Cornwall mum 'could be alive' if older driver rules changed
Mrs Gibson was trying to cross the A30 at Plusha near Launceston to meet a friend when she pulled into the path of another car.An inquest heard there was nothing the other driver, who suffered minor injuries, could have done to avoid it.National Highways told the hearing the junction had since been altered after other accidents but Mrs Eady, from West Sussex, said older age was "absolutely a factor" in her mother's crash.She learned her mother was struggling to manoeuvre beforehand and had a separate near-collision.Mrs Eady said she believed arthritis and an earlier stroke may also have affected her mum's driving."I don't think my mum ever would have thought she needed to stop driving because there were too many things that depended on her being out in a car," she said.Drivers have a legal responsibility to notify the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) of conditions affecting their fitness to drive, but Mrs Eady said this felt insufficient."You can't really rely on the individual to do that... especially if it's their only way of getting out," she added.She said she would like medical professionals to be legally required to notify authorities and for there to be mandatory testing for those over 70.
What are the current rules regarding older drivers?Drivers must renew their licence aged 70 and every three years thereafterThere is no upper age limit for driving in the UK, with about 500 licence holders aged between 100 and 108Drivers have a legal responsibility to self-declare medical conditions that could affect driving to the DVLAGuidance by the DVLA states health professionals should inform the agency if a patient cannot or will not, but it is not a legal requirement
As the UK population ages, the number of older drivers is also increasing, with licence holders aged 70 and over going up by about 200,000 a year, according to the DVLA.Department of Transport statistics show older drivers make up about 14% of all licence holders but account for a quarter of those killed on the roads, and that people aged over 75 and under 25 are at highest risk of being killed or seriously hurt in a crash.Rob Heard from the Older Drivers Forum, which supports motorists to continue driving safely for longer, said the "vast majority of older drivers have a wealth of experience, confidence and tolerance".But he added: "As we age, our relative frailty means that older drivers are often over represented in serious injury collisions, particularly for the age group of 80 and above."
Mr Heard said elderly drivers were more likely to crash due to illness or errors in judgement, while accidents involving younger drivers were more likely through speed or taking risks.He said he supported mandatory referrals of medical conditions by health professionals and advised concerned family members to encourage mature driver assessments.The BBC has had exclusive access to a report, which said many people were "unaware" of their legal obligation to inform the DVLA of certain medical conditions and health professionals were "reluctant to" do so.The research, prepared for a coroner in April, showed less than 10% of DVLA notifications were made by medical professionals and other third parties.
The report's author, Dr Carol Hawley, research fellow at the University of Warwick, said the system "does need to change".She said her research suggested there was underreporting of visual and medical conditions "because there are not that many notifications compared to the number of driving licence holders and the number of people that have those conditions".Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said the college would welcome a more formalised approach "to ensure that any necessary breaches of doctor-patient confidentiality are protected in law and avoid undermining patient trust".The Association of Optometrists and The College of Optometrists said they "strongly support" the introduction of regular mandatory vision checks for all drivers and said the current system was "not fit for purpose".
Elsewhere in Cornwall, Hilary Nias said she "feels very strongly" that change is needed, following her sister-in-law's fatal accident."It was a tragic end to a really interesting life," she said, adding family had repeatedly warned her that her driving was unsafe.Jennifer Nias, 90, pulled out onto the A39 at Devoran and crashed onto a roundabout when she mistook the accelerator pedal for the brake.She died from her injuries five months later.
Mrs Nias said her sister-in-law could "only just" see over the dashboard and was having problems with spatial awareness. "That needed testing and assessing... it could possibly have avoided my sister-in-law's ghastly accident - and many others," she said.Jennifer Nias applied for her driving licence to be renewed within the three years before her accident and no medical conditions were declared.Following her inquest Emma Hillson, assistant coroner for Cornwall, wrote to the Department of Transport and the DVLA, highlighting the lack of any "requirement for there to be any form of medical check or assessment to confirm fitness to drive".Mrs Nias said she was "frankly depressed" by the response, which did not suggest any changes to the current system.
