logo
Opinion: Valérie Plante needs to come out of hiding

Opinion: Valérie Plante needs to come out of hiding

Op Eds
It's the summer of 1997. I'm sitting in the back seat of my parents' car as we head off on our next family vacation. To keep me occupied, my mother hands me one of my Where's Waldo? books.
I could spend hours searching for Waldo — hidden behind a tree, a beach house or an ice cream parlour.
Today, as a political observer and with summer vacations in full swing, I'm no longer looking for Waldo. I'm looking for Valérie Plante.
Because like many Montrealers, I'm seriously wondering: Where is our mayor?
A few weeks ago, La Presse revealed that the city's top elected official has missed half of the executive committee's meetings since announcing her decision to step down last fall. That's as if the province's premier would neglect to attend half of their cabinet's meetings — serious questions would soon be raised about their leadership and ability to govern.
In recent months, Plante has also significantly reduced her media presence and public appearances, despite the city grappling with major events like the STM strike and dangerously poor air quality due to high smog levels. Understandably, many are now questioning her motivation and commitment to the job.
Usually, as their time in office winds down, politicians step up their public presence — to defend their legacy, to leave a lasting impression, to be remembered positively in the history books.
But after nearly eight years in power, what legacy does Plante really have to defend?
Bike paths? Sure. If you're among the few who believe spending nearly $100 million to turn Camillien-Houde Way into a giant bike path on Mount Royal — despite clear public opposition — is a productive and visionary move, when city hall is facing other, much more pressing issues, then maybe Plante's tenure can appear to have been a tremendous success.
Beyond that — and perhaps a few newly landscaped sidewalk corners — what else does she have to be proud of?
Frankly, not much. The city's finances are in poor shape, with steep property tax hikes under Projet Montréal. Our crumbling infrastructure continues to decay. Construction zones and orange cones remain omnipresent. Crime and homelessness are on the rise, with a Léger poll last summer revealing that two-thirds of Montrealers felt their city was less safe than it had been five years before. Small businesses are struggling, with many commercial areas now considered unsafe or uninviting.
Meanwhile, the housing crisis has worsened under the Plante administration's heavy-handed bureaucracy and restrictive bylaws, which have made Montreal's real estate market so unappealing that some developers now prefer to build in the suburbs — even though the city itself is where new housing is most urgently needed.
In short, almost everything Plante promised to fix when first elected in 2017 has only grown worse.
So, is there still a captain at the helm?
While her predecessor Denis Coderre was dubbed 'the omni-mayor' for insisting on being everywhere all the time, Plante could be remembered — at least for the final year of her tenure — as the 'ghost mayor.'
Maybe her party has asked her to stay out of the spotlight this summer so as not to overshadow her successor as Projet Montréal leader, Luc Rabouin, as he ramps up his campaign ahead of this fall's municipal elections.
Or maybe she's just no longer interested in the job now that her departure is official.
Either way, the mayor should remember that she still holds the office until someone else is sworn in this November — and that the important responsibilities with which she has been entrusted demand unwavering dedication at all times.
Because if she continues to hide like Waldo, Montrealers might remember Valérie Plante as the captain who abandoned ship before it reached its final destination.
It may be summertime, but it's not vacation time yet for the mayor.
Raphaël Melançon is a public affairs consultant and political analyst. He previously worked as a journalist and political adviser at all three levels of government.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Frustrated by stalled talks, STM maintenance workers consider strike action
Frustrated by stalled talks, STM maintenance workers consider strike action

