Dentist fined £150,000 for keeping patients' teeth too clean
Britain is facing a hidden dental disaster as kids are needing multiple teeth removed at their first ever appointment.
NHS dentist Rob Mew revealed the shocking cases he has encountered after opening his doors to one new child patient every Thursday, reports the Mirror.
The Mirror travelled to Devon, one of Britain's worst 'dentistry deserts' as part of theut Dentisrs for All campaign.
Our sister site visited Fairfield House Dental Surgery in Exmouth which is one of the few in Devon still seeing NHS patients.
Owner Rob passionately believes in the NHS and its founding principle that it should care for patients from "cradle to grave".
However, that is the only reason his practice still treats NHS patients, as it could earn hundreds of thousands of pounds more going private.
Rob has been fined £150,000 by the NHS in a funding "claw back" effectively for maintaining his patients healthy teeth through regular check ups and preventative work.
It is an example of the widely discredited NHS dental payment contract which is causing dentists to quit the health service in their droves to see only private patients.
Every Thursday, Rob opens his NHS books for local children, many of whom have gone years without a check-up. Some have never been seen at all.
Rob, who has three kids of his own, aged ten, eight and four, said: "That's one of the reasons I do it because I have young children but it's quite emotional. We were seeing four and five year olds who had so much decay we just had to send them to hospital to get extractions. There's such a backlog of sending these kids to have general anaesthetic to get the teeth out so we're trying to maintain them until they get their teeth extracted.
'One of the dentists saw a seventeen year old who hadn't seen a dentist in ten years and needed 28 fillings. You've got really emotional parents that are feeling really guilty that they have got themselves into this position. One of our nurses said she couldn't work on that list because it was too upsetting because she has kids of a similar age. It's a really sad situation.'
Rob's practice, Fairfield House Dental Surgery, has been serving patients for over 100 years. It offers free supervised tooth brushing in schools, and sends its team out to breastfeeding and toddler groups to teach parents about oral health.
Rob, 43, said: 'We're blessed with a group of patients who've been with us for a long time, some have been coming here for more than 50 years. So that's why I'm still with the NHS because it feels like the right thing to do, to keep going for them. It's a kind of cradle to grave service which is what the NHS was supposed to be. But that's the only reason we're doing it - out of good will.'
Why is top dentist being 'fined' £150,000 for keeping his patients' teeth too healthy?
Rob Mew owns a rare example of a thriving NHS dental practice in the middle of a dental desert. Fairfield House Dental Surgery employs ten dentists and does free outreach work in the local community to improve oral health.
Despite all this, Rob's being forced to return £150,000 in NHS money, as the surgery had not carried out enough Units of Dental Activity (UDA). It was having to pay £50,000 a month over three months.
UDAs are the metric used by the NHS in its dentistry payment contract which has been deemed 'not fit for purpose' by Parliament's Health and Social Care Committee.
Under the current deal, practices must carry out a set number of Units of Dental Activity (UDAs) every year or face financial penalties.
The contract requires practices to agree to perform a set number of UDAs - and they are penalised if they come in below or above this. A check-up is worth one UDA while giving a patient a filling racks up three UDAs.
Rob told the Mirror: 'We are being penalised for preventing patients requiring more UDAs. We have £150,000 'claw back' this year but we have 19,000 NHS patients which is more than the practice has ever had. The clawback is for not doing enough UDAs but when patients are being looked after better they don't have as much need for dental work.'
Fairfield surgery gives his patients a check up every 12 months whereas other practices call lower risk patients back for check ups every two years. Rob said: 'We are seeing them yearly and that's one UDA. We are preventing loss of tooth. A GP practice is paid for how many patients they have on their list. That's how they should be funding dentistry.'
Rob says between five and ten people call the practice every day desperate to be seen by an NHS dentist. He has taken on as many as he can but has just started a waiting list. He said: 'We have got patients travelling to be seen here from as far away as north Wales, Manchester and Sheffield.
"The NHS dental contract in England only funds enough for half the population to be treated so these patients have moved away but can't get a dentist. And the Exmouth population is exploding and we have a load of new housing but no more dentistry money to treat the people in those houses.'
