Researchers say they have a better way to measure weight than BMI
First introduced in the 19th century, body mass index has been used to define obesity in the U.S. for decades. Now, a new study questions the centuries-old standard.
Two in five U.S. adults are living with obesity. Obesity can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and other chronic health conditions. Also known as 'BMI,' it is a calculated measure of a person's body weight divided by their height to determine obesity.
BMI has recently come under heightened scrutiny regarding its methodology, history and what it says about patients and their health. During the Summer Olympics last year, U.S. rugby star Ilona Maher made waves when she said that her BMI is technically listed as overweight, despite being one of the world's top athletes.
'I am considered overweight. But alas, I'm going to the Olympics, and you're not,' the Bronze medalist posted on TikTok.
A new study draws the effectiveness of the calculation into question, with researchers at University of Florida Health suggesting it is 'deeply flawed' and fails to predict the risk of future death.
'This study is a game-changer,' Dr. Arch Mainous, a professor and vice chair of research in the University of Florida College of Medicine's Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, said in a statement. 'This is the ultimate Coke versus Pepsi test. And BMI failed.'
Mainous was the lead author of the study, which was recently published in the journal Annals of Family Medicine.
Instead, they concluded that a direct measurement of body fat using a fairly inexpensive device that picks up on the resistance of body tissue to a small electrical current is far more accurate. The method is known as 'bioelectrical impedance analysis,' and many models of the devices are under $300. They are found in some primary care practices.
While doctors would like to use direct measurements such as DEXA scans, they are not widely available and machines cost tens of thousands of dollars. DEXA stands for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and is 'considered the gold standard to measure body fat.'
'But it's never going to be viable in a doctor's office or family practice,' Mainous said.
Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is linked to the national death index, Mainous and his co-authors looked at the health of 4,252 people.
They determined that people with high body fat, as measured by bioelectrical impedance, were 78 percent more likely to die of any cause than those with healthy body fat levels during the 15 years they were tracked. Those individuals were also three-and-a-half times more likely to die of heart disease.
In contrast, there was no statistically significant association with 15-year mortality risk from any cause, including heart disease, when BMI is used.
The researchers said the two methods were analyzed in a way that removes the effects of age, race and income.
They pointed out that BMI can classify some people with a 'normal' BMI, even when they have a high percentage of body fat. A normal weight is a BMI between 18.5 to 24.9, overweight is between 25 and 29.9, and obese is any value 30 and above.
Furthermore, senior author Dr. Frank Orlando, medical director of University of Florida Health Family Medicine – Springhill, noted that BMI cannot distinguish between muscle and fat mass, only providing an indirect indication.
'For example, people who are bodybuilders can really elevate their body mass index,' Orlando said. 'But they're healthy even with a BMI indicating they're obese.'
Notably, the centuries-old practice does not account for how race, ethnicity, and gender affect variations in body size and fat percentage.
'BMI is just so ingrained in how we think about body fat,' Mainous added. 'I think the study shows it's time to go to an alternative that is now proven to be far better at the job.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump wants to rip $800bn out of Medicaid. It will punish Maga's poorest
Teresa Mcnab had just come back from taking their 11-year-old daughter to school when she heard her husband fall. She found him seizing on the floor. Jackie had been suffering from blood clots, and despite Mcnab's attempts to resuscitate him while waiting for the ambulance, he was later confirmed dead. He was just 45. 'We had been together for 20 years,' she says. Mcnab and her daughter Faye had to raise funds in order to pay for his burial, at one point selling lemonade to help cover the costs of his gravestone. But one small solace came from Jackie's hospital bills being covered by America's public health insurance programme for people on low incomes, otherwise known as Medicaid. For people like Trump supporter Mcnab in Knox County, Kentucky, this kind of support is vital to keep the threat of financial ruin at bay. It also demonstrates the importance of Medicaid in the poorest parts of rural America. However, that lifeboat may be about to be pulled away as part of Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'. Under the president's proposal, which he wants lawmakers to pass by Friday, July 4, up to $800bn (£600bn) will be cut from the Medicaid budget to help fund $3.7 trillion in tax cuts. Crucially, this will mean that 16m people will lose health insurance by 2034 compared with current projections, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). And while the bill has been hailed by many on the Right as a tool to boost household income, there are growing fears that Trump's healthcare cuts will target the low-income families who helped to propel him back into the White House. Of the 200 counties with the highest proportion of voters reliant on public health insurance, a staggering 84pc voted for Trump in last year's election. Nowhere exemplifies this contradiction more than Knox County, where 72pc of people backed the Republican presidential candidate. Here, 68pc of the population use some form of public health insurance, and of the 3,142 counties in America, it is one of the top 20 poorest. 