
Magic and divination in the age of AI
In a bookshop off London's Strand, fitted out in expensive utilitarian style – exposed ducting, unpainted plaster, birch plywood – a room of mostly young, artsy people are gathering for a talk about the future. There are cocktails and a DJ who is wearing a T-shirt that says 'Brutalism'. Facing the crowd is a sofa, above which is a projector screen displaying an AI-generated video of white, wafting things that look like fungal growths or jellyfish. Within their strands and webs are the faces of young women, their mouths moving without forming anything recognisable as words. The video was made, we are told, by someone who is a 'digital shaman'.
The talk has been convened by a group of people – a 'platform' – who are interested, in a fairly literal sense, in 'technology with spirit'. They are here to talk about the links between artificial intelligence and 'spiritual intelligence', forecasting and divination, the old gods and the new.
On the stage are an artist called Beccy, a tarot reader called Bel, and Sasha, a computer scientist who works for Google DeepMind but is also a meditator and practitioner of the Vajrayana Buddhist tradition. Beccy introduces herself as a 'climate storyteller' who creates 'imaginative acts of resistance'. This has involved, she tells us, training an AI model 'with love and respect… to welcome migrants and refugees', and also to 'generate a sense of inter-species solidarity'. People in the crowd nod enthusiastically.
Bel, the tarot reader, is not restricted to cartomancy. She also helps people – including corporate clients – to 'create oracles… systems for divination', she tells us. 'Many of them work.' Bel also works at the College of Psychic Studies, where other courses include alchemy, remote viewing and connecting with angelic beings.
Sasha, the computer scientist, works on reinforcement learning in multi-agent systems for Google DeepMind, which is owned by Alphabet, which has a market capitalisation of £1.64trn (at time of writing). But he sees a link between the old cultural practices of divination – scrying for answers in playing cards, tea leaves and the movements of birds – and the modern practice of asking ChatGPT or Gemini for the truth about something. Both types of system, he says, are 'cultural tools for generating behaviour'.
Joining the talk via the screen, in a brief and welcome break from the digital shaman's undulating forms, is Kevin, who runs an AI research group at Coventry University and a practice called Philosophy Machines. Kevin's work in AI is informed, he tells us, by his metaphysics, his willingness to ask questions about the underlying nature of reality: 'Is reality somehow constructed in a model that lives in our heads, or lives in a computer somewhere? Do we believe in things that we can't see… Do we believe that objects – rocks, clouds – have a soul, a spirit? Do we believe in angels, deities?' Companies and governments, he notes, 'exist only on paper, they only exist to the extent that everyone else believes in them'. Perhaps this is one to try in bankruptcy proceedings: does a business stop owing money if we stop believing in it? (No.)
Give any first-year philosophy student a bag of weed and you'll have to listen to similar questions being pondered for as long as you can stand it. But these seem like sensible people, who work for major companies and institutions. And they are not the only people having such conversations; beneath the AI boom is a philosophical debate, and a struggle for power.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
For 45 years, people have debated a thought experiment created by the American philosopher John Searle. The experiment goes like this: there is a room into which messages are posted. The messages are written in Chinese. Inside the room is a person who doesn't speak Chinese, but who has a book containing very detailed instructions on how to arrange Chinese text into convincing responses. So, the person matches symbols they don't understand to instructions, assembles new strings of characters – which are, to them, still meaningless – and posts them out again. To the people outside the room, it appears as if the occupant can speak Chinese. But they can't.
This thought experiment, published in 1980, has become much more relevant today, as it is fundamental to the debate over whether 'AI' is, in fact, artificial intelligence. A large language model (LLM) is 'trained' by breaking up text and images into chunks (not words, but strings of characters that appear together as parts of words) and then calculating the sequence of pixels and characters most likely to be accepted as a response. The companies that sell the LLMs say this amounts to reasoning; scientists and philosophers of language disagree.
One response to this is to argue, as Sam Altman (CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI) does, that in this case you aren't really thinking or feeling anything either. Like his computer, you are just regurgitating input to create responses. Or, like Elon Musk, you can argue that reality is probably just a simulation anyway. In both cases, the convenient conclusion is that you can do what you like to the world and other people, because they're only as sentient as your computer – if they exist at all.
