Urine test ‘could help spot recurring kidney cancer', researchers suggest
The AUR87A study, led by Swedish researchers, included 134 patients who were treated at 23 hospitals in the UK, Europe, US and Canada.
All had been diagnosed with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) – the most common type of kidney cancer – which had not spread beyond the kidney and was treated with surgery.
Most patients had their kidney completely removed.
This type of cancer returns in about a fifth of people, usually within one to two years.
Patients are monitored with CT scans, with their frequency based on the level of individual risk.
For the study, the group continued to have CT scans as part of their standard monitoring after the operation, alongside a urine test every three months.
These tests analysed the profiles of certain sugar molecules in the urine, known as glycosaminoglycans, and gave patients a score out of 100, known as the GAGome score.
After 18 months, cancer had returned in 15% of the group.
The study found the urine test correctly detected recurrence in 90% of these patients.
It also correctly ruled out recurring cancer in a little over half the patients who remained cancer-free.
Saeed Dabestani, associate professor at Lund University and consultant urologist at Kristianstad Central Hospital in Sweden, said: 'CT scans often pick up small lesions that aren't large enough to biopsy, and we currently don't know whether they are a sign of the cancer returning or not.
'Our only option is to do more frequent scans to monitor more closely, which is unpleasant for patients and often brings little benefit.
'If you have a urine test that can accurately show whether the cancer has actually returned then you can better assess risk levels and reduce the frequency of the scans required.
'Based on the results we have so far, it's likely that we could safely halve the number of scans that patients have to undergo.'
The findings are being presented at the at the European Association of Urology (EAU) Congress in Madrid and have been accepted for publication in the journal European Urology Oncology.
Researchers are currently recruiting a second group of patients for the AUR87A study, which results expected towards the end of the year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Democrat pushes for 'cognitive decline' tests for members of Congress
A push to set cognitive standards for the scores of aging lawmakers in Congress has hit a roadblock with their colleagues. After former President Joe Biden stunned the nation by cancelling his presidential bid weeks after his disastrous debate against Donald Trump, scrutiny over age-related decline has shifted from the White House to Capitol Hill. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., proposed an amendment earlier this summer that would force an independent congressional body that reviews misconduct allegations to create standards to determine lawmakers' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' Her proposal was unanimously and swiftly rejected by her colleagues, though her effort to set cognitive standards is far from over. 'I hear about it at town halls; I heard a lot about it after the presidential debate,' Perez told the New York Times of Biden's fateful showdown against Trump last summer. 'It is my job to reflect my community's sentiment that this is a problem. It's my job to reflect the accelerating loss of confidence in this body.' 'We have all of these rules about dumb stuff — hats — and not this more significant question of who is making decisions in the office,' she said. Perez, 37, is the co-chair of Democrats' moderate Blue Dog Coalition. She is one of the few Democratic members of Congress to be elected in a district that President Donald Trump carried. She is also one of the few Democrats to express concerns over the health of Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton, 88-year-old non-voting delegate for Washington, D.C. who has been dogged by reports about her cognitive decline. Norton, the oldest member of the House of Representatives, has shown signs of decline during her official duties. Aides frequently help her navigate the sprawling Capitol complex and they have had to walk back quotes Norton gives to reporters. But she seems unconcerned with her own condition, announcing recently that she would seek re-election next year, when she will be 89. One of her staffers later told reporters that 'no decision has been made' yet about the D.C. delegate's re-election. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle appear opposed to cognitive tests because they're seen as a personal attack on older lawmakers and infringe on Congress' long tradition that rewards seniority. According to an analysis done by the Times , more than one in five members, or 22 percent, of this Congress is 70 or older - a level not seen in modern history. Age-related issues in the Capitol have become painfully clear this year after three sitting members of Congress, all 70-years-old or older, have died this year while in office. In March, Democratic Reps. Sylvester Turner of Texas and Raúl Grijalva of Arizona passed away due to complications with cancer. Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly died in May from esophageal cancer while he held the top Democratic position on the powerful House Oversight Committee. In 2024, there were also three Democratic members of the House who passed away while in office. 'What I've heard from my neighbors, my community is this idea that this place is being run by a bunch of staffers,' Perez told Axios this year. 'And we're seeing a very real decline in confidence in Congress.' Despite her amendment getting shot down earlier this year, the 37-year-old has floated plans to renew her push for cognitive standards saying she may propose it as a stand alone bill. She has said she may court some Republican support to get her bill through the House. 'This is not an issue that's going away,' she told the Times. 'We're still talking to other members of Congress about a stand-alone bill, and trying to talk with leadership about a path forward here.' Her push comes amid a House Oversight Committee investigation into Biden's mental acuity and whether it was covered up by his top staffers. Many of the ex-Biden aides have pleaded their Fifth Amendment protections to not incriminate themselves during their interviews with the committee, raising questions about what they knew about the Democrat's health and when. 'It's a question of whether the elected member is making the decisions,' Perez said.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Growing push for cognitive decline tests for members of Congress hits snag despite 'accelerating loss of confidence'
