logo
Just Seeing A (Fake) Sick Person Can Activate Your Immune System

Just Seeing A (Fake) Sick Person Can Activate Your Immune System

Forbes3 days ago
We have all experienced the phenomena of seeing a disturbing or disgusting image that makes us feel physically ill. When the human brain processes certain types of visual images, it can send neural signals to our bodies that result in us feeling nauseated, light-headed, or shaky.
Scientists have now learned that certain types of visual imagery can also turn on our immune systems, even without being physically exposed to an infectious agent.
A team of scientists based in Switzerland performed an experiment with 248 healthy adults, in which the subjects were exposed to avatar images of people walking towards them. Some looked healthy with neutral facial expressions, others looked healthy but with fearful expressions, and some looked like they had a contagious illness (indicated by coughing and skin rashes). The subjects wore gaming headsets that created an immersive 3-D virtual reality environment, in which the simulated avatars walked towards them.
When the subjects were approached by avatars who looked sick and appeared ready to invade their personal space, the researcher found that subjects activated their innate lymphoid cells, which is part of the 'first responder' arm of the immune system. This was measured by blood sampling of the subjects. In contrast, this cellular response did not occur when the subjects were approached by fearful-looking but non-infected avatars, or by avatars with neutral expressions.
In other words, although the test subjects were not exposed to any actual infectious agents, the possibility of a simulated contact with an infected person was enough to trigger a real-world immune response. The fact that this response was elicted only by the 'infected' avatars but not the 'fearful' avatars, suggests that this is a specific response to potential infection, as opposed to a generalized response to a generic threat.
The researchers also showed that innate lymphoid cell response caused by simulated exposure to the infected avatars was the same as the response to real-world exposure to flu vaccine (which works by triggering an immune response).
The researchers also used functional MRI (fMRI) analysis of brain activation during the simulated exposures, to determine how the brain processed this simulated threat. They found that the simulated exposure increased blood flow in specific portions of the brain known as the 'salience network' which is 'an ensemble of interconnected brain regions whose major role is detecting and filtering salient stimuli, including threats.'
The exact mechanism by which the brain then activated the immune system is not fully understood, but likely related to stimulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal cortex (HPA) axis.
From an evolutionary perspective, these results make sense. Being able to anticipate an imminent threat of infection (and act accordingly) would be a pro-survival trait. And if avoidance of an imminent infection isn't always possible, being able to proactively stimulate the immune system before actual contact with a pathogen could offer a survival advantage vs. activating the immune system only after physical contact.
The authors also noted that this is an example of the 'smoke detector principle' in biological defenses, which is tuned to be mildly oversensitive to threats. In many contexts, an overly sensitive smoke detector that generated a few occasional false-positives (even if there was no actual fire) might save more lives than an insufficiently sensitive smoke detector that generated too many false negatives (failing to respond to actual fires.) The same applies to biological defenses.
This work is very preliminary. But this innovative research sheds light on hitherto unrecognized connections between the brain and the immune system, which could be helpful in developing new treatments against various pathogens. Could appropriate visual imagery help activate the immune system against infections in a way that supplements standard antibiotic therapy? Or stimulate the appropriate immune response to fight cancer cells? I look forward to further investigations along these lines.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Experts issue warning as 'alien monster' spider spreads around the globe on cargo ships — here's why it's so dangerous
Experts issue warning as 'alien monster' spider spreads around the globe on cargo ships — here's why it's so dangerous

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Experts issue warning as 'alien monster' spider spreads around the globe on cargo ships — here's why it's so dangerous

