
Which Home Run Derby participants are built to hit at Truist Park?
Advertisement
So, how do we pick a prospective winner in this year's contest? We look at the numbers, of course.
First, we looked at the data to see which contestant is best set up to smash baseballs out of Truist Park specifically.
For some of the Derby hitters, we have a large sample of data in Atlanta to draw from. Ronald Acuña Jr., who was initially slated to participate before pulling out with a back injury, hit 92 career HRs in 1,442 ABs at his home ballpark, by far the most substantial track record of anyone who was set to compete on Monday. His Braves teammate Matt Olson, who'll replace him in the festivities, has 62 HR in 1,052 ABs at Truist Park. And from his time as a member of the division-rival Miami Marlins, Jazz Chisholm Jr. also has 99 career ABs (with 5 HRs) at Truist Park.
But everyone else in the Derby lineup has 25 or fewer career ABs there, including Junior Caminero and his zero lifetime appearances in Atlanta. So clearly, to get a sense of who might get a charge at The Battery, we'll need to turn to other statistical tricks and approximations.
Along those lines, one of the coolest Statcast features tracked by Baseball Savant is its adjusted home run projections — which look at all of a player's batted balls, estimating how many of them would have gone out of every park in MLB after accounting for hit distance, temperature, elevation, wall height and other factors. Using these numbers for the Derby contestants, we can judge how many home runs each would have hit if they'd played every game at Truist Park, comparing that with their actual HR rates.
Here's a chart showing the change in home runs per AB — using at-bats rather than plate appearances to remove cases where a player walked or otherwise never got the chance to swing for the fences — between a player's actual numbers and his Atlanta-projected stats, looking at a weighted average from the past three seasons (with 2025 stats receiving more weight than 2024, and so forth):
Because Truist is a hitter-friendly park (relative to average) for home runs and hard-hit balls in general, many of our HR Derby contenders would have received a bump to their power stats if they'd played every single game in Atlanta. But there are a few notable exceptions. Olson, for instance, actually would have hit fewer HRs over the past three seasons (97 versus 100) if he didn't play any road games. Caminero's batted-ball profile would have resulted in one fewer HR this season if he'd played every game at Truist Park. And Raleigh, whose actual three-year HR/AB rate of 7.7 percent leads all HR Derby participants by nearly 1.5 percentage points over Brent Rooker (6.3 percent), would see his figure dip to 7.0 percent in Atlanta — while Rooker would rise to 6.5 percent under those same conditions, setting up a much closer comparison than the unadjusted stats would imply.
Advertisement
Of course, Raleigh's adjusted HR/AB rate of 7.0 percent would still come in tops among the Derby field, which lines up with his strong 25.0 percent implied probability to win the contest (based on the BetMGM odds, after removing the juice). But not every player's odds align with what we might expect based on their projected HR stats at Truist Park. The scatter plot below compares each player's Atlanta-projected HR per AB rate with their implied chance of winning the Derby:
The big outlier is Cruz, who is one of the favorites to win the whole thing despite hitting just 39 Atlanta-adjusted HR in 876 at-bats since 2023 — good for a weighted rate of 4.6 percent that actually ranks last among the Derby field by far. (Next-lowest is James Wood at 5.3 percent.)
What accounts for this huge disparity? Mainly, Cruz has loads of other non-home-run-related power indicators, such as his league-high (or near it) marks in exit velocity (maximum and average), hard-hit ball rate and bat speed. This potentially places him within a long tradition of HR Derby winners with eye-popping measurements in those underlying metrics, regardless of how many of those batted balls would have actually gone over the fence in Atlanta.
Clearly, then, bettors are placing more stock in Cruz's monster power potential than in-game results like homers or even isolated power, where he rates next to Cody Bellinger, Isaac Paredes and José Ramírez (i.e., hitters with far less raw power). Conversely, a hitter like Rooker, with excellent in-game power but less stunning exit-velo or hard-hit rates, might be getting underrated in the odds, particularly relative to how Atlanta would have provided him with even more HRs than he actually had.
