
AI To Create Mad Max-Like Future? Top Economist's Chilling Prediction
"The more likely scenario to me looks much more like Mad Max: Fury Road, where everybody is competing over a few remaining resources that aren't controlled by some warlord somewhere," Mr Autor said on the Possible podcast, hosted by LinkedIn cofounder Reed Hoffman.
The reference by Mr Autor is from the 2015 movie by George Miller, set in a post-apocalyptic wasteland where scarcity and inequality prevail while a tyrant rules over the hapless population. Mr Autor believes that AI could concentrate the wealth in the hands of people at the top while the workers fight for morsels.
"The threat that rapid automation poses - to the degree it poses as a threat - is not running out of work, but making the valuable skills that people have highly abundant so they're no longer valuable," he said, adding that roles like typists, factory technicians, and even taxi driver might be replaced.
AI to take away jobs
Mr Autor is not the only one warning about a dystopian AI future. In May, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that AI could soon wipe out 50 per cent of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. He added that governments across the world were downplaying the threat when AI's rising use could lead to a significant spike in unemployment numbers.
"We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming. I don't think this is on people's radar," said Mr Amodei.
According to the Anthropic boss, unemployment could increase by 10 per cent to 20 per cent over the next five years, with most of the people 'unaware' about what was coming.
"Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen. It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it," he said.
"It's a very strange set of dynamics where we're saying: 'You should be worried about where the technology we're building is going.'"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Switching industries? 7 ways to build credibility in a field you didn't study
Switching industries? 7 ways to build credibility in a field you didn't study It's a scenario that's increasingly common today: a literature graduate pursuing a career in UX design, an engineer moving into marketing, or a psychology major transitioning to data science. As industries evolve and interdisciplinary skills grow in demand, more and more people are entering fields unrelated to their undergraduate training. But even when the shift is possible, the question remains: how do you earn trust and legitimacy in a field you weren't formally trained for? Employers may be more open-minded today, but they still look for proof of fit. Whether you're aiming for a full career switch, planning to study further in a new field, or just trying to land that first job in an unfamiliar industry, building credibility is key. Fortunately, it's not about going back to school, it's about being intentional. Here are seven practical and proven ways to build credibility in a field that your original degree didn't prepare you for. 1. Learn the language of the industry Every profession has its own vocabulary—technical terms, key frameworks, jargon, even acronyms. Understanding and using this language correctly helps you sound informed and confident, especially in interviews, meetings, or online discussions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Start by immersing yourself in the industry: follow thought leaders on LinkedIn or X (formerly Twitter), listen to top podcasts in the field, read trade journals, and sign up for relevant newsletters. Engage with niche YouTube channels or blogs focused on real-world trends in that industry. Over time, you'll start to think and communicate like a professional in the space—something no certificate alone can teach. 2. Take focused courses that show intent You don't need another bachelor's degree to make the switch. What you do need is evidence that you're willing to learn. Short-term certifications or bootcamps signal that commitment clearly. Look for structured, outcome-oriented programs in your target field—such as Google's UX Design Certificate, Harvard's online Public Policy courses, or beginner-to-advanced Python classes on Coursera. Pick courses that are well-recognized, teach real-world applications, and (ideally) offer a capstone project or certificate of completion. These not only boost your skills but help bridge the academic gap on your resume. 3. Build a project that proves your ability Theory helps, but proof builds trust. Creating or contributing to a real-world project shows initiative and gives you tangible outcomes to share with employers. If you're switching to digital marketing, run a campaign for a local business or NGO. If you're moving into product design, build a UX case study based on an app redesign. If you're eyeing public policy, write a short whitepaper or policy brief on a topic you care about. Projects show that you're not just interested in the field—you're capable of doing the work. Plus, they double as portfolio material. 