Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories
The investment in Welsh rail announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday will be spent on new stations and upgraded railway lines, and delivered through both direct funding and additional money for the Welsh Government.
However, Ms Davies branded the sum 'paltry' and said the Government was 'short-changing' Wales.
The Conservative frontbencher asked Wales Secretary Jo Stevens: 'Does the minister prefer peanuts, cashew nuts, or simply scraps for Wales?
'The fabled two Labour governments in lockstep is simply a myth for voters.
'Changing rail classifications and short-changing Welsh communities is a true reality.
'Is the minister concerned by today's reported peanuts, because when did she become aware of just over £400 million, the paltry settlement to come to Wales?
'How will it be split to Welsh Government? How does she think it compares to our Government's £740 million on rail alone?'
Responding, Ms Stevens said: 'Her party was in government for 14 years when Wales got 1% of the rail enhancement budget, when it has 11% of the whole UK network.
'Her party are responsible for the historic underfunding of the Welsh rail and we'll hear from the Chancellor this afternoon about what this Government is going to do about it.'
Liz Saville-Roberts, Plaid Cymru's leader in Westminster, also accused the Government of reclassifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project, rather than England only.
She said: 'The Secretary of State for Wales joined Plaid Cymru in condemning the Conservatives for denying Wales £4.6 billion in rail funding.
'Now she's in government, she's waxing lyrical about 10% of that, and content with moving the goalpost to deny Wales a further £300 million by recently classifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as benefiting Wales. I don't know how they make this up.
'Does she oppose this new injustice? Or was she ignored? Or is it her mission to see Wales short-changed?'
Ms Stevens reiterated her previous response to this accusation that the Government had only been correcting a publishing error and that the Oxford-Cambridge line was always considered an England and Wales development.
She said: 'I listened very carefully to the question, and I'm sure she would not wish to unintentionally mislead the House.
'This was an error on the Oxford-Cambridge line. This was an error by the Conservative government in the 2021 spending review.
'And as she knows, heavy rail infrastructure is reserved, not devolved. Like every heavy rail project in England, Barnet consequentials do not apply.
'The UK Government fund from which East West Rail is being funded is also directing funding projects in Wales, like the redevelopment of Wales's busiest station, Cardiff central, improvements to level crossings in north Wales and upgrading the South Wales Relief Link.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You Buy Bitcoin With $10,000 in 2025, Will You Become a Millionaire in 10 Years?
Key Points Bitcoin continues to be viewed more favorably by institutions, companies, and government agencies, which bodes well. It wouldn't be surprising if Bitcoin reaches gold's market cap by 2035, because its returns will be lower than the past. Investors who can extend their time horizon should see better results. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) has undoubtedly made some of its early investors rich beyond their wildest dreams. That's because the world's top cryptocurrency has seen its price rise 41,000% in the past decade. A $10,000 investment back then would be worth more than $4.1 million today. Bitcoin is now becoming a mainstream financial asset that's grabbing the attention of investors, corporations, and governments, bringing in a new pool of capital. As of July 24, it trades just 1% off its peak -- and there is still upside. But if you invest $10,000 in the crypto in 2025, will you become a millionaire in 10 years? Bitcoin's growing adoption The world has now woken up to Bitcoin. Its 10-year track record is impressive. And the crypto has climbed 80% just in the past 12 months, as its incredible ascent continues. Investors appreciate its scarcity, with a hard supply cap of 21 million coins -- in stark contrast to other tokens on the market. And it's significantly better than fiat currencies, which are constantly being debased due to governments' troubling financial actions that cause spending and debt to increase. Institutions are getting in on the action. Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have so far been wildly successful, bringing in tens of billions of dollars of capital since January 2024. Banks can now hold the crypto on behalf of clients, getting the green light from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. And corporations own it on their balance sheets, a strategy that has helped drive up market valuations. The U.S. government is becoming accommodating as well. The White House created the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. And Trump Media & Technology Group just announced a $2 billion purchase of the digital currency and related securities. These trends drastically reduce the risk of buying and holding it. Growing adoption among major market participants is definitely a bullish indicator. Beating the stock market In the past decade, the S&P 500 index has generated a total return of 261%. This translates to an annualized gain of 13.7%, which is well ahead of the long-term average of 10%. Even if the closely watched benchmark repeats its superb performance over the next decade, I think Bitcoin will do even better. Because it doesn't produce revenue, net income, or free cash flow, investors struggle to properly value it. However, it's worth comparing the digital asset to gold, which is a scarce, neutral global asset that is also viewed as a store of value. Gold has a total value of $22.6 trillion, with Bitcoin's market cap sitting at $2.4 trillion. It's extremely reasonable to expect the cryptocurrency's price to rise tenfold over the next decade; it would simply have to get to parity with gold's value today. That's not hard to believe, especially when you consider the properties that make it superior to the precious metal. Plus, the ongoing digitization of our economy, coupled with the advancement of artificial intelligence agents, might provide another boost. This would turn a $10,000 investment into $100,000 in 10 years' time. No one would argue with this wonderful outcome. However, I don't think Bitcoin will rise 100-fold by 2035, which would turn a $10,000 outlay into $1 million. This kind of monster gain is a thing of the past -- the digital token is slowly maturing. And as it increases in value, the upside from that point forward naturally declines. But those who are able to invest more cash up front and extend their time horizon to several decades, can certainly raise the probability of becoming millionaires from Bitcoin. Should you buy stock in Bitcoin right now? Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If You Buy Bitcoin With $10,000 in 2025, Will You Become a Millionaire in 10 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Judges Continue to Block Trump Policies Following Supreme Court Ruling
WASHINGTON—When the Supreme Court issued a blockbuster decision in June limiting the authority of federal judges to halt Trump administration policies nationwide, the president was quick to pronounce the universal injunction all but dead. One month later, states, organizations and individuals challenging government actions are finding a number of ways to notch wins against the White House, with judges in a growing list of cases making clear that sweeping relief remains available when they find the government has overstepped its authority.
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Russia Counters Ukrainian Drones by Turning Off Russians' Mobile Internet
Katya's phone suddenly refused to provide the basics she needed to drive home to Moscow from St. Petersburg. She, her partner and countless others were unable to go online, cut off from their apps for things like maps, banking, paying road tolls and buying fuel. There was no warning, no hint how widespread the outage was, no clue how long it would last — but it wasn't a surprise, either. Russia's mobile internet networks now have frequent blackouts because of the war with Ukraine. Since last month, the authorities have shut those networks down every day in various parts of the country, in unpredictable patterns, for hours at a time. The goals is to try to thwart attacks by Ukrainian drones that use mobile connections for navigation. It is a big disruption in a country where smartphones provide the only online access for millions of people. The government regularly touts an array of online services, like filing tax returns and applying for jobs, and President Vladimir V. Putin claimed this year that Russia was 'a step ahead of many other nations.' Even so, 'they can turn off the internet,' said Katya, 32. She described how the government had encouraged reliance on apps and web services — and then exercised control over internet access — as a 'digital gulag.' Like others interviewed, she asked to be identified only by her first name out of fear for her safety. She and her partner made it home from their recent weekend getaway, after struggling with a partially downloaded map and phoning her partner's mother to top up their debit card to pay for gas. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
