
America's wealthy have too much power. It's hurting democracy – and our economy.
If there's one thing the Trump administration has a surplus of, it's billionaires. President Donald Trump himself is America's first billionaire president, boasting a net worth of $5.3 billion, according to Forbes.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics found the median weekly earnings for U.S. workers was $1,194 in the first quarter of 2025 – or $62,088 a year. At that rate, it would take the average American roughly 85,350 years to reach Trump's net worth.
Meanwhile, the total net worth of the billionaires who make up Trump's changing administration – including former friend Elon Musk, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Education Secretary Linda McMahon and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent among them – equals at least $450 billion.
And that money buys a lot of influence – and power. Maybe too much.
That's the question we asked you. As part of our Opinion Forum, we asked USA TODAY readers what you thought about the growing power of billionaires: in our corporations, in our markets and, yes, in our government. Is this exorbitant wealth something to aspire to? Or is it a threat? Read the responses below.
They've got yachts. We're just trying to keep our canoes afloat.
I do think the wealthy have too much power. Who listens to someone making minimum wage? (I'm speaking, by the way, as a former sociology professor, jail administrator and jail standards specialist.)
Having a large number of very wealthy people in political power also has a negative effect on our democracy. The richer people are, the less they are in tune with the common people they are supposed to represent.
Another view: America's problem isn't billionaires. It's what we let them to get away with. | Opinion Forum
The growth in the number of billionaires and in their collective wealth is not a sign of a healthy economy. A healthy economy is defined by a more equal income distribution. In the 1980s, CEOs earned about 40 times more than their hourly employees. Today it's about 300 times. There is something horribly wrong with this picture!
I do think taxes should be raised on the the richest people in our country. The wealthy are not paying their fair share. They sit back in their mansions and yachts while the rest of us are desperately trying to keep our canoes afloat.
— Bev Scott, Trinity, Texas
Let's stop assuming the wealthy are criminals
Without data directly on hand about how much people in different income strata contribute to the federal budget, it's hard to answer questions like whether we should raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans. But I'm in my 70s and have witnessed many things. My parents and their parents worked until they died. That work ethic comes with compensation. Some do better than others.
The common thread is working. I support the work requirements for Medicaid recently approved by Congress and signed into law. The details are rarely published. The headlines are almost always divisive and incomplete.
Musk proposes America Party: Do you think the US needs a third party? Tell us. | Opinion Forum
Let's stop accusing the wealthy as if they are criminals. They pay most of the taxes and give a tremendous amount to philanthropy. Google it!
Get the best education you can afford. Get a job that adds value to your life and work hard. Vote in every election. And try your best to live a good life. Stop judging others.
— Rick Bateman, Loveland, Ohio
Infinite wealth is fine, if everyone has a roof
Our distribution of wealth is completely out of balance and will have dire consequences. I have no argument against infinite personal wealth as long as every citizen has access to basic essentials. Food, medical care, shelter, public safety, etc. should be a foundation for the populace.
Do you want to take part in our next Forum? Join the conversation by emailing forum@usatoday.com.
You can also follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and sign up for our Opinion newsletter to stay updated on future Forum posts.
The uber wealthy can have all the mansions they want once everyone has a roof. Wealth is achieved through more than business acumen. Billionaires exist because they utilize economic and civic infrastructure, provided collectively by all of us. Their argument that "I did it" is, at best, specious. Without fundamental change, this will end badly.
— Sam Collins, Gainesville, Florida
Even those hurt by billionaire policies seem to support the billionaires
The increased involvement of billionaires in our government has a huge effect on how our system operates. The ultra rich have always held sway over American democracy, but the days of their political dealings being done behind the scenes are long gone.
Now, it's not only out in public every day that billionaires are controlling the government and looking to alter the country in such a way to elevate themselves even further above the average person, but it's also that a huge portion of the American public, most of them people who will be affected negatively by these actions, is still hugely supportive of this regime.
This means that the country can continue to be run in such a way that the marginalized are stomped on while the rich get richer. It is now to the point that the Trump regime can brazenly break laws and defy courts with few to no repercussions, and this is, surely enough, eroding away the foundation of American democracy.
