Syrian government starts evacuating Bedouin families from Sweida in bid to end weeklong clashes
'We have imposed a security cordon in the vicinity of Sweida to keep it secure and to stop the fighting there,' al-Dalati told the Syrian state-run news agency. 'This will preserve the path that will lead to reconciliation and stability in the province."
Advertisement
Buses filled with Bedouin families were accompanied by Syrian Arab Red Crescent vehicles and ambulances. Some families left on trucks with their belongings.
Syrian authorities did not give further details about the evacuation and how it ties into the broader agreement, following failed talks for a hostage swap deal Saturday.
Advertisement
However, Britain-based war monitor the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that as part of the agreement, the Bedouin fighters would have to release Druze women they were holding captive, and leave the province.
The Bedouin fighters had withdrawn from Sweida city Sunday, and alongside other tribesman from other parts of the country stood on the outskirts while security forces cordoned off the area. An aid convoy of some 32 Red Crescent vehicles entered the city, though a government delegation with another aid convoy was turned away.
After talks for a hostage swap fell through late Sunday, the Observatory and activist groups in Sweida reported hearing what they said were Israeli airstrikes and helicopters over villages where some skirmishes took place between the Bedouins and Druze militias.
The Israeli military said it was 'not aware' of any overnight strikes in Syria.
Syrian interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa has tried to appeal to the Druze community while slamming the factions loyal to spiritual leader Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri who have been involved in the clashes. He promised to hold accountable perpetrators of targeted attacks and other violations.
The country's Druze community largely celebrated the downfall of the Assad family that ended decades of tyrannical rule. While they had concerns about Al-Sharaa's de facto Islamist rule, a large number wanted to approach matters diplomatically.
Al-Hijri and his supporters, though, have taken a more confrontational approach with Al-Sharaa, contrary to most other influential Druze figures. Critics also note al-Hijri's previous allegiance to Assad.
However, the numerous cases of sectarian attacks, which included killing Druze civilians and desecrating photos of religious notables, have made the Druze more skeptical of Al-Sharaa and less optimistic of peaceful coexistence.
Advertisement
More than half of the roughly 1 million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most of the other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast War and annexed in 1981.
Chehayeb reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Tia Goldenberg in Tel Aviv, Israel, contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Iran worries U.S. will use nuclear talks as pretext for new attacks: Senior official
Iran is willing to return to the negotiating table with the U.S., "the sooner the better," but must be convinced the talks aren't cover for further military action, Tehran's nuclear negotiator Kazem Gharibabadi said on Wednesday. The big picture: U.S. officials were discussing the dates for future talks with Tehran last month while simultaneously coordinating war plans with Israel, Gharibabadi said. While Tehran knows it needs to negotiate with the U.S. to get sanctions lifted and avoid new ones, he said bluntly that "we don't trust the U.S." Driving the news: Iran and the "E3" — France, Germany and the U.K. — will hold talks in Istanbul on Friday on the issue of "snapback" sanctions. The European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal could impose those harsh sanctions for Iranian non-compliance, though Tehran denies that such a move would be legitimate. Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister and lead nuclear negotiator, said Friday's talks were "important" but not "decisive," because even if an agreement is not reached "we still have time." Between the lines: The U.S. and the E3 jointly settled on the end of August as a deadline to impose the harsh snapback sanctions if no U.S.-Iran deal is reached by then. But Gharibabadi suggested that was a soft deadline, noting that the E3 had also called Iran's foreign minister to express their desire to come to an arrangement. The power to impose snapback sanctions expires in October, but the Europeans are expected to raise the possibility of extending that deadline. In return, they want Iran to take steps toward resuming the work of UN inspectors in its nuclear facilities and possibly move its 60% highly enriched uranium to another country. Gharibabadi said it was "premature" to discuss an extension. What he's saying: Speaking to reporters in New York on Wednesday, Gharibabadi said it was now incumbent on Iran to negotiate over snapback with the Europeans and over the broader nuclear issue with the U.S. But he made clear just how difficult that would be. The last time around, he argued, the U.S. repeatedly changed its positions in talks — making it difficult to make progress — and then turned around and bombed Iran. Gharibabadi said a military operation may always have been the true U.S. intention — something U.S. officials deny — and that could be the case once again. Concerns about future attacks are one reason Iran want assurances on the Trump administration's seriousness before returning to the table, he said. State of play: Gharibabadi said Iran had invited a technical team from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to visit Tehran in the next few weeks, but not to visit the country's nuclear sites. Iran suspended its cooperation with the IAEA due to the Israeli and U.S. attacks. Gharibabadi criticized IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi for declining to condemn those attacks, suggesting he had political motives. But he said Iran was willing to discuss "a new modality" for cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, including access to the nuclear sites that were not attacked and also those that were. The IAEA has not yet requested access to the three bombed nuclear facilities, Gharibabadi said, noting that it would be very dangerous for inspectors to enter them. The intrigue: When reporters repeatedly asked about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities and material after the strikes, Gharibabadi joked that rather than asking him they should trust President Trump's insistence that they were "totally destroyed." What to watch: The U.S. has continually proposed a resumption of talks since the war, and there have been several discussions in Tehran about the terms on which to resume them, Gharibabadi said. He insisted that any talks would be "indirect," conducted through mediators, despite the U.S. desire for "direct" talks. Asked why, he said "we don't trust the U.S." and don't think the process has reached a stage where direct talks are appropriate. Gharibabadi didn't lay out a timetable for the resumption of talks with the U.S., but suggested Friday's talks in Istanbul would be a factor.
