National Doctor's Day: Date, History, Significance- All About It
History of National Doctor's Day
The Government of India designated July 1 as National Doctor's Day in 1991. This day marks the birth anniversary of renowned physician and the second Chief Minister of West Bengal, Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy.
Dr. Roy played a significant role in developing India's healthcare system and established the Indian Medical Association and the Medical Council of India. In addition to raising the nation's medical standards, his work motivated future medical professionals to strive for greatness and service.
He was born on July 1, 1882, and died on the same day in 1962.
Significance of Doctor's Day
Doctor's Day emphasizes the role of doctors in public health, especially during crises like pandemics, where their expertise and leadership are critical. It also serves as a reminder that healthcare is a communal effort, and doctors play a crucial role in maintaining public health.
Doctor's Day also provides an opportunity to raise awareness about the significance of health and the many challenges faced by medical professionals. Celebrating Doctor's Day can motivate doctors to continue their important work and inspire others to enter the medical field.
On this day various events and activities are organised across India to recognize the invaluable contribution of our doctors.
Disclaimer: This content including advice provides generic information only. It is in no way a substitute for a qualified medical opinion. Always consult a specialist or your own doctor for more information. NDTV does not claim responsibility for this information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Charak, Sushruta awards for state's top doctors announced on National Doctor's Day
Dehradun: State health minister Dr Dhan Singh Rawat announced the launch of the Charak Award and Sushruta Award on National Doctor's Day to honour MBBS doctors and faculty from govt medical colleges for their outstanding contributions to medicine. The announcement, made on Tuesday, came during the Doctor of the Year Award 2025 event at Doon Medical College in Dehradun. Named after two pioneers of Indian medical science—Charaka, the father of Ayurveda, and Sushruta, the father of Ayurvedic surgery—the awards aim to recognise excellence in both practice and medical education. The rollout may begin next year. This initiative follows the state's earlier move to replace the Hippocratic Oath with the Maharshi Charak Shapath, as recommended by the National Medical Commission (NMC). Dr Rawat said the awardees will receive monetary rewards of Rs 1 lakh, Rs 75,000, and Rs 50,000, and be eligible for international study support. They will also get a two-year relaxation in transfer policy, which is yet to be finalised. He added that a dedicated policy for the medical education department is being prepared to address faculty vacancies and improve healthcare services in the state's hilly and rural regions. On Wednesday, Dr Rawat criticised the slow progress in the construction of medical colleges, saying delays had escalated costs. While the state planned to set up a government medical college in each of its 13 districts, only four are currently operational with student batches. He added that the department is also focused on strengthening the public healthcare system through large-scale recruitment of specialist doctors, medical officers, nurses, paramedics, and technical staff across government hospitals and medical colleges.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
83% of Doctors in India Report Mental Fatigue, 70% Cite Workplace Safety Concerns
New Delhi: Medical brand Knya on the occasion of National Doctor's day has launched Knya Vitals 2025: Behind the Scrubs, a nationwide survey capturing insights from over 10,000 healthcare professionals across the country. The report intends to highlight the emotional, ethical, and physical toll of practising medicine in India today. The report finds that 83 per cent of doctors experience mental or emotional fatigue, with the rate rising to 87 per cent among women. One in three doctors reports having less than an hour each day for personal time, including rest and time with family. Workplace safety remains a serious concern, with 7 out of 10 respondents saying they do not feel safe at work. The report also states that 1 in 2 medical professionals feel pressured by their institutions to act against the Medical Code of Ethics. Among women doctors, 70 per cent say they feel unsafe at work, and 75 per cent regret entering or continuing in the medical profession. Fatigue levels are higher in smaller cities, with 85 per cent of respondents in tier 2 and 3 locations reporting emotional or physical exhaustion, compared to 74 per cent in Tier 1 cities. The survey indicated that doctors in India are also working significantly longer hours than the national average. Half of the surveyed medical professionals report working more than 60 hours a week, and 15 per cent work beyond 80 hours. Professionals in the 25–34 age group report the longest hours, highest levels of fatigue, and the most regret about career choices. This regret, however, drops notably after the age of 35. The report also highlights the compensation aspect. In terms of compensation and recognition, 43 per cent of respondents feel underpaid and cite inadequate institutional support during the most demanding years of their careers. Doctors practicing in tier 2 and 3 cities such as Nagpur and Aurangabad report more severe fatigue and safety concerns than their counterparts in larger metros, attributing this to limited mental health resources and overburdened infrastructure. According to the report, concerns about artificial intelligence displacing jobs are minimal, with fewer than 1 per cent of doctors viewing AI as a threat. Instead, 55 per cent of respondents fear burnout or mental health breakdowns, 50 per cent worry about a collapse of the public healthcare system, and 48 per cent cite concerns about physical safety in their workplace. Long working hours were identified by 58 per cent of respondents as the most significant barrier to well-being, followed by patient overload at 46 per cent and administrative burden at 36 per cent.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Mixing Ayurveda with modern medicine: What matters is scientific proof