And as for magic, the amount of money being thrown around in the AI boom is so vast that anything short of the supernatural would be a disappointment to investors. A week before the talk in the bookshop, Nvidia – the chip manufacturer that is selling the shovels in this particular gold rush – achieved the highest market value in history, at $4trn. Fundamental to this valuation is the idea that machines can see the future.
In the middle of the 16th century, John Dee, the court astronomer and magician to Elizabeth I, carried in his pocket a case made from shark skin. Within the case was a circular mirror made from obsidian – black volcanic glass – that had originally been created for an Aztec priest. To a modern eye it shows nothing but a dull reflection, but to Dr Dee it was said to show angelic communications and predictions. This gave Dee a significant political power.
Most of us carry a similar artefact today, of course. We seek answers and communication from our black rectangles. We choose the news we want to read and the people we want to hear from. We see what we want to see in the black mirror, but Kevin reminded us: 'Whoever controls what is seen in the mirror, in some way, controls the future.' The mirror of ChatGPT is darker and more obscure than obsidian. Its priorities are hidden in code that is not public, and which only a handful of people could understand.
What a tarot reader really does, Bel explains, is to deal out a random sequence of cards and give them the meaning the client is looking for. The cartomancer, the haruspex and the seer are not only predicting the future, they are answering the question of how a person should meet that future. 'The underlying question,' said Bel, 'is always: tell me how to live.' As anyone from the Pope to Mark Zuckerberg will attest, this can be a very profitable question to answer.
Throughout history, people have found that the trust they put in priests and oracles was misplaced. Today, the most popular use for AI chatbots, according to a recent survey, is for therapy; millions of people are entrusting this technology with access to their most personal feelings, allowing it to intervene in their thinking, their ethics and their sense of self. They are imbuing it with what esoterics call egregore – a form of being invoked when lots of people put their faith in something. A new power, no more accountable and no less dangerous than the clerics of the past. I think I'd rather put my faith in a pack of cards.
[See also: No 10 is scrambling for a Silicon Valley payday]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geeky Gadgets
8 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
The Truth about ChatGPT Agent : Game-Changer or a Glitchy Gimmick?
What if the tool you trusted to simplify your life ended up complicating it instead? That's the paradox many users are discovering with ChatGPT's much-anticipated AI Agent. Marketed as a innovative step in task automation, this feature promises to handle everything from deep research to booking your next vacation. Yet, behind the sleek branding lies a tool that's sparking heated debates. While some hail it as a glimpse into the future of AI, others are frustrated by its glitches, inefficiencies, and glaring security concerns. Is the AI Agent a new innovation or an overhyped experiment that's not quite ready for prime time? In this exploration, Skill Leap AI unpack the truth about ChatGPT's AI Agent—its potential, pitfalls, and the real-world implications of relying on it for complex tasks. You'll discover how it works, where it stumbles, and why it's raising eyebrows among both casual users and tech enthusiasts. From its ambitious claims of seamless automation to the frustrations of inconsistent outputs, this deep dive will help you decide whether the AI Agent is a tool worth embracing—or one to approach with caution. After all, the line between innovation and inconvenience is often thinner than it seems. AI Agent Limitations What Are AI Agents? AI Agents are sophisticated tools developed to handle complex, multi-step tasks that typically require human intervention. These tasks include conducting in-depth research, filling out forms, interacting with websites, and generating reports or presentations. By combining multiple functionalities into a single system, the AI Agent aims to reduce manual workload and improve overall efficiency. For example, it can audit your Google Calendar, book hotels, or create spreadsheets with minimal user input. However, despite its ambitious objectives, the AI Agent often struggles to deliver consistent results. Tasks that should be simplified by automation frequently encounter errors, delays, or incomplete outputs, leaving users questioning its reliability. While the concept of an all-in-one automation tool is appealing, the current execution leaves much to be desired. Performance Challenges One of the most significant drawbacks of the AI Agent is its inefficiency in performing tasks. Instead of simplifying workflows, the feature often complicates them. For instance, tasks like researching business formation processes or booking travel accommodations can take far longer than expected. Booking a hotel, for example, might require up to 25 minutes, with frequent interruptions caused by errors or extended processing times. Additionally, the outputs generated by the AI Agent are often poorly formatted or less effective compared to results achieved using standard ChatGPT tools. These performance issues undermine the feature's primary goal of saving time and effort. Users who expect seamless automation are often left frustrated by the tool's inability to meet basic