Wealthy Silicon Valley investors in line for US$17 billion windfall in US senate Republican tax Bill
[NEW YORK] Silicon Valley's favourite tax break may be getting an upgrade.
Venture capitalists, along with successful tech founders and early startup employees, already pay no taxes on billions of US dollars of gains annually, thanks to a lucrative and complicated provision called Qualified Small Business Stock, or QSBS. Now the carve-out could get even more generous in changes included in Senate Republicans' proposed tax and spending Bill moving through Congress.
The once-obscure provision is the subject of 'every dinner conversation in Silicon Valley,' said Christopher Karachale, a partner at law firm Hanson Bridgett in San Francisco. 'It's already an exceptional benefit for people who take risks on startups.'
Taxpayers claimed US$51 billion of QSBS gains in 2021, a record year for venture capital deal activity, according to a Treasury paper earlier this year, with the benefits skewed to a select group. While about 33,000 people reported QSBS to the Internal Revenue Service annually over the decade studied by Treasury, 90 per cent of the total income went to individuals reporting more than US$1 million of gains on eligible stocks.
Shares qualify as QSBS if they're acquired early enough in a startup's life cycle and held for more than five years. Once sold, capital gains aren't taxed up to certain limits, which advisers to the wealthy have figured out how to stretch and multiply several-fold. With the right planning, a venture capital investor or founder can end up with hundreds of millions of US dollars of tax-free income.
Now the QSBS break could get even better. Though it was not addressed in previous versions of US President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Senate Republicans slipped into their version tweaks relaxing its complex rules. Taxpayers would be able to invest at later stages in startups and still get QSBS, cash out earlier and still get a partial benefit, and skip taxes entirely on up to 50 per cent more of their windfalls.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'I'm surprised'
Critics say the QSBS provision is unnecessary and overly expensive. House Democrats proposed restricting the tax break in 2021.
'I'm surprised they're not killing this thing, but I guess the lobbyists did their work,' said Manoj Viswanathan, a professor at the University of California Law San Francisco who has studied QSBS. 'I just don't think it's worth it.'
The Treasury projects the current QSBS break will cost the US$44.6 billion over the decade beginning in 2025. The Senate bill's proposed changes would boost that by another US$17.2 billion over that period, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates.
Defenders of the provision have spent several years pushing Congress to expand it, arguing it encourages innovation and risk-taking. 'It brings more capital off the bench and into the game that might otherwise go to different asset classes,' said Patrick Gouhin, chief executive officer of the Angel Capital Association.
'QSBS encourages long-term investment in high-growth startups across the country by lowering the cost of capital,' Bobby Franklin, president and CEO of the National Venture Capital Association, said in a statement. 'It tells investors and founders alike: building something new in America is still worth it.'
Despite the name Qualified Small Business Stock, the vast majority of small businesses are not eligible. Only C-corporations issue stock that qualifies as QSBS. Service industries are generally excluded, and the break is most valuable for technology or biotech that can grow quickly and generate large capital gains.
The Senate proposal would be a potential boon to investors in artificial intelligence and other hot areas.
'Stacking' strategy
To qualify under current law, taxpayers must have obtained their shares in a C-corporation at an early stage, when it had less than US$50 million of gross assets, an accounting definition often significantly less than its valuation. People who hold QSBS for at least five years can avoid taxes on up to US$10 million of capital gains or 10 times their initial investment, whichever is more.
An early investor who puts US$30 million into a startup, therefore, can theoretically receive US$300 million tax-free. Founders can maximise their initial basis, and thus their potential QSBS-eligible gains, by transferring intellectual property into a startup from a predecessor company.
Through a process called 'stacking,' QSBS holders can multiply the benefits of the US$10 million exclusion as well.
'It's the biggest game in town,' Brian Gray, a partner at accounting firm Gursey Schneider in Los Angeles, said of the strategy. His clients typically set up six or seven trusts, each benefiting a different family member, to get up to US$60 million or US$70 million in tax-free gains rather than just US$10 million.
