Jewish groups back antisemitism report, while critics warn of curbs on free speech
Special envoy Jillian Segal delivered on Thursday a landmark report with sweeping proposals to curtail hate against Jewish people.
The most contentious proposals included a call to strip funding from universities, charities and cultural institutions that fail to combat hatred against Jewish people, calls for editorial standards within the media and the screening of visa applicants for antisemitic views.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did not say on Thursday whether his government would adopt all the report's recommendations, but he welcomed the report and said that some of its proposals were already under way or could be rolled out quickly.
Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler said the report was a significant milestone in fighting antisemitism.
'We particularly welcome the plan to withhold government funding from universities that fail to act against antisemitism,' Leibler said. 'Some of our major universities have seen a complete dearth of leadership, notwithstanding extensive consultation with Jewish students, staff, and numerous parliamentary inquiries.
'The real measure of this report will be its implementation. It is essential that these recommendations are enacted swiftly, and consistently by governments and institutions.'
Rabbi Dovid Gutnick, whose East Melbourne shule was targeted in an alleged arson attack last week, said he had not been able to closely examine the report but that 'it sounds like we are all moving in the right direction on this one'.
'Jillian Segal's office does some really good work for the community on the whole,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Is he scared of meeting Trump?': John Howard slams the PM for his ‘bad ordering of priorities'
Former prime minister John Howard says Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has a 'terrible lapse of judgement' and a 'bad ordering of priorities' due to his upcoming trip to China. 'I think it's a good thing that the Prime Minister is going to China and that he has a working relationship with the Chinese President,' Mr Howard told Sky News Australia. 'But I think it's a very bad thing, a very bad thing, that he's still not had a face-to-face meeting with the new American president. 'We will always be closer to the Americans because we share values, and the closeness of values binds countries together more tightly than anything else. 'Poor form to say the least, is he scared of meeting him?'
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
PM's China trip key despite chasmic differences on defence: expert
Anthony Albanese will land in Shanghai on Saturday, kicking off a six-day state visit to China amid severe regional uncertainty. The Chinese government has done its utmost to frame the visit positively, with Xi Jinping's envoy in Canberra spruiking it as an opportunity to take the two-way economic relationship to new highs. Ambassador Xiao Qian even teased the Albanese government with artificial intelligence – a temptation the Prime Minister has neither embraced nor rejected. Against a backdrop of China's rapid military build-up and increasing aggression in the Indo Pacific, Mr Albanese faces far harder conversations than televised tarmac niceties with grinning officials. Chasmic differences loom large on defence, global trade, human rights and the region. But Australia-China Relations Institute director James Laurenceson told NewsWire that was all the more reason to talk. 'Even if we don't like everything that China is doing in the strategic and security space, they are Asia's leading strategic power,' Mr Laurenceson said. 'So if you look around the region, there is no country that wants to talk less with China because it's a reality that even if you've got geopolitical or other conflicts with China, you've got to be able to manage those issues.' Defence is the elephant in the room. In the last year, China has test-fired a nuclear-capable missile, harassed an Australian surveillance jet in international airspace and carried out live fire drills off Australia's coast while circumnavigating the country with warships. All the while, China's estimated nuclear arsenal has nearly tripled since 2020, which Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said last month was driving 'security anxiety' in Canberra. Australia has committed tens of billions in extra military spending over the next decade amid defence assessments warning a conflict in the region could break out by 2034. The US has put it at 2027. Much of the defence funds are earmarked for long-term projects, such as AUKUS, which critics argue have come at the cost of Australia's immediate war-readiness. Pointing to Washington's mixed signals on AUKUS, Mr Laurenceson said it was important to keep comms 'open' with Beijing. 'Lurking in the background is the fact that you've got the US as a less reliable strategic partner,' he said. 'That provides some incentive to at least keep that dialogue in the strategic space open.' He said he expected Mr Albanese would navigate defence as 'he's been doing since he came to government'. 'He'll say that AUKUS is not up for negotiation,' Mr Laurenceson said. 'The fact that Beijing doesn't want us to pursue it … they're entitled to press that case, and they will, they have done and they'll continue to do it. 'But that's not something that Canberra needs to weigh too heavily. 'Canberra's job is to make decisions that it thinks are in Australia's national interest. 'I'm very confident that despite all Beijing's grumblings around AUKUS, they're not going to blow up the bilateral relationship more broadly because of it.' Trade: a lifeline Where Australia and China have the most common ground is trade. While Donald Trump seeks to pump the breaks on Australian goods entering the US, the Chinese President asks for more. The Albanese government has convinced Mr Xi to remove $20bn in trade barriers, letting Australian barley, lobsters and wine flow freely into China once again. 'The Chinese market is bigger than our next four largest markets combined,' Mr Laurenceson said. 'Some of those other four biggest markets are actually closing up. 