Israel's war against Iran is a gamble - and to pay off it can't afford to miss
But the same principle applies to Israel's decision to attack Iran. It's war is a gamble - to pay off, it must be entirely successful. It cannot afford to miss.
That may seem a strange thing to say as things stand. Israel seems to be hitting its targets with devastating accuracy.
Take the stunning campaign of decapitation: Israeli intelligence correspondent Ronen Bergman reports that Israel has developed the ability to monitor Iran 's top officials "in real time".
That fearsome power is being wielded with awesome effect. Iran's military and intelligence commanders are being traced and eliminated one by one - 20 of them in the first night alone.
The destruction of Iran's air defences is also on the mark. It has left Iran's skies open to Israeli jets to destroy target after target with pinpoint accuracy.
The mission is to destroy Iran's nuclear programme, but also it seems the regime's means of repression and control.
3:47
To be absolutely sure of success, Israel needs the regime to fall. It must destroy both Iran's ability to develop the bomb, but more importantly, its will to do so.
Fail on either front, and Iran's leaders will prioritise building a nuclear weapon. They will have to, so they can defend themselves better next time.
2:12
Their ability to build the bomb will be impossible to destroy completely, however massive the munitions Israel puts into the centrifuge halls of Natanz and Fordow.
The Iranian nuclear programme is too far developed. They have the knowledge and expertise. For as many nuclear scientists Israel kills, there are their students to replace them.
0:24
And the technology is in their favour. As one western source told the Israeli Haaretz newspaper over the weekend: "They have knowledge about the plant centrifuges.
"They don't need as many centrifuges as they used to. They can build a small plant somewhere, heavily fortified underground, maybe even in less than three years."
1:36
At some point, the Israelis will need to end their campaign. The Iranians' desire to build the bomb will then be redoubled among what's left of their regime.
The capacity to do so will have been degraded, but the know-how will remain. Toppling the regime will be the surest way of achieving Israel's aims if it ushers in a replacement not determined to go nuclear.
Israel knows that and has been going after people and places essential to the regime's apparatus of internal control and repression.
It has been attacking energy infrastructure, too, knowing soaring energy prices may fuel social unrest and dissent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Israeli cabinet meeting postponed as tensions rise over Netanyahu's occupation plan
An Israeli security cabinet meeting, which had been expected to discuss Benjamin Netanyahu's call for the 'full occupation' of Gaza, has been postponed amid mounting tensions over whether the plan is feasible. Amid a stalling of ceasefire negotiations with Hamas, Israeli officials had briefed local and international media that the prime minister was considering an expansive offensive, aimed at taking full control of the Palestinian territory after 22 months of war against the militant group Hamas. However, senior Israeli military officers and former senior commanders warned the plan would endanger the lives of the remaining Israeli hostages held by Hamas, risk further international isolation of Israel and require Israeli soldiers to administer a population in which Hamas fighters were still present. Any move towards full occupation is likely to be strongly resisted by large parts of the international community, already horrified by the conduct of Israel's military campaign. Israel's scorched-earth campaign has already obliterated large parts of Gaza, killing more than 60,000 people, mostly civilians, forcing nearly all of Gaza's more than 2 million people from their homes and causing what a global hunger monitor last week called an unfolding famine. That has caused widespread international anger and prompted several European countries to say they would recognise a Palestinian state next month if there was no ceasefire, amid mounting calls for sanctions against Israel. The disquiet follows briefings to Israeli journalists on Monday saying that Netanyahu had decided the expanded offensive was a foregone conclusion. 'The die has been cast. We're going for the full conquest of the Gaza Strip – and defeating Hamas,' the unnamed sources said, quoting Netanyahu. By Tuesday, however, evidence had emerged of deep splits between Netanyahu and senior military officials, including the chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, who reportedly voiced opposition to the plan, prompting calls for his dismissal. Military analysts in the Israeli media, channelling some defence officials, were also sceptical. Writing in Yedioth Ahronoth, the military affairs commentator Yossi Yehoshua described the risks of the proposal. 'Hostages … will die, large numbers of IDF [Israel Defense Forces] soldiers will be killed as well as a serious logistical problem – where to house the roughly 1 million civilians who are now in Gaza City. 