— Ben Rivera, Salt Lake City
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Backed Crypto Blitz Could Shake Up Tesla and Wall Street--Here's What's Coming
Congress just fired the opening shot of what some in D.C. are calling Crypto Week. Lawmakers are fast-tracking a stablecoin bill that could become the first major crypto legislation to land on the president's desksetting the tone for a string of upcoming votes that might reshape how digital assets are regulated in the U.S. The bill, which already passed the Senate with bipartisan backing, lays out reserve requirements for dollar-backed stablecoins and hands enforcement to state or federal regulators. Supporters say this could finally unlock mainstream adoption. Critics see a different storyone of political influence and conflicts of interest, especially with the Trump family's growing crypto empire. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NBIS. But there's more coming. The House is also preparing votes on two additional measures: one that redraws the market structure for cryptoshifting oversight from the SEC to the more industry-friendly CFTCand another that would block the Federal Reserve from issuing a digital dollar. That second bill could ripple into macro strategy. Stocks like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), which still holds Bitcoin on its books, as well as Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) and MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), are likely to move if these rules begin tipping the scales in favor of digital asset companies. Hearings are underway in both the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees, with a draft market structure bill expected by the end of the month. The goal: get something aligned before the September 30 deadline. Of course, not everyone's cheering. House Democrat Maxine Waters and Senator Elizabeth Warren are pushing back hard, warning that the bills don't do enough to protect consumersand open the door to regulatory capture, especially given Trump's personal stakes in the crypto sector. Waters is planning her own anti-crypto corruption week in protest. Still, the momentum seems real. With bipartisan movement and mounting institutional interest, this could be the first crack in the wall separating Washington from Wall Street's crypto bets. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores


Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Live Q&A: The Future of US Clean Energy Under Trump's Tax Law
The major tax and spending bill signed into law by President Donald Trump is a sharp pivot in US clean energy policy. The law will impact solar, wind and electric vehicle projects across the country — even in conservative states that saw an infusion of green investments and jobs. What can investors, companies and homeowners expect? Ahead of Bloomberg Green Seattle, Akshat Rathi will speak with Ari Natter, Michelle Ma and Mark Chediak in a Live Q&A on Monday, July 14 at 1pm EDT. Bloomberg digital subscribers and Terminal clients have exclusive access to sign in and ask our team questions during the live broadcast. A recording of this conversation will be made available to listen and share.


Miami Herald
22 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
How immigration issues can affect Florida real estate. ‘I can't live here.'
Some buyers have the upper hand in Florida, with rising inventory and developers offering sales incentives. But immigration issues also are affecting the real estate market, with uncertainty leading some property owners to sell their homes quickly to capitalize on rising prices. 'There are people leaving, calling me ... to put their house up for sale. 'I'm going back, I can't live here,' ' Gisela Rojas, a broker with Caissa Realty Investment, told el Nuevo Herald. Rojas, based in Orlando but also active in the Miami area said that many of the new listings she is handling are 'people who are returning to Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela and are looking for other places like Spain to start a new life.' 'I'm seeing it up close; most of them are facing immigration uncertainty,' said Rojas, who has a prominent social media presence and appears on Telemundo and Univision. 'They had already achieved the American dream without being residents, with a lot of effort.' Many immigrants bought homes by taking advantage of federal FHA loans, which allow for low down payments of around 3.5%, and other assistance for first-time buyers. They also became homeowners when mortgage interest rates were lower than the current just-under 7%. In most of Florida, a single person needs to earn around $80,000 to own a home, and in more expensive cities like Miami, Doral, Pembroke Pines and Weston, it's closer to $140,000. In addition to the high prices in Miami-Dade, especially compared to wages, buyers in the Miami metropolitan area, which includes Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, are paying mortgage rates above the national average. Mortgages in a buyer-friendly market Those with undefined immigration status who bought property a few years ago now have significant equity in their homes and are selling quickly to take advantage of that, Rojas said. Rojas points out that at a time when properties are staying on the market for 90 to 120 days, buyers can get a lot of benefits from sellers and also from developers, who are trying to drive sales of new construction. 'Builders are offering incentives. Yesterday I was able to put a contract on a new home for $600,000, and they gave the buyer $38,000 for closing costs,' Rojas said. Property appraisals are also coming in below the asking price, sometimes $30,000 less, giving buyers more leeway to persuade sellers to lower the price, he said. With the market in their favor, buyers should look for alternatives to finance. Those who can't qualify for an FHA loan can try for a conventional loan. Other programs require a buyer to have low or limited income, such as HomeReady Mortgage and Home Possible. Offers and incentives for renting in Florida The rental market is trending downward, especially in Central Florida around Orlando, Rojas said. But she hasn't noticed price declines in Miami and other high-demand cities, although there is increasing inventory. 'There are a lot of new condos for rent, and they offer incentives, like three months of free rent and no deposit required,' Rojas said. The real estate agent also sees opportunities for investors, who can buy properties at a discount in areas that will later appreciate in value, while also earning a return on the monthly rent. 'We're talking about two realities because foreign investors are arriving,' Rojas said, 'looking for people desperate to get out of their properties.'