There is a higher proportion of elderly people in the South West of England than the national average, and some here see driving as a lifeline.In Bodmin, 130 older people meet weekly at the town hall at an Age Concern social group. Some drive to get there.Widower Reg Harris, 85, said giving up driving would "absolutely crucify" his lifestyle.Alvin Trevenna, 88, added: "I wouldn't be able to get anywhere, do anything... I'd just as well sit in the armchair and wait to die."Drivers can refer themselves for an older driving assessment by Driving Mobility at a cost, but referrals from the DVLA, police or NHS are free. The charity said more than 10,000 people aged over 70 in England underwent one in 2024 - 0.2% of drivers of that age. The local road safety partnership Vision Zero South West wants more public awareness as well as tighter regulation.It said 176 drivers aged over 60 were killed or seriously injured on Cornwall and Devon's road network in 2024.Chair Alison Hernandez said: "We want to protect people's lives because it is absolutely devastating when this happens to people and their families."Asked what could be done to support older drivers who felt they had no choice but to carry on because public transport often was not good enough in rural areas, Hernandez said her office was planning to run a campaign "to educate older drivers on how they can be at their best behind the wheel".
The government told the BBC the DVLA was analysing findings from recent inquests, and from a 2023 call for evidence on the legislative framework governing driver licensing for people with medical conditions.It said the DVLA would continue to engage with healthcare professionals and their regulatory bodies to understand if there may be circumstances where they "could be encouraged or supported in notifying DVLA of a patient's medical condition".A Department for Transport spokesperson added: "The NHS recommends adults should have their eyes tested every two years and drivers are legally required to inform the DVLA if they have a condition which affects their ability to drive. "We are committed to improving road safety and continue to explore ways to achieve this."Additional reporting by Lauren Woodhead, England Data Unit
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Chancellor's attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful'
Rachel Reeves' efforts to intervene in the supreme court case on the car finance scandal were 'unprecedented and disgraceful' and send a 'really bad message' to consumers that the government is willing to defend wrongdoing by banks, Treasury committee member and Lib Dem MP Bobby Dean has said. While the supreme court largely sided with finance companies on Friday – helping lenders avoid a £44bn compensation bill – Dean said the chancellor had gone too far to show she was on the side of business. That included a controversial bid to intervene in the supreme court hearing in January, in which she urged judges to avoid handing 'windfall' compensation to borrowers. That attempt was ultimately rejected. 'I thought it was pretty unprecedented and pretty disgraceful,' said Dean, who sits on an influential parliamentary committee which scrutinises City firms, regulators and the Treasury. The chancellor had also been considering overruling the supreme court's decision with retrospective legislation, to help save lenders billions of pounds, in the event that it upheld the entirety of October's court of appeal ruling, the Guardian revealed last week. 'What message does it send to consumers that the industry can do wrong, the courts can support the claim that they've done something wrong, but the government is ready to intervene and defend the industry that's done wrong, instead of defending the consumer? I think that's a really bad message to put out,' Dean said. 'I feel like this government sometimes is too keen to demonstrate it is on the side of business, and is sometimes not understanding the rights of consumer,' he added. Reeves intervention efforts followed intensive lobbying by the car loan industry, which feared that the supreme court would uphold last October's shock ruling by the appeal court. That October ruling suggested commission payments paid by lenders to car dealers were unlawful, unless explicitly disclosed to borrowers. It could have opened the door to billions of pounds of compensation claims against companies including Lloyds Banking Group, Santander UK, Barclays and Close Brothers, and result in a redress scheme that rivalled the £50bn payment protection insurance saga. Lobby group the Financing and Leasing Association (FLA) – which represents car lenders – had warned the government that a big compensation bill could push some lenders into failure, while others would offer fewer or more expensive loans to claw back their losses. That could restrict options for borrowers who relied on credit. City bosses were also warning the Treasury that ongoing uncertainty over the scandal was deterring international investment in the finance industry, and was therefore putting the UK's economic growth at risk The FLA's head of motor finance Adrian Dally said that the lobby group was 'pleased' with the supreme court's ruling, and felt its concerns had been heard by Treasury and regulators. He confirmed the FLA had been speaking with the Treasury nearly every week in the wake of the court of appeal ruling in October, including about its concerns on the car finance case. However, he rejected suggestions the Treasury had prioritised the industry over consumers. 'We absolutely disagree with that because, ultimately, this [car finance] industry is a vital part of the nation's infrastructure, and enables millions of people to get to work, to get to school, and that was put at risk by these court cases. And ultimately, we believe the industry's interests and the consumers' interests are aligned on this.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But Dean said government interventions set a 'really bad precedent if you're going to intervene on cases of consumer redress on the basis that it might damage industry, because then almost every consumer redress case would fall,' Dean said. Dean added that compensation schemes can give consumers confidence to borrow and invest, knowing will be protected when companies take advantage of customers. 'Obviously, the best industry is one where these redress systems are not needed in the first place, because people play by the rules.' The Financial Conduct Authority is due to confirm whether or not it will press ahead with a compensation scheme before the stock markets open on Monday morning. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'It is vital that consumers have access to motor finance to enable them to spread the cost of a vehicle in a way that is manageable and affordable. 'We respect this judgment from the supreme court, and we are working with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers. 'We recognise the issues this court case has highlighted, and we are already taking forward significant changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Consumer Credit Act.'