'Voters would be mad' These sorts of figures highlight the political risks posed to Trump if he succeeds in passing his healthcare cuts, which edged one step closer on Saturday as Senate Republicans voted narrowly to advance the bill. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist, has already sounded the alarm by claiming the bill won't succeed 'because Maga is on Medicaid'. However, veteran pollster Frank Luntz says hardcore Trump supporters will back him regardless. 'They'll support whatever he says or does, even cutting their benefits, if they think it will help make America great again,' says Luntz. Though he admits the same may not be true for wavering working-class voters who voted for Trump. 'If there are actual, real, meaningful cuts to Medicaid that voters could see and feel, these voters would be mad,' Luntz adds. 'The Democrats have zero credibility claiming Trump is destroying the economy. But if voters can see and feel the Medicaid cuts, that changes the political calculus completely.' Public health insurance began in America in 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson launched the Medicaid and Medicare programmes. Medicare is a programme for over-65s that is federally funded, whereas Medicaid is an initiative for low-income individuals funded jointly by states and the federal government. Until Barack Obama passed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, however, most low-income, non-disabled adults were not eligible for Medicaid unless they had children. Even then, the median income eligibility for parents was just 64pc of the federal poverty line, which as of last year represented an annual income of $15,060. The ACA later allowed states to expand Medicaid provision to adults whose incomes were less than 138pc of the federal poverty line. Since these measures were rolled out, the number of uninsured Americans has plunged from 44m to 25m, expanding healthcare coverage significantly across the country. Trump's bill could change all of that. The president is planning to cut $793bn from Medicaid's budget over 10 years, delivering a hammer blow to states such as Kentucky. According to research firm KFF, the state will miss out on $21bn in federal funding as a result of the bill, while 277,000 people will lose access to health insurance. The bill's largest cost-saving measure is the introduction of a new 80-hours-per-month work requirement for adults who receive Medicaid under the ACA expansion. This will claw back $344bn, it is estimated, while the bill will also save $64bn by requiring these adults to redetermine their eligibility every six months instead of every 12. Darren Bullock, 40, is a Trump voter who switched from the Democrats in 2016. He is likely to lose Medicaid coverage because of the new requirements, although he is not hopeful of finding adequate employment. 'If they want people to work 80 hours a month, they'd need to bring in a lot more jobs,' he says. In rural areas like Knox County, a key barrier for people to finding work is logistics. Bullock might be able to find a job, but he will struggle to get there. He does not own a mobile phone or a car, and there is no public transport. Jennifer Tolbert, the director of state health reform at KFF and deputy director of the firm's Medicaid programme, warns that people aged 55 to 64 who have taken early retirement from physical jobs are the most vulnerable. 'They probably just can't work those jobs any more,' says Tolbert, who adds that they are also in an age bracket that means they are more likely to need healthcare. Tolbert also warns that many people who can meet the work requirements will lose Medicaid simply because of the new burden of paperwork. This includes Mcnab, now 42 and widowed for four years, who gets up at 4.30am every day to work as a full-time cook. She will have no problem meeting the 80-hour work requirement, but she has little time to spare for extra paperwork. 'I take care of my daughter, I take care of my 78-year-old mom, I take care of our home, and half the time I don't even have time for myself,' she says. Another major question is the impact of Medicaid cuts on drug rehabilitation programmes. Chris Ross, 39, is a former drug addict whose life was brought to a 'screeching halt' by substance abuse, as he fell victim to Kentucky's opioid crisis and became homeless. He was just one of many. 'We are plagued with substance abuse,' says Daniel Phipps, the secretary of the Appalachian Restoration Project, which runs drug rehab programmes and helps recovering addicts back into work. It was one of Phipps's programmes that helped to get Ross clean six years ago. He is now married, has custody of his children and works as the project's court liaison. Like the vast majority of the project's patients, his care was funded by Medicaid. 