BriaCell Therapeutics Announces Pricing of $15 million Public Offering
The offering is expected to close on July 16, 2025, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions. No Canadian prospectus has been or will be filed in a province or territory of Canada to qualify the securities in connection with the offering. The Company is relying upon the exemption set forth in Section 602.1 of the TSX Company Manual, which provides that the TSX will not apply its standards to certain transactions involving eligible interlisted issuers on a recognized exchange, such as Nasdaq.
The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for working capital requirements, general corporate purposes, and the advancement of business objectives.
ThinkEquity is acting as the sole placement agent for the offering.
A registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-288562) relating to the securities was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') and became effective on July 15, 2025. This offering is being made only by means of a prospectus. Copies of the final prospectus, when available, may be obtained from ThinkEquity, 17 State Street, 41 st Floor, New York, New York 10004. The final prospectus will be filed with the SEC and will be available on the SEC's website located at http://www.sec.gov.
This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
About BriaCell Therapeutics
BriaCell is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops novel immunotherapies to transform cancer care. More information is available at https://briacell.com/.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' that are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this press release are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release may be identified by the use of words such as 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'contemplate,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'intend,' 'seek,' 'may,' 'might,' 'plan,' 'potential,' 'predict,' 'project,' 'target,' 'aim,' 'should,' "will' 'would,' or the negative of these words or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current expectations and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based on assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. These and other risks and uncertainties are described more fully in the section titled 'Risk Factors' in the final prospectus related to the public offering that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are made as of this date, and the Company undertakes no duty to update such information except as required under applicable law.
Contact Information
Investor Relations Contact:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
42 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key)
Key Points The future of the auto industry lies in electric vehicles and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles. After many years in service, Waymo still can't point to a timeline of profitability. Tesla also faces challenges with its robotaxi offering, but it's well positioned, provided it can demonstrate safety and efficacy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL) isn't, strictly speaking, an electric vehicle (EV) company. However, its autonomous driving technology company, Waymo, is committed to only using EVs in its fleet. Funnily enough, it could be argued that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) isn't really a pure EV company either. After all, most of its sky–high valuation is attributable to the potential of its robotaxis. However, the comparison of these two as EV companies is valid because the future of the auto industry is EVs, and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles will be a larger part of the industry in the future. But which company is better placed, and which is the better stock? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Alphabet vs. Tesla It's entirely possible that Alphabet could decide to spin off Waymo, not least because it reportedly could be valued at more than $45 billion. Meanwhile, one of Tesla's biggest supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, ascribes 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) to robotaxis in its investment case for the stock, producing an expected value of $2,600 for the stock in 2029. As I have previously discussed, the Ark targets should be taken with a pinch of salt, as its track record on Tesla hasn't been good. However, Ark's core argument is sound and points to Tesla being potentially a far more valuable stock than Waymo ever will be. Pathways to profitability The core argument is that Tesla's business model is scalable to profitability while Waymo's is far less so. The issue of Waymo's profitability arose in a recent CNBC interview with Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, where she was asked whether Waymo is profitable. She replied, "We're proving out that it can be a profitable business." When asked when Waymo would be profitable, she replied, "not clear." It's also not clear if Alphabet/Waymo doesn't have an internal forecast for when it will hit profitability, or if Mawakana preferred not to divulge what the company considers an uncertain forecast. However, it's inconceivable that Alphabet is not internally crunching the numbers on this, and if it does decide to spin off Waymo, it's a question that needs to be answered. The point here is that a business that can't be profitable isn't worth anything, let alone $45 billion, so at some point, its management is going to have to set some timelines. Tesla and timelines Whereas investors need to hear more about timelines from Waymo, whose public self-driving ride-hailing service was launched in 2018, there's probably a need for fewer declared timelines from Tesla, or, rather, a need for more accurate ones. For example, in 2019, CEO Elon Musk famously told investors to expect a million self-driving vehicles on the road by mid-2020. In April 2022, he also stated that Tesla aspired to reach volume production of a dedicated robotaxi (Cybercab) in 2024 -- a timeline that has now been pushed back to 2026. These timeline estimates matter because plugging overly optimistic assumptions from them into valuation models can produce dramatically erroneous conclusions. Why Tesla is better positioned With all that said, Tesla has clear advantages over Waymo, provided it can demonstrate safety and reliability and achieve regulatory approvals. Its advantages include: Lower vehicle costs, with Musk aiming for a $30,000 price tag for a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts estimate Waymo's current vehicles cost more than $120,000. In addition, Tesla manufactures its own cars (Waymo does not), and existing Teslas can be converted into robotaxis using Tesla's as-yet-unreleased-to-the-public unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, giving Tesla a significant advantage in scaling the robotaxi business. Tesla's use of camera-centric technology is inherently less expensive than Waymo's combination of cameras, light detection and ranging (Lidar) lasers, and high-definition maps. Every Tesla car (robotaxi or not) on the road is effectively a data gatherer, with the data used to improve the AI that powers its AI models. As such, even though Waymo was first, Tesla has significantly more data than Waymo. Which is the better EV stock? Waymo may become profitable in the future, particularly if Lidar costs continue to drop. However, it's challenging to think that it will be a strong competitor to Tesla, provided Musk's company can master safe, unsupervised FSD using a camera-centric approach. That's a big "if" at this stage, but it becomes a smaller "if" as time goes by and Tesla expands its nascent robotaxi offering across new geographies. Tesla's next robotaxi launch is expected to be in Phoenix, as it plans to continue slowly building its robotaxi business. I think Tesla is the better EV stock when comparing Tesla and Alphabet. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $449,961!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,603!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $636,628!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
CTV News
6 hours ago
- CTV News
Homebuilders navigate higher material costs, uncertain supply chains amid trade war
Construction workers work at the site of a condo tower under construction, in Delta, B.C., on Wednesday, July 2, 2025. Six months after U.S. President Donald Trump's return the White House, many in the home construction sector say unpredictability persists around the cost and timing of obtaining the materials they need. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck As a tariff storm blew in from south of the border earlier this year, many industries in Canada, including the home building sector, feared the unknown ahead of them. With stakeholders already keenly aware of the need to rapidly scale up housing supply and improve Canada's housing affordability gap, blanket tariffs and more targeted material-specific levies meant additional unwelcome obstacles to overcome. That included a potential need to slow down the pace of construction as supply chains shifted and key construction parts became more expensive. 'I would say that's been borne out,' said Cheryl Shindruk, executive vice-president of Geranium Homes, a residential developer in southern Ontario. 'It's difficult to pinpoint what exactly is the cost impact, but we certainly can say that there is an impact in terms of business confidence and ... having materials when they need them in a timely manner.' About six months after U.S. President Donald Trump's return to the White House, many in the home construction sector say unpredictability persists around the cost and timing of obtaining the materials they need. For Geranium, that's meant having to pivot on the fly when it comes to the supply chains it's long relied on. Shindruk said the firm is now increasingly sourcing materials made in Canada, such as brick and stone, and doubling down on products typically imported from other countries besides the U.S. That includes steel, which it sources from countries including South Korea, Portugal and China — allowing it to avoid surtaxes on American steel in response to Trump's tariffs. But she said some materials simply can't be replicated in domestic or other international markets. For instance, a component in the layered glass windows used by Geranium continues to be sourced from the U.S. due to patent issues. The company has essentially decided to eat the extra costs. 'It's not like switching on a switch and all of a sudden those materials that used to be sourced from the U.S, which are significant, can now be produced in Canada,' she said. 'Where that's not realistic, then items are continuing to be sourced from the U.S. and (we're) paying the tariff.' Among products hit hardest by the trade war, Canadian Home Builders' Association CEO Kevin Lee highlighted appliances, interior doors and carpeting. In some cases, he said builders have looked for substitutions to their typical input materials. 'Where somebody might have been getting carpet in the past, they're saying 'You know what, we can move to vinyl plank,'' he said. Others are getting creative by stockpiling materials to avoid potential shortages later on. 'They're taking advantage of the availability of acquiring it and then having it available for future, which then increases the overhead because you're holding on to that material, rather than acquiring it when you need it,' Shindruk said. With early concerns about the effects of the trade war, Greater Toronto Area-based Altree Developments had forecast a three to five per cent hit to its overall budget, said the company's president and CEO Zev Mandelbaum. That figure has since decreased due to more Canadian material being available than first anticipated, said Mandelbaum. But he said the roller-coaster of tariff developments — from the latest threat of additional levies to hope that ongoing negotiations will soon lead to a new trade deal — has made it 'impossible' to plan ahead. He added his company has seen a far greater impact on the revenue side of the business over the past six months, as economic uncertainty drove down buyer demand. 'It was more the fear of just ... economic instability in Canada that stopped house buying and stopped people from wanting to invest, whether it be locals looking for homes or foreigners looking to invest in the country,' he said. 