Where else will Verstappen threaten McLaren? Plus, F1 reacts to incredible Hülkenberg
Welcome back to Prime Tire, where I'm still drying out after being caught in a downpour walking into the Silverstone paddock on Sunday morning. The warm glow from seeing Nico Hülkenberg take a first Formula One podium in 239 attempts is helping, however.
I'm Alex, and Madeline Coleman will be along later.
Patrick Iversen has just flown back home to Texas, and while I've stayed steady on London time all week, I'm back as Tuesday host with Pat again taking my slot on Friday. Normal service will resume next week.
I fully agree with Madeline saying 'a case of 'what could've been'' about Oscar Piastri's 2025 British Grand Prix. One can make the same case for Lando Norris taking his trophy to celebrate with fans gathered on the Silverstone pit straight before a photographer essentially fell on his nose.
But the same really applies to Max Verstappen's result last Sunday too.
Advertisement
The Dutchman delivered another epic lap to claim pole — running adrift of the Q3 pack and being all inevitably Thanos in sealing a fourth such grid-heading result of 2025. It was Suzuka-esque, and afterwards I asked him how he feels when showing such searing speed at tracks that really show an F1 driver's class.
'I think it's natural. (These are) tracks that I just enjoy more,' Max replied. 'I don't like street circuits in general. I just like the high speeds, where you have to be committed. It's more flowing. That's really where an F1 car comes alive. Naturally, the car has to work with you, right? And we know that on this kind of track the car just comes alive a bit more.'
And this got me thinking: What other tracks have these Red Bull-boosting characteristics for the rest of the F1 calendar? Because, at these, Verstappen is surely going to be more than just a thorn in orange sidepods.
Now, as discussed last week, you can never count Max out of anything in F1.
He's good enough to be in the fight at upcoming tracks where McLaren should dominate — in Hungary, the Netherlands and Singapore. But four tracks out of the remaining 12 where Red Bull could really nick more wins along the lines of Suzuka and Imola for Verstappen earlier this year isn't enough to overturn the now 69-point deficit he faces in the drivers' standings.
So, what happened to Verstappen's Silverstone potential?
In a word: rain.
The Sunday morning and early afternoon showers at Silverstone meant Red Bull's skinny wing choice was exposed — and it was notable that Verstappen was fast in the drier start and end to the race. In the soaking middle he was nowhere and furious about it.
Red Bull had fitted its Monza wing to eradicate the understeer Verstappen hates that had held him back on single lap pace in practice. The weather forecast changing dramatically overnight on Saturday-Sunday left it stranded, as when it rains, bigger rear wings help drivers keep control of their cars with extra downforce effect.
Advertisement
Of course, Verstappen also made a second major error in this season — after his Spain red mist moment. He spun out of second at the safety car restart and had also been off the road in front of Norris before the first pitstops for the leaders. It was an rare poor mistake from the world champion, which he didn't feel was down to Piastri's penalty-earning safety car restart braking.
'I just got on throttle and the car was gone,' Verstappen said of his spin.
Another team off the road and spinning around at Silverstone was Ferrari. Over to Madeline to explain what went wrong for Lewis Hamilton, Charles Leclerc and co. last weekend.
Ferrari's British GP was complicated. It'd shown signs of strong competitive pace, and with Hamilton starting the race fifth, you couldn't rule him out of podium contention. After all, the seven-time world champion had previously secured 12 consecutive podium finishes at Silverstone, and he excels in wet conditions.
The Ferrari drivers immediately diverged on strategy in the mixed-conditions race, where knowing when to swap intermediate tires for slicks (and which compound at that) was the key. Leclerc made the call to go from inters to slicks on the race's formation lap — giving up his sixth place to start from pit lane. He then had several off-track moments on the way to a bruising 14th.
'It's easy to say at the end that it was not the right call,' Ferrari team boss Fred Vasseur said afterwards. 'But I think Charles (quickly) understood that it was not the right call because he was already five seconds slower than the guy in front of him (on the first lap).'