expectations. OpenAI ChatGPT Agent Review Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in AI Agents. Security Concerns Data security is another critical issue associated with the AI Agent. To perform certain tasks, the feature requires access to personal accounts and sensitive information, which introduces potential risks. The virtual browser setup, while innovative, comes with warnings about malicious websites, further eroding user trust. The lack of robust safeguards to protect sensitive data is a significant concern. Users are advised to exercise caution when granting permissions or sharing confidential information. Until stronger security measures are implemented, the AI Agent's reliance on personal data will remain a barrier to widespread adoption. Use Cases and Limitations The AI Agent demonstrates potential in specific scenarios, but its limitations are hard to ignore. Tasks such as creating presentations or auditing schedules can often be accomplished using existing ChatGPT features without the need for the agent mode. This redundancy raises questions about the feature's necessity for many users. Moreover, frequent errors and an underdeveloped interface detract from its usability. Instead of simplifying workflows, the AI Agent often introduces additional complications, leaving users feeling frustrated rather than empowered. While the tool has potential, its current state makes it difficult to justify its inclusion in high-tier subscription plans. User Experience and Usability The overall user experience is hindered by long processing times, frequent glitches, and inconsistent outputs. These issues make the AI Agent feel more like a beta test than a polished product. For a feature included in premium subscription plans, such as the $200/month option, users expect a seamless and efficient experience. Unfortunately, the AI Agent falls short of these expectations, leading to disappointment among early adopters. The lack of a user-friendly interface further compounds the problem. Navigating the AI Agent's features can be cumbersome, and the frequent need for manual intervention undermines its purpose as an automation tool. For many users, the time spent troubleshooting the AI Agent outweighs any potential benefits it might offer. Pricing and Value The AI Agent is available as part of ChatGPT's premium subscription plans, but its value proposition is questionable given its current limitations. Users paying for higher-tier plans anticipate significant improvements over standard tools. However, the AI Agent often underdelivers, making it difficult to justify the additional cost. Simpler and more reliable alternatives are readily available, further diminishing the appeal of the AI Agent. Until the feature undergoes significant improvements, its inclusion in premium plans may feel like an unnecessary expense for many users. Future Potential Despite its current shortcomings, the AI Agent holds promise as a tool for automating complex tasks. Developers have acknowledged the existing inefficiencies and security risks and are actively working to refine the technology. If these improvements materialize, the AI Agent could become a valuable asset for users seeking to streamline their workflows. However, as of now, the feature remains an overhyped tool that struggles to meet user expectations. For those considering the AI Agent, it is essential to weigh its potential benefits against its current limitations. While the concept is promising, the execution still requires significant refinement to deliver on its ambitious goals. Media Credit: Skill Leap AI Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


Scottish Sun
9 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Only eagle-eyed people can spot the AI-generated fruit photo in 10 seconds or less – can you?
Scroll down to find out how brainteasers can improve your memory EYE-SAY Only eagle-eyed people can spot the AI-generated fruit photo in 10 seconds or less – can you? Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) TEST your vision to the max with this mind boggling brainteaser. AI is increasingly becoming part of our everyday lives, with Brits using sites such as Chat GPT to do everything from booking cheap flights to doing home and garden renovations. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Can you figure out which image is AI? Credit: Peec AI However, fraudster can also use it to create fake AI photographs, which can then be used to scam people. AI generated photographs can look incredibly real, but do you have the ability to spot one in just a few seconds? At first glance, it looks like all of these images provided by Peec AI, are real pictures of people chopping up fruit. However, one of the images has been completely created by AI. Whether you're hoping to improve your problem solving skills or boost your memory, this puzzle is bound to be a challenge for many readers. Put your observation skills to the test and figure out whether you have what it takes to spot the AI image in just a few seconds. Make sure to set your stopwatch before undertaking this challenge, to make it extra hard for yourself. If you can do it in under 10 seconds, you are said to have the eyes of a hawk. Unless you're lucky enough to spot the AI image straight away, we recommend analysing the pattern very closely to spot the answer. The visual deception of this image will have you scratching your head trying to solve it, but the payoff is worth it. Everyone can see the footballs in this Euros brainteaser but are you in the 1% of fans who can find the 3 mistakes? If you need a hint, we recommend looking at the hands cutting up the