We have money to fight Kentucky's opioid crisis. Let's not waste it.
Thanks to landmark settlements with pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors, states and municipalities across the country will receive over $50 billion in opioid abatement funding over the next 18 years. Kentucky alone is poised to receive more than $800 million. These funds represent an unprecedented opportunity to reverse the damage done and build a recovery system that works — not only for those battling substance use disorder (SUD) today but for future generations as well.
But with this opportunity comes a responsibility that we cannot afford to squander.
Already, we're seeing the warning signs. A yearlong investigation by KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) Health News, along with researchers at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and the national nonprofit, Shatterproof, found many jurisdictions used settlement funds on items and services with tenuous, if any, connections to addiction.
These choices may help balance ledgers, but they fundamentally betray the purpose of these funds. This money was not awarded to maintain the status quo. As Robert Kent, former general counsel for the Office of National Drug Control Policy, put it, 'Certainly, the spirit of the settlements wasn't to keep doing what you're doing. It was to do more."
Kentucky must not follow this path.
To be sure, the temptation is real. Counties face budgetary constraints, state agencies are stretched thin and public servants are overdue for raises. But the long-term cost of misusing these funds will far exceed any short-term relief. Not only could such decisions lead to clawbacks of funds or disqualifications for future disbursements under the terms of the settlement agreements, they would also represent a tragic missed opportunity to finally turn the tide in our battle against addiction.
Gerth: I work with people battling addiction. Trump's tariffs won't stop fentanyl. | Opinion
Fortunately, Kentucky has already shown it knows how to lead.
In 2022, our legislature passed a landmark initiative — the Behavioral Health Conditional Dismissal Program. Backed by $10.5 million in opioid settlement funds, this four-year pilot program provides an alternative to incarceration for individuals charged with certain non-violent, non-sexual misdemeanors and Class D felonies. Instead of jail, eligible participants are evaluated by medical professionals and offered treatment for SUD and/or other mental health conditions. The goal is to use data to create a replicable, collaborative model that breaks the cycle of addiction, reduces recidivism and restores lives.
Early signs are promising, and the legislature is rightly considering expansion. This is exactly the kind of innovative, evidence-based programming that Kentucky should prioritize as we distribute settlement funds.
Other models from across the country offer inspiration as well. In several jurisdictions, police departments are now pairing with mental health professionals for real-time crisis intervention. These partnerships reduce trauma for both officers and individuals in crisis, lead to more humane outcomes and, ultimately, save taxpayer dollars by reducing unnecessary hospitalizations and incarcerations.
The opioid epidemic has already claimed more than 600,000 lives nationally. While recent data from the CDC show a hopeful 17% decline in opioid overdose deaths between July 2023 and July 2024, this drop is not a sign to become complacent — it's a sign that smart policy and targeted investment can work.
Opinion: Pope Leo and the Catholic Church, not Trump, should point the way for our future
And we'll need them. More potent synthetic opioids like nitazenes and dangerous additives like xylazine ('tranq') are beginning to enter the illicit drug supply. Without aggressive investment in innovative treatment options and infrastructure, public education, harm reduction and law enforcement support, we risk falling behind again just as we're beginning to catch up.
Let this be a turning point — not a footnote.
Kentucky's business leaders, health care providers, civic institutions and elected officials must all align around one unifying principle: These funds will be used for their intended purpose — to address the opioid crisis.
That means rejecting the temptation to misuse funds to paper over fiscal problems or bankroll unrelated projects. It means providing accountability and transparency. And it means staying focused on building a future in which fewer families grieve, fewer children are left behind and more Kentuckians live free from the grip of addiction.
This is our shot. Let's not waste it.