A key Mirror campaign demand is reform of the controversial NHS payment contract which disincentivises dentists from treating the patients who need it most. Dentists get paid the same for delivering three or 20 fillings, often leaving the practice treating NHS patients at a loss.
Last week the Government published its Ten Year Health Plan which pledged that "by 2035 the NHS dental system will be transformed" - but the British Dental Association insists contract reform must happen much sooner.
Rob said: 'With these most vulnerable patients with high needs it's really tricky for the practice to to make that work [financially].
'We had a family last Thursday with three kids and they had never been seen by a dentist. There was decay everywhere and they clearly need a lot of work and the parents are saying we haven't been able to be seen anywhere. And they're just tired because they've been calling around practices trying to get in and it kind of gets put on the back burner.
'We had a 14 year old girl come in a couple of weeks ago and she had four crowns put on her back teeth. And you're thinking, if we hadn't handled that soon she would have a couple of back teeth missing and then a lower denture.'
Dental surgeries are being squeezed by soaring costs, with Fairfield House Dental Surgery now scrambling to raise £30,000 just to buy a new dentist's chair.
Rob has worked in the NHS in some form for 28 years, starting at the age of 15 in a hospital kitchen. He added: 'I've got a lot of good will towards the NHS so yeh I try my best to make it work.'
But NHS dentistry cannot rely on good will alone.
The British Dental Association (BDA) has told the Public Accounts Committee the UK Government is propping up NHS services by relying on practices delivering care at a loss - fuelling an exodus of NHS dentists into lucrative private work.
Figures from the BDA show a typical practice loses over £40 for every set of NHS dentures it fits, and £7 for each new patient exam. A damning report from Westminster's Health Select Committee branded the state of NHS dentistry as 'unacceptable in the 21st century'.
And under the current NHS contract, dentists are restricted by quotas,limiting how many patients they can see and procedures they can carry out each year.
To make matters worse, the Tories have slashed funding in real terms for over a decade. England's £3billion dental budget now only stretches far enough to treat half of the population.
This week, ministers are expected to reveal long-awaited details on plans to finally reform the system. Labour pledged to overhaul the dental contract before the last General Election, but there are serious doubts about whether meaningful change will happen in this Parliament, or whether the Treasury will cough up the cash needed for real reform.
It's understood the UK Government will announce new plans on Tuesday aimed at reversing the current system, one which discourages dentists from taking on patients who need complex care.
Care minister Stephen Kinnock, who has responsibility for dentistry, told the Mirror: 'It isn't right that it's less cost effective for dentists to take on patients who need more complex and extensive treatments like crowns and bridges.'This is why this government will overhaul the dental contract to make it more attractive to offer NHS dental care, especially for those who need it most. As we deliver on the Plan for Change, we're fixing NHS dentistry to make it fit for the future.'
The Government's announcement will also include confirmation of 700,000 extra urgent and emergency dental appointments this year. Officials say these emergency slots will become part of standard NHS provision, and that practices will be paid separately to deliver them, alongside routine check-ups.
Devon worst 'Dental Desert'
It's now harder to get an NHS dentist in the South West of England than anywhere else in the UK, with Devon emerging as one of the country's worst so-called 'dental deserts'.
New figures from the annual GP Patient Survey show that just 72% of people with an NHS dentist in Devon managed to get an appointment, way below the national average of 84%.
Survey responses were grouped by regional Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) which include NHS bodies, local councils and voluntary organisations. The One Devon ICB is responsible for the health of the population in the county. Among people who were already in with an NHS dentist, Devon saw just 72% of people successfully get an appointment. In the wider South West region this was 74% while for England as a whole it was 84%.
Of those who attempted to get an appointment at a practice they had not been seen at before, only 14% were successful in Devon. This compared to 19% in the South West region and 33% as the average for England.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
The big caveat is that many will not have tried to get an appointment if they thought they had no chance.
The data shows only a minority of dentists are taking on new adult patients, and in Devon and the South West, hardly any are.