Senate Republican lawmakers would turbo-charge those benefits. They would set a US$75 million limit on an eligible startup's gross assets, up from US$50 million, on QSBS issued after the bill is enacted. Maximum tax-free gains would jump to US$15 million, from US$10 million. Both limits would be adjusted for inflation starting in 2027.
The bill would also make it easier for QSBS holders to exit their investments sooner than five years without forfeiting tax benefits, allowing them to exclude half their gain after three years and 75 per cent after four years.
That will be valuable to serial entrepreneurs, according to Gouhin of the Angel Capital Association. 'This gives you an added incentive to turn that company as quickly as possible.' BLOOMBERG
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Trump dismisses reports US is weighing up to $38 billion civilian nuclear deal for Iran, World News
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) dismissed media reports that said his administration had discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion (S$38 billion) to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear programme. CNN reported on Thursday and NBC News reported on Friday that the Trump administration in recent days had explored possible economic incentives for Iran in return for its government halting uranium enrichment. The reports cited sources. CNN cited officials as saying that several proposals were floated and were preliminary. "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a "Hoax." Since April, Iran and the US have held indirect talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran says its programme is peaceful and Washington says it wants to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. Trump, earlier this week, announced a ceasefire between US ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The US struck Iran's nuclear sites over the last weekend and Iran targeted a US base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation, before Trump announced the ceasefire. [[nid:719354]] Israel is the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The UN nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme in Iran.

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court wraps up its term
Mr Trump has scored a series of victories at the Supreme Court since returning to office in January. PHOTO: REUTERS Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court wraps up its term WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court on the last day of rulings for its current term gave Donald Trump his latest in a series of victories at the nation's top judicial body, one that may make it easier for him to implement contentious elements of his sweeping agenda as he tests the limits of presidential power. With its six conservative members in the majority and its three liberals dissenting, the court on Jan 27 curbed the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, resetting the power balance between the federal judiciary and presidents. The ruling came after the Republican president's administration asked the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of so-called 'universal' injunctions issued by three federal judges that halted nationally the enforcement of his January executive order limiting birthright citizenship. The court's decision has 'systematically weakened judicial oversight and strengthened executive discretion,' said Mr Paul Rosenzweig, an attorney who served in Republican President George W. Bush's administration. June 27's ruling said that judges generally can grant relief only to the individuals or groups who brought a particular lawsuit. The decision did not, however, permit immediate implementation of Mr Trump's directive, instead instructing lower courts to reconsider the scope of the injunctions. The ruling was authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of three conservative justices who Mr Trump appointed during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021. Mr Trump has scored a series of victories at the Supreme Court since returning to office in January. These have included clearing the way for his administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face and ending temporary legal status held by hundreds of thousands of migrants on humanitarian grounds. The court also permitted implementation of Mr Trump's ban on transgender people in the military, let his administration withhold payment to foreign aid groups for work already performed for the government, allowed his firing of two Democratic members of federal labor boards to stand for now, and backed his Department of Government Efficiency in two disputes. 'President Trump secured the relief he sought in most of his administration's cases,' Mr George Mason University law school professor Robert Luther III said. 'Justice Barrett's opinion is a win for the presidency,' Mr Luther said of the decision on nationwide injunctions. 'It recognises that the executive branch is a bully pulpit with a wide range of authorities to implement the promises of a campaign platform.' Once again, as with many of the term's major decisions, the three liberal justices found themselves in dissent, a familiar position as the court under the guidance of Chief Justice John Roberts continues to shift American law rightward. The rulings in favour of Mr Trump illustrate that "the court's three most liberal justices are proving less relevant now than at any earlier point in the Roberts Court with respect to their impact on its jurisprudence," Mr Luther said. The cases involving Mr Trump administration policies this year came to the court as emergency filings rather than through the normal process, with oral arguments held only in the birthright litigation. And those arguments did not focus on the legality of Mr Trump's action but rather on the actions of the judges who found that it was likely unconstitutional. 