logo
Gaza Civil Defence Says Israeli Fire Kills 67 Aid Seekers

Gaza Civil Defence Says Israeli Fire Kills 67 Aid Seekers

Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces opened fire on a crowd of Palestinians trying to collect humanitarian aid in the territory's north on Sunday, killing 67 people and wounding dozens more.
The UN World Food Programme said its 25-truck convoy carrying food aid "encountered massive crowds of hungry civilians which came under gunfire", soon after it crossed the border from Israel and cleared checkpoints.
Israel's military disputed the death toll and said soldiers had fired warning shots "to remove an immediate threat posed to them" as thousands gathered near Gaza City.
Deaths of civilians seeking aid have become a regular occurrence in Gaza, with the authorities blaming Israeli fire as crowds facing chronic shortages of food and other essentials flock in huge numbers to aid centres.
The UN said earlier this month that nearly 800 aid-seekers had been killed since late May, including on the routes of aid convoys.
In the southern Gaza Strip, the civil defence agency said six others were killed on Sunday near an aid distribution centre northwest of Rafah, where dozens of people lost their lives a day earlier.
In Gaza City, Qasem Abu Khater, 36, told AFP he had rushed to try to get a bag of flour but instead found a desperate crowd of thousands and "deadly overcrowding and pushing".
"The tanks were firing shells randomly at us and Israeli sniper soldiers were shooting as if they were hunting animals in a forest," he added.
"Dozens of people were martyred right before my eyes and no one could save anyone."
Civil defence agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP the death toll was 67 and expected to rise while the WFP condemned violence against civilians seeking aid as "completely unacceptable".
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify tolls and details provided by the agency and other parties.
The army has maintained that it works to avoid harm to civilians, saying this month that it issued new instructions to its troops on the ground "following lessons learned" from a spate of similar incidents.
The war was sparked by Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, leading to the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed 58,895 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday expressed his regret to Pope Leo XIV after what he described as a "stray" munition killed three people sheltering at the Holy Family Church in Gaza City.
At the end of the Angelus prayer on Sunday, the pope slammed the "barbarity" of the Gaza war and called for peace, days after the Israeli strike on the territory's only Catholic church.
The strike was part of the "ongoing military attacks against the civilian population and places of worship in Gaza", he added.
"I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians, as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations."
The Catholic Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Pierbattista Pizzaballa, held mass at the Gaza church on Sunday after travelling to the devastated territory in a rare visit on Friday.
Most of Gaza's population of more than two million people have been displaced at least once during the war and there have been repeated evacuation calls across large parts of the coastal enclave.
On Sunday morning, the Israeli military told residents and displaced Palestinians sheltering in the Deir el-Balah area to move south immediately.
Israel was "expanding its activities" against Hamas around Deir el-Balah, "where it has not operated before", the military's Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee said on X.
The announcement prompted concern from families of hostages held since October 7, 2023 that the Israeli offensive could harm their loved ones.
Delegations from Israel and militant group Hamas have spent the last two weeks in indirect talks on a proposed 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and the release of 10 living hostages.
Of the 251 hostages taken during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Palestinians are facing chronic shortages of food and other esssentials AFP The more than two million people who live in Gaza are facing a chronic shortage of food and other essentials AFP Families of hostages in Gaza called on the United States and Israel to agree an end to the war AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU Leaders Poised For Thorny Talks In China Summit
EU Leaders Poised For Thorny Talks In China Summit

