logo
Should the 10 Commandments be required in Alabama schools? Community members weigh in

Should the 10 Commandments be required in Alabama schools? Community members weigh in

Yahoo14-04-2025
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (WHNT) — Two controversial companion bills requiring Alabama public schools to display the Ten Commandments are one step closer to being passed.
SB166 and HB178 have moved out of the Senate and House committees and are now in a position to receive a vote on each floor.
Dropping a needle on the record-collecting community in Huntsville
These bills would require each board of education to display a copy of the Ten Commandments in a common area of each school.
On Sunday, several community members in Huntsville said they support the bill.
'To me, the Ten Commandments, God itself displays love,' Tarana Hudson said. 'If we could put love back into the schools to me that's what the Ten Commandments does.'
Gerald Lane, another community member who said he supports the bill, believes the Ten Commandments could help with behavior.
📲 to stay updated on the go. 📧 to have news sent to your inbox.
'Anytime that you are taking God out then we are at a big disadvantage for our kids especially when we see what's going on in today's society,' Lane said. 'The only way that we can get our kids back and save our kids is to teach them about God.'
Others said that Alabama lawmakers should see that God is engrained into our society and that the Ten Commandments should be no different.
'On the back of every single note that we have with our money, it says 'In God we trust' so how much do you really believe that?' Ashley Hayes said.
Despite some support for the bill, not everyone is fully on board with the legislation.
Ashanti Ortega lives in Huntsville and said she would be okay with the Ten Commandments in schools if other religious documents were also displayed.
'It could be maybe like Buddhism or Hinduism documents,' Ortega said. 'Any kind of representation just so everyone at a school can feel like they can represent who they are and like they do belong to be there instead of this certain demographic of people.'
'I think that I can only support it to some degree, not 100% again it needs to be more inclusive to everyone,' Ortega said.
Under the proposed law, the Ten Commandments would have to be displayed on an 11X14 poster in large, easily readable font.
Some faith leaders also oppose the bills. Reverend Julie Conrady, president of the Interfaith Alliance of Central Alabama, said the bill violates the First Amendment. Rev. Conrady believes it would put teachers and school staff members in an awkward position.
'To put it on a poster specifically, as a religious scholar myself, they are putting up a poster without context, without explanation, without any understanding of why this is here,' Rev. Conrady said. 'In doing so are putting teachers and administrators in the position of then explaining and interpreting a religious text for students.'
Louisiana passed similar legislation in 2024, but it has since been blocked by a federal judge. Rev. Conrady believes if Alabama passes these bills, it would end in a similar result.
'We will continue to push against it until we have a resolution that protects the religious freedoms of all Alabama families,' Rev. Conrady said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Republican senators to watch on cutting PBS, NPR and foreign aid funding
The Republican senators to watch on cutting PBS, NPR and foreign aid funding

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

The Republican senators to watch on cutting PBS, NPR and foreign aid funding

Senate leadership is setting up votes, kicking off Tuesday, to claw back billions of dollars of appropriated federal funds. But first, there are GOP senators who need to be appeased. Why it matters: There are two buckets of GOP Senate skeptics, despite President Trump's threat to withhold his support or endorsement from any Republican who does not vote for the bill. 1) Skeptical on principle: Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) made an argument last week that the process of cutting spending is supposed to be through the annual appropriations process. Also watch Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) — the other top-ranked members on the Appropriations Committee. 2) Looking for tweaks: Others are more likely to get on board after changes. Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Todd Young (R-Ind.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) fall into this category. The two biggest issues: Cuts to a global health program to prevent HIV and AIDS, as well as cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that could impact relied-on local radio stations. Collins also objects to PEPFAR cuts. OMB Director Russ Vought is expected to attend lunch Tuesday to answer additional questions from senators about the proposed cuts, per sources familiar. The other side: Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) has been leading the charge on getting the rescissions package done.

House GOP blocks Dem maneuver to force release of Epstein files
House GOP blocks Dem maneuver to force release of Epstein files

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

House GOP blocks Dem maneuver to force release of Epstein files

House Republicans on Monday night voted against attaching a Democratic amendment to landmark cryptocurrency legislation that would force the Justice Department to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. Why it matters: It's the outcome Democrats anticipated, and one they plan to gleefully cite as President Trump continues to grapple with the MAGA fallout over the DOJ's handling of the documents. "The question with Epstein is: Whose side are you on?" Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the author of the Epstein measure, told Axios ahead of the vote. "Are you on the side of the rich and powerful, or are you on the side of the people?" he said, promising to introduce the amendment "again and again and again." What happened: The House Rules Committee, which prepares legislation for votes on the House floor, voted 5 to 6 against attaching Khanna's amendment to a procedural measure related to the GENIUS Act and a defense funding bill. The measure would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish all documents related to Epstein on a "publicly accessible website" within 30 days of procedural measure being enacted. Republicans said the amendment was not pertinent to the GENIUS Act, which would create the first regulatory framework for stablecoins, or the defense funding bill. Yes, but: In a rare move, Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) crossed over and voted with the panel's four Democrats in favor of attaching the amendment. He told Axios earlier on Monday: "The public's been asking for it. I think there are files. All of a sudden not to have files is a little strange, We'll see how it plays out ... I think the president will do the right thing." Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), the other right-wing member of the panel who occasionally breaks with his party, did not vote. What they're saying: " I want to know what the hell is in these files," said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, arguing in favor of the resolution. "This is about trust. Republicans said, 'Trust us. Vote for us and we will release these files.' Well here we are — they're backtracking," McGovern added. "I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it," Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), the chair of the Rules Committee, said after the vote. Zoom in: McGovern also tried to ram through Rep. Marc Veasey's (D-Texas) five-page resolution demanding that the administration release the Epstein files and that the FBI release a report on "any delays, suppression or destruction of evidence" related to the files.

Japan's Ruling Parties at Risk of Losing Upper House Majority
Japan's Ruling Parties at Risk of Losing Upper House Majority

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Japan's Ruling Parties at Risk of Losing Upper House Majority

Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party and its junior coalition partner Komeito are at risk of losing its majority in the upper house in elections this Sunday, potentially weakening Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and his minority government's standing further amid ongoing trade negotiations with the US. Compared to polls from earlier in the campaign period, the ruling coalition has lost steam and could miss its target of winning 50 seats in the election, according to multiple polls conducted by local media. Polls by the Asahi newspaper said the LDP looked likely to win some 34 seats, while Komeito looked likely to secure about 9. Kyodo also said that the LDP could struggle to win 40 seats.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store