Experts issue warning as 'alien monster' spider spreads around the globe on cargo ships — here's why it's so dangerous Australia may soon be invaded by a spider that scientists have called an "alien monster." What's happening? The New Zealand false widow spider, a native of the Canary Islands and Madeira in Spain, is an invasive species that is spreading rapidly via cargo shipments. According to the International Business Times, the spider that scientists have labeled an "alien monster" is believed to be making its way to Australia. The false widow is known for adapting well to urban environments and can be found everywhere from mailboxes to garden sheds, so it will thrive in areas of Australia with similar environments. However, this invasive species offers a double whammy with its bites, which is what earned it the label of "alien monster." Though the species is less aggressive than some other spiders found in Australia, its venom is neurotoxic and can cause swelling, pain, tissue necrosis, and low blood pressure. Fatalities from the bite of this spider are rare; however, hospitalizations are not. Even worse, though, is the fact that the false widow spider is a host for a plethora of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, meaning antibiotics don't always work on bites from this species. Why are invasive species concerning? Any kind of invasive species is a major concern for the country it invades, as they can cause immense damage to native species and local ecosystems. As evidenced by the false widow spider in New Zealand, invasive species spread rapidly. They outcompete native species for vital resources, such as food, and introduce new diseases into local populations (or in this case, new neurotoxins and antibiotic-resistant pathogens). Some invasive species can also impact human food supplies, destroy native plants, alter soil chemistry, and even exacerbate extreme weather conditions. Protecting and prioritizing native species is a crucial way to help conserve natural resources, safeguard food supplies for both animals and humans, and limit the spread of new diseases. Do you worry about air pollution in your town? All the time Often Only sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What's being done about the New Zealand false widow spider? Unfortunately, there's only so much that experts can do to stymie the tide when it comes to invasive species, especially in cases like this one where the species is small and can hide in cargo to enter the country. According to IBT, experts in Australia have urged the government to increase the monitoring of imported goods, educate the public about the species, and make investments in containment measures to mitigate the risks associated with the false widow spider. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword

These 2 Popular 'Healthy' Snacks Can Actually Increase Dementia Risk, Neuroscientists Warn
These 2 Popular 'Healthy' Snacks Can Actually Increase Dementia Risk, Neuroscientists Warn

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

These 2 Popular 'Healthy' Snacks Can Actually Increase Dementia Risk, Neuroscientists Warn