British Dental Association chair Eddie Crouch said: 'This shows why the government is right to commit to major surgery for NHS dentistry, rather than mere sticking plasters. But we need pace. This service is on the critical list, and demoralised dentists are walking away every day this contract remains in force. If we don't make a break in this Parliament there may not be a service left to save.'
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Social Care said: 'This government inherited a broken NHS dental system but we are getting on with fixing it through our 10 Year Health Plan.
'We have already begun the rollout of 700,000 extra urgent dental appointments, a 'golden hello' scheme is underway to recruit dentists to areas with the most need and we are reforming the NHS dental contract, with a shift to focus on prevention and the retention of NHS dentists - including introducing tie-ins for those trained in the NHS."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Health regulator issues warning as vaccine given to millions is linked to debilitating illness
NHS staff must now warn patients of a rare neurological reaction linked to a new vaccine given to millions of pensioners and pregnant women after a string of cases. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued the alert for two versions of a jab that protects against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This alert was issued after reports of 21 patients—all over 60—developing Guillain-Barré syndrome after being vaccinated. Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare but serious neurological disorder which needs urgent treatment in hospital to prevent it progressing. It can affect people's senses, movement, breathing and heartbeat and usual starts in the arms and legs before spreading to other areas. The alert doesn't mean the jab has been withdrawn, just that staff need to inform patients of the link so any who develop the reaction get the help they need as soon as possible. In fact, experts said the benefits of being protected against RSV, which kills 8,000 adults and 100 babies each year and hospitalises many more, outweighs the small risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome, so it is still recommended to get it if offered. The MHRA issued the alert for both the Abrysvo RSV jab—made by Pfizer of Covid vaccine fame—and another RSV jab called Arexvy, made by GSK. Abrysvo is available in the NHS while latter is available privately. The MHRA alert reads: 'Healthcare professionals should advise all recipients of Abrysvo and Arexvy that they should be alert to signs and symptoms of Guillain-Barré syndrome and, if they occur, to seek immediate medical attention as it requires urgent treatment in hospital.' While warnings that the jab may cause the syndrome are included in patient safety information leaflets NHS staff will now have to warn patients directly. The watchdog's warning follows a similar one issued by US health chiefs who in January. Like UK experts, American officials also said while awareness of the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome was important taking jab if eligible was still recommended. Symptoms of Guillain-Barré syndrome can include tingling, numbness or pins and needles in feet and hands, muscle weakness and difficulty moving joints. There may also be problems breathing and drooping face muscles or trouble swallowing or speaking. Up to June 2, the MHRA has received 21 Yellow Card reports of suspected Guillain-Barré syndrome in older adults, aged 75-79 where known, after they were given an Abrysvo vaccine. This out of almost 2million doses of Abrysvo administered, it said. The MHRA has not received any Yellow Card reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome following Arexvy, however it noted there has been very limited use of this vaccine in the UK to date. The 'Yellow Card' scheme allows officials to track potential adverse reactions to medications approved for use in the UK and spot emerging patterns. Every drug approved for use in Britain has to go through safety trials before being made available to the public. But there is an unavoidable risk that rare reactions may have been missed, which is where the Yellow Card system comes in. If a worrying pattern emerges it can lead to drugs' approval being reviewed, having new warnings added to the labels or the medication potentially being taken off the market completely. As anyone can use the system—patients as well as their medics—a reaction being linked to a vaccine or drug is not proof it was responsible. The MHRA highlights that some reactions may simply be coincidence. For example, a patient given an RSV jab may develop Guillain-Barre syndrome, but the vaccine itself may not be responsible. Guillain-Barré syndrome is a poorly understood condition. It occurs when the body's immune system, which normally protects people from infection, mistakenly attacks healthy nerve cells. While most patients recover within a year, some are left with permanent nerve damage. What triggers the immune system to attack nerve cells in Guillain-Barré syndrome isn't understood. But, as the syndrome can also occur following an infection with a virus or bacteria, some experts suspect it's caused by a misfiring of the immune system in response to a foreign substance, be that a pathogen or a vaccine. Such reactions, from both infections or RSV vaccines, are rare, with the risk estimated to be about one in every 1,000. RSV vaccines, which were only approved in the UK last year, offer protection to older adults and babies who are at increased risk of becoming seriously ill if infected. The virus can cause dangerous breathing problems in babies as well as pneumonia in older people, both of which may require hospital stays. RSV jabs are offered to pregnant women so that the protection passes to the developing baby, reducing their risk of severe infection by about 70 per cent. Government data shows that 62 per cent of eligible older adults and about half of pregnant offered the RSV vaccine on the NHS in England had the jab. The latest NHS data—for the 2023-2024 financial year—recorded about 3,000 admissions for Guillain-Barré syndrome in England's hospitals though some cases could be the same patient needing to admitted multiple times that year.
Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'I called NHS dentists for 7 years but couldn't get in, so pulled my teeth out'
NHS dental crisis left Linda Colla having to pull out her last three teeth after being unable to get an NHS dentist for seven years [warning graphic video] A desperate pensioner pulled out her last three teeth because she was unable to get an NHS dentist. Linda Colla, 76, had been calling around practices for seven years trying to get an appointment but has just been stuck on waiting lists. The Mirror visited Linda in Devon as part of a series of special reports from one of Britain's worst dentistry deserts. The British Dental Association has demanded that Labour urgently reforms the NHS dental contract to end the 'horror show'. Local MP Caroline Voaden told the Mirror that not a single dentist in South Devon is now taking on new NHS patients. Linda, a retired charity manager who receives pension credit, said: 'My gums were all inflamed and were so painful I could only eat baby food and soup. I couldn't eat anything solid. In the end I just pulled my teeth out. I just kept wiggling it and wiggling it until it came out. When I went through childbirth with my daughter they always told me I had a high pain threshold.' Without the three teeth to anchor it, Linda's lower denture plate wouldn't fit. She eventually found the money to pay a private dentist £200 to fit a new one. The mother-of-two said: 'My plate had to be adapted to have the three teeth put in but that cost me £200 which was my week's pension gone in one fell swoop. 'I'm a pensioner and I should have free NHS dental treatment but I can't get it, despite all the years I've paid into the NHS through taxes and National Insurance contributions. 'Let's face it, if you paid into an insurance company and then when you needed them they didn't deliver then there would be hell to pay. But that is what the government is doing. READ MORE: 'I pulled my own tooth out with a pipe wrench because of the unbearable toothache' 'Now I'm in a situation now where at the moment my dentures aren't too bad but at some point I've either got to have them realigned or replaced. I'm going to have to find £1,500 for dentures and I'm on pension credit - one of the poorest people in the country so they tell me - I can't afford that. And I shouldn't have to go into debt to see a dentist.' A number of different question responses in last year's GP Patient Survey suggested Devon is one of the places in the country where it is hardest to get an appointment with an NHS dentist. Linda said: 'It's the most awful thing because your face is what you present to people. When you lose your teeth, you're losing a heck of a lot of self-confidence. My self-confidence went down the plughole. So I do worry for all the children that are losing their teeth. When they start off with bad oral health that is going to dog them for the rest of their lives.' After a decade of real terms funding cuts under the Tories the £3 billion NHS dental budget for England is now only enough to treat around half of the population. Linda said: 'There's not the budget for dentists to be able to take on more on the NHS, this is what I was told. They can't work for nothing. I must have called about a dozen NHS dentists and I'm willing to travel 20 miles but I can't get in anywhere. I could afford to go private I'd get a dentist tomorrow.' Caroline Voaden, Lib Dem MP for South Devon, told the Mirror: 'Scarily, stories like Linda's are not rare – with not a single dentist in South Devon taking on NHS patients. Urgent action is needed to attract and reward dentists who practise in less-served areas.' The British Dental Association warned the Public Accounts Committee earlier this year that the Treasury has become reliant on practices delivering care at a loss - fuelling an exodus of NHS dentists into lucrative private work. Caroline Voaden MP added: 'Remuneration is one part of this, but we should also explore a contract that gives dentists greater flexibility, reduces red tape, and promotes the kind of work-life balance that mirrors what they find in the private sector. 'The sad truth is that this Government has been in office for a year now and has often spoken about reforming the NHS dental contract. But in the same period, South Devon has lost three dental surgeries, and more are on the brink. While the Government weighs its options, this crisis is deepening.' Last week the Government published its Ten Year Health Plan which pledged that "by 2035 the NHS dental system will be transformed" - but the British Dental Association insists contract reform must happen much sooner. READ MORE: Keir Starmer's plan to 'rewire' NHS explained – why you won't have to go to hospital The professional body estimates a typical practice loses over £40 delivering a set of NHS dentures and £7 for every new patient exam. A Parliamentary report by the Health Select Committee has described