
Immigration authorities demand landlords turn over tenant information
Eric Teusink, an Atlanta-area real estate attorney, said several clients recently received subpoenas asking for entire files on tenants. A rental application can include work history, marital status and family relationships.
The two-page "information enforcement subpoena," which Teusink shared exclusively with The Associated Press, also asks for information on other people who lived with the tenant. One, dated May 1, is signed by an officer for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ' anti-fraud unit. However, it is not signed by a judge.
It is unclear how widely the subpoenas were issued, but they could signal a new front in the administration's efforts to locate people who are in the country illegally, many of whom were required to give authorities their U.S. addresses as a condition for initially entering the country without a visa. President Donald Trump largely ended temporary status for people who were allowed in the country under his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Demands pose legal questions
Some legal experts and property managers say the demands pose serious legal questions because they are not signed by a judge and that, if landlords comply, they might risk violating the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin.
Critics also say landlords are likely to feel intimidated into complying with something that a judge hasn't ordered, all while the person whose information is being requested may never know that their private records are in the hands of immigration authorities.
"The danger here is overcompliance," said Stacy Seicshnaydre, a Tulane University law professor who studies housing law. "Just because a landlord gets a subpoena, doesn't mean it's a legitimate request."
ICE officers have long used subpoenas signed by an agency supervisor to try to enter homes. Advocacy groups have mounted "Know Your Rights" campaign urging people to refuse entry if they are not signed by a judge.
The subpoena reviewed by the AP is from USCIS' fraud detection and national security directorate, which, like ICE, is part of The Department of Homeland Security. Although it isn't signed by a judge, it threatens that a judge may hold a landlord in contempt of court for failure to comply.
Tricia McLaughlin, a Homeland Security spokeswoman, defended the use of subpoenas against landlords without confirming if they are being issued.
"We are not going to comment on law enforcement's tactics surrounding ongoing investigations," McLaughlin said. "However, it is false to say that subpoenas from ICE can simply be ignored. ICE is authorized to obtain records or testimony through specific administrative subpoena authorities. Failure to comply with an ICE-issued administrative subpoena may result in serious legal penalties. The media needs to stop spreading these lies."
Requests are new to many landlords
Teusink said many of his clients oversee multifamily properties and are used to getting subpoenas for other reasons, such as requests to hand over surveillance footage or give local police access to a property as part of an investigation. But, he said, those requests are signed by a judge.
Teusink said his clients were confused by the latest subpoenas. After consulting with immigration attorneys, he concluded that compliance is optional. Unless signed by a judge, the letters are essentially just an officer making a request.
"It seemed like they were on a fishing expedition," Teusink said.
Boston real estate attorney Jordana Roubicek Greenman said a landlord client of his received a vague voicemail from an ICE official last month requesting information about a tenant. Other local attorneys told her that their clients had received similar messages. She told her client not to call back.
Anthony Luna, the CEO of Coastline Equity, a commercial and multifamily property management company that oversees about 1,000 units in the Los Angeles area, said property managers started contacting him a few weeks ago about concerns from tenants who heard rumors about the ICE subpoenas. Most do not plan to comply if they receive them.
"If they're going after criminals, why aren't they going through court documents?" Luna said. "Why do they need housing provider files?"
ICE subpoenas preceded Trump's first term in office, though they saw a significant uptick under him, according to Lindsay Nash, a law professor at Yeshiva University's Cardozo School of Law in New York who has spent years tracking them. Landlords rarely got them, though. State and local police were the most common recipients.
ICE can enforce the subpoenas, but it would first have to file a lawsuit in federal court and get a judge to sign off on its enforcement — a step that would allow the subpoena's recipient to push back, Nash said. She said recipients often comply without telling the person whose records are being divulged.
