Trump announces major trade deal with South Korea that includes $350 billion investment
'I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has agreed to a Full and Complete Trade Deal with the Republic of Korea,' Trump said on Truth Social.
The South Korean government could not immediately be reached for comment. Reuters has not verified the terms of a deal.
As part of the arrangement, South Korea would invest $350 billion in the United States in projects selected by Trump and purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products, the president said.
It was not immediately clear how the investment deals would be structured or over what time frame. Trump said additional investments would be announced later.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will visit the White House 'within the next two weeks' for a meeting with Trump, the U.S. president added.
Trump also said South Korea would accept American products, including cars, trucks and agriculture into its markets and impose no import duties on them.
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States would charge a 15% tariff on imports from South Korea as part of an agreement with the Asian trading partner that avoids even higher levies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump gives Mexico 90-day tariff reprieve as deadline for higher duties looms
July 31 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump gave Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs to negotiate a broader trade deal but was expected to issue higher final duty rates for most other countries as the clock wound down on his Friday deal deadline. The extension, which avoids a 30% tariff on most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade, came after a Thursday morning call between Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. "We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum wrote in an X social media post, adding that the Trump call was "very good." Approximately 85% of Mexican exports comply with the rules of origin outlined in the USMCA, shielding them from 25% tariffs related to fentanyl, according to Mexico's economy ministry. Trump said that the U.S. would continue to levy a 50% tariff on Mexican steel, aluminum and copper and a 25% tariff on Mexican autos and on non-USMCA-compliant goods subject to tariffs related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis. "Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many," Trump said in a Truth Social post without providing details. Trump is expected to issue tariff rate proclamations later on Thursday for countries that have not struck trade deals by a 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT) deadline. South Korea agreed on Wednesday to accept a 15% tariff on its exports to the U.S., including autos, down from a threatened 25%, as part of a deal that includes a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S. projects to be chosen by Trump. But goods from India appeared to be headed for a 25% tariff after talks bogged down over access to India's agriculture sector, drawing a higher-rate threat from Trump that also included an unspecified penalty for India's purchases of Russian oil. Although negotiations with India were continuing, New Delhi vowed to protect the country's labor-intensive farm sector, triggering outrage from the opposition party and a slump in the rupee. Trump hit Brazil on Wednesday with a steep 50% tariff as he escalated his fight with Latin America's largest economy over its prosecution of his friend and former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies. The run-up to Trump's tariff deadline was unfolding as federal appeals court judges sharply questioned Trump's use of a sweeping emergency powers law to justify his sweeping tariffs of up to 50% on nearly all trading partners. Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare an emergency over the growing U.S. trade deficit and impose his "reciprocal" tariffs and a separate fentanyl emergency. The Court of International Trade ruled in May that the actions exceeded his executive authority, and questions from judges during oral arguments before the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit in Washington indicated further skepticism. "IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them," Judge Jimmie Reyna said at one point during the hearing. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal with China, but it is "not 100% done," and still needs Trump's approval. U.S. negotiators "pushed back quite a bit" over two days of trade talks with the Chinese in Stockholm this week, Bessent said in an interview with CNBC. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals.
