The AI race has Big Tech spending $344 billion this year
Microsoft, which set a $24.2 billion capital spending record last quarter, plans to drop upward of $30 billion in the current period. Amazon.com similarly spent $31.4 billion last quarter, almost double what it dropped a year ago, and is maintaining that level of investment. Google owner Alphabet raised its capital expenditures guidance this year to $85 billion.
Then there's Meta Platforms: The social networking giant lifted the low end of its forecast for 2025 capital expenditures and projected that costs will continue to grow at an even faster pace next year. Altogether, the four companies are expected to spend more than $344 billion for the year, with much of it going to the data centers necessary to run AI models.
"We've basically tripled capex investment in cloud due to AI,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh said.
The emphasis from virtually every company executive during this earnings season was on investing as quickly as possible to get ahead.
"We need the teams to execute at their very best to get the capacity in place as quickly and effectively as they can,' Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood told analysts in a call Wednesday.
Susan Li, Meta's CFO, said the goal of its own spending is to secure the advantage "in developing the best AI models.'
Wall Street's response has been mixed.
Meta was rewarded — in large part because the company posted a strong second-quarter sales beat and issued a rosy revenue forecast, signaling that the billions it's spending on AI are paying off.
"On advertising, the strong performance this quarter is largely thanks to AI unlocking greater efficiency and gains across our ad system,' Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg said on an analyst call.
Zuckerberg has plans to build several massive data centers and has been luring top AI researchers with compensation packages valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. The company recently restructured its internal AI division, now referred to as Meta Superintelligence Labs, in an effort to build human-level AI capabilities and apply that technology across its products.
Shares of the company have gained more than 8% since it reported earnings on Wednesday.
Amazon, on the other hand, failed to convince investors that its lavish spending has been worth it. The stock was down as much as 8.1% on Friday after the company reported tepid sales from its cloud division. The results were "especially disappointing' given the strong performance from Google's and Microsoft's own cloud services, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during an event at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, California, in September 2023. |
Reuters
And the ongoing capital costs won't help. The operating margin for Amazon's cloud unit will continue to face pressure "through 2026 as capital spending ramps up,' BI analysts Poonam Goyal and Anurag Rana said.
Alphabet's shares are essentially unchanged from last week when it reported earnings and issued guidance. The company raised its capital expenditures outlook by $10 billion and expects to ramp up spending even more in 2026. Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai explained that the investments are necessary to keep up with customer demand.
"Obviously, we are seeing strong momentum across our portfolio, and especially in cloud,' Pichai told analysts in a call on July 23. "It's a tight supply environment, and we are investing more to expand.'
Nikhil Lai, an analyst at Forrester, put it another way: If Google wants to keep up with rivals, he said, it has little choice but to follow suit: "Google's hand is forced by OpenAI to spend tremendously on AI's infrastructure and applications.'
Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to a 39% jump in sales for its Azure cloud-computing division, which came in ahead of analysts' estimates. "We continue to lead the AI infrastructure wave and took share every quarter this year,' Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella said in a call with analysts on Wednesday.
"In Microsoft's case, the returns are good,' Gil Luria, an analyst with DA Davidson & Co., said in an interview. The only question now is whether Microsoft's customers are in turn seeing a decent return on investment, he said. "That's where the test will be,' he said. "If they don't, they're not going to increase that spend next year.'
Apple's capital plans pale in comparison to its Big Tech peers. But the iPhone-maker did raise its spending estimates, tying much of the increase to AI efforts. Apple's property, plant and equipment investments totaled $9.47 billion in the nine months ended June 28, up nearly 45% from a year ago.
"You are going to continue to see our capex grow,' Chief Financial Officer Kevan Parekh told analysts on Thursday. "It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow, substantially. And a lot of that's a function of the investments we're making in AI.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
5 hours ago
- NHK
Ishiba to urge Trump to sign order to cut auto tariffs
Japan's Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru says he will do all he can to urge US President Donald Trump to quickly sign an executive order to cut auto tariffs, following last month's agreement between the two countries. The Lower House budget committee debated the bilateral tariff agreement and other issues on Monday, with Ishiba and Japan's top tariff negotiator, Akazawa Ryosei, in attendance. Yamashita Takashi, former justice minister of the main governing Liberal Democratic Party, said the principle of investment rather than tariffs has become the standard for Trump's tariff measures. He cited an agreement between the US and the European Union as one example. Yamashita asked Ishiba to explain the significance of the Japan-US deal. The prime minister said both countries will bring their technology, labor forces and capital together to offer better things to the world, with jobs created in the US and no job losses in Japan. He said it will be a "win-win relationship." Ishiba said some people think that implementing the agreement will be more difficult than reaching it. He asked for continued support. Yamashita referred to an agreement between the ruling and opposition blocs to abolish the provisional gasoline tax rate this year. He asked Ishiba whether he ordered the move as the LDP leader. Ishiba said he did, adding that the government will do all it can to implement the agreement on the tax rate sincerely, steadily and swiftly. The leader of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, Noda Yoshihiko, said a document was created for the 2019 Japan-US trade agreement, but it was effectively scrapped. He said the Trump administration may stretch the interpretation of the recent bilateral agreement and "keep ripping Japan off" if a document is not produced. Ishiba said the US president is the type of person who changes rules. He said his major concern is that drawing up a document would lead to a delay in tariff cuts. Ishiba said Trump should focus on issuing an executive order to cut auto tariffs, which is most important for national interests. He said he decided not to draw up a document after carefully considering what will be best for Japan. Noda also took up the topic of political reform. He said his party has been calling for banning donations from companies and organizations. Noda said the largest force and the second largest force in the Diet should sincerely discuss the matter, reach a conclusion and ask for support from other parties. He expressed hope that Ishiba will hold talks on the issue with him rather than leaving it to people at the working level to reach an agreement. Ishiba said he will try to discuss essential issues with Noda and share the results with other parties to ensure fairness and prevent money from swaying politics. Ishiba also referred to a message he intends to issue to mark 80 years since the end of World War Two. He said that regardless of the format, it is necessary to release the message to prevent memories from fading and war from breaking out again. Ishiba said he has strong feelings about the issue and will try to draw up a better message that reflects a range of views.
