logo
Growing Call For A Halt To Dangerous And Undemocratic Speed Increases

Growing Call For A Halt To Dangerous And Undemocratic Speed Increases

Scoop03-06-2025
Press Release – City Vision
2 June 2025
City Vision elected members and candidates are backing their communities and leading road safety organisations in calling for a halt to the dangerous and undemocratic speed increases taking place on over 1400 streets across Auckland.
Auckland Transport has claimed that these increases are necessary under the 2024 Speed Rule, but questions have been raised with both the Minister of Transport Chris Bishop and the AT Board about the conflict between the Speed Rule and AT's statutory purpose to 'contribute to an effective, efficient, and safe Auckland land transport system in the public interest'.
'With no notification to affected communities and questions rising about the unworkability of Simeon Brown's Speed Rule, it is reckless in the extreme to push ahead with the speed increases,' says Albert-Eden Local Board member Christina Robertson.
'We know other cities like Hamilton and Dunedin have interpreted the Speed Rule differently, and that the Minister has said that he's comfortable with their approach. We know raising speed limits will cost lives. Why isn't AT's leadership taking the chance to pause and ask the Minister to clarify how they should resolve this conflict between the Rule and the legislation?' asks Dr Robertson.
'Faced with a conflict between applying a new rule, and clear evidence that that will lead to increased harms and even death, directors have no choice but to explore every avenue to protect the public. Otherwise it is hard to see what their role is even for,' says Patrick Reynolds, former NZTA board member and candidate for Waitematā and Gulf Ward.
The evidence is clear. Raising speed limits–outside train stations, in quiet residential streets, outside parks and early childhood centres and (for 23 hours of the day) outside schools–will contribute to a transport system that is less effective, less efficient, and most importantly less safe.
'30km/hr speeds work. Pushing people back into cars puts kids at greater risk, especially during the school run when the streets are busiest. Auckland Transport math is waiting for at least one of our tamariki to die on our local streets before they will stand up again for safe speeds,' says Emma McInnes, founder of the Waterview School bike train and candidate for Albert-Eden Local Board.
Waitematā Local Board member Alex Bonham notes, 'I've worked with advocates to save an area in Ponsonby from speed increases. The limit was set at 30kph because it made sense in our narrow residential streets. AT accepted that the Speed Rule doesn't apply because it was for the community at large. That speed limits must rise in other areas like Arch Hill, Freemans Bay and Parnell because the consultation there also acknowledged the benefits to children going to school is bizarre.'
'When I've asked, AT have said they don't want to do these changes, and that safety is their priority. And yet AT is persisting down a path they don't have to follow, taking actions that are counterproductive to their stated goals. It's baffling that they haven't been open with the public about why they're doing this, and for communities concerned about their safe speeds, the lack of answers does nothing to rebuild public trust and confidence,' says Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa councillor Julie Fairey.
'AT was created partly to ensure Aucklanders get a transport system that doesn't get destroyed based on political whims. However, what we have here is an indecent rush to overturn evidence-based policy at a cost to ratepayers, all based on a badly written rule out of Wellington,' says Jon Turner, Puketāpapa Local Board member and candidate for Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward.
AT must not knowingly endanger the Aucklanders whose safety it is responsible for. To resolve the conflict between the Speed Rule and AT's duty under law, AT must urgently clarify the status of a rule which conflicts so directly with its legislative purpose. City Vision endorses the call for a pause by civil society groups including All Aboard Aotearoa, Bike Auckland, Walk Auckland, Living Streets Aotearoa, Access Matters Aotearoa and Blind Low Vision NZ, and calls on Minister Bishop and AT Board Chair Richard Leggat to work together to find a common-sense way forward.
City Vision is an alliance of Labour, Greens and community independents working together for progressive change in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland. Since 1998, City Vision has championed policies that support a liveable, safe, connected, healthy, economically and environmentally sustainable city for all Aucklanders. City Vision stands candidates in the Waitematā, Puketāpapa and Albert-Eden Local Board areas, and the Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa and Waitematā and Gulf Wards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Transit ticketing project review: Wide-ranging recommendations
Transit ticketing project review: Wide-ranging recommendations