These 2 Popular 'Healthy' Snacks Can Actually Increase Dementia Risk, Neuroscientists Warn originally appeared on Parade. While meals are often planned out (to avoid the inevitable 'what's for dinner?' inquiries), snacks tend to be an in-the-moment decision. But just like at meal time, everything you eat or drink impacts the body for better or for worse, including the makes the ready-to-eat snacks you keep on hand extra important. Think about what's in your pantry and fridge right now that are your household's most popular snacks. Even if you make most of your meals using nutrient-rich, whole food ingredients, many people rely on processed, packaged foods for snacks because they're quick and easy. Not all processed foods are unhealthy; some are good for you. However, there is one snack that many people think is healthy, but neurologists say it can increase the risk of dementia when eaten regularly. 🩺SIGN UP for tips to stay healthy & fit with the top moves, clean eats, health trends & more delivered right to your inbox twice a week💊 The 'Healthy' Snacks That Increase Dementia Risk When Eaten Regularly According toDr. Jamey Maniscalco, PhD,a neuroscientist and founder of Manifest Wellness, two snacks that many people think are healthy—but in reality are not good for brain health—are granola bars and flavored yogurt. 'They're often full of added sugars, artificial ingredients and processed oils, while also lacking the fiber, healthy fats and nutrients your brain needs to thrive. When eaten regularly, they can disrupt the way your brain functions and increase the risk for mental and cognitive health problems over time,' he you freak out too much, Dr. Maniscalco says that when only eaten occasionally, these snacks are nothing to worry about. But if added sugar-filled granola bars or flavored yogurt are part of your daily routine, he says that over time they can increase the risk of Dr. Faye Begeti, PhD, a neuroscientist and author of The Phone Fix, also says that ultra-processed foods—which can include granola bars and flavored yogurt—are detrimental to brain health long-term. 'Ultra-processed foods tend to be high in refined sugars and unhealthy fats and typically lack essential nutrients our brains need. Regularly consuming these foods can negatively affect blood sugar control and increase inflammation, both of which are linked to impaired cognitive function, memory issues and a higher risk of dementia later in life,' she explains. Dr. Maniscalco adds to this, saying, 'Inflammation doesn't just affect your joints or your gut; it affects your brain too. Inflammatory chemicals can interfere with how your brain cells communicate, making it harder to focus, regulate emotions and stay mentally sharp.' Scientific research backs this up, showing that regularly consuming ultra-processed foods is linked to a higher risk of dementia. Related: Granola bars and flavored yogurt aren't the only 'healthy' snacks where added sugar can be found. Neurologist and author Dr. David Perlmutter, MD, says that orange juice often contains more sugar than many people realize. 'We often think a glass of orange juice is a healthy way to start the day, but a 12-ounce serving contains an astounding 31 to 39 grams of sugar, comparable to or even exceeding the sugar in a 12-ounce can of Coca-Cola, which has about 39 grams,' he says. Though orange juice has vitamin C, Dr. Perlmutter says that the high sugar content outweighs this benefit. 'It causes a rapid blood sugar spike, triggering insulin release and promoting fat storage and inflammation,' he explains. A healthier way to get your vitamin C? Have an orange. That way, you get the added benefit of fiber and don't get the added sugar that juices contain. Related: Brain-Healthy Snacks To Have Instead It bears repeating that not all processed snacks are unhealthy. Consider this yet another reminder to check the nutritional panel and ingredients list when shopping for snacks. If you want a snack that lowers your risk of dementia instead of increasing it, Dr. Begeti says to choose something high in omega-3 fatty acids. This can include a handful of nuts, edamame or smoked salmon on toast. Maniscalco says that foods high in antioxidants and fiber support short-term and long-term brain health too. Some examples of this include trail mix containing berries and nuts, hummus and veggies and avocado on whole grain toast. Transitioning from eating sugar-filled processed snacks to nutrient-rich snacks can be challenging at first, but Maniscalco says it gets easier over time. 'One of the biggest barriers to switching from ultra-processed snacks to whole-food alternatives is taste. Hyperpalatable foods overstimulate your taste receptors and reward pathways, essentially desensitizing you to natural flavors. As a result, whole foods may initially taste bland or 'off.' But the good news is that your taste buds regenerate every one to two weeks, and your brain adapts too. After even 10 to 14 days of reduced added sugar and processed flavoring, most people report that fruit tastes sweeter, vegetables are more satisfying and cravings diminish. In other words, whole foods start tasting really good—you just need to give your brain and palate time to adjust,' he explains. Making the switch from snacks full of added sugar to ones containing nutrients like omega-3s, fiber and antioxidants will benefit your brain both in the short term and the long term. The key is having them on hand, prepped and ready to eat! Up Next:Sources Dr. Jamey Maniscalco, PhD,neuroscientist and founder of Manifest Wellness Dr. Faye Begeti, PhD, neuroscientist and author of The Phone Fix Dr. David Perlmutter, MD, neurologist and author of The Grain Brain Cookbook, among other books These 2 Popular 'Healthy' Snacks Can Actually Increase Dementia Risk, Neuroscientists Warn first appeared on Parade on Aug 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Why does your mind goes 'blank'? New brain scans reveal the surprising answer
Why does your mind goes 'blank'? New brain scans reveal the surprising answer

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why does your mind goes 'blank'? New brain scans reveal the surprising answer