CTV News

time4 days ago

  • CTV News

Frustrated by stalled talks, STM maintenance workers consider strike action

Bruno Jeannotte, president of the Montreal Transit Union, addresses journalists to denounce the lack of progress in negotiations between the STM and its maintenance employees during a demonstration held on Thursday, Jul 17, 2025. (The Canadian Press/Pierre Saint-Arnaud) Hot dogs, hamburgers, signs, flags, horns and whistles were on the menu outside the Youville workshops where the Société de transport de Montréal (STM) services and repairs its buses, as about 100 maintenance workers staged a protest Thursday afternoon over stalled contract talks. According to Bruno Jeannotte, president of the Syndicat du transport de Montréal, which represents about 2,400 STM maintenance workers, the slow pace of negotiations could lead to stronger pressure tactics. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Jeannotte expressed frustration with the employer's failure to table its bargaining priorities, despite nine days of mediated talks since the end of the last strike in mid-June. 'Our perception is that the employer is stalling at the bargaining table,' he said. 'Instead of identifying its priorities — which should have happened on day one or two of mediation — they're asking us for clarifications on various articles, which in the end might not even make it into their priority list. So we're really at a standstill right now.' Waiting on Bill 89? Jeannotte suspects the STM may be dragging its feet in hopes the Quebec government will rush through Bill 89, legislation titled An Act to Better Consider the Needs of the Population in the Event of a Strike or Lockout. 'We know the labour minister, Jean Boulet, is hinting that bills like Bill 89 could be fast-tracked. Is the employer leaning on the minister, thinking it will get government backing, and so sees no benefit to negotiating right now? I can't explain why the STM still hasn't presented its priorities.' Bill 89 would limit strikes and expand the definition of essential services in Quebec. It also gives the labour minister new powers to intervene in labour disputes, including the ability to impose arbitration to end strikes or lockouts in certain cases. Pressure tactics or a breakthrough Maintenance workers already walked off the job from June 9 to 17. If bargaining remains stalled, Jeannotte warned the union may have to repeat that strategy. 'Will we be forced to strike again to really make an impact, to put pressure on the STM? We don't want it to come to that. But after nine full negotiating sessions without any priorities being tabled, we're concerned. If we can't reach an agreement in July or August, there will be pressure tactics come September.' Salaries and outsourcing are at the heart of the dispute. On wages, management is offering an 11 per cent raise over five years — less than half of the union's demand of 25 per cent. Outsourcing poses additional complications. The STM has said that due to chronic underfunding from Quebec, it is considering no longer doing certain maintenance work in-house, particularly in construction. But the union argues that outsourcing will cost more in the long run than using its own workers — assuming they stay. 'In the past, we were still ahead of the construction sector,' Jeannotte said. 'Now when we look at outside job postings, construction wages and conditions have improved. We need electricians, masons and bricklayers who work in the Metro at night. But the competition offers daytime work, weekends off, and overtime pay for weekend and night work. Meanwhile, the STM wants workers on regular pay for days, evenings, nights and weekends. That doesn't attract people.' Thirteen years of night shifts The Canadian Press spoke to one employee, who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of employer retaliation, who works as a track maintenance worker in the Metro . His reality echoed Jeannotte's comments when asked why he was protesting under the sweltering sun. 'It's mostly about work-life balance,' he said. 'I've been with the STM for 13 years, working nights as a track maintenance worker, and I still don't see the day when I'll have a daytime position.' The collective agreement expired Jan. 1, but negotiations began in March 2024. Mediation has been ongoing since the end of the strike on June 17. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on July 17, 2025.

Craig Sauvé is running for mayor of Montreal with a new party, vowing to ‘shake this race up'
Craig Sauvé is running for mayor of Montreal with a new party, vowing to ‘shake this race up'

Montreal Gazette

time4 days ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Craig Sauvé is running for mayor of Montreal with a new party, vowing to ‘shake this race up'