fruit. Not all of them look quite right. If you're looking for more of a challenge, this tricky puzzle asks readers to find the odd one out in a sea of TikTok logos. If you need another tricky test, only the most eagle-eyed readers will be able to spot the six items that need tidying up in this spot the difference puzzle. How can optical illusions and brainteasers help me? Engaging in activities like solving optical illusions and brainteasers can have many cognitive benefits as it can stimulate various brain regions. Some benefits include: Cognitive stimulation : Engaging in these activities challenges the brain, promoting mental agility and flexibility. : Engaging in these activities challenges the brain, promoting mental agility and flexibility. Problem-solving skills : Regular practice enhances analytical thinking and problem-solving abilities. : Regular practice enhances analytical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Memory improvement: These challenges often require memory recall and can contribute to better memory function. These challenges often require memory recall and can contribute to better memory function. Creativity: They encourage thinking outside the box, fostering creativity and innovative thought processes. They encourage thinking outside the box, fostering creativity and innovative thought processes. Focus and attention: Working on optical illusions and brainteasers requires concentration, contributing to improved focus. Working on optical illusions and brainteasers requires concentration, contributing to improved focus. Stress relief: The enjoyable nature of these puzzles can act as a form of relaxation and stress relief. And if that's not hard enough, only those with 20/20 vision will be able to spot the 'impostor' bee in this image. Another tricky puzzle asks hawk-eyed readers to spot five tickets hidden amongst a sea of football fans. If that's still not hard enough for you, then have a go at spotting the hidden broom amongst the clothes in less than five seconds. Coming back to our challenge, were you able to solve it in under 10 seconds? For those struggling to locate it, we have marked the answer below. 2 One of the hands in this AI image, only has four fingers Credit: Peec AI How did you do?


The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Only eagle-eyed people can spot the AI-generated fruit photo in 10 seconds or less – can you?
TEST your vision to the max with this mind boggling brainteaser. AI is increasingly becoming part of our everyday lives, with Brits using sites such as Chat GPT to do everything from booking cheap flights to doing home and garden renovations. 2 However, fraudster can also use it to create fake AI photographs, which can then be used to scam people. AI generated photographs can look incredibly real, but do you have the ability to spot one in just a few seconds? At first glance, it looks like all of these images provided by Peec AI, are real pictures of people chopping up fruit. However, one of the images has been completely created by AI. Whether you're hoping to improve your problem solving skills or boost your memory, this puzzle is bound to be a challenge for many readers. Put your observation skills to the test and figure out whether you have what it takes to spot the AI image in just a few seconds. Make sure to set your stopwatch before undertaking this challenge, to make it extra hard for yourself. If you can do it in under 10 seconds, you are said to have the eyes of a hawk. Unless you're lucky enough to spot the AI image straight away, we recommend analysing the pattern very closely to spot the answer. The visual deception of this image will have you scratching your head trying to solve it, but the payoff is worth it. Everyone can see the footballs in this Euros brainteaser but are you in the 1% of fans who can find the 3 mistakes? If you need a hint, we recommend looking at the hands cutting up the fruit. Not all of them look quite right. If you're looking for more of a challenge, this tricky puzzle asks readers to find the odd one out in a sea of TikTok logos. If you need another tricky test, only the most eagle-eyed readers will be able to spot the six items that need tidying up in this spot the difference puzzle. How can optical illusions and brainteasers help me? Engaging in activities like solving optical illusions and brainteasers can have many cognitive benefits as it can stimulate various brain regions. Some benefits include: Cognitive stimulation: Engaging in these activities challenges the brain, promoting mental agility and flexibility. Problem-solving skills: Regular practice enhances analytical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Memory improvement: These challenges often require memory recall and can contribute to better memory function. Creativity: They encourage thinking outside the box, fostering creativity and innovative thought processes. Focus and attention: Working on optical illusions and brainteasers requires concentration, contributing to improved focus. Stress relief: The enjoyable nature of these puzzles can act as a form of relaxation and stress relief. And if that's not hard enough, only those with 20/20 vision will be able to spot the 'impostor' bee in this image. Another tricky puzzle asks hawk-eyed readers to spot five tickets hidden amongst a sea of football fans. If that's still not hard enough for you, then have a go at spotting the hidden broom amongst the clothes in less than five seconds. Coming back to our challenge, were you able to solve it in under 10 seconds? For those struggling to locate it, we have marked the answer below. 2 How did you do?