1News

time19 hours ago

  • 1News

Transit ticketing project review: Wide-ranging recommendations

A review into the beleaguered $1.3 billion national public transport ticketing project has resulted in a "wide range of recommendations," but remains under wraps for now. A spokesperson for Transport Minister Chris Bishop said yesterday afternoon that he hadn't yet received a copy of the report or a promised plan to deliver the project. An NZTA spokesperson said the independent review carried out by LEK Consulting "includes a wide range of recommendations which require careful consideration to understand their implications and feasibility". "We will share further information on the report and the revised rollout plan in late August, following the next meeting of the national ticketing solution governance board." The transport agency did not reveal the costs of the inquiry when asked, and Bishop said the release of the report into the National Ticketing Solution (NTS) would take place in "due course in accordance with commercial confidentiality". ADVERTISEMENT A person uses their phone on a Motu Move reader (file image). (Source: Supplied) Cubic — the key American contractor involved in developing the system — has previously faced capacity problems in the project, RNZ reported. The Motu Move system was intended to allow seamless travel across the country on all public transport providers using a prepaid card or contactless bank cards. In June, Bishop said he expected a copy of the report and a "plan to deliver the project" by the end of last month. The minister said yesterday that he "haven't got either yet and I'm looking forward to reading them". The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including fleeing driver hits house, severe turbulence hits US flight, and massive new bug found in Australia. (Source: 1News) $1.3bn Motu Move system under scrutiny after delays The Transport Minister has previously expressed frustration with the project's progress, telling a Parliamentary select committee in June that he was "worried and frustrated". ADVERTISEMENT "No options are off the table in terms of anything we need to do to bring the project back on track. It has suffered repeated delays," he said. Bishop acknowledged to MPs that the concepts of the system had been in development since 2009 — 16 years ago. He said ongoing issues included complex fare discount structures between different council areas and the need for consensus at the governance level of the programme. A Motu Move card reader. (Source: Supplied) "The governance group, the way it's structured, is: Unless everyone agrees, nothing moves forward," the minister told MPs. The review was commissioned earlier this year after the project suffered repeated delays, with the original 2024 launch date in Timaru pushed back multiple times. Later, NZTA announced in May that testing of "complex components" would prevent a delayed planned mid-year rollout, marking the third delay for the project since 2024. ADVERTISEMENT At the time, the transport agency said it was "exploring alternative delivery approaches for Canterbury to implement Motu Move features in phases". Political lobby group the Taxpayers Union called for the system to be scrapped in June. There remained no firm launch date for the system. Leadership for the project received changes in June, with NZTA creating a new programme director role and hiring Roger Jones, a former chief technology officer at Auckland Transport, to fill it.

Officials warn Govt's boy-racer car-crushing powers threaten judicial discretion
Officials warn Govt's boy-racer car-crushing powers threaten judicial discretion

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Officials warn Govt's boy-racer car-crushing powers threaten judicial discretion

Ministers Chris Bishop and Mark Mitchell announced new offences and penalties in Rotorua on Sunday, with Rotorua Mayor Tania Tapsell. Video / Kelly Makiha Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. The Government is pushing ahead with a bill designed to target boy racers, despite concerns it could compromise judicial discretion. Transport Minister Chris Bishop and Police Minister Mark Mitchell today announced that the Anti-Social Road Use Legislation Amendment Bill had been introduced to Parliament and would have its first reading next month. The bill contains new powers, announced in May, that include establishing a presumptive sentence of vehicle destruction or forfeiture for anyone participating in street racing, burnouts and intimidating convoys, as well as any vehicle owner who refused to identify offending drivers. Exceptions would be made if the offender didn't own the car, if crushing the vehicle was manifestly unjust or would cause extreme hardship. A draft Cabinet paper, released today, noted justice officials were concerned the 'very high threshold' for not applying a sentence could result in 'outcomes perceived to be unfair'.

Boy racer legislation introduced to Parliament
Boy racer legislation introduced to Parliament

RNZ News

time3 days ago

  • RNZ News

Boy racer legislation introduced to Parliament

Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone New legislation set to bring in harsher penalties for what the government calls "idiot" boy racers, has been introduced to Parliament. Announced in May , the Anti-Social Road Use Legislation Amendment Bill will set up new offences and penalties for people driving dangerously, including costly infringement fees and making vehicle seizure or destruction more common for street racing, burnouts and fleeing police. The bill defines "anti-social road users" as people who flee police, participate in unauthorised street racing, burnouts, intimidating convoys, disorderly dirt bike gatherings, or siren battles. The bill is expected to receive its first reading in August. In a statement, Transport Minister Chris Bishop says those who want to drive dangerously will face serious consequences. "Kiwis are sick of seeing these idiot drivers putting everyone around them at risk, so we're taking action through a range of much tougher penalties," he said. The bill would also give police more powers to manage illegal gatherings by closing roads or public areas, like infringements of $1000 for those who fail to leave areas when told to by police Police Minister Mark Mitchell said the additional powers would support to continue cracking down on illegal events. "We have seen substantive responses to these illegal gatherings, including arrests, checkpoints, and other tactics to shut these events down. These gatherings are dangerous to the participants, to bystanders, and to the public," he said. "Boy racers only care about one thing - their car. Once they realise they're not getting it back, they'll think twice about fleeing police or driving dangerously," Mitchell said. "We have seen substantive responses to these illegal gatherings, including arrests, checkpoints, and other tactics to shut these events down. These gatherings are dangerous to the participants, to bystanders, and to the public." An offender will be exempt from vehicle forfeiture or destruction if they do not own the car (unless they fail to provide information about a driver to police), if it would be "manifestly" unjust, or cause extreme hardship to the offender or undue hardship to someone else. After its first reading, the bill will go through a four month Select Committee process including public consultation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store