the state of NHS dentistry as "unacceptable in the 21st century". The NHS contract effectively sets quotas on the maximum number of NHS patients a dentist can see as it caps the number of procedures they can perform each year. BDA chair Eddie Crouch said: 'The crisis in NHS dentistry was made in Westminster. A failed contract has left patients taking matters into their own hands, or flying abroad for care that should be available in their own backyard. We can end this horror show, but we need to see real urgency and ambition.' Dentists for All campaign Save NHS Dentistry petition Sign our petition to save NHS dentistry and make it fit for the 21st century Our 3 demands Everyone should have access to an NHS dentist More than 12 million people were unable to access NHS dental care last year – more than 1 in 4 adults in England. At the same time 90% of dental practices are no longer accepting new NHS adult patients. Data from the House of Commons Library showed 40% of children didn't have their recommended annual check-up last year. Restore funding for dental services and recruit more NHS dentists The UK spends the smallest proportion of its heath budget on dental care of any European nation. Government spending on dental services in England was cut by a quarter in real terms between 2010 and 2020. The number of NHS dentists is down by more than 500 to 24,151 since the pandemic. Change the contracts A Parliamentary report by the Health Select Committee has branded the current NHS dentists' contracts as 'not fit for purpose' and described the state of the service as "unacceptable in the 21st century". The system effectively sets quotas on the maximum number of NHS patients a dentist can see as it caps the number of procedures they can perform each year. Dentists also get paid the same for delivering three or 20 fillings, often leaving them out of pocket. The system should be changed so it enables dentists to treat on the basis of patient need. Have you had to resort to drastic measures because you couldn't access an NHS dentist? Are you a parent struggling to get an appointment for a child? Email or call 0800 282591 The Government is rolling out 700,000 extra emergency dental appointments and bringing in supervising toothbrushing for three to five year olds in the most deprived areas of the country. It is currently in negotiations with the British Dental Association about reforming the NHS dental contract.
.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Lofty ambition, very little detail': Readers react to Labour's 10-year plan for the NHS
Labour's recently unveiled 10-year plan for the NHS has sparked a lively debate among Independent readers, many of whom are cautiously weighing its promises against the past. The plan, unveiled last week by Sir Keir Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, includes ambitious goals such as 'a doctor in your pocket' through a greatly enhanced NHS smartphone app, 24/7 health advice, easier online appointments, and a shift towards preventative medicine and neighbourhood health centres. When we asked whether you thought Labour's 10-year NHS plan could deliver real improvements, nearly half (47 per cent) of readers said no, citing a lack of funding, staff, and detail. Another 28 per cent said the ambition is right, but delivery will be the real test, while 25 per cent believed it is the bold, long-term reform the NHS requires. Many said the plans represent a welcome move towards modernising a service often criticised for being stuck in analogue times. Yet, despite the optimism around the digital and structural reforms, several readers remained sceptical about whether the plan could deliver the improvements the NHS so desperately needs, with concerns focusing on funding, staffing shortages, and the lack of detailed delivery mechanisms. With the NHS under constant pressure from an ageing population and rising demand, the question of how these reforms will be implemented was front and centre. Here is what readers had to say about the plan's prospects and challenges: 'All just empty words and no delivery' I can say that I am going to travel to the Moon and back – but if I don't say how I intend to do it, how I intend to pay for it, and how anyone will know that I have done it, it is all just empty words and no delivery. The NHS has a huge recruitment/retention problem, and it is going to need tens of thousands of extra staff. In addition, Streeting has run away from Social Care, which is the one thing that will solve the NHS crisis. So like every other plan, it will not be resourced properly – but there will be lots of highly paid executives involved, working out of fancy offices, until the next plan comes along... ListenVeryCarefully 'Prevention is not a quick fix' Prevention work is already undertaken by Public Health departments in local authorities, in collaboration with the NHS. This is absolutely nothing new. Councils spend millions on