Cuomo stays in NYC mayor's race as an independent after losing Democratic primary to Mamdani
In a video, Mr. Cuomo, who last month suffered a bruising loss to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, announced he was making another run to combat the progressive Mr. Mamdani, who he said 'offers slick slogans but no real solutions.'
'The fight to save our city isn't over,' Mr. Cuomo said. 'Only 13 percent of New Yorkers voted in the June primary. The general election is in November and I am in it to win it.'
Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams also is running as an independent in the general election and Curtis Sliwa — founder of the 1970s-era Guardian Angels anti-crime patrol — is again on the Republican line.
People opposed to Mr. Mamdani's progressive agenda, which includes higher taxes on the wealthy, have called on donors and voters to unite behind a single candidate for the November election. They fear multiple candidates will splinter the anti-Mamdani vote, increasing the Democrat's chances to win.
The decision to continue on in the race is the latest chapter in Mr. Cuomo's comeback attempt, launched almost four years after he resigned as governor in 2021 following a barrage of sexual harassment allegations. He denied wrongdoing during the campaign, maintaining that the scandal was driven by politics.
Mr. Cuomo was treated as the presumed frontrunner for much of the Democratic primary, with the former governor boasting deep political experience, universal name recognition and a juggernaut fundraising operation. He limited media interviews, held few unscripted events and avoided mingling with voters.
That strategy contrasted with Mr. Mamdani's energetic street-level campaign centered around affordability issues. The 33-year-old amassed a legion of young volunteers who blanketed the city to build support, while the candidate's savvy social media persona won him national acclaim.
Lagging behind Mr. Mamdani in the vote count, Mr. Cuomo conceded the race last month on primary night. Final results released after the city ran through its ranked choice voting calculations showed Mr. Mamdani besting the former governor by 12 percentage points.
Despite the Democratic primary loss, Mr. Cuomo had also qualified to run on an independent ballot line in November under a party he created called 'Fight and Deliver.'
As he weighed whether to stay on as an independent, Mr. Cuomo began losing support from traditional allies. Key labour unions backed Mr. Mamdani and the Rev. Al Sharpton, an influential Black leader, urged Cuomo to step aside.
Some deep-pocketed contributors have meanwhile aligned behind Mr. Adams, who is running as an independent. Although he's still a Democrat, Mr. Adams pulled out of the primary shortly after a federal judge dismissed a corruption case against him at the request of President Donald Trump's Justice Department, arguing that the case had sidelined him from campaigning.
Mr. Cuomo, 67, served as governor for over a decade and modeled himself as a socially progressive Democrat who got things done. He pushed through legislation that legalized gay marriage and tackled massive infrastructure projects, like a three-mile bridge over the Hudson River that he named after his father.
Mr. Cuomo's national profile peaked in the early days of the nation's coronavirus outbreak during his televised daily briefings. The governor leavened stern warnings for people to wear masks with heartfelt expressions of concern for his elderly mother or brotherly banter with Chris Cuomo, a TV journalist.
His reputation was soon tainted when it emerged that the state's official count of nursing home deaths had excluded many victims who had been transferred to hospitals before they succumbed.
