initially menaced with a tariff of 40 percent. Taiwan Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te called its 20-percent tariff 'temporary... with the possibility of further reductions should an agreement be reached'. The US president had threatened to hit the island with a 32-percent tax and possible separate duties on the island's huge semiconductors shipments. Washington 'needs Taiwan in supporting resilient supply chains, in supporting manufacturing and some high-end technologies,' Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim said recently. Japan A tariff of 15 percent agreed last week between Japan and Washington — down from a threatened 25 percent — is due to be applied from August 7. But Japanese auto exports were already being hit by a 25-percent rate, and Tokyo wants to know when this will be lowered too. 'We continue to urge the US to take prompt measures to implement the agreement, including lowering tariffs on automobile and auto parts,' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Friday. Confusion also surrounds Trump's claim that Japan — as a 'signing bonus' — will invest $550 billion in America, which will recoup 90 percent of the profits. Malaysia Malaysia also achieved a lower tariff of 19 percent — down from 25 percent — which the government called a 'positive outcome'. 'This decision by the United States reflects the strong and enduring economic ties between our two nations,' Trade and Industry Minister Zafrul Abdul Aziz said. Sri Lanka Sri Lanka also expressed relief that it will face a 20-percent hit, a sharp reduction from the 44 percent originally floated, and expressed hope of a further cut. 'We are happy that our competitiveness in exports to the US has been retained,' finance ministry official Harshana Suriyapperuma told reporters. Around 40 percent of Sri Lanka's $5.0 billion of garment exports last year went to the United States. — AFP