A push to set cognitive standards for the scores of aging lawmakers in Congress has hit a roadblock with their colleagues. After former President Joe Biden stunned the nation by cancelling his presidential bid weeks after his disastrous debate against Donald Trump, scrutiny over age-related decline has shifted from the White House to Capitol Hill. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., proposed an amendment earlier this summer that would force an independent congressional body that reviews misconduct allegations to create standards to determine lawmakers' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' Her proposal was unanimously and swiftly rejected by her colleagues, though her effort to set cognitive standards is far from over. 'I hear about it at town halls; I heard a lot about it after the presidential debate,' Perez told the New York Times of Biden's fateful showdown against Trump last summer. 'It is my job to reflect my community's sentiment that this is a problem. It's my job to reflect the accelerating loss of confidence in this body.' 'We have all of these rules about dumb stuff — hats — and not this more significant question of who is making decisions in the office,' she said. Perez, 37, is the co-chair of Democrats' moderate Blue Dog Coalition. She is one of the few Democratic members of Congress to be elected in a district that President Donald Trump carried. She is also one of the few Democrats to express concerns over the health of Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton, 88-year-old non-voting delegate for Washington, D.C. who has been dogged by reports about her cognitive decline. Norton, the oldest member of the House of Representatives, has shown signs of decline during her official duties. Aides frequently help her navigate the sprawling Capitol complex and they have had to walk back quotes Norton gives to reporters. But she seems unconcerned with her own condition, announcing recently that she would seek re-election next year, when she will be 89. One of her staffers later told reporters that 'no decision has been made' yet about the D.C. delegate's re-election. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle appear opposed to cognitive tests because they're seen as a personal attack on older lawmakers and infringe on Congress' long tradition that rewards seniority. According to an analysis done by the Times, more than one in five members, or 22 percent, of this Congress is 70 or older - a level not seen in modern history. Age-related issues in the Capitol have become painfully clear this year after three sitting members of Congress, all 70-years-old or older, have died this year while in office. In March, Democratic Reps. Sylvester Turner of Texas and Raúl Grijalva of Arizona passed away due to complications with cancer. Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly died in May from esophageal cancer while he held the top Democratic position on the powerful House Oversight Committee. In 2024, there were also three Democratic members of the House who passed away while in office. 'What I've heard from my neighbors, my community is this idea that this place is being run by a bunch of staffers,' Perez told Axios this year. 'And we're seeing a very real decline in confidence in Congress.' Despite her amendment getting shot down earlier this year, the 37-year-old has floated plans to renew her push for cognitive standards saying she may propose it as a stand alone bill. She has said she may court some Republican support to get her bill through the House. 'This is not an issue that's going away,' she told the Times. 'We're still talking to other members of Congress about a stand-alone bill, and trying to talk with leadership about a path forward here.' Her push comes amid a House Oversight Committee investigation into Biden's mental acuity and whether it was covered-up by his top staffers. Many of the ex-Biden aides have pleaded their Fifth Amendment protections to not incriminate themselves during their interviews with the committee, raising questions about what they knew about the Democrat's health and when. 'It's a question of whether the elected member is making the decisions,' Perez said.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Canadian wildfires prompt New York air quality alert
An air quality health advisory has been issued for New York City and its surrounding areas because of smoke from wildfires in Canada. In a post on X, New York state's Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and Department of Health (DOH) issued the advisory for Long Island, New York City Metro, Lower Hudson Valley, Upper Hudson Valley, and the Adirondacks on Saturday. Authorities are warning air quality in those regions is "unhealthy for sensitive groups".Wildfires in Canada have forced tens of thousands of people to leave their homes, and the smoke drifting over the border has sparked air quality concerns across the northern United States. The air quality index (AQI) is predicted to be above 100 in much of New York state on Saturday, and could reach 135. Alerts are also in place for parts of New AQI measures the severity of pollution in the air and categorises health risks. The higher the number, the more unsafe the air is to breathe. This is not the first time US authorities have issued air quality alerts because of smoke from the Canadian mid-July, a similar alert was issued for Chicago, with additional precautions advised for babies and the political implications of the wildfire smoke have also reached in July, six members of Congress wrote to the Canadian ambassador complaining that smoke from wildfires was making it difficult for Americans to enjoy their are currently more than 550 active fires in Canada, with the most concentrated in the province of Manitoba, according to authorities. 6.1 million hectares (15 million acres) of land has been burnt across the country in the past and June were particularly destructive months in western Canada, with roughly 30,000 people forced to evacuate in the provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba, where local administrations declared a state of have consistently linked the intensifying wildfire seasons to climate is believed to be warming at twice the global average rate, and its Arctic regions are heating up at nearly three times the global rate, scientists have warned.