Hamilton's strategy, though, was the right one — inters, inters and softs. But because others such as Hülkenberg and Lance Stroll pitted before him, they were able to jump ahead, though Hamilton later caught and passed Stroll
Advertisement
It's fair to wonder whether Hamilton's pit stop to finally take softs came too early. He pitted a lap before Hülkenberg (who went on to secure his maiden F1 podium). But Hamilton's out lap wasn't clean, as he skidded off the track just after the pit lane exit and lost several seconds (with Leclerc also off in the background). The off aided Hülkenberg in holding that coveted podium result, as Hamilton is still waiting for his first silverware in Ferrari red.
'When you have to take the decision on the pit wall, it's a very tricky one because you always have to be in anticipation,' Vasseur said. 'And on top, we lost the Lewis' GPS all the race. It meant that were completely blind and we didn't know where the car was.'
Hülkenberg ending his 238-race long F1 podium drought went down tremendously well in the paddock.
As Luke Smith explained, Mercedes and Aston Martin — where the veteran made several super-sub appearances across its various guises at the start of this decade — were on hand to help Sauber with extra champagne for its surprise celebrations.
Here's what a selection of Hülkenberg's peers had to say about his result, with the German a popular figure amongst the F1 driver pack:
Hülk's result really enhanced the feel-good factor as the paddock was packing down at Silverstone. It's a huge achievement for a driver who was effectively shown the door on full-time F1 racing after the 2019 season.
But he refused to accept his fate. He used his position as Racing Point/Aston reserve driver (and occasional pundit on German TV) to badger Guenther Steiner into a full-time return with Haas for 2023. And Hülkenberg used his time off in the meantime to think about how he could improve with rear tire sliding, which had held him back for years of sensitive Pirelli tires to such movement. Ever since, he's consistently lit up the midfield with magic results.
Advertisement
Hülk mark two is arguably better than his trophy-laden junior career and early F1 record showed. Now, he's got headline result (and plenty of Lego) to prove it.
Congrats, Nico.
🚨 Very much not deserving of points this, but Northamptonshire Police are appealing for assistance in catching a man wanted in connection with the theft of a steering wheel from a classic F1 car on display at Silverstone. Other cars were sadly damaged too, with several YouTubers arrested over one incident.
🏆 In much more uplifting news — as Norris, Piastri and Hülkenberg did on Sunday — here's the full story on those intricate Lego trophies handed out on the Silverstone podium via Luke.
👨👩👧👧 And also at Silverstone, Madeline told the story of Williams at the formerly family-run team's home event. Albon brought home a handful of handy points in eighth, while Sainz was in the wars with the wayward Leclerc.
📫 Love Prime Tire? Check out The Athletic's other newsletters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
How small provision added to Donald Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' affects taxes for sports bettors
A small provision added to President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — that came to light days before the president signed the bill into law July 4 — could have a major impact on sports betting. The small change could force some bettors to pay income tax even in years when they have net losses and could significantly hike the tax burden on professional sports bettors. Advertisement The provision nearly escaped notice until alarm began to spread on X just days before Trump signed the bill into law. 'Not to be hyperbolic, but it's an extinction of professional sports betting,' a gambler who goes by the pseudonym Jack Andrews told The Athletic. Andrews is a professional gambler with a popular YouTube channel and a contributor to a MasterClass on sports and gambling. 'It is the end of my career, potentially.' One sentence of the 940-page bill says gamblers can deduct only 90 percent of their annual losses, instead of 100 percent, which has been the norm. What does that mean? Before now, when gamblers reported their betting income, they would take their gross winnings, subtract their gross losses and then report the net amount as their taxable income. Now, they're allowed to subtract only 90 percent of those losses, which means they appear to have more income, even though they don't actually have that money. That 10 percent change amounts to a whole lot if you're dealing with huge numbers. Andrews told The Athletic that, in a year, he makes between $7 million and $10 million in gross winnings. 'If it's $7 million as gross winnings and it's $6.6 million as net losses, then I have a $400,000 net,' Andrews said. 