We have money to fight Kentucky's opioid crisis. Let's not waste it.
Thanks to landmark settlements with pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors, states and municipalities across the country will receive over $50 billion in opioid abatement funding over the next 18 years. Kentucky alone is poised to receive more than $800 million. These funds represent an unprecedented opportunity to reverse the damage done and build a recovery system that works — not only for those battling substance use disorder (SUD) today but for future generations as well.
But with this opportunity comes a responsibility that we cannot afford to squander.
Already, we're seeing the warning signs. A yearlong investigation by KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) Health News, along with researchers at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and the national nonprofit, Shatterproof, found many jurisdictions used settlement funds on items and services with tenuous, if any, connections to addiction.
These choices may help balance ledgers, but they fundamentally betray the purpose of these funds. This money was not awarded to maintain the status quo. As Robert Kent, former general counsel for the Office of National Drug Control Policy, put it, 'Certainly, the spirit of the settlements wasn't to keep doing what you're doing. It was to do more."
Kentucky must not follow this path.
To be sure, the temptation is real. Counties face budgetary constraints, state agencies are stretched thin and public servants are overdue for raises. But the long-term cost of misusing these funds will far exceed any short-term relief. Not only could such decisions lead to clawbacks of funds or disqualifications for future disbursements under the terms of the settlement agreements, they would also represent a tragic missed opportunity to finally turn the tide in our battle against addiction.
Gerth: I work with people battling addiction. Trump's tariffs won't stop fentanyl. | Opinion
Fortunately, Kentucky has already shown it knows how to lead.
In 2022, our legislature passed a landmark initiative — the Behavioral Health Conditional Dismissal Program. Backed by $10.5 million in opioid settlement funds, this four-year pilot program provides an alternative to incarceration for individuals charged with certain non-violent, non-sexual misdemeanors and Class D felonies. Instead of jail, eligible participants are evaluated by medical professionals and offered treatment for SUD and/or other mental health conditions. The goal is to use data to create a replicable, collaborative model that breaks the cycle of addiction, reduces recidivism and restores lives.
Early signs are promising, and the legislature is rightly considering expansion. This is exactly the kind of innovative, evidence-based programming that Kentucky should prioritize as we distribute settlement funds.
Other models from across the country offer inspiration as well. In several jurisdictions, police departments are now pairing with mental health professionals for real-time crisis intervention. These partnerships reduce trauma for both officers and individuals in crisis, lead to more humane outcomes and, ultimately, save taxpayer dollars by reducing unnecessary hospitalizations and incarcerations.
The opioid epidemic has already claimed more than 600,000 lives nationally. While recent data from the CDC show a hopeful 17% decline in opioid overdose deaths between July 2023 and July 2024, this drop is not a sign to become complacent — it's a sign that smart policy and targeted investment can work.
Opinion: Pope Leo and the Catholic Church, not Trump, should point the way for our future
And we'll need them. More potent synthetic opioids like nitazenes and dangerous additives like xylazine ('tranq') are beginning to enter the illicit drug supply. Without aggressive investment in innovative treatment options and infrastructure, public education, harm reduction and law enforcement support, we risk falling behind again just as we're beginning to catch up.
Let this be a turning point — not a footnote.
Kentucky's business leaders, health care providers, civic institutions and elected officials must all align around one unifying principle: These funds will be used for their intended purpose — to address the opioid crisis.
That means rejecting the temptation to misuse funds to paper over fiscal problems or bankroll unrelated projects. It means providing accountability and transparency. And it means staying focused on building a future in which fewer families grieve, fewer children are left behind and more Kentuckians live free from the grip of addiction.
This is our shot. Let's not waste it.
Vickie Yates Glisson is a lawyer and arbitrator who focuses her practice on health care and health insurance issues. She is president and founder of VYBG Consulting, PLLC and former secretary of the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: KY can't afford to waste funds to fight the opioid crisis | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
ACA health plan premiums could spike in 2026: report
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Insurers offering Affordable Care Act marketplace plans are proposing the largest premium increases since 2018 amid significant policy uncertainty, according to a preliminary analysis by KFF and the Peterson Center on Healthcare. Across more than 100 marketplace insurers in 20 markets, payers are requesting a median premium increase of 15% for 2026, according to the report published Friday. In comparison, average premiums for marketplace plans have held relatively steady or risen slightly since 2018. Insurers say potential policy changes — like expiring financial assistance for people buying coverage on the exchanges and cost hikes linked to tariffs — are contributing to premium hikes. Dive Insight: Insurers submit rate filings to state regulators each spring and summer to justify their premium changes for the following plan year. Typically, medical costs are the biggest factor behind premium changes — but planning for 2026 also reflects significant policy changes on the horizon, according to KFF and Peterson. The latest analysis, which includes 105 insurers in 19 states and Washington, D.C., found that most payers are requesting premium increases of 10% to 20% for 2026. Additionally, more than one-quarter are proposing premium hikes of 20% or more. That's a divergence from recent years. In 2025, the average benchmark premium was $497, increasing about 4% from $477 the previous year, according to KFF. And so far, no insurers have proposed decreasing their premiums for 2026, while at least some have dropped rates in recent years. Policy uncertainty is changing insurers' premium calculus, according to the report. For example, enhanced premium tax credits — first enacted in 2021 to increase subsidies and eligibility for financial assistance — are set to lapse at the end of 2025, absent intervention from Congress. And if lawmakers don't extend the tax credits, premiums would spike for many ACA enrollees, pushing some to leave the exchanges entirely. Insurers expect those beneficiaries would likely be healthier on average, leaving behind sicker and more expensive enrollees, according to the report. Tariffs could also drive up the cost of drugs, medical equipment and other supplies, increasing costs for insurers. Some payers report the uncertainty surrounding tariff policy is driving rate increases about 3% higher than they would otherwise, according to the report. Some insurers also submitted proposed premiums before President Donald Trump signed a massive tax law with significant healthcare implications in early July. The law is expected to result in nearly 12 million more uninsured people by 2034, due to policies like Medicaid work requirements and other eligibility checks. Additionally, the CMS recently finalized a regulation that would shrink sign-up windows for ACA plans and increase eligibility verification. It's unclear how insurers will respond to these policies, according to the analysis. Finalized rate changes for 2026 are expected to be published in late summer. Recommended Reading Tariffs send healthcare industry into 'unchartered waters'