In addition to Cruz versus Rooker, the biggest question marks in this data are whether Raleigh will see at least some of his fearsome, league-leading power sapped by a poor fit with the host ballpark, and how Truist Park will treat Olson, who'll certainly get fan support, but perhaps not a boost for being more suited to hitting at his home park.
Advertisement
The big takeaway is that Chisholm Jr. figures to benefit the most from ballpark fit, with a HR/AB rate projected to be 0.4 percentage points higher if he played every game at Truist. And Rooker would be right behind him, which means Rooker and Chisholm Jr. present more value than the odds are giving them credit for. On the flip side, Raleigh (because the stadium hurts him) and Cruz (because his in-game HR rate isn't as good as Statcast metrics would predict) present less value.
Ultimately, the park-specific HR projections suggest a tighter race than the odds imply, though we'll have to see who actually goes deep once the big bats start swinging in Atlanta.
Editor's note: Stats were as of Saturday, July 12
Betting/odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
Neil Paine is a freelance writer whose work also appears regularly at ESPN.com, NASCAR.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Sherwood News and his eponymous Substack. He is the former Sports Editor at FiveThirtyEight, and was also an analytics consultant for the NBA's Atlanta Hawks.
(Photo of Cal Raleigh: Douglas P. DeFelice / Getty Images)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
Pac-12, Mountain West fail to resolve poaching fees case in mediation
The Pac-12 Conference and the Mountain West Conference are heading back to court after failing to resolve their $150 million-plus poaching fees case by a deadline that had been set for Tuesday. The lawsuit was initially brought by the Pac-12 last September over poaching fees it said the Mountain West had forced upon it. The Mountain West countered with a motion to dismiss. Both conferences filed a motion on March 14 to stay the case to discuss mediation. The conferences had a deadline of July 15 to report to the court on the progress of the mediation. Advertisement On Tuesday, the Pac-12 and Mountain West acknowledged that they had not made progress and requested that the court hold a hearing on Sept. 9. In a statement acquired by The Athletic on Tuesday, the Pac-12 acknowledged that sides had 'jointly requested a hearing on the pending motion to dismiss,' adding that 'the Pac-12 remains committed to moving forward with legal action in response to the Mountain West's attempt to impose so-called 'poaching penalties,' provisions we believe are unlawful and intended to obstruct our ability to act in the best interests of our student-athletes and member institutions. 'We are confident in the strength of our position and remain focused on upholding the academic excellence, athletic success, and proud tradition that have defined the Pac-12 for more than a century.' The Mountain West did not immediately respond to a request for comment. New in court: The Pac-12 and Mountain West did not resolve their $150m+ poaching fees case in mediation, so it'll continue in court. MW has filed a motion to dismiss the Pac-12's case, that'll come up in September. — Chris Vannini (@ChrisVannini) July 15, 2025 In late 2023, the Mountain West, Pac-12, Oregon State and Washington State signed a football scheduling agreement for the 2024 season. OSU and WSU lacked options following the set departures of 10 Pac-12 schools to the Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC. As part of the agreement, the Pac-12 agreed to a set of escalating poaching fees if it added some, but not all, Mountain West schools. After the Mountain West and Pac-12 couldn't reach a scheduling agreement last summer for the 2025 season, the Pac-12 added Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, San Diego State and Utah State. Those moves are set to happen next summer. In the case filed in California in late 2023, the Pac-12 sued over the $55 million in poaching fees owed to the Mountain West over the Pac-12's additions of the five Mountain West schools. Advertisement In its lawsuit, the Pac-12 argued that the poaching fees and agreements were forced upon them at a vulnerable time. The Mountain West said the conference and its two members made the agreement freely and made no objection at the time. In December, the Mountain West filed a motion to dismiss the case. It is worth noting that the five schools that are departing the Mountain West did put in their notice to leave this summer, putting their exit fees at $18 million each. Some of those schools have separately sued the Mountain West over their exit fees, but this mediation had hoped to resolve it altogether. The entire saga has come as a result of the disintegration of the Pac-12 in 2023-24. Former members USC, UCLA, Washington and Oregon are now in the Big Ten, while Arizona, Arizona State, Utah and Colorado have moved to the Big 12. Stanford and Cal are now competing in the ACC. Oregon State and Washington State, the lone remaining teams from the conference, have tried to lead a rebuild. In addition to the five former Mountain West schools set to join, Texas State has also agreed to move over from the Sun Belt Conference next July. Basketball power Gonzaga, a member of the West Coast Conference, will also join next July as a non-football member.