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. You look up from your phone screen and suddenly realize you weren't thinking about anything. It's not a lapse in memory or a daydream; it's literally a moment when you're not thinking of anything at all. Neuroscientists have a term for it — mind blanking — which they define as a brief, waking state when conscious thought simply stops. Scientists used to think our waking minds were always generating thoughts, but recent research shows that's not the case. Mind blanking is now recognized as a distinct conscious state associated with changes in arousal, which in neuroscience refers to alertness and responsiveness to stimuli. Studying this curious state could shed light on how consciousness works, some researchers think. "For some, it's kind of a blip in the mind, and suddenly there's nothing," Thomas Andrillon, a neuroscience researcher at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research and the Paris Brain Institute, told Live Science. "But not with that feeling, 'There was something that I forgot.'" Often, people are unaware of the lapse until they are prompted to answer "What were you just thinking about?" "When we interrupt them randomly," Andrillon continued, "it's clear it's more frequent than what people realize." Although the frequency of this phenomenon varies among individuals, various studies suggest about 5% to 20% of a person's waking hours may be spent in this state. Related: Super-detailed map of brain cells that keep us awake could improve our understanding of consciousness An investigation of 'mind blanking' In a study published in the July issue of the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Andrillon and his team used electroencephalography (EEG) — which involves placing electrodes on participants' heads — to measure brain activity while people experienced lapses in attention, such as mind wandering or mind blanking. Mind wandering occurs when people's thoughts drift to tasks or ideas unrelated to the one at hand, while mind blanking involves the absence of all thought. While wearing EEG caps, participants watched numbers flash rapidly on a display screen. They were instructed to press a button every time a number appeared except for 3, which they were told to skip. This task tests how quickly people react when a response is required and how well they can inhibit that response, when necessary. Because most of the presented numbers required a response, people often pressed the button by mistake when they saw a 3 onscreen. The researchers paused the task once a minute to ask what the participants were thinking, finding that they were either focused on the task, their mind was wandering, or they were experiencing a "mind blank." Participants pressed the button more quickly when their minds were wandering, whereas their responses slowed noticeably during mind blanking, suggesting these two mental states are distinct. Brain activity told a similar story. The EEG data showed that the participants' brain activity tended to slow down slightly more when their minds were blank than when they were wandering, compared to the baseline of their paying attention. 'The connectivity changes as if the inner workings of the brain were specific, in a way, to that state," Andrillion said. EEG data is great for tracking rapid changes in brain activity, but it can't pinpoint exactly which brain regions are involved. That's in part because it records brain waves through the skull, and the signals blur as they make their way through the brain tissue, fluid and bone. Andrillon explained it's like listening through a wall. You can tell if a group inside is noisy or quiet, but you can't tell who is talking. The EEG results from the study suggest that during mind blanking, the brain's activity slows down globally, but the technique couldn't identify specific areas. That's where functional MRI (fMRI) came in. Related: 'Hyper-synchronized' brain waves may explain why different psychedelics have similar effects, rat study reveals Hypersynchronization fMRI provides a clearer view of which regions are active and how they interact, but its tracking speed is slower because the technique tracks bloodflow, rather than directly following brain signals. fMRI is more like peeking into the room and seeing who's talking to whom, but not knowing precisely when, Andrillion said. Study co-author Athena Demertzi, a neuroscience researcher at the GIGA Institute-CRC Human Imaging Center at the University of Liège in Belgium, led the fMRI portion of the study. As people rested in an fMRI scanner with no particular task at hand, Demertzi and her team periodically asked what they were thinking. The results were surprising: when people reported mind blanking, their brains showed hyperconnectivity — a global, synchronized activity pattern similar to that seen in deep sleep. Typically, when we are awake and conscious, our brain regions are connected and communicating but not synchronized, as they appear to be during mind blanks. "What we think happens in the case of mind blanking is that the brain is pushed a little bit toward the side of synchronization," Andrillon said. "That might be enough to disrupt these sweet spots of consciousness, sending our mind to blank." Research into mind blanking is still in its early stages, but Andrillon and Demertzi noted that its similarity to brain patterns seen during deep sleep may offer an important clue as to its function. Deep sleep, also known as slow-wave sleep, coincides with important cleanup work for the brain. It clears away accumulated waste, cools the brain, conserves energy and helps reset the system after a full day of mental activity. RELATED STORIES —Why do we forget things we were just thinking about? —Electronic' scalp tattoos could be next big thing in brain monitoring —'Hyper-synchronized' brain waves may explain why different psychedelics have similar effects, rat study reveals Andrillon and Demertzi suggested mind blanking may act as a mini-reset while we're awake. Demertzi said it's like "taking five to steam off" or "to cool your head." Early studies in Demertzi's lab suggest sleep-deprived people report more mind blanks, adding support to this idea. Both researchers stressed that this state is likely a way for the brain to maintain itself, though "it's not ideal for performance," Andrillon said. Andrillon believes it's possible but unlikely that there are people who have never experienced mind blanking. Detecting a mind blank can be a challenge. "It can require being interrupted," Andrillon said, "to realize, 'OK, actually, there was no content.'"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store