Public Health preventive work. The problem is that prevention can take years to show an effect or to realise savings for the NHS. Many people don't seem to get that. Preventive work is not a quick fix. To be honest, I am sick of successive governments and highly funded think tanks producing report after report when we already know the answers. Flossie 'They know the answers' The announcement is very short on detail, particularly on how they will help prevent ill health. Successive governments have commissioned reports on diet, exercise, and active travel for years – they know the answers. Why the reluctance to announce them and any sort of delivery plan? Holly 'Like a nurse reorganising the Houses of Parliament' Again, the government is seduced into reorganising the organisers and office teams. Non-clinical people always do this, and it makes no difference – it's like a nurse reorganising the Houses of Parliament. Plain hopeless. Emperor's new clothes. Having been through five of these restructures, I can say they never change or improve anything. As always, they want less clinical activity and more admin... Diane1234 'We can't afford an NHS that fixes everything' The biggest problem with the NHS is that we want it to fix every ailment – from cuts and scrapes to organ transplants. Sooner or later, we have to face up to the fact that we can't afford an NHS that tries to fix everything, including things we should take responsibility for, such as obesity. Issuing painkillers to just about every patient who has a procedure is also ludicrous, as paracetamol or ibuprofen costs about 39p a pack in a no-frills supermarket. Using the NHS should be limited to "must do" and "could do" – not "it would be nice if I could use it because I'm too idle to sort out my minor problem myself". We are nearing the point where we will need to pay a small charge for all the high blood pressure pills and statins issued to the older population. They're all on them. onmyown 'Primary prevention works – but it's never been prioritised' Primary prevention has always been the Cinderella service within our health system, because it is not "sexy" and requires hard graft to change attitudes and promote health. But quite simply, it works. As a retired health visitor with more than 40 years in practice, I can categorically state that if you invest in taking health into the community, it will work. For too long, resources have been directed into much more expensive tertiary care. I really hope this time they mean it. HappilyRetiredWoman 'Nothing new' This is nothing new – we've been trying to transfer care from hospitals to communities for years (since Thatcher and "care in the community"). This appears to be a blueprint to shut down more hospitals or reduce funding. This isn't what's needed – just the opposite. Community services are already stretched. Doctors' surgeries are reducing services, and waiting times are too long. Pharmacies are closing down and being sold due to a lack of funding. This 10-year plan is just the usual political BS that won't get to grips with the real problems. ChrisMatthews 'This is the future – and it's already happening' A very good idea. Not far from where I live, there are two modern NHS clinics where diagnostic procedures are performed without the need to travel miles to the general hospital. This is the future, and this is what has already been done in many more advanced European countries. Pomerol95 'Abolish the CQC – there's £50m saved' I recently changed my GP because I was unhappy with the service. The contrast between the two services is stark, and I wondered how it could be that there is such inconsistency at such a basic level. My old GP had a CQC rating of "good", but it was far from that. I dug around a bit and found that the last time the CQC had assessed the practice was in 2016 – nearly a decade ago. The problem with such rating systems, beloved of the competition-obsessed Tories, is that they're actually worse than useless. They create an illusion of competence where it doesn't exist. Plainly, it isn't practical for one organisation to continuously monitor standards throughout the healthcare system, so it should be blindingly obvious that this is not an appropriate way to ensure consistency of service. Abolish the CQC – there's £50m a year saved. RickC 'District hospitals and prevention – let's hope it happens' Moving frontline services to community care centres would be a very positive move. Re-establishing the district hospital would be very popular. Shifting the emphasis to the prevention of illness and the improvement of public health systems is also a laudable aim. Let's hope this can be achieved in 10 years! PaleHorse 'Lofty ambition, very little detail' I cannot see anything concrete in this statement – plenty of lofty ambition, but very little detail. I like the idea of local health centres providing access to diagnostic services. If they are allowed to invest in