'Currently, Israel simply doesn't have legitimacy either to continue to fight in Gaza or to establish a city of refugees on its ruins.' Israeli officials have said Netanyahu discussed a plan with the White House as it attempted to portray Hamas as having walked away from ceasefire negotiations, a claim denied by Hamas, which blamed Israel for the protracted impasse. While the Trump administration has not commented on the Netanyahu proposal, it has been given some credence by leaked comments made by the US envoy Steve Witkoff to Israeli hostage families at the weekend, suggesting his proposal for a ceasefire in exchange for the release of half of the remaining living hostages had failed. Witkoff added that Donald Trump 'now believes that everybody should come home at once. No piecemeal deals,' adding they were now pursuing an 'all or nothing' plan. At the centre of the Netanyahu plan is the notion that, by surrounding areas where hostages are believed to be held, Israeli forces can raid those areas and rescue the captives, a policy that has broadly failed during the past two years of war. Amid questions over the practicality of a wider offensive, some have speculated that Netanyahu's call may be more rhetorical than real in substance, aimed at keeping onboard far-right ministers who have demanded they be allowed to build settlements in Gaza. A Palestinian official close to the talks and mediation said Israeli threats could be a way to pressure Hamas to make concessions at the negotiation table. 'It will only complicate the negotiation further, at the end, the resistance factions will not accept less than an end to the war, and a full withdrawal from Gaza,' the official told Reuters, requesting not to be named. Practically, too, it is unclear whether Israel has the capacity for the kind of expanded operation described. The IDF has struggled with manpower issues as the war drags on, with reservists being repeatedly called up amid concerns over a mental health crisis that has included a number of suicides. On Tuesday, during a visit to Gaza, Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, suggested a less comprehensive long-term Israeli occupation, saying that Israel would maintain a permanent IDF presence in a 'security buffer zone' in strategic areas of Gaza to prevent future attacks on Israeli communities and arms smuggling into the strip. 'This is the main lesson of October 7,' said Katz. 'As in other sectors, here too the IDF must stand between the enemy and our communities – not only to fight the enemy, but to separate it from our civilians.' Inside Gaza on Tuesday, Israeli gunfire and strikes killed at least 13 Palestinians, local health authorities said, including five people in a tent in Khan Younis and three aid seekers near Rafah in the south. Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza earlier on Tuesday, but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive. Agencies contributed to this article
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Boris Johnson: Taiwan has better claim to statehood than Palestine
Taiwan has a 'far more robust' claim to statehood than Palestine, Boris Johnson has said. While there is an 'analogy' that can be drawn between the two places, the former prime minister said that Taiwan's claims for recognition are stronger. 'They actually have a recognised government. They actually have boundaries that they control. They actually have a proper democratic system, none of which you could say, with all due respect, about Palestine.' Taiwan's claims are 'far more robust' he said at the Ketagalan Forum, a security conference in Taipei. While there are certain commonalities between Taiwan and Palestine in that both seek international recognition, they also differ in many ways given their distinct histories and political systems. Taiwan is an island nation located off the south-east coast of China, with a population of approximately 23 million people. It is recognised as a distinct country with its own democratic government, visa rules, airline and army. It is also largely integrated into the global economic system. The island is under threat from China, which claims the territory as its own. China's defence ministry spokesperson Wu Qian said earlier this year: 'We will come and get you, sooner or later.' Only 13 countries recognise Taiwanese statehood. Britain supports Taiwan's participation in international organisations where statehood is not a prerequisite, but does not have formal diplomatic relations with the island. Palestine is a state under occupation, which has long sought sovereignty amid internal divisions and external threats from Israel. Palestine is primarily managed by the Palestinian National Authority (PA), which runs the West Bank, but Hamas runs the Gaza enclave. Its borders remain contested, it has no army, no central government and does not recognise the state of Israel. Som 147 countries out of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine. Britain, France and Canada have all signalled their intentions to by September, putting pressure on Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, who is now considering full occupation of the territory. In response to journalists in Taiwan, Mr Johnson also spoke about the global risk of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, drawing comparisons with Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Without