Int'l Business Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

EU Leaders Poised For Thorny Talks In China Summit

EU bosses Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa are in Beijing on Thursday for talks with top Chinese leaders over areas of friction from trade to the Ukraine war -- with low hopes of a breakthrough on any front. Beijing has sought to draw the European Union closer as it positions itself as a more reliable partner than the United States and a bedrock of stability in a troubled world. But the EU has made clear it will confront deep divisions over trade, fears that cheap, subsidised Chinese goods could overwhelm European markets and Beijing's tacit support for Russia's war against Ukraine. Though nominally intended to celebrate 50 years of diplomatic ties, the long list of grievances set the stage for a contentious summit. Brussels has pitched Thursday's talks between its top bosses and Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang as "a clear opportunity for detailed, frank, substantive actions around all aspects of our relationship". "We know that we don't see eye to eye with China on many issues," a senior EU official told AFP last week. "But we believe that it is essential to have this kind of very direct and open and constructive conversation sitting at the table at the highest level." Top of the agenda for the EU is the yawning trade deficit with China that stood at $357 billion last year and which von der Leyen has described as "unsustainable". Beijing has dismissed those concerns, insisting that Brussels must "rebalance its mentality" not its economic ties with China. Von der Leyen has also said Brussels will demand that China eases market access for European companies and loosens export controls on strategically crucial rare earths. The EU has imposed hefty tariffs on electric vehicles imported from China, arguing that Beijing's industrial subsidies unfairly undercut European competitors. China has rebuffed that claim and announced what were widely seen as retaliatory probes into imported European pork, brandy and dairy products. A second key source of friction is Russia's war in Ukraine -- Brussels says China's deepening political and economic relations with Russia since the 2022 invasion represent tacit support for Moscow that have helped its economy weather sweeping Western sanctions. Last week, the bloc adopted a sweeping new package of sanctions on Russia over the war -- including on two Chinese banks, leading Beijing's commerce minister to issue "solemn representations" to his EU counterpart. "This is a core issue for Europe," the senior EU official said. "We know that Chinese companies supply around 80 percent of the dual-use goods to the war," they said, referring to goods with nominally civilian uses but which can also have military applications. "We're not naive. We're not asking China to cut relations, but to step up the customs and financial controls." Beijing said this week ties with the bloc were at a "pivotal juncture" as both economic giants contend with an aggressive US trade strategy under President Donald Trump. "Against the backdrop of increasing international turbulence, rising unilateralism, and rampant protectionism", the summit "serves the interests not only of both parties, but also of the whole world", foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said. Brussels has sought to temper expectations but pointed to areas like climate where it wants China to do more but where cooperation is seen as more feasible. "The EU doesn't expect breakthroughs from this summit but sees it as a chance to keep communication channels open with Chinese leaders while it works to carve out its geopolitical role and reduce critical dependencies," Marta Mucznik, senior EU analyst at the International Crisis Group, said. Other analysts agree that concrete progress on any of the hot-button issues is unlikely. "We should expect a very difficult moment," Abigael Vasselier of the MERICS think tank told a briefing this week. "This summit is not going to change the course of Europe-China relations, which is one of deterioration due to structural issues," she said. "Europe needs to be ready for a long-term struggle and probably needs to rethink its China strategy at this stage."

World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025
World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025

DW

time7 hours ago

  • DW

World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued its ruling on States' legal obligations in relation to climate change. In an watershed advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague has said a "clean, healthy and sustainable environment" is a human right, and that the climate must be protected for "present and future generations." Outlining the obligations of states to protect the human rights of citizens being impacted by climate change, the UN's highest court said "greenhouse gas emissions are unequivocally caused by human activities and have crossborder effects."Reading the ruling, ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa said "the consequences of climate change are severe and far-reaching," adding that they affect both natural ecosystems and human populations. "These consequences underscore the urgent and existential threat posed by climate change." He said countries have a duty to cooperate on preventing harm caused by climate change and must make sure their national climate targets represent the highest possible ambition. The case began after students from Pacific Island countries lobbied governments into calling for the legal clarification. The state of Vanuatu requested the ICJ to rule on the obligations of states under international law to protect the climate and environment from greenhouse gas emissions. And by extension present and future generations. In December, the court heard testimonies from almost 100 countries and 12 international organizations. Speaking at the time, Gaston Browne, Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, told judges that sea level rise driven by "unchecked emissions" was eroding island coastlines and "swallowing land that is vital to our country." The Caribbean archipelago is being eroded by rising sea levels and faces more intense storms as a result of the impacts of a warming world. Also speaking as part of the December hearings, high-emitting nations, like the United States, said existing UN treaties — primarily the 2015 Paris Agreement — already provide legal obligations on action towards slowing climate change. President Donald Trump has since announced his country's withdrawal from the landmark accord that saw 195 nations agree to reduce carbon emissions and pursue efforts to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit). But experts say the Paris Agreement was never intended to define all laws around climate change. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Joie Chowdhury, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) says because rising temperatures affect "almost every possible dimension of our lives," there is scope for a lot of different laws. She also points to existing international regulations on human rights, international law and legislation around state responsibility as potential tools to enforce climate action. "The climate treaties remain very important, they're just not the only game in town," she told DW. In bringing the case to the court, Vanuatu also asked for clarification on the legal consequences for countries that failed to meet their obligations on slowing their emissions. Some experts say countries that have emitted most CO2 cumulatively — including the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union — carry the most responsibility for global warming. "Past emissions matter," Chowdhury told DW, adding that harm has already been done. "That must be recognized and repaired." Poorer countries have long been calling for richer nations to pay for damage caused by extreme weather linked to the emissions that are heating the planet. Many of these less wealthy states are experiencing the worst impacts of climate change, despite having done the least to contribute to the ICJ advisory warned that "adverse impacts and loss and damage will escalate with every increment of global warming". A loss and damage fund was established at UN climate negotiations two years ago in Dubai, but has only received around $700 million in pledges. That is far lower than the hundreds of billions of dollars experts say climate change could cost in damages by 2030. "At its heart, this case is about accountability. It's a signal to end the era of empty pledges," Chowdhury added. The ICJ advisory opinion is one of three that have been delivered in past months outlining state obligations around climate action. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion asserting countries' obligations to protect citizens' human rights by ensuring a healthy environment and stable climate. The opinion also highlighted states' responsibility in relation to disinformation and misinformation, adding that authorities should not obstruct the population's access to "reliable, truthful, and complete information" needed to address risks to human rights occurring through the climate emergency. And in May last year, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea was the first to issue its advisory opinion recognizing greenhouse gases as a form of marine pollution. Although advisory opinions are not legally binding, they hold significant legal weight and moral authority. Speaking ahead of Wednesday's ruling, Chowdhury said the advisory opinion could have far-reaching consequences for the November COP30 climate negotiations in Brazil. It could mean "not everything is up for negotiation' because some things have been clearly legally defined. "We hope very much that this clarity will provide a very clear legal blueprint which would allow states and those most affected on the front lines to hold polluters accountable for climate disruptive conduct and to secure remedy and reparations," she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