Mr. Cuomo resigned shortly after New York's attorney general released the results of an investigation that found he sexually harassed at least 11 women.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pro-Palestinians programmed, voted against Trump: Watch Kanye West's rant
Kanye 'Ye' West is no stranger to controversy, and the American rapper seems to have waded into another one, saying that anyone who brings up Palestine was likely 'programmed' and were the same people who voted against Donald Trump. Kanye has also been facing flak on the work front, after he was late to the Shanghai show.(AP) A video of Kanye has been circulating online. HT has not independently verified the authenticity of this video. What's Kanye saying? Kanye, in the expletive-laden video, can be heard saying, 'You nig** don't know about Palestine, you don't give a f*** about it. The media made you give a f*** about it, and it's shit that you just put up on your motherf***in timeline.' This rant from Kanye comes after his many anti-Semitic posts, and glorification of Hitler on social media. On the work front Kanye has been facing flak on the work front, after he was late to the Shanghai show, with many fans demanding refunds. 'Was hard to get tix for him in Shanghai but got it. Was hyped af. Couldn't even sleep night before. But. Worst concert I've ever been to. @kanyewest u can be better,' one commented after the rapper was almost 40 minutes late after what was billed as his grand return to China after 17 years. 'Mostly lip synching. His microphone must have been up less than 20 per cent of the time,' another said, adding, 'For the encore, he disappeared for over 20 minutes at one point as tracks like Wolves just played out with him nowhere in sight. I could have just played your music at home man. Came to see u perform????' Troubles on the personal front Ye is facing troubles on the personal front as well, with an amended lawsuit from former assistant Lauren Pisciotta, accusing him of sexual assault, battery, stalking and sex trafficking. West's spokesperson, meanwhile, has denied these allegations.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Trump Faces A Political Crisis Over Epstein Investigation
New York: As his supporters erupt over the Justice Department's in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking investigation, President Donald Trump's strategy has been to downplay the issue. His problem? That nothing-to-see-here approach doesn't work for those who have learned from him that they must not give up until the government's deepest, darkest secrets are exposed. Last week, the Justice Department and the FBI the notion that there's an Epstein client list of elites who participated in trafficking of underage girls. Trump quickly and chided a reporter for daring to ask about the documents. The online reaction was swift, with followers calling the Republican president "out of touch" and demanding transparency. On Saturday, Trump used his Truth Social platform to again attempt to amid reports of infighting between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino over the issue. He suggested the turmoil was undermining his administration - "all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein." That did little to mollify Trump's supporters, who urged him to release the files or risk losing his base. At least one follower responded to Trump's post by saying it seemed as though the president was just trying to make the issue go away - but assured him it wouldn't. The political crisis is especially challenging for Trump because it's one of his own making. The president has spent years stoking dark theories and that casts him as the only savior who can Now that he's running the federal government, the community he helped build is . It's demanding answers he either isn't able to or does not want to provide. "The faulty assumption Trump and others make is they can peddle conspiracy theories without any blowback," said Matt Dallek, a political scientist at George Washington University. "The Epstein case is a neat encapsulation that it is hard to put the genie back in the bottle." Last week's two-page statement from the Justice Department and the FBI saying they had concluded that Epstein roiled Trump's supporters, who pointed to past statements from several administration officials that the list ought to be revealed. Bondi had that such a document was sitting on her desk waiting for review, though last week she said she had been referring generally to the Epstein case file and not a specific client list. Conservative influencers have since demanded to see all the files related to Epstein's crimes, even as Trump has tried to put the issue to bed. Far-right commentator Jack Posobiec said at Turning Point USA's Student Action Summit on Saturday that he would not rest "until we go full Jan. 6 committee on the Jeffrey Epstein files." Trump's weekend post sought to divert attention by calling on supporters to focus instead on investigating Democrats and arresting criminals rather than "spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein." His first-term national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. , pleaded with him to reconsider. "@realdonaldtrump please understand the EPSTEIN AFFAIR is not going away," Flynn wrote, adding that failing to address unanswered Epstein questions would make facing other national challenges "much harder." Other Trump allies continue to push for answers, among them far-right activist , who has called for Bondi to resign. She told Politico's Playbook newsletter on Sunday that a special counsel should be appointed to investigate the handling of the files on Epstein, who was in 2019 about a month after he was arrested. Experts who study conspiracy theories warned that more sunlight does not necessarily make far-fetched narratives disappear. "For some portion of this set of conspiracy theory believers, no amount of contradictory evidence will ever be enough," said Josephine Lukito, who studies conspiracy theorists at the University of Texas at Austin. The president and many figures in his administration - including and FBI Director - earned their political capital over the years in part by encouraging disproven conspiracy theories on a range of topics, from elections to vaccines. Now, they're tasked with trying to reveal the evidence they'd long insisted was there - a challenge that's reached across the government. Last week, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator posted on X what seemed like an endorsement of that the contrails left by