'But if it's $7 million of gross wins and you can only deduct the $6.6 times 90 percent ($5.94 million), now you have $1 million that the government sees as your net income versus $400,000. I'm looking at probably a 35 percent tax rate, so about $350,000 in tax. So now I'm paying $350,000 in taxes on a $400,000 actual income. And that's not worth it.' The bill also means that even in losing years, some gamblers might still owe income tax. For example, if you win $100,000 and lose $100,000, you can deduct only $90,000 of those losses, meaning you will owe taxes on $10,000 of income even though you did not take home any money. Advertisement The biggest impact will be on people who gamble as a professional career. These professional gamblers — some of whom are known in the industry as 'sharps' — record every wager, how much they win and lose, and report all of it in their taxes. Professional gamblers tend to wager large sums of money with small margins, which can lead to a significant profit over a year. (If you wager $100 million and lose $99 million, you still made a profit of $1 million.) These gamblers aren't just trying to win more bets; they're trying to make money even after covering the costs of betting, including cuts from casinos and taxes. 'It's going to be disastrous for them,' Nathan Goldman, CPA and tax professor at North Carolina State University, told The Athletic. 'It's going to devastate the Nevada economy. The professional gamblers bring a lot to that economy.' 'Gambling operates by the 80/20 rule, maybe 90/10,' Andrews said. 'Ninety percent of the business comes from 10 percent of the players, the VIPs.' And in Nevada, alarm bells are sounding. Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.), whose district includes Las Vegas, has already introduced a bill to reverse the change (more on that in a minute). 'I think this is something that a lot of people make a livelihood off of,' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who co-sponsored Titus' new bill, told The Athletic. 'We know people who are working at the unions or the casinos and in these industries whose livelihood will be affected.' This week, many are looking at the IRS' definition of a gambling 'session,' which typically means you can report your net winnings or losses from a whole night on a casino floor, rather than reporting every game you played while inside the casino. But with sports betting, every bet is one session. Advertisement If bettors can stretch that interpretation to say, a day, a week, etc., they could have more control over how they report their taxable income. 'I think you're going to see three types of people,' Zak Zimbile, CPA, told The Athletic. 'Those who continue to gamble and report incorrectly, those who continue to do it and adjust their definition of what a session is, and those who might completely stop altogether, which might be your high-volume, low-margin people.' Amateur sports bettors — people who make casual bets on sports betting apps such as BetMGM or FanDuel — might not feel the effects. At least not unless they get audited. 'A lot of people don't even understand that they owe taxes on gambling,' Goldman said. 'But if a bettor gets audited and the IRS reviews their sportsbook account balance, they could say, 'Wait a minute, you bet $100,000 throughout the year, you won $50,000 and lost $50,000, you actually have taxable income of $5,000.'' The deduction rule came from the Senate Finance Committee, chaired by Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho). After the bill was approved by the House on May 22, the Senate Finance Committee introduced revisions June 16. The final version of the legislative text was released by the Senate on June 27 and passed by the Senate on July 1. The bill was then rushed back to the House to meet Trump's timeline, passed in the House on July 3 and was signed into law by Trump on July 4. Many in the gambling world woke up July 1 to news of the change, and it took days to become widespread. Speculation online about the reasons for the provision has run wild, ranging from straightforward accounting explanations to conspiracy theories that sportsbooks were behind the change in an attempt to eliminate sharp bettors or that the provision benefits new prediction market firms such as Kalshi, which are seen as rising competitors to sportsbooks. Advertisement 'You can deduct your full losses under this bill if you're one of these predictive sites because those aren't technically online betting sites,' Khanna told The Athletic. Prediction markets are not regulated and operate differently from sportsbooks but allow users to put money on future outcomes, similar to traditional betting. 'I just think that they were looking for revenue. Who's going to be for standing up for betting?' 'It's very popular to tax gamblers,' Goldman said. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the gambling tax provision would generate over $1.1 billion in additional revenue over eight years, although some question this estimate. 'You're going to have a lot of professional gamblers stop being professional gamblers,' Goldman said. 'It's only $1.1 billion if everyone continues doing the exact same thing as before.' Politicians are scrambling to determine whether they can reverse this change. Monday, Titus introduced the FAIR BET Act, which seeks to restore the 100 percent deduction rate. Titus says there is bipartisan support, but it's too soon to know whether it will truly gain traction. FAIR BET Act by @RepDinaTitus is out. Language gets right to the point. First reported by InGame. — Fairplaygov (@fairplaygov) July 8, 2025 Titus argues this bill is a threat to legal betting and will drive professional gamblers to unregulated, illegal markets. 'We should be encouraging players to properly report their winnings and wager using legal operators,' she said in a statement. 