Vickie Yates Glisson is a lawyer and arbitrator who focuses her practice on health care and health insurance issues. She is president and founder of VYBG Consulting, PLLC and former secretary of the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: KY can't afford to waste funds to fight the opioid crisis | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
How immigrants contribute to Arkansas' health care workforce
Immigrants make up a lower share of Arkansas' health care workforce than in most states, but the nation's hospitals still rely heavily on an immigrant workforce, per census data analyzed by KFF. Why it matters: It's a pivotal moment for the nation's hospitals. The health care industry is facing a double challenge — a White House immigration crackdown that could translate to worker shortages and the "big, beautiful bill," which pulls back federal health care spending. Meanwhile, an aging population will require more care. Zoom in: About 5% of health care workers in Arkansas are immigrants, and Northwest Arkansas has a growing need for health care workers to meet growing demand as the nation sees a shortage. By the numbers: Nationwide, 16% of hospital workers are immigrants — roughly in the line with the share of the workforce that's foreign-born. More populous states have higher numbers — 32% in California, 29% in New York and New Jersey, and 27% in Florida. The intrigue: There are already shortages of doctors in certain areas and within certain specialities, as well as an overall workforce shortage. Reducing the number of immigrants in the U.S. could make that worse. And it's not just physicians. Immigrants account for a high share of the cleaning and maintenance staff in hospitals — close to 30%. "If there aren't enough workers, hospitals may need to limit services," says Scott Hulver, a policy analyst at KFF. State of play: Hospitals are one of the big losers from the new spending bill, taking a major hit from Medicaid cuts and changes to the Affordable Care Act, report Axios' Peter Sullivan and Victoria Knight. Millions are likely to lose their health insurance. The bottom line: Since the passage of the ACA in 2010, more people have had access to health care and the industry exploded, hiring surged, and more workers were in demand.
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Where it costs the most to give birth
The average total in-network cost of giving birth in the U.S. is about $15,200 for vaginal deliveries and $19,300 for C-sections, per data from FAIR Health, a national independent nonprofit. By the numbers: For vaginal deliveries, Alaska has the highest average cost (about $29,200), followed by New York and New Jersey (both about $21,800). Alaska also has the highest average cost for C-sections ($39,500), followed by Maine ($28,800) and Vermont ($28,700). How it works: The amounts in FAIR's Cost of Giving Birth Tracker include delivery, ultrasounds, lab work and more. They reflect total costs paid by patients and their insurance companies, as applicable. Insured patients' financial responsibilities are typically well below the total amount paid, with average out-of-pocket costs of just under $3,000 in 2018-2020, per a 2022 Peterson-KFF analysis. What they're saying: Many factors drive the differences between states, FAIR Health's Rachel Kent tells Axios, including provider training levels, local salaries and costs of living, malpractice insurance costs and insurers' bargaining power. Between the lines: Black and Hispanic people paid more out-of-pocket for maternal care than Asian and white patients with the same insurance, per a study published earlier this year in JAMA Health Forum.
The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
AARP endorses bill to prevent upcoding in Medicare Advantage
In a statement Thursday, AARP noted that upcoding is expected to increase care costs for Medicare Advantage enrollees by $40 billion this year. The No UPCODE Act was introduced by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) earlier this year. The bill would disincentivize upcoding by developing a risk-adjustment model using two years of diagnostic data as opposed to one, limiting the use of unrelated medical conditions when estimating the cost of care, and bridging the gap between how patients on Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare are assessed. In a letter to Cassidy and Merkley, AARP senior vice president for government affairs Bill Sweeney wrote, 'While many Medicare beneficiaries appreciate the flexibility and ease of use that MA provides, we are concerned that upcoding leads to both inflated payments to insurance plans and higher premiums for American seniors.' 'These resources would be better spent strengthening Medicare, such as by providing dental, hearing, and vision coverage,' Sweeney added. 'This bill addresses a problem both Republicans and Democrats have labeled as waste, fraud, and abuse. AARP agrees the No UPCODE Act protects seniors by preserving benefits and eliminating waste,' Cassidy said in a statement Thursday. 'When companies upcode, taxpayers foot the bill and patients get nothing. That's wrong.' While the Trump administration has railed against waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid, the vast majority of Medicare payments are made properly. As KFF found in its analysis of fiscal year 2024 payments, 94.4 percent of Medicare Advantage payments were made properly, with improper Medicare payments totaling $54.3 billion.