Japan Times
10 hours ago
- Japan Times
Opposition parties fume over U.S. trade deal not being put in writing
Opposition parties, wary of U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable diplomacy, criticized Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Tokyo's chief tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, on Monday for failing to put the U.S.-Japan trade agreement in writing — a step the government fears could delay or even cancel planned tariff reductions. 'This is the Trump administration we're talking about. If we don't issue a written document, (the U.S.) will keep stretching the deal while Japan continues getting ripped off. Doesn't everyone agree?' said Yoshihiko Noda, chief of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, during a Lower House budget committee meeting. Noda's remarks came after Japanese officials said no official documentation would be released outlining the trade agreement under which the U.S. will impose a 15% 'reciprocal' tariff on most Japanese goods effective Aug. 7 — up from the current 10% but lower than the 25% the United States threatened to impose — while U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said rates could 'boomerang' back to 25% if 'the president is unhappy' with the deal's implementation. The discrepancies between the two countries' reports — while the U.S. fact sheet says there will be 'over $550 billion in a new Japanese/USA investment,' Japanese government documents say it will provide 'up to $550 billion investments, loans and loan guarantees' — is more reason to issue a joint statement, Noda said. Trump's executive order also lacked details about sectorial tariffs, including those on automobiles — the U.S. had agreed to cut a 25% auto tariff in half, to 12.5%. The total for autos will be 15%, including a 2.5% duty charged independent of Trump tariffs. Ishiba, who has not spoken with Trump since Japan and the U.S. reached a surprise trade deal on July 22 in Washington, agreed with Noda that Trump 'isn't a normal guy' and 'changes the rules' but said that issuing a joint document will not serve the nation's interests and may instead jeopardize the agreement. Akazawa said that a document would have been useful to 'put a pin in it,' but that 'the number one fear is being unable to lower the tariffs anymore' if asking for a written agreement changes Trump's mind about them. The U.K. secured a written agreement with the U.S., but Vietnam, the Philippines, the European Union and South Korea, like Japan, have not. Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of the opposition Democratic Party for the People also took issue with the mismatched interpretations of the trade deal and demanded that Japan at least also release its own fact sheet on the prime minister's official website. Taking an extra jab at Ishiba, Tamaki also asked, 'Until when are you planning to stay on as prime minister?' The question of Ishiba's political fate has been in focus since the Liberal Democratic Party, of which he is the president of, suffered yet another defeat in last month's Upper House election, prompting LDP members and opposition parties to call on him to resign. Ishiba, however, reiterated his conviction to continue his premiership for as long as it takes to see the trade deal's implementation through. 'I need to ensure that businesses don't take on unfair losses. How much longer that will take? I can't say for certain now,' Ishiba replied to Tamaki. Rather than taking issue with the agreement not being in writing, Ryohei Iwatani, Nippon Ishin no Kai's secretary-general, criticized the deal for it being 'protection money' against the U.S. 'The deal uses words like 'investment' and 'loans,' but isn't this simply Japan paying the U.S., like protection money?' Iwatani said, adding that even Howard Lutnick, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, bluntly said Japan 'bought the ability to be down to 15%.' Akazawa, advising Iwatani to 'not believe everything the other country's officials say,' reassured him that the trade deal is meant to build a 'strong supply chain in the U.S. that can benefit both Japan and the U.S.'
Japan Times
11 hours ago
- Japan Times
AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink
Generative artificial intelligence assistants like ChatGPT are cutting into traditional online search traffic, depriving news sites of visitors and impacting the advertising revenue they desperately need, in a crushing blow to an industry already fighting for survival. "The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon," warned Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media. "Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away." While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Center study reveals that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles. When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared with traditional searches. This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions. According to Northeastern University professor John Wihbey, these trends "will accelerate, and pretty soon we will have an entirely different web." The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had already slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions. But Wihbey noted that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organizations. Limited lifelines The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touch point with potential readers, Karolian said. However, "these remain incredibly modest compared to other platforms, including even smaller search engines." Other AI-powered tools like Perplexity are generating even fewer new subscriptions, he added. To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) — a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimization). This involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, comprehensible text and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies. But a fundamental question remains: "Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to basically crawl your website and your content?" asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimization startup OtterlyAI. Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content. "We just need to ensure that companies using our content are paying fair market value," argued Danielle Coffey, who heads the News/Media Alliance trade organization. Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as The New York Times and Amazon, Google and the Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse, among others. But the issue is far from resolved, as several major legal battles are underway, most notably The New York Times' blockbuster lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. Let them crawl Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers. Faced with this challenge, "media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access," Peham observed. Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed. According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29% of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36%. And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognized as reliable, "we don't see this with ChatGPT," Peham noted. The stakes extend beyond business models. According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15% of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news. Given ongoing questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility — much like social media did before it. "At some point, someone has to do the reporting," Karolian said. "Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarize." Perhaps with this in mind, Google is already developing partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features, suggesting potential paths forward. "I think the platforms will realize how much they need the press," predicted Wihbey — though whether that realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question.