4. Frame your transferable skills with clarity Soft skills like critical thinking, communication, research, collaboration, and problem-solving are highly valued across fields—but only if you frame them in context. If you're coming from a humanities background and want to enter data analytics, talk about your experience with research design and pattern recognition. If you worked in events but are shifting to HR, highlight your stakeholder coordination and process management skills. Use real examples from academic, volunteer, or work experiences to demonstrate how your existing abilities apply in the new domain. A well-structured resume and LinkedIn profile can help reinforce this cross-domain narrative. 5. Connect with people in the industry Career changes are smoother when you're not doing it alone. Seek out people who work in your target field and learn from their journeys. Reach out on LinkedIn, join virtual panels, attend meetups, or follow community Slack groups. Ask questions, request short informational interviews, and be genuinely curious. Networking not only helps you gain insight into industry expectations but also builds your visibility. When people see you show up repeatedly and ask thoughtful questions, they begin to associate your name with the field—even before you land a formal role. Over time, these connections can lead to mentorship, referrals, or even job leads. 6. Craft a strong narrative for your pivot You don't need to hide your academic background—in fact, you should use it. Build a compelling story that explains why you're shifting, what you bring from your previous field, and how that perspective can add value to your new one. For instance, 'I studied biology, but working in community engagement during the pandemic sparked my interest in public health strategy. I've since completed a certification in health policy and written two research pieces on health communication.' This kind of story works well in SOPs, cover letters, and interviews because it shows that your switch is thoughtful—not random. 7. Share your learning journey publicly One of the most underrated ways to build credibility today is by showing your learning in real time. Start a blog, a LinkedIn series, or even a Twitter thread documenting your projects, takeaways from courses, or industry insights. You don't need to be an expert—just be consistent and authentic. This habit not only forces you to reflect and consolidate your learning, but also helps recruiters and professionals in your target field discover you. Over time, you'll position yourself as someone serious, self-driven, and genuinely interested in the field. That's credibility, earned in public. Switching industries is no longer the exception: it's the new normal. The challenge isn't whether you're allowed to change direction, but how well you communicate your intent, your preparation, and your potential. With a mix of strategic learning, real-world experience, and intentional storytelling, you can confidently enter a field you didn't originally study and thrive in it. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Pharma sector: Firms to clock 11% sales, EBITDA growth in Q1FY26; hospitals, diagnostics segments to outperform
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. India's pharmaceutical sector is likely to record a steady 11 per cent year-on-year growth in both sales and EBITDA for the first quarter of FY26, supported by sustained market traction across geographies, a new report by Kotak Institutional Equities has said. However, the report warned that muted domestic demand in April and March may partially offset the gains, as per news agency ANI. 'For pharma companies, we expect continued traction across most markets to drive 11%/11% yoy growth in overall sales/EBITDA in 1QFY26,' the brokerage noted in its sector outlook. The hospitals segment is expected to outpace the broader pharma industry, posting a robust 17 per cent growth in both revenue and EBITDA, aided by higher patient footfalls, new bed additions, and a moderate increase in Average Revenue Per Occupied Bed (ARPOB). Meanwhile, diagnostics firms are projected to see a 14 per cent jump in sales on the back of better test mix, organic volume expansion, and recent merger and acquisition activity. India's pharmaceutical market stood at $50 billion in FY24, with exports contributing $26.5 billion and the domestic market valued at $23.5 billion. Globally, India ranks third in production volume and 14th in value, with a strong portfolio of generics, over-the-counter drugs, vaccines, biologics, and biosimilars. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo According to the National Accounts Statistics 2024 by the ministry of statistics and programme implementation, the gross output from pharmaceuticals, medicinal and botanical products was Rs 4.56 lakh crore in FY23 at constant prices, with Rs 1.75 lakh crore in value addition. Nearly 9.26 lakh people were employed in the sector during the period, government data showed. The government continues to invest in pharma R&D and education. Seven National Institutes of Pharmaceutical Education & Research (NIPERs) have been set up by the department of pharmaceuticals to promote high-end academic and industry-oriented research. These institutions also support postgraduate and doctoral training in advanced pharma specialisations. To further boost innovation, the department has introduced the National Policy on Research & Development and Innovation in the Pharma-MedTech Sector. The policy aims to foster a robust R&D ecosystem and promote entrepreneurship, enabling India to become a global leader in drug discovery and medical device innovation. The outlook remains optimistic for India's pharma industry, with policy support, institutional research, and global market reach expected to sustain growth momentum across all segments. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