'One theme is the court's struggle to keep pace with a faster-moving legal world, especially as the Trump administration tests the outer boundaries of its powers,' Boston College Law School professor Daniel Lyons said. In other cases during the nine-month term, the court sided with a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, endorsed South Carolina's plan to cut off public funding to reproductive healthcare and abortion provider Planned Parenthood, and made it easier to pursue claims alleging workplace 'reverse' discrimination. The court also spared two American gun companies from the Mexican government's lawsuit accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels, and allowed parents to opt elementary school children out of classes when storybooks with LGBT characters are read. In several cases involving federal statutes, the message from the justices is that people unhappy with the outcome need to take that up with Congress, according to Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson. 'The court is implicitly saying, 'That's Congress' problem to fix, and it's not the court's role to solve those issues,'' Mr Levinson said. This is the second straight year that the court ended its term with a decision handing Mr Trump a major victory. On July 1, 2024, it ruled in favour of Mr Trump in deciding that presidents cannot be prosecuted for official actions taken in office. It marked the first time that the court recognised any form of presidential immunity from prosecution. The Supreme Court's next term begins in October but Trump's administration still has some emergency requests pending that the justices could act upon at any time. It has asked the court to halt a judicial order blocking mass federal job cuts and the restructuring of agencies. It also has asked the justices to rein in the judge handling a case involving deportations to so-called 'third countries.' Recent rulings 'have really shown the court for what it is, which is a deeply conservative court,' Georgia State University law professor Anthony Michael Kreis said. The court's jurisprudence reflects a larger shift in the national discourse, with Republicans feeling they have the political capital to achieve long-sought aims, Kreis said. The court's conservative majority, Mr Kreis said, 'is probably feeling more emboldened to act.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Eye care giant Alcon keeps 'lens' on the future with expanded manufacturing and logistics facility in Tuas, Singapore News
Eye care-device giant Alcon officially opened its expanded state-of-the art manufacturing and logistics facility in Tuas Biomedical Park on Friday (June 27) morning. This brings Alcon's investments in Singapore to more than US$600 million (S$765 million) since it began operations in Singapore back in 2005. The completed Tuas facility is one of the Swiss-American firm's largest high-tech manufacturing sites with Industry 4.0 capabilities, advanced automation and smart manufacturing systems to meet the increasing global demand for its contact lenses. Amid a growing middle class and rising demand for quality healthcare, the Asia-Pacific region continues to be the fastest-growing market for medical technology, with its market value projected to reach nearly S$300 billion by 2030. This puts the region second only to the US as a source of demand for medical technology (Medtech). "Singapore is home to some of the world's best-in-class Medtech manufacturing palnts. The sector has been growing steadily, with a manufacturing output of S$19.4 billion in 2023. This marks a $5.2 billion increase over the past decade," said Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry Low Yen Ling at the opening ceremony of Alcon's expanded facility. Beyond strengthening innovation and supply chain resilience within Singapore's MedTech ecosystem, Alcon's investment is also expected to benefit Singaporean workers and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Singapore. Muhammad Haiqal Bin Sapuan, an associate supervisor at Alcon made the switch from the oil and gas industry, through the Career Conversion Programme (CCP), in 2022 to have more time with his family. A year and a half into his role as a senior technician, he was nominated by his peers to step up as an associate supervisor. [[nid:707984]] "That recognition gave me confidence. I started off as an interim, and it was tough at first, but the team's support made the difference," said Haiqal. To date, nearly 180 Singaporean workers have benefitted from the CCP to become Alcon associates. Alcon's new facility is expected to create new job opportunities in production operations, quality control and supply chain management. It is also expected to strengthen innovation and supply chain resilience within Singapore's Medtech ecosystem through initiatives such as the Partnership for Capability Transformation, which partners local SMEs to buiild capabilities from precision moulding to packaging, helping them to scale and compete globally. [[nid:715407]] editor@