'That alienation caused us to have less sales, and because of that, that put even more pressure on construction costs.' In its housing forecast for the year, published in February, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. predicted a trade war between Canada and the U.S. — combined with other factors such as reduced immigration targets — would likely slow the economy and limit housing activity. The national housing agency had also said Canada was set for a slowdown in housing starts over the next three years — despite remaining above the 10-year average — due to fewer condominiums being built, as investor interest lags and demand from young families wanes. As of June, year-to-date housing starts totalled 114,411 across regions with a population of 10,000 or greater, up four per cent from the first half of 2024. Despite that boost in new construction, a regional analysis shows provinces with industries more exposed to tariffs are experiencing a slowdown, said CMHC chief economist Mathieu Laberge. He noted Ontario's housing starts have dropped around 26 per cent to date year-over-year, while B.C. has seen an eight per cent decline. In Ontario, five of the 10 most tariff-impacted cities also recorded an increase in mortgage arrears during the spring. Laberge said the trade war, or associated macroeconomic factors, likely prompted layoffs in those regions which meant people couldn't pay their mortgage. He said he expects that will eventually translate to a lower number of homes being built. 'This is a slow filter through, but it's a real one. We see it happening — although maybe not in the housing starts or resales yet,' Laberge said. Lee said the industry is already noticing those effects. 'The big problem now is we're just not getting the kind of starts we need and there's a lot of concern in the industry now,' Lee said. Before tariffs, he said some regions, such as Atlantic Canada and the Prairies, had started to see housing starts rebound from a national lull that was fuelled by previously high interest rates. Other provinces, such as Ontario and B.C. — where houses remain the most expensive — hadn't yet reached similar levels of new construction. 'What's happened with the trade war is that it's made things worse in Ontario and B.C. and we are seeing things slow down a little bit in Atlantic Canada and the Prairies,' said Lee. 'So it's having a dampening effect everywhere.' His association's second-quarter survey of its membership found 87 per cent of builders stated they have concerns about the well-being of their business over the next 12 months. Around 35 per cent said they have had to recently lay off workers and have no current plans to rehire — up from 21 per cent a year ago. 'It's getting quite serious,' said Lee. 'There's just a great deal of concern in the market.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 27, 2025. Sammy Hudes, The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail
7 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
After Soaring 40% in July, Is It Too Late to Buy This Supercharged Quantum Computing Stock?
Key Points Rigetti Computing announced a breakthrough with its multichip system. 2030 is a key turning point for quantum computing. 10 stocks we like better than Rigetti Computing › Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) has had a phenomenal July, with the stock up around 40% at the time of writing, although it was up around 50% just a few days ago. Most investors would be pleased with that return over a multiyear time frame, let alone one year. However, considering the reason behind Rigetti Computing's rapid rise, this could be the beginning of an even larger movement. Last week, Rigetti announced a breakthrough with its Ankaa-3 system, which caused shares to soar on the announcement. This spike wasn't for nothing. Rigetti announced a real breakthrough that could vault it into the leadership position in the quantum computing race. Rigetti's breakthrough shows it's on the right track Rigetti Computing announced that its Ankaa-3 system, which is composed of four 9-qubit chips, achieved a 99.5% two-qubit gate fidelity. This means that when a two-gate calculation is run, the computer delivers the correct answer 99.5% of the time. While this sounds impressive, it's still several orders of magnitude away from the accuracy of traditional computing, which is the fundamental problem companies in the quantum computing race are facing. Instead of bits that use a 0 or 1 to transmit information, quantum computers utilize qubits, which are better described as the probability of an answer being a 0 or a 1. While the information collapses to a 0 or a 1 at the end of a computation, this can lead to some errors, which is why increasing accuracy is a key problem that these quantum computing companies must solve. According to Rigetti Computing, its system is the largest multichip quantum computer available, vaulting it into a leadership position in this regard. However, there are several competitors with better two-qubit gate fidelity scores, so Rigetti Computing still has some work to do in this area. Regardless, Rigetti Computing has made a significant breakthrough, demonstrating progress toward the practical relevance of quantum computing. However, how long will investors have to wait before it becomes a reality? Rigetti's stock is a high-risk, high-reward investment Prior to 2030, Rigetti Computing estimates that the annual demand will range from $1 billion to $2 billion, mostly driven by research institutions. After 2030, this market is expected to experience significant growth, with annual demand projected to reach $15 billion to $30 billion. The 2030 date isn't unique to Rigetti Computing; nearly every other quantum computing competitor has circled this date as a turning point within the quantum computing industry. That's a long time from now, but is the market opportunity worth buying and holding a stock like Rigetti's? Currently, Rigetti Computing has a market capitalization of approximately $5 billion. If it can capture a fraction of the market opportunity by 2030, say $2 billion, then its stock easily has room to double, if not triple, from today's prices. A double or triple in the investing world over a five-year time frame is a phenomenal return, making this an attractive investment opportunity. However, there is another factor investors must be aware of. Rigetti Computing's technology may fail in the future or be surpassed by another company offering similar technology. Because there is no backup plan for Rigetti Computing, this could cause the stock to fall to zero. Investors must be aware of the risk-reward profile with Rigetti's stock, as it could become worthless as easily as it doubles or triples. As a result, quantum computing investors should ensure that a single company doesn't make up more than a 1% position within a portfolio. That way, if it goes to $0, it won't have as significant an impact on your returns. But if it doubles or triples, it can still have a sizable impact. Time will tell if Rigetti Computing's strategy is a winning one, but its latest breakthrough shows investors that it's on the right track. Should you invest $1,000 in Rigetti Computing right now? Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Rigetti Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