New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
What time is the MLB All-Star Game?
Hello baseball fans and welcome to The Athletic's live coverage of the 2025 MLB All-Star Game! Baseball's brightest stars are once again gearing up for the midsummer classic with both the American League and National League starting lineups featuring a blend of familiar faces and budding young stars. We'll be taking you through all the action tonight before, during and after the game with some help from our own all-star roster of MLB writers here at The Athletic , including several on the ground in Atlanta! So stick with us right here all night long as baseball's best share the field!


Fox Sports
17 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
Cal Raleigh successful on first All-Star robot umpire challenge, a day after winning Home Run Derby
Associated Press ATLANTA (AP) — Cal Raleigh was just as successful with the first robot umpire All-Star challenge as he was in the Home Run Derby. Seattle's catcher signaled for an appeal to the Automated Ball-Strike System in the first inning Tuesday, getting a strikeout on San Diego's Manny Machado. 'You take 'em any way you can get 'em boys,' Detroit pitcher Tarik Skubal said on the mound. Skubal had given up Ketel Marte's two-run double and retired the Dodgers' Freddie Freeman on a groundout for his first out when he got ahead of Machado 0-2 in the count. Skubal threw a 89.5 mph changeup, and plate umpire Dan Iassogna yelled" 'Ball down!' Raleigh tapped his helmet, triggering a review by the computer umpire that was tested in spring training this year and could be adopted for regular-season use in 2026. 'I think it's a strike,' Raleigh said to Skubal in a conversation captured because they were wearing microphones for the Fox broadcast. An animation of the computer analysis was shown on the Truist Park scoreboard and the broadcast. NL manager Dave Roberts laughed in the dugout after the challenge. Before the game, baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred indicated the sport's 11-man competition committee will consider the system for next season. "I think the ability to correct a bad call in a high-leverage situation without interfering with the time of game because it's so fast is something we ought to continue to pursue,' Manfred said. ABS decisions may have an error of margin up to a half-inch. 'Our guys do have a concern with that half inch, what that might otherwise lead to particularly as it relates to the number of challenges you may have, whether you keep those challenges during the course of the game,' union head Tony Clark told the Baseball Writers Association of America. 'Does there need to be some type of buffer zone consideration? Or do we want to find ourselves in a world where it's the most egregious misses that we want focus in on?' Manfred sounded less concerned. 'I don't believe that technology supports the notion that you need a buffer zone,' he said. 'To get into the idea that there's something that is not a strike that you're going to call a strike in a review system, I don't know why I would want to do that.' MLB sets the top of the automated strike zone at 53.5% of a batter's height and the bottom at 27%, basing the decision on the midpoint of the plate, 8 1/2 inches from the front and 8 1/2 inches from the back. That contrasts with the rule book zone called by umpires, which says the zone is a cube. 'We haven't even started talking about the strike zone itself, how that's going to necessarily be measured, and whether or not there are tweaks that need to be made there, too," Clark said. "So there's a lot of discussion that still needs to be had, despite the fact that it seems more inevitable than not.' Manfred has tested ABS in the minor leagues since 2019, using it for all pitches and then switching to a challenge system. Each team gets two challenges and a successful challenge is retained. Only catchers, batters and pitchers can call for a challenge. 'Where we are on ABS has been fundamentally influenced by player input,' he maintained. "If you had two years ago said to me: What do the owners want to do? I think they would have called every pitch with ABS as soon as possible. That's because there is a fundamental, very fundamental interest in getting it right, right? We owe it to our fans to try to get it right because the players as I talked to them over a couple of years really, expressed a very strong interest or preference for the challenge system that we decided to test." __ AP MLB: recommended Item 1 of 3 in this topic