By Craig Sauvé is throwing his hat in the ring for mayor of Montreal alongside the launch of a new political party, The Gazette has learned. The independent city councillor confirmed the move Wednesday, saying Transition Montréal is a progressive option that wants to 'redefine the campaign.' 'We're going to shake this race up,' he said in an interview. 'We're going to offer another choice for Montrealers, instead of the two older parties. And we'll try to do it in a way that's fun, respectful and interesting.' Sauvé will officially make the announcement Thursday morning. In vying for the city's top job, he will be facing off against Projet Montréal Leader Luc Rabouin, who is also mayor of the Plateau-Mont-Royal borough, and Soraya Martinez Ferrada, a former federal Liberal cabinet minister who was acclaimed leader of Ensemble Montréal earlier this year. Sauvé said he brings the most experience with his 12 years as a city councillor and if he is elected, he will be connected to the ground and 'trying to bring people together.' When asked what he would do first if he becomes the next mayor of Montreal, he said he would 'reach out to the other teams and try to see how we can work together going forward.' 'I would have an executive committee where there's not just my party members sitting on the executive committee, but open it up to talented members of Ensemble Montréal and Projet Montréal so that we can work together,' he said. Since 2013, Sauvé has served as a city councillor representing the Saint-Henri—Little-Burgundy—Pointe-Saint-Charles district, and was first elected with Projet Montréal. He withdrew from the party caucus during the 2021 municipal election over a 2012 sexual abuse allegation he categorically denied. At the time, Sauvé said that he was already cleared of any wrongdoing, following investigations. When asked about the allegation Wednesday, Sauvé noted that both Projet Montréal and the police had investigated, and police had closed the file. He said it was something he wanted to 'address in a responsible, open, transparent, integral process' but that he is 'trying my best to move forward, with respect to everybody.' Since withdrawing from Projet Montréal in 2021, Sauvé has remained an independent city councillor. Did he consider returning to the party? He said there were discussions. 'There was a possibility there. At the same time, and this is again, I ran two campaigns federally, right? In between, I ran for the NDP twice, I came close during the byelection. After the second election, which we didn't win again, I started discussing with Projet again.' The long-time politician said he thought about it, adding he has 'very dear friends in the party' but ultimately decided against it. 'I'm not sure if that's the best motivation to do politics, you know? And to say, I want to be with this party,' he said, referring to friendships. 'I didn't feel inspired, by the recent, how can I say, the recent administration of Projet Montréal.' He said he doesn't want to bash other parties, but he was 'inspired by the project that Transition Montréal was proposing.' With his experience both behind the scenes and in office, he said he is in a unique position to 'undertake something like this.' The party will have its official launch Thursday. The new leader says he has already been working to recruit candidates and Transition Montréal plans to run them in all 19 boroughs. They want a diverse team, he added, including different linguistic and professional backgrounds. 'We want to stay above the fray of the bickering and the quarrelling,' he said. 'So we're going to try to propose this other voice for Montrealers that I think will appeal to many Montrealers.' The party will be announcing policies and candidacies in the coming weeks, he said. Sauvé mentioned two 'main pieces' will be addressed Thursday: one in economic justice and homelessness, and another in construction and public service. It will mark the third campaign for Sauvé in two years, including two attempts with the NDP in the LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. He said he didn't run because he grew bored of his current job, but he wanted to bring economic and social justice issues to a new level. 'I do love my job and I feel that this move is another way for me to bring my experience forward. And I'm excited about it,' he said.

Changing estimates after bids close is illegal, but Montreal did it anyway
Changing estimates after bids close is illegal, but Montreal did it anyway

Montreal Gazette

time4 days ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Changing estimates after bids close is illegal, but Montreal did it anyway