'Ideally, we'd like to diversify trade away from China but in fact, the US, which is currently our third largest market, is actually making it harder for Australia to export its stuff there. 'So, China wants stuff, and trade is flowing freely between Australia and China right now.' While China has been keen to embrace Australian products, which often attract a premium price tag, Beijing has made clear it will not play fair in all sectors. China is the world's leading producer of critical minerals – precious materials vital to everything from cars to phones. Australia's fledgling rare earth industry is the biggest challenge to China's dominance in the space. So seriously is the threat being taken that Australia's leading mining firm, Lynas Rare Earths, has been hit by a relentless cyber campaign stoking fear around its projects in Australia and abroad. Mr Laurenceson said it was good that Mr Albanese 'is wanting to position Australia as a an alternative for other countries in critical minerals supply chains'. 'That makes perfect sense,' he said. 'We don't want to be in a world where we're locked in to highly concentrated sources of supply.' The EU has signalled it would like more Australian critical minerals to cut back its reliance on China. The Albanese government has also leaned heavily on critical minerals in tariff negotiations with the US. But as Mr Laurenceson pointed out, the biggest market for rare earths is China. 'To give you one example, 98 per cent of Australia's lithium goes to China,' he said. 'Now, why is that? Is that because we love them? No, it's because they're the ones who want to buy it. 'America is at least 10 years behind China's capabilities in the energy transition space, so we'd love to sell more lithium to America, but they just don't want it because they haven't got the industries there.' He added that the US was also 'busy building out its own domestic supply chains of lithium'. 'So Australia still has to engage with that economic reality,' Mr Laurenceson said. Balancing act Other sore points Mr Albanese will need to navigate are China's human rights abuses in its province of Xinjiang and Labor's election commitment to scrap Port of Darwin's 99-year lease to a Chinese company. Australia has criticised China for torturing and enslaving Uighurs in Xinjiang and called on Beijing to implement all recommendations made in a United Nations report on the abuses. The Chinese government has in turn accused Australia of 'hypocrisy', saying the Australian Defence Force has committed 'abhorrent crimes'. On the Port of Darwin, the Albanese government has not ruled out forcing China's Landbridge Holdings to sell it back to an Australian firm. The deal was greenlit by the Turnbull-Coalition government a decade ago. Beijing has indicated it would bring up the touchy topic when Mr Albanese visits. Despite the points of friction, Mr Laurenceson said Mr Albanese's approach was 'working. 'I think he's doing exceptionally well,' he said. He described both Canberra and Beijing as being 'pragmatic and clear eyed' about the relationship. 'Neither side is willing to let the differences define the relationship, but neither side is kidding themselves that the other is geopolitically aligned,' Mr Laurenceson said. 'And frankly, that's not bad. 'I think that would serve Australia's national interests if that approach we take to China was wheeled out more generally.'
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Not going to tolerate' antisemitism: Bill Shorten outlines university's plan to combat ‘hate' following envoy report
University of Canberra's Vice-Chancellor and former Labor leader Bill Shorten has outlined the universities' plan to combat antisemitism on camps, saying 'we're not going to tolerate people being treated badly' due to their Jewish heritage. Australia's Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal handed down a major report on Thursday, just one year after the business executive was appointed to the role. Ms Segal ordered university chancellors and vice-chancellors to cooperate with her plan to stamp out antisemitism on campuses, or risk funding cuts. Following the recommendations announcement, Mr Shorten said he thought it was important to promptly take a stance on the matter, as 'Antisemitism is real'. 'It's not a creation of the right wing or Israel lobbyists, antisemitism is real. It's a centuries-old hate, and we thought it was all in the history books but now it's come out of the drains,' Mr Shorten told Sky News on Friday. In light of incidents such the alleged arson attack on a Melbourne synagogue last week, Mr Shorten said antisemitism needs to 'be called out' 'And Jewish Australians have got to know... we're not going to tolerate people being treated badly because they're Jewish,' he said. Pressed as to whether the University of Canberra will be implementing the special envoy's recommendations, the vice-chancellor said it will work with other universities and will ensure the safety of students with Jewish heritage on campus. 'I do not want people coming from outside the campus causing grief, and Australians of Jewish heritage have got to feel that when they come to the University of Canberra, this is a place where they can study, learn, be treated with respect,' Mr Shorten said. '... UC wants students of all faith, including kids of Jewish heritage.' Ms Segal's report outlines a series of measures needed in order to combat antisemitism, which it claimed had 'reached a tipping point that threatens social harmony, undermines trust in institutions and marginalises Jewish Australian citizens'. Ms Segal told Sky News host Sharri Markson on Thursday that she planned to delegate work for 'different parties', especially the federal and state government, and educational and cultural institutions. 'There's support I will need from the federal government, but also from state governments, also from leaders in society, leaders of cultural institutions, chancellors and vice-chancellors at universities,' Ms Segal said. 'I will be putting them to the task of supporting me when I need federal government support, but equally I'll be looking to state governments to support educational initiatives. 'I'll looking to universities to continue what has been very cooperative stance from them in moving towards initiatives to combat antisemitism on campuses.'