'If I hadn't had Medicaid, I would probably still be homeless,' he says. The public health insurance programme is the bedrock of the project's business, Phipps adds. The Republican bill does exempt people who have a substance use disorder or are participating in rehabilitation programmes from the new work requirements. But the cuts could hit rehab programmes in other ways, says Tolbert. For example, drug addicts may lose their coverage because they cannot meet the reporting requirements, or federal funding cuts will lead to states cutting back on payments for rehab providers. Overall, Tolbert says regional hospitals that cater to low-income communities will be hit hard financially as more people become uninsured, with many set to cut back on staff or services. The political consequences of such changes could be far-reaching. In Knox County, voting Republican is entrenched in the local culture, although such drastic healthcare cuts will no doubt force some people to think again.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The food that gives you worse nightmares than cheese
Sweet dreams may be driven away by sweet treats before bedtime. While cheese usually gets the blame for disrupted sleep and nightmares, a new study suggests that desserts and sugary snacks are worse. Canadian researchers surveyed 1,082 students, asking about sleep time and quality, dreams and nightmares, and the association between types of dreams and different foods. Desserts and sweets topped the list for vivid, disturbing, bizarre or lucid dreams, with dairy coming second and fruit third. Surprisingly, spicy foods and pickles were less of a problem than cereals or meat. 'We are routinely asked whether food affects dreaming,' said Tore Nielsen, professor of psychiatry at the University of Montreal. 'Now we have some answers.' The study also found a link between nightmares and lactose intolerance, which researchers suspect may be the reason that cheese has gained such a bad reputation. Dairy prevents body from switching off When the authors compared reports of food intolerances to reports of bad dreams and poor sleep, they found that lactose intolerance was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, nightmares and low sleep quality. They believe that eating dairy can activate gastrointestinal disturbances that stop the body being able to switch off during sleep, with the resulting discomfort affecting people's dreams and the quality of their rest. Women were more likely to report both food intolerances and allergies. 'Nightmare severity is robustly associated with lactose intolerance and other food allergies,' said Prof Nielsen. 'These new findings imply that changing eating habits for people with some food sensitivities could alleviate nightmares. 'They could also explain why people so often blame dairy for bad dreams.' However, researchers say the link between food and sleep is not clear cut because it is possible that people do not eat well because they don't sleep well, or that another unknown factor influences both sleep and diet. The team is hoping to run a study asking people to ingest cheese products versus a control food before sleep to see if this alters their sleep or dreams.'
Medical News Today
39 minutes ago
- Medical News Today
A fasting-mimicking diet may improve blood sugar control in type 2 diabetes
Dietary changes are a crucial component of managing type 2 diabetes and can even help achieve remission of the diets, which involve calorie restriction during specific hours or days, have been shown to be effective in alleviating symptoms of type 2 diabetes.A previous randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a monthly cycle of a fasting-mimicking diet that limits calorie intake during five consecutive days can lower blood sugar levels and reduce reliance on from a recent study provides real-world evidence to support the effectiveness of a 5-day fasting-mimicking diet, beyond the controlled conditions of a clinical trial. About 11% of the American population had diabetes in 2021, with type 2 diabetes accounting for 90% to 95% of these diets, which involve alternating periods of fasting and eating, are effective in alleviating the symptoms of type 2 diabetes and can be easier to follow than reducing daily calorie intake over a long time.A new study, conducted using real-world evidence, shows that individuals with type 2 diabetes who follow a fasting diet involving restricted energy intake for 5 consecutive days per month exhibit improvements in blood glucose (sugar) levels, weight loss, and a reduced reliance on diabetes fasting program has been patented by L-Nutra, a nutrient technology company. One of the study authors, William Hsu, MD, an endocrinologist and Chief Medical Officer at L-Nutra, told Medical News Today that:'This study demonstrates how the fasting-mimicking diet (FMD), when combined with physician oversight and registered dietitian (RD) coaching, can be safely and effectively implemented in real-world clinical settings to manage type 2 diabetes.'The researchers presented these results at the American Diabetes Association's 85th Scientific Sessions on June 20, 2025. The findings are yet to appear in a peer-reviewed