"Many people see these subpoenas, think that they look official, think that some of the language in them sounds threatening, and therefore respond, even when, from what I can tell, it looks like some of these subpoenas have been overbroad," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
20 minutes ago
- NBC News
JD Vance urges Republican voters to 'talk to your friends' about the 'big, beautiful bill'
WEST PITTSTON, Pa. — Vice President JD Vance gave an early glimpse of the argument that Republicans will make ahead of the 2026 midterm elections while touting the mega bill that the White House pushed through Congress. In a 20-minute speech Wednesday in northeast Pennsylvania, Vance urged the audience to become fellow evangelists for what he called the "Big, Beautiful Bill" in conversations with family and friends. Vance supplied the talking points he wants them to use, describing how workers at the machine shop that hosted his appearance will no longer pay taxes on overtime pay. Vance was silent about less popular facets of what had been a nearly 900-page bill. He did not mention, for example, steep cuts to Medicaid, which provides health coverage to low-income people. A report published Wednesday in JAMA Health Forum found that the cuts could lead to 1,000 more deaths a year. And while Vance said that Trump and congressional Republicans are getting 'Washington spending under control,' the nation's debt will increase by $3.3 trillion over the next decade under the legislation, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. The vice president invited the audience to do their own research, but asked them to 'take what I said and … go talk to your neighbors, go and talk to your friends about what this bill does for American citizens.' Without explicitly mentioning the midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, Vance said, 'We don't want to wake up in a year and a half and give the Democrats power back.' Both parties are now in the opening phase of a battle to shape voter impressions of the new law ahead of the midterms. Trump's cabinet members are expected to travel the country in the coming months to help sell the bill to voters. Introducing Vance was Kelly Loeffler, administrator of the Small Business Administration. She used her speech to promote the law, calling it 'rocket fuel for small business.' Republicans face some headwinds in selling the legislation. A recent Economist/YouGov survey taken after Trump signed the bill on July 4 showed that 35% of adults supported it, compared to 53% who were opposed. The White House needs GOP voters to be enthused about the law and motivated to vote next year if the party hopes to hang onto majorities in the House and Senate. 'The Trump voters are happy and complacent right now,' said John McLaughlin, a Trump pollster. 'And we have to get them fired up for next year. We have a lot of work to do. If President Trump is not on the ballot, it's harder to get them out.' The vice president's appearance was also an investment of sorts in his own political future. Pennsylvania is a perennial battleground state. Trump lost it in 2020 when he was defeated by Joe Biden, but won it back in 2024 when he was elected to a new term. Vance is a likely GOP candidate in the next presidential race — a prospect that voters interviewed before his speech said they welcome. Dwayne McDavitt, 63, of the group Bikers for Trump, said: 'I love JD Vance. I hope he runs in 2028. He's a very intelligent man.' In his remarks, Vance said nothing about the ongoing furor that threatens to divide Trump voters: The Justice Department's finding that the Jeffrey Epstein files contain no ' incriminating 'client list' ' or evidence that would implicate third parties. Many hardcore Trump have balked at the claim, while Trump has called upon them to drop the subject and stop talking about Epstein. Before Vance's appearance, supporters waiting in line offered mixed views of whether they believe the Trump administration is suppressing damning information involving Epstein. Steven Taylor, a truck driver living across the street from the machine shop said he was 'angered' when Trump said that people should move on from the Epstein controversy. 'I think we're being lied to,' said Taylor, 52. 'And I don't appreciate it. This is supposed to be the era of transparency.' 'We put our trust in him [Trump],' he continued. 'I'm still going to support him, but with a slanted eye. We're the ones who put him where he is. It's totally disrespectful.' But Richard Geiersbach, 66, a contractor wearing a MAGA hat, echoed a point that Trump has been making in recent days: Epstein isn't worth discussing anymore. 'It's a waste of time, a waste of money,' he said. 'Let it go.'


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trading Day: Trump-Powell drama sizzles, dollar fizzles
ORLANDO, Florida, July 16 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist A dramatic day on Wednesday ended with Wall Street in the green and the dollar and short-dated Treasury yields lower, although off their earlier extremes, after President Donald Trump denied reports he will soon fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell. More on that below. In my column today I look at Trump's call for 300 basis points of Fed rate cuts and, although it is wishful thinking, why it shines a light on whether Fed policy is too tight, too loose, or maybe just about right. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Trump-Powell drama sizzles, dollar fizzles At around midday in the U.S. session on Wednesday, it looked like six months of verbal attacks on Fed Chair Jerome Powell from President Donald Trump for not cutting interest rates were about to reach boiling point - according to Bloomberg News, Powell would soon be fired. The market reaction was what you might expect - the dollar, stocks, and short-dated Treasury yields fell, and the yield curve steepened. The most notable moves were in the dollar and two-year yield. But Trump swiftly denied the report, insisting that although he had discussed ousting Powell with lawmakers, it was "highly unlikely" he would fire him. Markets recovered their poise, especially stocks, although the rebound in short-dated yields and the dollar was less pronounced. Trump firing Powell would be a monumental event as no president has ever formally dismissed a Fed Chair. But it would come as little surprise. Trump's desire for lower interest rates is ferocious, and he regularly berates Powell for not cutting them. Political interference in monetary policymaking? Yes, but Trump crossed that Rubicon some time ago. Rates traders still expect no change from the Fed on rates later this month and a quarter point cut by October. They added around 10 bps of expected easing into next year's forecasts. Even at the depths of the selloff on Wednesday Wall Street's main indices were never down more than 1%, perhaps reflecting investors' skepticism that Trump really will pull the trigger. But it's noteworthy given that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq had clocked new highs the day before - there's scope for a deep correction if investors want one. The latest twist in the Trump-Powell saga dominated the U.S. session and will likely be the main driver of global markets again on Thursday. But investors have other signposts to guide them, including corporate earnings, tariffs and economic data. On Wednesday, three of America's biggest banks reported results - Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. On Thursday the spotlight turns to Netflix, and before that in Asia, Taiwan's TSMC, the world's main producer of advanced AI chips. Trump boxes in Fed with extreme rate cut calls While almost no one thinks Donald Trump's verbal attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell are a positive development, they have electrified the debate about whether the U.S. president is right that interest rates are too high. Presidential tirades aside, there is a strong case to be made that the fed funds rate should be lower than its current 4.25-4.50% target range. The labor market is beginning to show signs of cracking, 'hard' economic data is softening, and a tariff-led slowdown may be in the offing. On the other hand, economic growth is clocking in at an annualized pace of around 2.5% and not expected to dip much below 2% next year, unemployment is still historically low, the stock market is at a record peak, and other financial assets like bitcoin have also never been higher. And, crucially, core inflation is still almost a percentage point above the Fed's 2% target, suggesting that we may be starting to see the inflationary impact of tariffs. By those measures, policy may be too loose, not too tight. Indeed, Jason Thomas, head of global research and investment strategy at Carlyle, reckons financial conditions are "unusually accommodative", and argues that had the Fed not said in December that policy was 'restrictive', there would be no need to explain why it hadn't cut rates six months later. The president clearly does not agree. Trump is clamoring for borrowing costs to be slashed by 300 basis points. That would take the policy rate closer to 1%, a level usually associated with severe financial market stress, strong disinflationary pressures or a deep economic funk. Or all three. One would be hard-pressed to find many experts who would agree with Trump's call, even those who fall on the dovish side. But then where should rates be? Policymakers typically use forward-looking models and frameworks to inform their decisions. The most famous of these, so-called 'R-Star', comes in for a lot of criticism, as it is theoretical, referring to the inflation-adjusted long-term neutral interest rate that neither accelerates nor slows growth when inflation is at target. This may be a fuzzy concept, but officials look at it, so investors cannot dismiss it completely. There are two benchmark 'R-Star' models, both partly created by New York Fed President John Williams. One currently puts this rate at around 0.80% and the other around 1.35%. If inflation were at the Fed's target 2%, then these models would put the nominal fed funds rate at around 2.80% or 3.35%, respectively. Fed policymakers split the difference in their latest median projections, putting the long-term nominal Fed funds rate right at 3.00%. If these estimates are anywhere close to accurate, the nominal policy target range of 4.25-4.50% now appears to be restrictive, so the path ahead is lower. Rates traders and investors seem to agree. While the latest CPI report has caused jitters at the long end of the yield curve, rates markets are still pricing in more than 100 basis points of easing over the next 18 months. But this has helped fuel the asset price rally, which, ironically, strengthens the argument that policy may be closer to neutral than models suggest. Powell may have backed the Fed into a corner by maintaining that policy is still restrictive, albeit "modestly" so. These claims signal the Fed will lower rates, but it has not done so, as it is waiting to see if Trump's protectionist trade agenda unleashes inflation. Moreover, it also does not want to appear to be responding to political pressure to cut rates. "Some will say this collision was unavoidable. But the Fed would find itself in a far more defensible position had it embraced a posture of neutrality, pledging to cut or hike as warranted by future developments (including policy shifts)," Carlyle's Thomas wrote on Tuesday. In short, the Fed is in a bit of a bind, and Trump's attacks will only make it worse. His call for 300 basis points of rate cuts may end up being similar to his 'reciprocal tariff' gambit: aim extremely high, settle for something less, and claim victory. The problem, of course, is that monetary policy is not supposed to be a negotiation. What could move markets tomorrow? Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Vance travels to Pennsylvania to tout the 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Vice President JD Vance traveled to West Pittson, Pennsylvania, to promote the passage of the "Big, Beautiful Bill," and the Trump administration priorities it 16, 2025