naming either China or Taiwan, he seemed to make a veiled threat towards China that the use of 'force in situations like this can lead to utter disaster – not just for the world, but for you'. The former prime minister then noted that neither the UK or the US 'want to see a change in the balance of power' in the Indo-Pacific or 'a change in the composition of the First Island Chain', referring to the group of islands that stretches from Japan down through Taiwan and to the Philippines. While he didn't elaborate on what the UK can do to maintain the status quo, he noted that the UK trade office in Taiwan, which serves as the country's de facto embassy in the absence of formal diplomatic relations, has been 'very busy' and 'things are picking up'. Last week, Defence Secretary John Healey told The Telegraph that the UK would be 'ready to fight' if a conflict broke out in the Indo-Pacific . Mr Johnson is the third British former prime minister to visit Taiwan, following Liz Truss in 2023 and Margaret Thatcher in the 1990s. It was his first time travelling to Taiwan and during his keynote address to the forum earlier in the day, he joked that before today he had 'only seen this country on my 'lockdown' Peloton machine', which had a screen showing one of Taiwan's virtual coastal paths. During his speech, he also accused China of 'trying to bully Taiwan into submission' through its 'grey zone' coercion where it sends 'boats into Taiwanese waters and planes into Taiwanese airspace'. China has increased these methods of intimidation against Taiwan in recent years, which experts say is likely a strategy to both demonstrate its capabilities as well as to erode trust in the government in Taipei. Mr Johnson said that these incursions seem to be an effort 'to remind the world' of the 'might of the Chinese armed forces and thereby signalling their intention by 2027' – the year that Chinese president Xi Jinping reportedly told his military to be prepared for an invasion. During her visit to Taiwan in 2023, Ms Truss had also urged Taiwan to stand up to the 'aggressive bullying' by China, while also calling the government in Beijing 'totalitarian'.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
India hits back at Trump's threat over Russian oil purchases
NEW DELHI, Aug 5 (Reuters) - India's ruling party and main opposition condemned on Tuesday a threat by U.S. President Donald Trump to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, in a show of political unity as a trade rift deepens with Washington. Trump had already in July announced 25% tariffs on Indian imports, and U.S. officials have cited a range of geopolitical issues standing in the way of a U.S.-India trade accord. Manish Tewari, a member of parliament and leader of the opposition Congress, said Trump's "disparaging remarks hurt the dignity and self-respect of Indians". "The time has come to call out this constant bullying and hectoring," he added. BJP Vice President Baijayant Jay Panda quoted Henry Kissinger - the most powerful U.S. diplomat of the Cold War era - in a post on X: "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal." India's Foreign Ministry said the country was being unfairly singled out over its purchases of Russian oil, and highlighted continued trade between Moscow and both the United States and the European Union, despite the war in Ukraine. "It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia," it said in a statement issued late on Monday. "It is unjustified to single out India," the ministry said. It said the EU conducted 67.5 billion euros ($78.02 billion) in trade with Russia in 2024, including record imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) reaching 16.5 million metric tons. The United States, the statement said, continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilisers and chemicals. It did not give a source for the export information. The U.S. embassy and the EU's delegation in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both the United States and EU have sharply scaled back their trade ties with Russia since it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In 2021, Russia was the EU's fifth-largest trading partner, with goods exchange worth 258 billion euros, according to the EU executive European Commission. India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. It has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Moscow since Russia invaded Ukraine. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and economic needs. India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is likely to travel to Russia this week on a scheduled visit, two government sources said. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar is expected to visit in the coming weeks. The sudden rift between India and the U.S. has been deepening since July 31, when Trump announced the 25% tariff on goods being shipped to the U.S. and for the first time threatened unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil. Trump has said that from Friday he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end the war with Ukraine. The trade tensions have caused concern about the potential impact on India's economy. The equity benchmark BSE Sensex .BSESN closed down 0.38%, while the rupee dropped 0.17% versus the dollar.