new equipment, it will speed up the move to digital services. Moonraker2025 'Dangerous to cut cure before prevention pays off' Prevention vs cure is logically all very well – but do we know how to reliably prevent sickness that might put people in hospital? For many conditions, effective systems for prevention might take more than a decade to have much effect. So, no money is saved through needing less for cure for 10 years or more. It is very dangerous to run down curative services until we see the new investment in prevention paying dividends. I suppose Streeting will require the NHS to blame the unwell for not following prevention guidelines – as a sort of "not our responsibility: you did this to yourself". Simplesimon 'So… it won't happen' It would take a lot of cash; the NHS doesn't have it because the Treasury doesn't have it... It would require the UK economy to improve dramatically... It won't. Or they could increase taxes, particularly for the wealthy, but they won't do that, as it would upset their donors – and higher taxes aren't why the donors put them in power... So… it won't happen. ScoobytheDog 'Nothing really new here' After spending nearly fifty years working in the NHS, I think this all seems to have been said before. So nothing really new here, but the sentiment is a good one. How to deliver it will be the real test. Sparrow 'Remember Blair's polyclinics?' If Labour don't put in the funding and increase the staffing, this latest NHS plan will fail. Remember Blair's polyclinics, anyone? rcourt130864 'No understanding of cause and effect' There seems to be no vision at all. No understanding of cause and effect. For example, the "food" industry, peddling its processed junk, has made people ill and obese. But rather than tackle the cause, expensive weight-loss drug injections are prescribed. Likewise, the alcohol industry. Either a lack of vision, or the government has been 'bought off' by wealthy pressure groups. Heisenberg97 'The NHS is a public service, not a business' It can work – the basic problem has always been that the NHS was never intended to be a business and cannot be run as one. It is a public service. Before the advent of business management techniques (plied by business consultants), it was the envy of the world as a health service, not measured by being a profitable public company-style business. I worked on this well over 20 years ago. Clinical and non-clinical should be treated separately. Fixed assets should be NHS-owned (not government-owned), giving them control over expansion, upgrades etc. Build a model based on the production side and the service side. The production side is more predictable and can be proactive. In the NHS, you could represent this by likening it to a catalogue of products: tests, scans, standard operations (hip, knee replacements etc.), and all post-operative support can be included as 'products'. The supplier or deliverer of the individual products does not have to be the NHS, but coordination should be through an NHS functional system. The NHS could rent on-site space to a service provider who would, for example, equip an area where scans, x-rays etc. are provided to patients on referral from an NHS-approved doctor on an agreed service contract. I challenge the view that to outsource these services is 'selling off' the NHS. The service side of any operation, on the other hand, is always more reactive (as in any business) and needs skilled resources with the flexibility, training, and tools to provide support to the patient. They need the best resources to handle unclassified 'breakdowns' and set in motion a recovery plan that covers not just fixing the problem, but getting the patient back to normal (or a new normal). This is the NHS's core function and is the public service that we all expect. ArcticFox 'Not a plan, just a wish list' First, it almost certainly isn't a "plan" in the sense that anyone in business would recognise. I bet it is just a wish list of things they want to happen, much like the recently published "Modern Industrial Strategy", lacking any detail as to how it's actually going to be delivered, what the key milestones are, who is going to be responsible, what resourcing and cash is going to be dedicated towards it, and what the measures of success will be. Equally, I doubt there is any delivery structure in place, or transformation programme governance, or anything like that. Second, Labour is going to be out of office come 2028 or 2029 for the next 30 years, and whoever takes over from them will almost certainly tear this plan up. They don't have ten years, and they must know that by now. So honestly, what's the point in publishing a "ten-year plan"? It's just performative at this stage. sj99 The conversation isn't over. To join in, all you need to do is register your details, then you can take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking 'log in' on the top right-hand corner of the screen.