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Busy UK motorway used by 130,000 drivers a day shuts ALL weekend sparking chaos for airport & port passengers
A BUSY UK motorway which is used by 130,000 drivers a day has been closed for the entire weekend, causing chaos for airport and port travellers. Motorists heading for Belfast City Airport or the port have been told to add extra time for their journeys as one of the city's main roads has been shut. 2 Friday saw the closure of the eastbound carriageway of the M3 Lagan Bridge from Nelson Street on-slip to Dee Street. It is due to re-open at 6am on Monday. The closure is one of two weekend's worth of disruption on the road, which is undergoing a £400,000 maintenance scheme to replace bridge bearings. The westbound carriageway, from Bridge End to the M2 Foreshore, will be closed to traffic from 9pm on August 15 until 6am on August 18. Northern Ireland 's Department for Infrastructure (DfI) warned delays were 'inevitable' but added the works had been planned to minimise disruption. Traffic heading eastwards on the M3 over the Lagan Bridge will be affected by the current closure. The road will be closed between the M2 and Dee Street, with traffic being diverted off at the Nelson Street off-slip. There will also be no access to the bridge from Nelson Street on-slip. A diversion route is in place which follows: Nelson Street A2 Great Patrick Street A2 Dunbar Link Waring Street Donegall Quay Middlepath Street A2 Eastbound Middlepath Street on-slip Major motorway closed after lorry bursts into flames as drivers face hour-long delays and 7 miles of congestion The news comes after huge delays were reported on the M54 following a horror crash involving a number of vehicles. Two lanes were shut eastbound between Junction 2 for Wolverhampton and Junction 1 for Featherstone following a serious collision. Emergency services were called to the incident at around 2pm on Friday, where four people are thought to have been injured. A female passenger and male driver in one of the cars were rushed to Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woolwich, where they are being treated for serious injuries. A child and lorry driver were also taken to hospital for minor injuries. While at the end of last month, the M6 northbound in Warwickshire was closed between J3A for Coleshill and J4 for the M42, after a lorry caught on fire. 2
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
King Charles puts Queen Elizabeth II's luxury helicopter up for sale - and it's set to fetch £5m
King Charles has put Queen Elizabeth II 's luxury helicopter on the market - with the monarch set to cash in £5million. The King is selling his mother's eight-seater red 2009 Sikorsky and will instead use two environmentally friendly jets, believed to cost £8.5m each. The royal family have used the new AgustaWestland AW139s, which run on 50 per cent sustainable aviation fuel, since last year, having flown in the previous helicopter for the previous 15 years. The opulent interior of the late Queen's helicopter has been revealed for the first time after it was put on sale. Spacious grey leather seats are matched with a blue carpet, while a magazine rack, a wooden clock and tinted windows complete the design. The listing, by helicopter broker AeroAsset, boasts that it has only had 'one owner since new' and is a 'Head of State Aircraft'. It has had 5222 hours of flying and comes with 'ultraleather and ultrasuede interior panel upholstery,' it adds. The Queen made innumerable trips in her helicopter, including one from Sandringham to Windsor a few months before she died. Her personal Range Rover, which she used between 2006 and 2008, is also up for auction. The 2006 L322 model features a distinctive ornament of a labrador with a grouse in its mouth. It also has a number of unique features including side steps, mud flaps, a made-to-measure dog guard for Elizabeth II's canine companions and extra wiring for security measures. While the rear grab handles, to help with the late Queen's entry and exit from the vehicle have been removed. The car has covered 120,000 miles and is described as being in 'exemplary condition throughout. The model's current value is between £9,000 and £16,000. But it is estimated to raise up to £70,000 when it goes for sale at the Silverstone Festival on August 23. The same auction house sold a different one of her Range Rovers for £132,750. The car's MOT record shows that by April 2009 - around a year after it was released from the Royal Household - it had clocked just under 18,000 miles. Today, it is showing 119,938. Rob Hubbard, Managing Director and Principal Auctioneer of Iconic Auctioneers, said: 'Vehicles with such distinguished provenance rarely enter the market, making this an exceptional opportunity for collectors and enthusiasts alike. 'Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II's personal Range Rover combines automotive excellence with an unmatched historical significance. 'We anticipate considerable interest in this vehicle as has been the case with other Royal vehicles we have offered.'