'The Senate change will only push people to not report their winnings and to use unregulated platforms.' 'If (VIP bettors) realize this creates a glass ceiling above them, they won't want to gamble anywhere it would show up on their taxes,' Andrew said. 'All gambling income is taxable, no matter where or how it's done, but regulated gambling definitely is more likely to create a paper trail than offshore or underground gambling.' Advertisement The American Gaming Association, which lobbies for casino and sportsbook operators, initially applauded the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' in a post that drew ire from gamblers online. The organization has since thrown its support behind Titus' legislation. 'We are committed to working with Congresswoman Titus, other congressional leaders, and the Trump Administration to restore the long-standing tax treatment of gaming losses,' an AGA representative told The Athletic. When asked whether the AGA raised concerns about the provision, a representative from Crapo's office told The Athletic, 'The legislative text was released very widely and publicly June 16 via press release, posted on the website, reported on, etc. The American Gaming Association raised concerns with Sec. 899 of the bill. Not the 90 percent threshold.' 'If they didn't know of the tax change language between June 16, when it was published by the Senate Finance Committee, and when it hit social media around July 1, that's pretty damning,' Andrews said.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Why Red Bull sacked Christian Horner now, after a year that never stopped spiraling
This was never the way that Christian Horner would have expected his time in charge of Red Bull's Formula One team to come to an end. As recently as last month, Horner said his commitment was '100 percent' to Red Bull Racing, with a contract running to the end of the decade. In 20 years, he'd overseen the team's transformation from a floundering midfielder that was sold to the energy drink giant for £1 to one that conquered the F1 world with unprecedented levels of success. Advertisement In January 2005, a 30-year-old Horner waited in the car park of the team's factory while the former Jaguar F1 boss was being dismissed, before being introduced to the workforce as the youngest team principal in F1 history upon the rebrand to Red Bull Racing. In the book Growing Wings, published last year, Horner revealed he only knew one person in the room, getting an otherwise frosty response from the stunned workforce. Twenty years later, Horner knew every single person who assembled for his speech on Wednesday morning when he informed them he would no longer be serving as team principal. In footage of the speech obtained by Sky Sports, Horner called the news a 'shock' as he paid tribute to the team members, calling his time at Red Bull 'the biggest privilege of my life.' He was subject to a big round of applause when he took a moment to gather himself after becoming emotional. It was evidence of the widespread support that Horner retained from the workforce within Red Bull Racing, which had persisted even in the wake of the investigation into allegations of misconduct and inappropriate behavior made against Horner by a female Red Bull employee last year. The grievance was dismissed after an internal investigation, a decision upheld on appeal. Horner denied the allegations. But with the team tracking for its worst championship finish in a decade, and continued questions being asked over star driver Max Verstappen's future, Red Bull Racing's parent company, Red Bull GmbH, has now decided to act and confirmed on Wednesday that Horner had been 'released from his operational duties.' It's a significant break point in the recent history of Red Bull, and although the tensions have been bubbling away in the team for some time, the sudden nature of Horner's departure makes it a big shock for the entire F1 paddock. Since the death of Red Bull's founder, Dietrich Mateschitz, in October 2022, the struggle for power at Red Bull Racing has been rumbling in the background between the two 'sides' that own the parent company, Red Bull GmbH. The Austrian side of the company owns 49 percent of shares, overseen by Mark Mateschitz, Dietrich's son and heir. The remaining — and crucial — 51 percent belong to Chalerm Yoovidhya, the son of Chaleo Yoovidhya, who co-founded Red Bull with Dietrich Mateschitz in the 1980s Advertisement The fact that Yoovidhya had the majority share meant that, through all the internal power struggles that may have played out at Red Bull, his support was critical to Horner. Yoovidhya was a notable attendee at last year's Bahrain Grand Prix — days after the grievance against Horner was dismissed, and a cache of unverified messages and photos purportedly sent by Horner to the complainant were anonymously sent to numerous international media members and high-ranking F1 figures — and spent time with Horner on the grid, as well as in parc ferme while celebrating Verstappen's victory. Yoovidhya most recently attended the Austrian Grand Prix, Red Bull's home race, at the end of June. Traditionally, decisions taken by the shareholders were made in consultation with Horner, Red Bull Motorsport consultant Helmut Marko (who has always been close to the Austrian side of the