
Ukraine war briefing: US moving ‘with haste' to enable weapons shipments to Kyiv, says Washington
Nato's supreme commander in Europe said separately that preparations were under way to ship the first Patriot systems to Ukraine under the scheme. US general Alexus Grynkewich said there was an 'ongoing conversation' about whether the US would sell Patriots already available in its own military stockpiles. The Swiss government, meanwhile, said delivery of US Patriot systems to Switzerland would be delayed as Washington reprioritised to provide more support to Ukraine. The moves came as Trump's effort to take credit for the additional weapons headed to Ukraine at Europe's expense created mild friction in EU-US relations, with the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, saying: 'If we pay for these weapons, it's our support.'
Donald Trump's decision to ramp up arms shipments to Ukraine is a signal to Kyiv to abandon peace efforts, Russia said, vowing it would not accept the 'blackmail' of Washington's new sanctions ultimatum. Trump on Monday set a 50-day deadline for Moscow to reach a ceasefire or face sanctions, while also promising more weaponry for Kyiv. Russia's foreign ministry condemned the move, with spokesperson Maria Zakharova saying: 'It is obvious that the Kyiv regime consistently perceives such decisions by the collective west as a signal to continue the slaughter and abandon the peace process.'
Russian troops have taken control of three villages in three different parts of the frontline running through Ukraine, the defence ministry claimed on Thursday. Official Ukrainian reports of activity along the 1,000km (600-mile) front disputed part of the Russian account, particularly concerning a key village in the south-east. The Russian defence ministry report named the three captured settlements as Kamianske in the south-eastern Zaporizhzhia region, Dehtiarne in north-eastern Kharkiv region and Popiv Yar in Donetsk region. The battlefield reports from either side could not be independently verified. Ukrainian military spokesperson Vladyslav Voloshyn told the liga.net media outlet that holding Kamianske, south-east of the region's main town of Zaporizhzhia, was important to keep that city safe from attack.
Russian lawmakers have advanced a bill that would outlaw opening or searching for content online judged 'extremist', such as songs glorifying Ukraine and material by feminist rock band Pussy Riot. Critics say the law, which has drawn a rare backlash from across Russia's political spectrum, would stifle internet freedom. The legislation threatens fines of up to 5,000 rubles ($64) on anyone found to have deliberately searched for or gained access to material listed as extremist by the justice ministry. More than 5,000 entries are on the list, including webpages, political slogans, books, artworks and music albums.
Slovakia will stop blocking the approval of the 18th package of European Union sanctions against Russia on Friday, the prime minister said. Robert Fico said on Thursday that Slovakia had achieved as much as it could at this point, after blocking the EU's approval of the sanctions multiple times to demand guarantees against damages it fears from a separate EU plan to end all gas imports from Russia from 2028. EU countries' ambassadors would meet on Friday morning to approve the new sanctions. The European Commission last month proposed the 18th package of sanctions against Russia for its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, aimed at Moscow's energy revenue, banks and military industry.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Portugal to decide next week on future of central bank chief
LISBON, July 18 (Reuters) - The Portuguese government will decide next week whether to replace or reappoint Bank of Portugal Governor Mario Centeno, whose five-year term ends on Saturday, Finance Minister Joaquim Miranda Sarmento said on Friday. Centeno has been the target of frequent criticism from the political right, now in power, for moving from his role as finance minister in a previous Socialist administration to the central bank in 2020, a move detractors said undermined the institution's independence. Miranda Sarmento has previously said the cabinet would consider whether to reappoint Centeno, who has been a vocal so-called "dove" favouring looser monetary policy at the European Central Bank, or replace him towards the end of his term. Friday's cabinet meeting ended without a decision, however. The minister gave no further comment on the likelihood of Centeno being replaced after months of speculation that centre-right Prime Minister Luis Montenegro was looking for a new central bank chief, despite Centeno's strong European credentials at the ECB and as Eurogroup president in 2018-2020. The central bank declined to comment. Centeno has previously said he is ready to continue leading the institution. Central bank governors are proposed by the finance minister and nominated by the cabinet for a five-year term and can be reappointed once. The nominee must submit to questioning by a parliamentary committee - which has no power to block the nomination - before the government can officially appoint him or her. Portugal's parliament began its summer recess until September on Thursday, although committees can still hold hearings through next Friday. It is not uncommon for heads of regulatory bodies in Portugal to remain in office months after their terms expire. Filipe Garcia, head of Informacao de Mercados Financeiros consultants, said the fact that the government had not denied speculation that Montenegro sought to replace Centeno suggested that his days at the helm of the central bank were numbered. Several names of potential successors have circulated in Portuguese media recently, including the Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Joao Cabral dos Santos, and former CEO of Portugal's Novo Banco, Antonio Ramalho.


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
President Donald Trump will sign a new cryptocurrency bill into law on Friday
President Donald Trump on Friday will sign into law a new set of regulations for a type of cryptocurrency that are seen as a way to legitimize the burgeoning industry. The GENIUS Act sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency that is tied to a stable asset like the U.S. dollar to reduce price volatility. It passed both the House and Senate with wide bipartisan margins. The measure is meant to bolster consumer confidence in the rapidly growing crypto sector. Its passage comes as Trump makes it a mission to make the U.S. the 'crypto capital of the world.' 'Congratulations to our GREAT REPUBLICANS for being able to accomplish so much, a record, in so short a period of time," Trump wrote on his social media site Friday morning as he announced the bill signing. The House also passed two other bills Thursday that are meant to boost the legitimacy of the crypto industry. One creates a new market structure for cryptocurrency, and the other bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a new digital currency. Both measures now go to the Senate.


Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why Trump must avoid an Epstein special prosecutor
Donald Trump really does not want his Justice Department to launch an independent review of the Jeffrey Epstein files. He attempted a maneuver to get his MAGA base off his back by directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public Epstein-related grand jury testimony. However, the president's supporters won't be satisfied until everything related to the case against the disgraced financier is made public. Top legal experts said it's not surprising the White House moved to quash the idea gaining steam in MAGA circles that a special counsel could get to the bottom of the notorious sexual trafficker's network. They tell the Daily Mail that it would be in the president's best interest to avoid a special counsel if he wants to put the scandal behind him. And if he appoints one, it could make the scandal that he so desperately wants to put behind him worse. Others claim it's actually up to Congress to investigate the matter further . Trump, some believe, could risk paying a steep political price should an independent investigator turn up any new information in the case that has his base up in arms. And then there are the cold-hard skeptics who know Trump best. Ty Cobb, who served on Trump's legal team during his first term, said that any investigation would be designed to produce a predetermined outcome favorable to the administration, only infuriating the most ardent Epstein skeptics and conspiracy theorists. 'The only incentive for a special counsel is buying time,' Cobb told the Daily Mail. He said: 'The result is not in question – the result will be laudatory of [Pam] Bondi and Trump and, you know, he won't appoint anyone who wouldn't provide that result.' Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow John Malcolm told the Daily Mail Trump would rather 'just have the whole matter go away.' 'It's causing internal tensions within his administration,' he said. 'He's going to have to make a determination as to whether or not he thinks that he will pay too high a political price just to leave things the way they are.' The White House clarified Thursday that Trump does not support appointing a special prosecutor to review files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It signals a shift in the president's thinking after he considered having his Attorney General Pam Bondi appoint one a day earlier following outrage from his MAGA base. 'The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That's how he feels,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail in the daily briefing. The easier move is to let Congress hash it out. 'I think the best thing to do would be for Congress to investigate the Epstein matter,' law professor John Yoo tells the Daily Mail. Yoo said that the committee could be comprised of those skeptical of the DOJ's findings and conclude with a report of their findings after the review of sensitive law enforcement documents. 'It could have hearings where officials like Pam Bondi can explain under oath their past statements,' Yoo added. But in an attempt to quell surging criticism from even his most loyal supporters, Trump is now instructing his AG to release more. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. He added: 'This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' Trump has consistently railed against special counsels and used them as his personal punching bag when seeking to discredit any rivals' claims against him. He says the 'Jeffrey Epstein hoax' is another Democratic initiative to divide Republicans comparing it to the 2016 election collusion probe and the claims that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian disinformation campaign. Still, the president's base remains furious over the Justice Department's botched review of the Epstein files. No matter how hard Trump tries to get his supporters and loyalists to move on, they aren't buying the DOJ's conclusion that Epstein killed himself in prison and that there was no 'client list' of high-profile co-conspirators in his child sexual trafficking ring. Amid the continued demand for an un-redacted release of all Epstein investigation materials, Attorney General Pam Bondi fired federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York Maurene Comey this week. Some feel the move was an effort to get the heat off Bondi's back, though no official reason was provided. The DOJ declined to comment to the Daily Mail on the decision. When a reporter asked Trump on Wednesday: 'Would you consider appointing a special counsel to investigate the Jeffrey Epstein investigation?,' Trump said he had nothing to do with it. As his base remains adamant in the search for what remains to be released, far-right media voice Laura Loomer led the calls for a special counsel appointment. It appeared to be something Trump could do to put the case to rest for good. But legal experts explain why this is ill-advised – and some express skepticism over whether any investigator appointed by Trump's team could remain impartial anyway. The DOJ did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment on whether Attorney General Bondi is considering the appointment of a special counsel in the Epstein case. And the White House referred the Daily Mail to the DOJ when asked if Trump was pushing for an independent review, before later revealing at Thursday's press briefing that he doesn't want one. Leavitt said she is not aware of any conversations Trump has had with Bondi about the potential of a special counsel appointment. Malcolm, who is Vice President of the Heritage Foundation's Institute for Constitutional Government, told the Daily Mail: 'There's no reason why the Department of Justice can't make these decisions on its own' on what to release from the Epstein files. 'On the other hand, if this is a political football, and either President Trump or Attorney General Bondi would like to get a little bit of distance – political distance – between, you know, to support the ultimate decision. That would be a way to do it,' he added. Still, he predicted that Trump and Bondi would decide not to go to an independent investigator if they felt the political cost would be 'severely damaging.' The president told JustTheNews this week that he would support a special counsel to look into weaponization of the DOJ against conservatives in the 2016 elections – and in that same interview with John Solomon said he wouldn't mind someone looking into the Epstein case. But it appeared that Trump was referring to an investigation into Democrats for creating what he now calls the 'Jeffrey Epstein hoax.' 'It's all the same scam. They could look at this Jeffrey Epstein hoax also, because that's the same stuff that's all put out by Democrats,' he said. He also expressed concerns former intelligence and federal law enforcement officials could have tampered with evidence surrounding the Epstein case. CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 asked attorney and legal commentator Elie Honig about the potential for a special prosecutor. 'It makes no sense,' Honig responded. 'It would be purely a fig leaf. It would cure nothing. It would solve nothing.'