American Military News
14 minutes ago
- American Military News
Video: Trump touts $36 million CBS settlement over deceptive Harris interview
President Donald Trump confirmed on Tuesday that CBS News and Paramount Global paid $16 million to settle the 'historic lawsuit' the president filed against them for interfering in the 2024 presidential election. Trump also revealed that he is expected to receive an additional $20 million in advertising and programming. In a Tuesday statement on Truth Social, Trump wrote,'BREAKING NEWS! We have just achieved a BIG AND IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against 60 Minutes, CBS, and Paramount. Just like ABC and George Slopadopoulos, CBS and its Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and were desperate to settle.' Trump explained that Paramount and CBS paid a $16 million settlement on Tuesday and claimed that he anticipates another $20 million in advertising and programming from the 'new owners' of Paramount following the company's merger with Skydance Media. The 47th president described the settlement with CBS and Paramount as another victory in a 'long line of VICTORIES over the Fake News Media, who we are holding to account for their widespread fraud and deceit.' READ MORE: Video: CBS, Paramount forced to pay Trump $16 million in major settlement Trump warned that The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, and 'all other Mainstream Media Liars' have been put on notice that 'the days of them being allowed to deceive the American People are OVER.' The settlement with Paramount and CBS comes after Trump filed a $20 billion lawsuit against CBS News and accused the company of interfering in the 2024 presidential election by deceitfully editing an interview of former Vice President Kamala Harris on '60 Minutes.' In a video promotion on CBS News' 'Face the Nation,' Harris gave a lengthy 'word salad' answer regarding a question about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's perceived hesitance to follow the advice of the Biden-Harris administration amid the war between Israel and Hamas; however, when CBS released the full interview ahead of the 2024 election, Harris gave a completely different answer. In the video clip used to promote the CBS interview, Harris can be heard saying, 'Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.' Meanwhile, in the edited version of the interview, Harris can be heard saying, 'We are not gonna stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.' 60 Minutes removed Kamala's word salad in the latest version. 1984 is here. — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 8, 2024
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Gaza aid crisis: Why Gazans are dying of hunger or being killed by Israel on a near daily basis
Twenty-one months into Israel's war in Gaza, the enclave is gripped by escalating scenes of death and hunger, with some killed while trying to reach aid, others dying of starvation and growing condemnation of Israel's conduct even among many of its closest allies. The United Nations says more than a thousand people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking food since late May, when a controversial new Israel- and US-backed aid group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, began operating. Of those, hundreds have died near GHF sites, according to the UN. The GHF was created to replace the UN's aid role in Gaza and has been widely criticized for failing to improve conditions. All 2.1 million people in Gaza are now food insecure. On Tuesday, Gaza's health ministry said 900,000 children are going hungry, and 70,000 already show signs of malnutrition. But how did it come to this? Before the war, Gaza was already one of the most isolated and densely populated places on earth, with around two million people packed into an area of 140 square miles. Israel has maintained tight control over the territory through a yearslong land, air and sea blockade, with severe restrictions on the movement of goods and people. More than half of its residents were food insecure and under the poverty line, according to the UN. Between 500 and 600 truckloads of aid entered Gaza daily before the conflict. That number has since plummeted to an average of just 28 trucks per day, a group of humanitarian organizations said Wednesday. It's unclear if the figure includes trucks used in GHF's operations. Following Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack, which left 1,200 people dead and more than 250 taken hostage, Israel ordered a 'complete siege' of Gaza, halting the supply of electricity, food, water and fuel. A humanitarian crisis swiftly unfolded, as trapped residents faced both hunger and a devastating Israeli military campaign in response. Human rights groups have repeatedly criticized Israel's use of food as a 'weapon of war' and accused it of imposing 'collective punishment.' Following international pressure, the first trucks carrying aid entered Gaza in late October. A temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas began on November 24, 2023, slightly increasing aid flow. But the truce collapsed a week later. Aid deliveries subsequently dwindled again, and stringent Israeli inspections further delayed shipments. Israeli authorities said screening was necessary to prevent Hamas from diverting supplies but humanitarian officials accused Israel of deliberately throttling aid. Further compounding the crisis was the Israeli campaign against the UN and its aid delivery system, which Israel said was ineffective and allowed aid to fall Hamas' hands. The