company), and Oliver Mintzlaff, Red Bull GmbH's CEO of corporate projects and investments. Last year, Marko's position came into question amid scrutiny over his potential role in the message leaks, only for talks with Mintzlaff to lead to him staying in his position. Verstappen had warned when the initial question marks over Marko's future arose that he would not be able to continue racing for the team if the Austrian were to depart. Last week at Silverstone, Horner spoke of Red Bull Racing having 'very tight senior management' and 'a very strong structure.' While this may have been true for the team itself, with key personnel reporting to Horner, there was always an awkward struggle for power playing out behind the scenes — one that would only be definitively decided by those at the very top. The fact that Horner has now been dismissed from his role by Red Bull GmbH suggests that the all-important support from the Thai side of the company has disappeared, and there is an alignment between the shareholders that a change was required. The Athletic has approached GmbH for comment. The messaging from Red Bull in the wake of the news has been one of gratitude. The press release announcing Horner's exit included a quote from Mintzlaff thanking the Briton for his 'exceptional work.' The team's social media post about the news was almost word-for-word the same as Mintzlaff's quote. What separates the Red Bull of July 2025 from any other point in its recent history under Horner is its on-track fortunes. Because this year, they have not been wholly positive. Verstappen has hauled his Red Bull RB21 car to two race wins, putting in majestic displays at Suzuka and Imola to snare victory away from the dominant McLarens. Otherwise, Verstappen's immeasurable talent has been enough to compensate for the shortcomings of Red Bull's car, which has proven troublesome since midway through last season. Advertisement The issues with the car have been illustrated most plainly by the 'second' Red Bull car, which hasn't recorded a top-five finish in over a year. Sergio Pérez's spiraling form led to his exit at the end of last year, with Red Bull preferring to pay out for his contract for 2025 instead of keeping him in the car. His replacement, Liam Lawson, lasted just two races before being dropped for Yuki Tsunoda, who has scored only seven points and is still far behind Verstappen. As much as Red Bull may insist the car is not built around Verstappen, the truth is only the Dutchman has been able to tame its difficult nature to score regular points. Verstappen is responsible for 165 of the team's 172 points this year, or 95.9 percent, a reliance and lack of support from the other side of the garage that could also have bred some frustration within the Verstappen camp. The lack of two drivers fighting at the very front will always hurt championship potential. The failure to remedy the struggles with the car that emerged midway through last year and keep pace with McLaren has also occurred against the backdrop of a series of major departures. The highest-profile exit was that of Adrian Newey, Red Bull's chief technical officer and the most successful designer in F1 history, who quit after 19 years last year ahead of a move to Aston Martin. This followed the exit of chief engineering officer Rob Marshall at the start of 2024, who joined McLaren as a technical director and has since been instrumental in the team's success. Newey wasn't the only big name to leave Red Bull last year. Jonathan Wheatley, Red Bull's sporting director, departed at the end of the season to become the Sauber team principal, while head of strategy Will Courtenay is set to join McLaren next year as its new sporting director. Horner has consistently downplayed the potential impact of these exits, instead talking up Red Bull's strength in depth and its ability to bring more engineering talent through its ranks. However, observers from rival teams up and down the paddock have privately commented that it doesn't point to a stable team to have so many names leaving. The big concern for Red Bull's shareholders right now will be the struggle for on-track performance compared to its rivals. At present, Red Bull sits fourth in the constructors' championship and is effectively relying solely on Verstappen for its returns. Barring an uplift in form, it's tough to envisage the team clawing past either Mercedes or Ferrari, with McLaren already well on its way to a second straight constructors' title. Fourth would be Red Bull's worst constructors' finish since 2015, bringing with it a reduced prize money return running into the tens of millions compared to the historic double title-winning 2023 season. Another critical piece of context at this time is the spotlight being placed on Verstappen's future amid continued speculation about a potential switch to Mercedes for the 2026 season. Horner has always dismissed this as 'noise' and pointed to Verstappen's contract that runs to 2028. Although he acknowledged at Silverstone that there was a need to plan for a post-Verstappen era at Red Bull, it wasn't one he outwardly recognized could happen soon. Verstappen has recently batted away questions about his future, yet also passed on opportunities to firmly state he will be racing for Red Bull next year. Advertisement Verstappen's father, Jos, was one of the most outspoken critics