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Wall Street stocks outperform Europe on megacap earnings boost
NEW YORK/ LONDON, July 31 (Reuters) - Wall Street outperformed European equities on Thursday, boosted by megacap earnings reports, even as data showed signs of rising inflation and investors watched for last-minute trade deals ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline. U.S. Treasury yields briefly pared declines in choppy trading after data showed that U.S. inflation in June as tariffs on imports started raising the cost of some goods, supporting economists' expectations that price pressures would pick up in the second half of the year. The Federal Reserve kept rates steady on Wednesday, and chair Jerome Powell said that the central bank needed to wait for more data before deciding whether to adjust rates in September, drawing further criticism from Trump on Thursday. "Anybody hoping for the Fed to move more aggressively in the near term continues to be disappointed that it comes back to both the inflation and the job story. The PCE data this morning reinforced the inflation worries the Fed still has and helps explain why it's in no hurry to move at this point," said Jim Baird, Chief Investment Officer with Plante Moran Financial Advisors. But while Powell's comments had sent equities lower on Wednesday, U.S. indexes rebounded on Thursday after better-than-expected results from Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab. "A couple of solid earnings reports last night suggest that one of the key themes that's been driving the stock market this year is still seemingly intact. You've seen a nice rebound in tech today, or nice surge in tech today. "The AI theme, the enthusiasm around the technology sector still appears to be intact. So that's a positive catalyst for the market," said Baird. On Wall Street, indexes lost some steam as the session progressed. At 11:14 a.m., the Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab fell 123.28 points, or 0.28%, to 44,338.00. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab rose 13.57 points, or 0.21%, to 6,376.47 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab rose 119.18 points, or 0.56%, to 21,248.86, both around session lows. In Europe, however, the broad Stoxx 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab benchmark was weighed down by miners after U.S. September Comex copper futures fell 22%, the biggest decline on record, after Trump said the U.S. would impose a 50% tariff on copper pipes and wiring. The pan-European STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab index was down 0.73% while MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab fell 1.07 points, or 0.11%, to 933.26. Earlier, Chinese stocks also retreated after official PMI gauges showed weaker than expected economic activity in July. China's blue chip CSI 300 had ended 1.8% lower, its biggest single day drop since April 7, and Hong Kong's (.HSI), opens new tab index closed 1.6% lower. In currencies, the U.S. dollar had a mixed performance on the day. The dollar index , which measures it against a basket of currencies, including the yen and the euro, rose 0.05% to 99.83. The euro was up 0.34% at $1.1443. But against the Japanese yen , the dollar strengthened 0.59% to 150.39. The Bank of Japan held interest rates steady and increased its inflation forecast. The Korean won weakened 0.2% against the dollar to 1,395.78 per dollar after rising earlier following Trump's announcement that the U.S. would charge a 15% tariff on imports from South Korea, which would in return invest $350 billion in U.S. projects and purchase $100 billion in U.S. energy products. In Treasuries, the yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes fell 4.6 basis points to 4.332%, from 4.378% late on Wednesday while the 30-year bond yield fell 5.1 basis points to 4.8624%. The two-year note yield, which typically moves in step with interest rate expectations for the Federal Reserve, fell 1.9 basis points to 3.918%, from 3.937% late on Wednesday. In oil markets, prices fell after rising for the prior three sessions as investors weighed the supply risks from Trump's push for a to the war in Ukraine through more tariffs and a surprise build in U.S. crude stocks put pressure on prices. U.S. crude fell 1.71% to $68.79 a barrel and Brent fell to $72.47 per barrel, down 1.04% on the day. Gold prices rose as traders turned to the safe haven asset amid ongoing tariff uncertainty, ahead of the August 1 tariff deadline. Spot gold rose 0.63% to $3,295.33 an ounce.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
In this time of rancour, fear and war, peaceful nuclear cooperation in the Middle East is still possible
Ten years ago, after the Iran nuclear deal, I wrote in the Guardian about the urgent need for global nuclear disarmament – starting with the establishment in the Middle East of a zone free from weapons of mass destruction. A decade later, as our region teeters on the edge of catastrophe, that call is no longer just noble – it is essential. The proposal was not a new Iranian initiative. As far back as 1974, Iran proposed a zone free from nuclear weapons in the Middle East at the UN, and was soon joined by Egypt. That proposal passed overwhelmingly in the general assembly. After Iraq's use of chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq war, the initiative was expanded in 1990 to cover all weapons of mass destruction. But for half a century, progress has been blocked by Israel and its main patron, the United States. This paralysis is no accident. Despite overwhelming annual support