German government denies rift over Israel's conduct in Gaza – DW – 07/23/2025
German government denies rift over Israel's conduct in Gaza – DW – 07/23/2025

DW

time11 hours ago

  • DW

German government denies rift over Israel's conduct in Gaza – DW – 07/23/2025

The German chancellery insists that the ruling coalition is united in its stance on Israel's actions in Gaza despite differing views. A split appeared after Germany refused to add its name to a 28-country declaration. German Chancellery Minister Thorsten Frei on Wednesday dismissed concerns of a rift within Germany's coalition government over its position on Israel. A split emerged after Germany opted not to join dozens of Western countries in signing a condemnation of the "inhumane killing" of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Frei, Chancellor Friedrich Merz's top aid, said the coalition was united in its aims regarding Gaza, even if there were divisions over how Germany could achieve them. "There's not even a sheet of paper between the partners," Frei told German broadcaster ZDF. "Of course, you can have different views about the form and the path to a shared goal." On Tuesday, leading figures in the Social Democrats (SPD), the junior coalition partner to Merz's Christian Democrats (CDU), urged the government to join a joint declaration signed by 28 states, including France, Italy and the UK, as well as the European Commission, the European Union's executive branch. It called for an immediate end to the war in Gaza and condemned Israel's actions. Germany has so far declined to sign on to the declaration. However, Frei defended the government's stance, saying the declaration lacked clarity in its sequencing of events. "It must be made clear that the starting point of this war was Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, and that Hamas continues to hold hostages," he said. He added that Germany maintains "many channels of contact" with the Israeli government. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Frei emphasized that "the humanitarian situation in Gaza must change," and while Israel has the right to self-defense, protecting civilians is "a legal imperative under international law." Matthias Miersch, the SPD's parliamentary leader, praised the signatory states, including Germany's "closest partners such as France, Canada and Austria," for sending "a clear signal." The countries involved condemned what they called the "drip feeding of aid" to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was "horrifying" that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking food and water. "If international law is systematically violated, there must be consequences," Miersch wrote on the platform X. "Germany should join the UK's initiative and not opt out here." "Starving children, destroyed infrastructure, attacks on people seeking help: That goes against everything that international humanitarian law protects," the senior SPD politician said. Reem Alabali-Radovan, Germany's international development minister and an SPD member, said Tuesday she was disappointed by the decision. "The demands in the letter from the 29 partners to the Israeli government are understandable to me. I would have wished for Germany to join the signal sent by the 29 partners," she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video SPD foreign policy spokesperson Adis Ahmetovic and rapporteur for the Middle East Rolf Mützenich, both senior lawmakers within the party, also called on Germany to join the declaration. They stressed in a joint statement that "the situation in Gaza is catastrophic and represents a humanitarian abyss." German officials have said their stance on Israel is shaped by a unique responsibility, the Staatsraison (reason of state), rooted in the country's Nazi-era history and the Holocaust. They argued they can accomplish more through private diplomatic channels than with public declarations. Merz has said the European Council, the heads of state or government of the European Union, had already issued a joint declaration "practically identical in content to what is expressed in the letter" now circulating. He pointed to the Council's June statement, which deplored the humanitarian crisis in Gaza but was less emotional and bluntly critical of Israel and did not condemn its planned relocation of Palestinians to a so-called "humanitarian city" unveiled earlier this month. "I was one of the first to say very clearly, even in Germany, that the situation there is no longer acceptable," Merz said, pushing back on claims of any split. On Monday, he said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday, telling him "very clearly and very explicitly that we do not share the Israeli government's policy on Gaza." "The way the Israeli army is operating there is not acceptable," Merz said. Fractures within the ruling coalition, only in power since May, were already exposed over a dispute about the appointment of a Constitutional Court judge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store