After the sole bid on a City of Montreal contract to re-engineer the traffic lights at some intersections came in 51 per cent higher than the city's cost estimate last year, the city raised its estimate to narrow the gap. That violated the Quebec Cities and Towns Act. But the municipal department handling the call for tenders didn't stop there. Montreal's urban planning and mobility department also altered a clause in the contract tender specifications to match a noncompliant element of the bidder's offer. The $3.4-million, two-year contract that went to engineering firm FNX-INNOV Inc. passed under the media's radar. It was approved during the eighth hour of a 10-hour session of city council in June 2024, one of 50 contractual items on the meeting agenda that generated no headlines. But the contract raised red flags with the opposition at city hall, which scolded the department in council for its manoeuvres to get the contract approved. 'The million-dollar question is: Are the estimations right?' Dominic Perri, an opposition Ensemble Montréal councillor who chairs city council's contracts review committee, said in an interview last week. 'How do we know if we're paying the correct price?' His committee, which includes councillors from the opposition and the Projet Montréal majority at city hall, was created in 2011 after corruption scandals had rocked Montreal. Contracts that must be sent to the committee for review include those worth $2 million or more that either received a sole bid or have a winning bid that is 20 per cent or more above or below the city's estimate. 'What I have a problem with is when they (city departments) present a bid in front of me and the difference from the estimation is 30 to 40 per cent,' Perri said. 'In the past two years, we see this kind of spread a lot, which makes us wonder why the estimations aren't more accurate. Sometimes we get reasonable answers, sometimes we want more explanation, sometimes we find errors and we point them out.' Civil servants from the urban planning and mobility department told Perri's committee that they had estimated $2.4 million for the traffic light contract by taking the price of a contract passed in 2021 and adding inflation. When FNX-INNOV's bid came in at $3.73 million, the city department negotiated with the firm, which agreed to lower its bid to $3.4 million. (Negotiation is permitted under Quebec law when there's a sole bidder.) The firm's new price narrowed the gap with the city's estimate to 38.18 per cent from the initial 51.32 per cent. Then the city department hiked its internal estimate by $500,000 to $2.9 million, which narrowed the gap with the firm's new price to 17.27 per cent. The department told Perri's committee that the bidder had used 12-hour workdays to price the surveillance work called for in the contract. The civil servants acknowledged to the committee members that the contract tenders had specified eight-hour workdays. However, the civil servants said they had underestimated the work involved and therefore amended the eight-hour workdays to 12-hour workdays in the contract specifications. They also said they had underestimated the time required to manage the tracking of excavated contaminated soil, a new requirement in Quebec that didn't exist for the 2021 contract that served as the base for their estimate. The Cities and Towns Act says a municipality may not amend a contract after the call for tenders is closed, unless the amendment is incidental to the contract and doesn't change its nature. What is 'incidental' is a matter of opinion. However, the Act offers no wiggle room on requiring municipalities to produce internal estimates on contracts over $100,000 before opening the bids. The Quebec Municipal Affairs Department told The Gazette it can't comment on specific situations. However, the ministry confirmed that even a revised estimate must be produced before opening the envelopes. But according to a former member of Mayor Valérie Plante's Projet Montréal administration, it's 'common practice' for the city to alter its estimates after seeing the bids. 'And do you know why?' former Plateau-Mont-Royal borough mayor Luc Ferrandez, who was on the city executive committee during Plante's first term, said on his radio program on 98.5 FM in May. 'If the submitted bid exceeds the city's assessment by, say, 30 or 40 per cent, the city must publicly justify why it is proceeding anyway. And to avoid having to publicly justify why it is proceeding anyway, it will modify its assessment to reduce the difference.' Ferrandez made the assertion while discussing a recent study by the Institut de recherche et d'informations socioéconomiques (IRIS) that found Montreal's fees to private engineering firms have skyrocketed while the quality of work has diminished in the past decade. Perri's committee didn't recommend approving the traffic light contract — a first in its history, according to the opposition. The panel instead recommended suspending the awarding process and asking the Bureau de l'inspecteur général (BIG) to investigate. The committee's report on the contract 'expressed discomfort' over several aspects of the file. It noted that 'the conditions of a call for tenders should not be changed after the bids have been opened, as this could have disadvantaged other bidders who might otherwise have decided to submit a bid. This change may also suggest that the estimate was revised to make the gap more acceptable. Furthermore, it may suggest that the firm exerted influence on the department's recommendation to award the contract.' Nine firms had purchased the call for tenders package, but only FNX-INNOV submitted an offer. Less than two weeks later, the BIG issued a confidential opinion to Perri's committee: Altering the estimate and the tender specifications after the fact 'had no impact on the fairness of the contract-awarding process,' the BIG concluded. A week after, city council voted unanimously to award the contract. Perri shared the contracts committee's misgivings in council and read out the BIG's response. His colleague, Ensemble Montréal councillor Alan DeSousa, chastised the urban planning and mobility department for its actions, starting with creating an estimate 'riddled with errors.' Projet Montréal councillor Sophie Mauzerolle, a member of the city executive committee, cited the BIG's finding and said the tendering process was correctly handled. 'Certainly, some elements were omitted by the estimator, including data that could have been collected during negotiations, which explains the subsequent price adjustment,' she told council. 'But I want to reassure all my colleagues that everything was done properly.' The BIG's blessing was reason enough to greenlight the contract at council, Perri maintains. The BIG has the authority and experience to judge such matters. But even if his misgivings about the contract were allayed, Perri says he remains concerned about the city's inaccurate estimates. Montreal still uses a 'historical price' method to estimate engineering contract prices. The method takes the price of a previous contract and adds inflation to calculate an acceptable price for the bids on a new contract. By contrast, Montreal uses a 'fair value' method of estimation for construction contracts today to determine market value. The method assesses objective factors, like the real costs of items, the complexity of the work, market competition and the availability of labour. 'We would like estimates that reflect market price,' Perri said of his committee. 'It would help us do our work, and it would also help the city to better budget for its work.' A shortcoming of historical-price estimation, as the 2013 Léonard report pointed out, is it assumes that historical contract prices resulted from a free and competitive market. Colin Pratte, who authored the IRIS study, found there's little competition for Montreal's engineering contracts. Three-quarters of them are won by five firms, and a substantial portion receive a sole bid. DeSousa, meanwhile, bats the issue of what he calls 'lazy estimation' back to the BIG to investigate. DeSousa asked: Does the city regularly alter its estimates to come closer to bid prices? Have other contracts avoided scrutiny by the committee because the city narrowed the gap between its estimate and the bid price to less than 20 per cent? 'And how widespread is it?' he asked. The BIG refused to discuss the traffic light contract with The Gazette. 'The Inspector General cannot comment on a matter that has not been the subject of a public report,' BIG spokesperson Linda Boutin said. Information exchanged during the contracts committee's in-camera meetings is confidential. If it discussed the opinion it gave on the traffic light contract, she said, 'the Inspector General would be violating this confidentiality rule adopted by elected officials.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store