in the UN general assembly and repeated commitments in the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), the Middle East remains one of the only regions on Earth without a nuclear weapon-free framework. More than 100 non-aligned states at the 1995 NPT review and extension conference made progress towards such a zone a condition of the treaty's indefinite extension. Yet 30 years on, little has changed. In fact, the situation has deteriorated, showing that while possession of nuclear weapons usually leads to reckless adventurism, such weapons in no way assure success, provide invincibility or safety for citizens. Recent unlawful military action by the nuclear-armed Israel – which is not party to the NPT – against Iran's internationally monitored nuclear facilities brought our region dangerously close to an abyss. The failure of Israel to achieve its unwarranted objectives, and the inability of the US to bring Iran to its knees, could and still can engulf this region and by extension the entire world in a forever war. Enough is enough. We must take the future of our region's security into our own hands. It is time for the Middle East and north Africa to move beyond empty rhetoric and towards genuine regional cooperation – based on mutual respect and the peaceful use of nuclear energy. That is why we propose the creation of the Middle East Network for Atomic Research and Advancement, or Menara, which fittingly means 'lighthouse' in Arabic. Menara would be a regional body designed to facilitate peaceful nuclear cooperation among its members. Open to all qualified states in the Middle East and north Africa, to join, countries must reject the development or deployment of nuclear weapons and commit to mutual verification of their compliance. In return, Menara would help them benefit from peaceful nuclear technology, including energy production, medicine, agriculture and scientific research. Such a body is not a substitute for disarmament – it is a step towards it. Regional nuclear cooperation, with strong safeguards and mutual oversight, can strengthen non-proliferation and enhance energy security without enabling militarisation. It has long been argued that progress on regional disarmament must wait for Israel to disarm. But a regime that has shown no regard for international legitimacy by committing international crimes such as apartheid, genocide and, most recently, mass starvation will hardly be influenced by this negative pressure – it certainly has not been for more than 50 years. And its perilous nuclear arsenal has been and will always remain the gravest threat to international non-proliferation and regional and global peace and stability. Holding hundreds of millions of people hostage to one regime's nuclear arsenal and political impunity is a recipe for permanent instability. We must find a new way forward. Menara would also help reframe the nuclear debate in the region. For too long, nuclear issues have been cast solely in terms of risk and threat. But nuclear science also offers solutions – to the climate crisis, water scarcity, food security and energy diversification. As oil and gas reserves dwindle, nuclear energy will be vital for regional growth and sustainability. Menara can make this future a shared, secure reality. Here's how it would work. Menara would coordinate research, education and development across member states. It would support joint ventures in fields ranging from uranium enrichment and waste management to nuclear fusion and medicine. Members would share facilities, pool expertise and ensure transparency through a joint regulatory board. Contributions would be proportional to each country's capacity, but every member would benefit. The network would be headquartered in one of the participating countries, with branch offices and potentially shared enrichment facilities in others. Oversight would be conducted by a board of governors composed of national representatives, with international observers from the UN, the security council and the International Atomic Energy Agency invited to participate. Crucially, Menara would include robust mutual safeguards to prevent the diversion of materials for military use. Today, more than ever, we in the Middle East and north Africa region have been woken up to a collective cognisance of the horrifying picture of our future unless we seize this moment. We know that mistrust runs deep in our region. Iran has its grievances and so do others. But history must not define our destiny. We call on the nations of the Middle East and north Africa to endorse Menara and begin formal negotiations on its structure, mandate and membership criteria. A regional summit – under the auspices of the UN and with support from global powers – could lay the foundation. Such a step would not only reduce the risk of nuclear conflict but also offer a model for cooperation in a fractured world. The status quo is unsustainable. The nightmare of escalation and its inherent potential to cause proliferation is no longer hypothetical; it is dangerously close to becoming real. But there is still time to choose a different path. Menara can be a beacon guiding us towards a future where the Middle East is no longer a battleground for nuclear brinkmanship, but a leader in peace, progress and responsible energy. The time to act is now. Javad Zarif is associate professor of global studies at the University of Tehran. He was Iran's foreign minister and chief nuclear negotiator from 2013-21. His co-author is Mohsen Baharvand, who was Iran's deputy foreign minister and ambassador to the UK Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