of Horner at the height of the investigation into the now former Red Bull team principal last year. He warned after the season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix that Red Bull would be 'torn apart' if Horner stayed in charge; a clear sign of just how poor relations had grown between the two men, with there being little outward sign of improvement since then. In a crammed media session, the images of which have since been widely shared on social media, at Silverstone last Thursday, Max Verstappen was asked if there was any truth to rumors that his camp was pushing for Horner's exit. Verstappen replied: 'I don't know anything about that.' Verstappen's personal social media account shared a message on Wednesday that struck a similar grateful tone to the Red Bull GmbH statement, accompanied by a picture of him embracing Horner. 'From my first race win, to four world championships, we have shared incredible successes,' Verstappen wrote. 'Winning memorable races and breaking countless records. Thank you for everything, Christian!' The exit of Horner unquestionably will have an impact on Verstappen's future as he weighs up what to do for 2026. He's been clear in his frustration about the team's struggle for form this year, long brushing off thoughts of retaining his world title. To him, the most important thing is performance. And one thing Verstappen has always stressed is the need to bring that out, particularly in the early months of 2024, is a calmness and peace around him; the right conditions in which to get the best out of himself. Should this change bring about that peace by defusing any power struggle, that would only be seen as a positive step toward keeping Verstappen in place. Yet changing the man at the top does not immediately guarantee on-track success. It took Andrea Stella 18 months to get things to click with McLaren, while Fred Vasseur's Ferrari honeymoon is well and truly over amid its own struggles. Horner's replacement, Laurent Mekies, is well-known and well-liked within the Red Bull setup. However, a significant task will be convincing Verstappen that it remains the best place for him to race next year and beyond. If the doubt is so great that a move away is desired, then Red Bull would end up losing its most prized asset of all — and leave it in need of an even greater rebuild.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Christian Horner Breaks Silence On Social Media After Red Bull Sacking
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Former Red Bull Racing CEO and team principal Christian Horner has opened up after his sudden exit. Horner served the team for 20 years from 2005 but was let go with immediate effect on Wednesday. News about Horner's Red Bull departure sent shockwaves across the F1 community, especially given the team's current struggles, and as Red Bull develops its power unit for the new era beginning in 2026 under the Red Bull Powertrains banner. Horner has been replaced by former Racing Bulls team principal Laurent Mekies, while Racing Bulls sporting director Alan Permane was promoted to the role of team principal. Horner was said to have reached the Red Bull factory at Milton Keynes yesterday following his exit announcement, where he broke down while addressing his team. Much later, he posted a statement on Instagram, revealing that he was proud of what the team had achieved under his leadership. He wrote: "After an incredible journey of twenty years together, it is with a heavy heart that today I say goodbye to the Team I have absolutely loved. Every one of you, the amazing people at the factory, have been the heart and soul of everything that we have achieved. Win and lose, every step of the way, we have stood by each other as one and I will never forget that. It's been a privilege being part of and leading this epic Team and I am so proud of our collective accomplishments and you all. Christian Horner, Team Principal of Oracle Red Bull Racing waves in the Paddock prior to practice ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Austria at Red Bull Ring on June 27, 2025 in Spielberg, Austria. Christian Horner, Team Principal of Oracle Red Bull Racing waves in the Paddock prior to practice ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Austria at Red Bull Ring on June 27, 2025 in Spielberg, Austria."Thanks to the amazing partners and fans who enabled us to go racing. Your support has helped grow the team from its humble beginnings to an F1 powerhouse that laid claim to 6 Constructors Championships and 8 Drivers Championships. "Equally, thank you to our rivals, with whom there would be no racing at all. You've pushed us, challenged us, and enabled us to achieve accolades we never dreamed possible. The competition has made every victory sweeter and every setback an opportunity to develop and grow. "Formula 1 is a sport built on relentless ambition, passion, and respect. The rivalries have been fierce, but the mutual drive to innovate and raise the bar is what has made this journey so special. "It's been an honour to be part of this incredible era of motorsport. I leave with immense pride in what we've achieved and also with what's in the pipeline for 2026 - and huge respect for everyone who's made F1 the pinnacle it is today. Thank You." Related: Christian Horner Closed Red Bull Chapter With Emotional Goodbye To Team