The proposal to integrate MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) and BAMS (Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery) into a single course has sparked controversy and opposition, with some calling it 'mixopathy'. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) and other organisations have voiced concerns, stating it is unscientific and could compromise patient safety. The proposed course, planned for JIPMER, aims to create doctors capable of utilising both allopathic and Ayurvedic treatments and provide a holistic diagnosis and treatment plan for patients. The Hindu webinar examined this proposal by the Central government to merge the Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) with the Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) into a single integrated course. It has not just ignited a debate within the medical community, but will also have a direct impact on the way patients will be diagnosed and treated in as little as five years from now. The panellists included Dr. R.P. Parasher from the All India Doctors Association of ISM; Dr. Lakshya Mittal from United Doctors Front; Dr. Rajeev Jayadevan, former IMA President in Cochin; and Dr. Manisha Mishra, Ayurveda Physician MD (Ayu). The discussion was moderated by Bindu Perappadan, Senior Assistant Editor at The Hindu. The principle of falsifiability Speaking against this integration, Dr. Jayadevan said that every country has its own traditional knowledge systems; while traditional systems like Ayurveda deserve respect, they cannot be mixed with modern medicine, as Ayurveda and modern medicine are founded on completely different principles. Also Read: IMA opposes proposed integrated MBBS-BAMS course, calls it unscientific He emphasised that modern medicine is evidence-based and founded on proof. So whatever is claimed must be supported by evidence, adhering to the principle of falsifiability. For instance, if it is said that water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, that statement should be demonstrable with proof as true or false. However, if it is said that a particular disease occurs due to one's actions in a past life, it is a belief-based and non-falsifiable statement. 'These systems can exist in parallel, but mixing them is not acceptable,' he said. Dr. Manisha Mishra, speaking in support of integration, highlighted that Ayurveda is fundamentally focused on health preservation and disease prevention, viewing health as a balance of bioenergy, physical and mental attributes, lifestyle (vihar), and diet (ahaar). It considers the soul, emotions, and genotype and phenotype in assessing disease risk and advising lifestyle changes early on to avoid future illness. She said that while Ayurveda once included surgical practices, its strength today lies more in therapeutic and holistic approaches. Unlike modern medicine's precision and symptom-focused interventions, Ayurveda aims to restore physiological balance. Dr. Mishra argued that integrating both systems could lead to holistic patient care, especially in acute cases where diagnostics from modern medicine can be combined with Ayurvedic lifestyle interventions. Integration, she added, would also improve doctor-patient communication, reduce stigma around using alternative supplements, and offer cost-effective, accessible healthcare, particularly in rural and primary care settings. Not at the cost of patient safety Dr. Mittal questioned the scientific basis of integrating the two systems, suggesting that mixing treatments without full knowledge could lead to serious side effects. He said that reforms should be in the larger public interest, and not rushed at the cost of student welfare and patient safety. Dr. Mittal called this policy idealistic but impractical. Drawing on feedback from medical students and young resident doctors, he argued that India's medical education system is already under strain, with infrastructure and quality degrading. Dr. Mittal emphasized that existing issues in medical colleges, including inadequate auditing and poor facilities must be addressed before introducing such major reforms. He warned that students are being treated like guinea pigs in these hybridisation experiments, and that this could eventually compromise both medical training and patient care. No single system complete on its own Dr. Parasher supported the integration of Ayurveda and modern medicine, arguing that no single system of medicine is complete on its own. He said that while modern medicine is heavily evidence-based, Ayurveda has its time-tested wisdom that can be valuable in today's healthcare context. Also Read: Ayurvedic medicine manufacturers support move to launch integrated medicine course at JIPMER Dr. Parasher noted that patients often do not receive complete or satisfactory treatment from a single system, and combining approaches could address the limitations of each. He also highlighted that many modern medicines, like TB drugs and antibiotics, are hepatotoxic, and Ayurvedic formulations can help manage or reduce these side effects, leading to better patient compliance. Lastly, he pointed out that despite scientific advancements, lifestyle diseases such as diabetes and hypertension are rising, and incorporating Ayurvedic principles and treatments could help manage these conditions more effectively. Important to place regulatory norms for Ayurveda Moderator Bindu Perappadan asked whether there is a lack of academic and research rigor in alternative medicine systems like Ayurveda compared to modern medicine. She highlighted that MBBS education involves stringent processes for documentation, publication, and clinical trials, and asked whether the absence of similar standards in Ayurveda could compromise the quality of education and ultimately impact patient care. Also Read: What are the risks of the government's proposed 'mixopathy' move? | In Focus podcast Dr. Manisha Mishra responded by acknowledging the gap in regulatory rigor and agreed that Ayurvedic patent medicines should be subjected to Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs). She pointed out that while modern medicines are target-based and require DCGI approval, similar regulatory enforcement is lacking in Ayurveda, and it is the government's responsibility to address that. However, she defended classical Ayurvedic formulations, noting they've been used safely over centuries and that reverse pharmacology research has been conducted on herbs like Ashwagandha, Brahmi, and Turmeric. She emphasized that CCRAS and PG students are doing research, but conceded that it should become more rigorous. Improve scientific temperament Dr. Rajeev Jayadevan stressed that belief or tradition alone cannot substitute for scientific evidence. He shared an anecdote from his medical training in New York, where his professor dismissed a drug recommendation because it lacked scientific backing, even though it had been taught to Jayadevan by another professor. Jayadevan explained, 'That's the point here, even in modern medicine, we must improve scientific temperament.' He emphasized that modern medicine is built on evidence and transparency, including explicit documentation of side effects, which is often missing in alternative systems. He warned against the illusion of safety in traditional treatments and shared that some liver transplants today are necessitated by unregulated herbal medicine use. As discussions continue around this proposal's implications for future medical education in India, it remains clear that any changes must prioritise patient welfare above all else while ensuring rigorous standards are maintained across all forms of medical practice.