AI may now match humans in spotting emotion, sarcasm in online chats
When we write something to another person, over email or perhaps on social media, we may not state things directly, but our words may instead convey a latent meaning – an underlying subtext. We also often hope that this meaning will come through to the reader. But what happens if an artificial intelligence (AI) system is at the other end, rather than a person? Can AI, especially conversational AI, understand the latent meaning in our text? And if so, what does this mean for us? Latent content analysis is an area of study concerned with uncovering the deeper meanings, sentiments and subtleties embedded in text. For example, this type of analysis can help us grasp political leanings present in communications that are perhaps not obvious to everyone. Understanding how intense someone's emotions are or whether they're being sarcastic can be crucial in supporting a person's mental health, improving customer service, and even keeping people safe at a national level. These are only some examples. We can imagine benefits in other areas of life, like social science research, policy-making and business. Given how important these tasks are – and how quickly conversational AI is improving – it's essential to explore what these technologies can (and can't) do in this regard. Work on this issue is only just starting. Current work shows that ChatGPT has had limited success in detecting political leanings on news websites. Another study that focused on differences in sarcasm detection between different large language models – the technology behind AI chatbots such as ChatGPT – showed that some are better than others. Finally, a study showed that LLMs can guess the emotional 'valence' of words – the inherent positive or negative 'feeling' associated with them. Our new study published in Scientific Reports tested whether conversational AI, inclusive of GPT-4 – a relatively recent version of ChatGPT – can read between the lines of human-written texts. The goal was to find out how well LLMs simulate understanding of sentiment, political leaning, emotional intensity and sarcasm – thus encompassing multiple latent meanings in one study. This study evaluated the reliability, consistency and quality of seven LLMs, including GPT-4, Gemini, Llama-3.1-70B and Mixtral 8 × 7B. We found that these LLMs are about as good as humans at analysing sentiment, political leaning, emotional intensity and sarcasm detection. The study involved 33 human subjects and assessed 100 curated items of text. For spotting political leanings, GPT-4 was more consistent than humans. That matters in fields like journalism, political science, or public health, where inconsistent judgement can skew findings or miss patterns. GPT-4 also proved capable of picking up on emotional intensity and especially valence. Whether a tweet was composed by someone who was mildly annoyed or deeply outraged, the AI could tell – although, someone still had to confirm if the AI was correct in its assessment. This was because AI tends to downplay emotions. Sarcasm remained a stumbling block both for humans and machines. The study found no clear winner there – hence, using human raters doesn't help much with sarcasm detection. Why does this matter? For one, AI like GPT-4 could dramatically cut the time and cost of analysing large volumes of online content. Social scientists often spend months analysing user-generated text to detect trends. GPT-4, on the other hand, opens the door to faster, more responsive research – especially important during crises, elections or public health emergencies. Journalists and fact-checkers might also benefit. Tools powered by GPT-4 could help flag emotionally charged or politically slanted posts in real time, giving newsrooms a head start. There are still concerns. Transparency, fairness and political leanings in AI remain issues. However, studies like this one suggest that when it comes to understanding language, machines are catching up to us fast – and may soon be valuable teammates rather than mere tools. Although this work doesn't claim conversational AI can replace human raters completely, it does challenge the idea that machines are hopeless at detecting nuance. Our study's findings do raise follow-up questions. If a user asks the same question of AI in multiple ways – perhaps by subtly rewording prompts, changing the order of information, or tweaking the amount of context provided – will the model's underlying judgements and ratings remain consistent? Further research should include a systematic and rigorous analysis of how stable the models' outputs are. Ultimately, understanding and improving consistency is essential for deploying LLMs at scale, especially in high-stakes settings.