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Sen. Hawley doesn't want to "experiment" with rural hospital funding
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) doesn't want to "experiment" with the "vitally important" funding hospitals receive, he said during an Axios News Shapers event Wednesday. Why it matters: Hawley is positioning himself as a key defender of the Medicaid program, even after voting to cut Medicaid through President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The cuts to Medicaid include rolling back nearly $1 trillion in funding over the next 10 years, and make changes the provider tax. Driving the news:"My concern is, is what result would it really have?" Hawley asked about the long term affects of the provider tax on rural hospitals. "Would it force us to go out and find new funding in other places?" he asked. "Would it force us to raise taxes in some areas? I don't know the answer that, and I don't want to risk it. I don't want to take the experiment." Hawley commended Republicans for capturing the votes of working class, blue collar Americans, but pointed out that the party now needs to deliver policies that benefit them. "Does that mean that they're in the Republican Party to stay forever? I don't think so," he said. "It means they're giving the Republican Party a shot." Context: Hawley introduced the "Protect Medicaid and Rural Hospitals Act" earlier this month to block any future cuts to Medicaid. His bill would repeal the provider tax moratorium and the reduction of provider tax authority, which would restore part of the money that states rely on to fund their programs. The bill would also double the Rural Health Transformation Fund from $50 billion to $100 billion. By the numbers: About 1.2 million people are enrolled in Medicaid in Missouri, 50% of whom are children. The federal government funds 78% of total Medicaid spending in Missouri, according to a May report from KFF.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Venus Williams Reveals She Returned to Tennis Over Health Insurance
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Venus Williams has claimed that her return to tennis, after 16 months away from the sport, was because she needed the health insurance. "I had to come back for the insurance," she said in an on-court interview following her Mubadala Citi D.C. Open victory against Peyton Stearns in Washington on Tuesday. "They informed me this year that I'm on COBRA, so it's like, I got to get my benefits on," she said, giggling to interviewer Rennae Stubbs, which prompted a chorus of laughter from those watching in the stands. Williams' victory made her the oldest woman to win a WTA singles match since 2004, when Martina Navratilova, aged 47, triumphed at Wimbledon. Why It Matters Williams confession sheds light on the brutal reality of healthcare costs in America at present. If a professional athlete and a celebrity, with a multi-million net worth, says she needs to continue playing her sport to secure access to health coverage—even if it may have been somewhat tongue in cheek—it begs the question of how those without such hefty assets can possibly afford to pay their medical bills. In a KFF study this year, six in ten Americans were found to be somewhat worried about affording health care services or paying unexpected medical bills for themselves and their families. This was a significantly larger proportion than those who were concerned about affording housing costs, transportation expenses, utilities and food for their families. Venus Williams celebrates her win over Peyton Stearns at the Citi Open tennis tournament in Washington, D.C., on July 22, 2025. Venus Williams celebrates her win over Peyton Stearns at the Citi Open tennis tournament in Washington, D.C., on July 22, 2025. Nick Wass/AP What To Know "I'm always at the doctor, so I need this insurance," Williams said after her victory. In 2023, during a Wimbledon match, Williams badly injured her knee, and she previously shared how challenging her recovery was. She battled through the pain to play in that year's U.S. Open, but was eliminated early, and then took some time out to recover. She also reportedly had to undergo surgery last year to treat uterine fibroids. The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) enables Americans to continue receiving health benefits, provided by their group health plan, for limited periods of time under certain circumstances. These circumstances might include voluntary or involuntary job loss, a reduction in hours worked, transition between jobs, death, divorce and other life events. In some cases, individuals may receive benefits for 36 months, but if their working hours were reduced, or job terminated, they can only receive COBRA benefits for 18 months. Venus Williams after becoming the oldest WTA match winner since 2004: 'I had to come back for the insurance, because they informed me this year that I'm on cobra. So it's like, I got to get my benefits on' 😭😭😭😭 — The Tennis Letter (@TheTennisLetter) July 23, 2025 At the age of 45, Williams would not be able to qualify for Medicare—the federal health program available to those over the age of 65. Given her $95 million net worth, generated via significant income from tournaments and sponsorships, despite her not having a fixed monthly income, she would also not qualify for Medicaid—the federal health program for Americans with limited income and resources. Williams entered the Citi Open on a wild card, after not playing on the WTA Tour since March 2024. Nevertheless she still beat her opponent, Stearns—22 years her junior—6-3, 6-4. What People Are Saying Williams said after her victory: "I think I just attacked the whole time. It's just trying to find the right balance between going too hard and not enough. It's the same because this is what I do, but at the same time, it was imperative for me to do it. Now I don't have to do this, but I have the same fire and the same want to win. In some ways, I'm still getting back into that. When you do it every day, everything is natural. Not as natural feeling now, but I hope I can get back to that." She added: "I think it was a big win for me today. Like I said, it's not easy. It won't be easy. It's not easy for anyone out here. So I know I'll have to fight for every match, but I'm up for that." What Happens Next Williams had already secured a victory on Monday during a doubles match with her partner Hailey Baptiste. She is set to play Magdalena Frech, the Polish fifth seed, in the singles on Thursday.