aircraft are releasing chemicals for potentially nefarious reasons. But a second post from Zeldin underscored the fine line the Trump administration is trying to walk by linking to a new page on the EPA website that essentially debunked the theory. The value of conspiratorial fabrications is that they help people get political power, said Russell Muirhead, who teaches political science at Dartmouth College. He said Trump has exploited that "more ably than anybody probably in American history." But the Epstein case brings unique challenges, he said. That's because it's rooted in truth: A wealthy and well-connected financier abusing large numbers of young girls while escaping justice. As a result, Trump needs to come forward with truth and transparency on the topic, Muirhead said. If he doesn't, "large segments of his most enthusiastic and devoted supporters are going to lose faith in him." As right-wing outrage over Epstein dominates the political conversation, Democrats and other Trump rivals have been taking advantage. Several Democratic lawmakers have called for the release of all Epstein files and suggested Trump could be resisting because he or someone close to him is featured in them. Conservatives expressed concerns that Trump's approach on Epstein could hurt them in the midterms. "For this to go away, you're going to lose 10% of the MAGA movement," right-wing podcaster Steve Bannon said during the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit on Friday. There's also the challenge of governing. Bondi and Bongino last week at the White House over a story about Epstein, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a private conversation. And Loomer, who is close to Trump, said Friday she was told that Bongino was "seriously thinking about resigning." Bongino showed up at work Monday, according to a person familiar with the matter who insisted on anonymity to discuss personnel issues. The FBI declined to comment. Patel also took to social media Friday to dismiss what he called "conspiracy theories" that he himself would be leaving the administration. Dallek, the George Washington University professor, said it's alarming that the country's top law enforcement officials are feuding over a conspiracy theory. "It's possible at some time voters are going to notice the things they want or expect government to do aren't being done because the people in charge are either incompetent or off chasing rabbits," he said. "Who is fulfilling the mission of the FBI to protect the American people?"
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
US Senate to vote on Trump funding cuts, AIDS program funding preserved
The US Senate is due to begin voting on Tuesday on President Donald Trump's request to slash billions in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting previously approved by Congress, the latest test of Trump's control over his fellow Republicans. However, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought told reporters it will no longer include a plan to cut funds designated for PEPFAR, a global fund to fight HIV/AIDS, bringing the size of the package of cuts to $9 billion from $9.4 billion. Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the chamber's Republican majority leader, said he expected the first procedural voting on Tuesday. He had said that some members of his party had wanted changes in the bill. The Senate has until Friday to act on the rescissions package, originally a request to claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid funding and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Otherwise, the request will expire and the White House will be required to adhere to spending plans passed by Congress. Approving the Senate bill without the PEPFAR cuts means the measure must go back to the House of Representatives for a vote before it can be sent back to Trump to sign into law. Thune said he expected the House would act quickly to pass the measure. The amounts at stake are extremely small in the context of the sprawling federal budget, which totaled $6.8 trillion in the fiscal year ended September 30. Yet the proposed cuts have raised the hackles of Democrats and a handful of Republicans who saw an attempt to erode Congress's Constitutionally mandated authority over spending. The foreign aid initiatives in Trump's request for cuts included lifesaving support for women and children's health and the fight against HIV/AIDS that have long had strong bipartisan support. The package also cuts funds supporting public broadcasting, which can be the main source of news and emergency information in rural parts of the US. Critics of the cuts said the amounts of money involved were small but funded essential programs that should not be cut. 'What is going on here? Does anyone stand up to these horrible, horrible cuts that hurt the American people?' Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the chamber's Democratic leader, said on Monday. Trump has threatened to withhold his endorsement from any member of Congress who does not vote for the measure without changes. Standalone presidential rescissions packages have not passed in years, with lawmakers reluctant to cede their constitutionally mandated control of government spending. During Trump's first term in 2018, Congress members rejected Trump's request to revoke $15 billion in spending. Trump's Republicans hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House. So far, they have shown little appetite for opposing his policies. The rescissions legislation passed the House by 214-212 last month. Four Republicans joined 208 Democrats in voting against it. Some Republican senators had expressed concern about some of Trump's requests. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Appropriations Committee, had said she opposed Trump's request to cut funding for the global programs to fight HIV/AIDS. Democrats have warned that the foreign aid and broadcasting cuts, which overturn spending agreements between Republicans and Democrats, could make it more difficult to negotiate the package of spending bills that must pass by September 30 to fund the government next year and avoid a shutdown. 'How are we supposed to negotiate a bipartisan deal if Republicans will turn around and put it through the shredder in a partisan vote?' asked Senator Patty Murray from Washington, the top Democrat on the appropriations committee. Appropriations bills require 60 votes to move ahead in the Senate, but the rescissions package needs just 51, meaning Republicans can pass it without Democratic support.