UN denies this. Among the agencies targeted was the UN's Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), which Israel accused of having staff involved in the October 7 attack. A UN investigation found that nine of UNWRA's 13,000 Gaza-based employees 'may have' participated and no longer worked at the agency. In January this year, Israel banned UNRWA from operating in Gaza, cutting off viral services like food, health care and education to hundreds of thousands of people. As Israel's campaign leveled much of Gaza, displacing most of its residents and weakening Hamas' grip on the territory, lawlessness began to spread. Looting became a new hurdle for UN trucks, and casualties mounted at aid delivery points. Israel has repeatedly blamed Hamas and armed gangs for the chaos. The UN warned just weeks into the war that civil order was beginning to collapse, with desperate Palestinians taking flour and hygiene supplies from warehouses. By November 2024, the UN again raised the alarm, saying the capacity to deliver aid was 'completely gone.' In 'one of the worst' looting incident, over 100 trucks were lost, it said. Drivers were forced to unload trucks at gunpoint, aid workers were injured, and vehicles were damaged extensively. As Hamas' grip on Gaza waned and the territory's police force was hollowed out, gangs emerged to steal aid and resell it. Israel has also armed local militias to counter Hamas – a controversial move that opposition politicians have warned will endanger Israeli national security. The arming of militias appears to be the closest that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has come to empowering any form of alternate rule in the strip. Since the start of the war, the Israeli leader has refused to lay out a plan for Gaza's governance once the conflict ends. On January 19, another temporary ceasefire was reached. Aid resumed, but remained well short of what was needed. Israel reinstated a total blockade of Gaza on March 2 after the truce expired. Two weeks later, it resumed fighting, with officials saying the goal was to force Hamas to accept new ceasefire terms and release hostages. By July, the World Food Programme (WFP) assessed that a quarter of Gaza's population was facing famine-like conditions. At least 80 children have died of malnutrition since the conflict began, the Palestinian health ministry says. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), most of these occurred after the March blockade. In May, GHF, the controversial new Israeli- and American-backed organization, announced it would begin delivering with Israel's approval. Just days before GHF began operating, its director Jake Wood resigned, saying it was impossible to do his work 'while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.' The foundation was created to replace the UN's role in Gaza, while complying with Israeli demands that the aid not reach Hamas. The GHF said it would coordinate with the Israeli military, but that security would be provided by private military contractors. The UN has refused to participate, saying the GHF model violates some basic humanitarian principles. Critics have noted that there are only a small number of GHF distribution sites, in southern and central Gaza – far fewer than hundreds under the UN's previous model. This has forced massive crowds to gather at limited locations. The GHF has defended its system, saying it is a 'secure model (that) blocks the looting.' But soon after it began operating on May 27, the plan turned deadly as those seeking aid increasingly came under fire near GHF aid sites. Palestinian officials and witnesses have said Israeli troops are responsible for most of the deaths. The Israeli military acknowledged firing warning shots toward crowds in some instances, but denied responsibility for other incidents. And the deaths aren't limited to the vicinity of GHF aid sites. On Sunday, Israeli forces killed dozens waiting for aid in northern Gaza, according to the Palestinian health ministry. Israel said troops fired warning shots after sensing an 'immediate threat' The ministry of health recorded 10 deaths due to famine and malnutrition in 24 hours from Tuesday, bringing the total of Palestinians who died of starvation to 111. On Wednesday, 111 international humanitarian organizations called on Israel to end its blockade and agree to a ceasefire, warning that supplies in the enclave are now 'totally depleted' and that humanitarian groups are 'witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes.' An Israeli official said at a press briefing on Wednesday that they expect more aid to enter the enclave in the future. 'We would like to see more and more trucks entering Gaza and distributing the aid as long as Hamas is not involved,' the official said. 'As we see for now, Hamas has an interest: First, to put pressure on the State of Israel through the international community in order to (have) an effect in the (ceasefire) negotiation process; and second, to collapse the new mechanism that we have established that is making sure that they are not involved in the aid delivery inside Gaza.' International pressure continues to mount on Israel, including from the United States. And on Monday, the foreign ministers of 25 Western nations slammed Israel for 'drip feeding' aid into the Gaza Strip. Israel's foreign ministry said it 'rejects' the statement, calling it 'disconnected from reality.' CNN's Tim Lister, Mostafa Salem, Catherine Nicholls, Oren Liebermann, Eugenia Yosef, Dana Karni, Mike Schwartz, Mick Krever, Eugenia Yosef and Jeremy Diamond contributed reporting.