do fasting diets work?The treatment for type 2 diabetes typically involves a combination of lifestyle modifications and medications. Lifestyle modifications, including dietary changes and increased physical activity, help lower blood glucose levels and facilitate weight medications such as metformin and GLP-1 agonists facilitate the management of diabetes symptoms, only lifestyle changes, such as dietary modifications, can lead to disease have shown that restricting daily calorie intake is effective in managing blood sugar levels and reducing weight in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, adhering to such a diet over the long term is the body adapts to long-term calorie restriction, resulting in a slower metabolism, which makes sustained weight loss more various forms of fasting diets, involving alternating periods of fasting and unrestricted food intake, have been suggested to be easier to adhere to while alleviating diabetes triggers a stress response in cells and the body, promoting healthy aging by reducing inflammation and oxidative damage, while enhancing diets may involve either restricting calorie intake during certain hours of the day, known as intermittent fasting, or during specific days of the week or month, referred to as periodic fasting-mimicking diet is a form of periodic fasting that involves restricted calorie intake for 4 to 7 consecutive days per have developed the fasting mimicking diet to simulate the beneficial health effects of water-only fasting, which involves only water intake during a 24 to 72-hour period. In contrast to water-only fasting, a fasting-mimicking diet allows for limited calorie intake during the fasting period, making adherence less challenging. Blood sugar control: How is a 5-day fasting approach better?The authors of the current study have developed a patented low-calorie, plant-based diet that is low in sugar and protein, but rich in healthy unsaturated fats and fiber.A previous study demonstrated that a 5-day fasting-mimicking diet also leads to a decrease in blood sugar and insulin levels, while increasing the levels of ketone bodies. Moreover, a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a 5-day fasting mimicking diet combined with medications was more effective than medications alone in improving blood glucose control and reducing medication reliance. These results were observed under highly controlled conditions in a clinical trial, including strict criteria for patient inclusion and exclusion. This makes it essential to evaluate the real-world efficacy of this impact of a fasting-mimicking dietIn the present study, researchers evaluated the real-world benefits of integrating a fasting-mimicking diet into routine care for individuals with type 2 present study included data from patients enrolled in a diabetes management program that involved following a monthly 5-day fasting-mimicking diet under the supervision of physicians and registered were enrolled in the study on a rolling basis, and data were collected from those who had completed at least 3 or 6 months of the the end of 3 and 6 months, the fasting-mimicking diet was effective in facilitating weight loss and reducing glycated hemoglobin levels, a marker of blood glucose levels. The fasting-mimicking diet also helped a greater percentage of participants achieve blood glucose control at these time points than at the time of fasting-mimicking diet also reduced reliance on medications for blood glucose control, while still resulting in high levels of engagement in the addition, Hsu noted: 'Most participants are able to integrate the fasting-mimicking diet into their daily lives without significant disruption. Because it's a 5-day monthly intervention rather than a daily regimen, many find it feasible to complete even with work and family obligations, especially with RD support to tailor practical strategies for adherence and personalization.'While the fasting-mimicking diet can be safely undertaken by most individuals with type 2 diabetes, patients should consult a physician before starting such a Routhenstein, MS, RD, CDCES, CDN, a preventive cardiology dietitian and heart health expert at Entirely Nourished, not involved in this study, expressed some caution about the findings.'While the positive effects of the FMD program on weight and HbA1c [a marker of blood sugar] are promising, it is important to note that the intervention was associated with common signs of energy deficit — including fatigue, headache, dizziness, and nausea — in a substantial number of participants during the 5-day fasting period,' Routhenstein told MNT.'Although these symptoms resolved between cycles, they may pose risks for certain individuals, especially those with coexisting health conditions or frailty,' she pointed also cautioned that: 'While the program accommodates most individuals with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome, certain conditions are exclusionary, such as recent cardiovascular events, end-stage diabetes complications, frailty, a BMI under 18, or allergies to FMD ingredients. The program is designed to prioritize safety while expanding access to innovative nutrition-based care for metabolic health.'Finally, Routhenstein advised that 'the inclusion of lifestyle advice with the option to consult a dietitian may have influenced some of the study findings.'
