
Seven brands account for 1 in 7 US FDA refusals of Indian food, drug, cosmetic shipments
As of early July, the US FDA has refused 4,089 India-origin shipments in the ongoing US fiscal year 2025 (October 2024 to September 2025) – already exceeding the 3,648 refusals recorded in all of FY24, according to data from the top public health regulator.
Haldiram Snacks Food – in which Singapore's Temasek acquired a 10 per cent stake earlier this year at a $10 billion valuation – recorded the highest number of US FDA refusals, with 731 shipments containing Haldiram-manufactured products denied entry since October 2020. Notably, 94 per cent of these rejections occurred in FY24 and the ongoing FY25, the data shows.
Haldiram's refusal rate – the share of shipments denied over total shipments sent – rose to 1.7 per cent in FY24 and FY25 (till July), a sharp jump from below 0.1 per cent in FY22 and FY23 combined. The rejected consignments primarily consisted of snack foods, including fried items, flagged for alleged unsanitary manufacturing conditions and the presence of salmonella, a disease-causing pathogen.
Haldiram and Temasek did not respond to requests for comment.
Nestlé noodles flagged for unsafe additives, mislabelling
In the food products category, which accounts for 55 per cent of all US FDA refusals since October 2020, Haldiram was followed by Nestlé India, with 300 shipments rejected. Most of the consignments contained Nestlé-manufactured noodles, and were refused entry for misbranding, mislabelling, or containing unsafe additives or filth.
Nearly two-thirds of these rejections occurred in FY24 and the ongoing FY25, with Nestlé recording a refusal rate of 25 per cent – more than five times the 4 per cent in FY22 and FY23. While the US FDA data lists Nestlé India as the firm behind these consignments, a company spokesperson told The Indian Express that these exports were not made by Nestlé India and that no refusals have been recorded in the recent past.
The refusal rate of all food consignments from India stands at 0.32 per cent in FY25, up from 0.15 per cent in FY22.
Sun Pharma, Cipla face FDA heat
In the drugs and biologics category, Sun Pharma led with 335 shipment rejections since October 2020 – mostly for exporting unapproved drugs or failing to meet good manufacturing standards. Its refusal rate between FY22 and the ongoing FY25 stands at 1.8 per cent.
In June 2025, the US FDA issued a warning letter to Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd over 'significant violations' of Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations for finished drugs. The letter followed a December 2023 inspection of the company's Dadra facility, which found that some exported products were adulterated due to non-compliance with CGMP norms.
Sun Pharma is followed by Cipla, which has recorded 244 rejections since October 2020, primarily for exporting unapproved drugs. Cipla's refusal rate between FY22 and the ongoing FY25 stands at 1.5 per cent. In November 2023, the US FDA had issued a warning letter to Cipla Ltd, too, for non-compliance with CGMP norms.
The refusal rate of all drugs and biologics shipments from India has risen in recent years, from 0.7 per cent in FY22 to 1.06 per cent so far in FY25. These consignments account for 39 per cent of all refusals since October 2020, the second-largest category after food products.
Sun Pharma and Cipla did not respond to requests for comment.
Patanjali tops cosmetic refusals
While cosmetic shipment rejections by the US FDA make up a small share – just 3 per cent, with 136 refusals so far in FY25, trailing 156 in FY24 – Patanjali Ayurved has recorded a high refusal rate of 11 per cent since FY22, data shows.
Of the 548 India-origin cosmetic shipments refused since October 2020, nearly 20 per cent contained Patanjali-manufactured products – mostly shampoos, toothpastes and powders, and hair tonics. The most common reasons for rejection include the use of unsafe colour additives, unapproved ingredients, and labelling violations. In addition to cosmetics, Patanjali shipments have also faced rejections in the drugs (44) and food (35) categories.
Hindustan Unilever and Himalaya Wellness have faced 51 and 54 shipment rejections, respectively, since October 2020, with refusal rates of 2.1 per cent and 1.2 per cent since FY22. Most of their consignments were flagged for containing unsafe colour additives or unapproved drugs. Hindustan Unilever also recorded 23 refusals in the food category and 8 in drugs.
Patanjali, Hindustan Unilever, and Himalaya did not respond to requests for comment.
The overall refusal rate for Indian cosmetic shipments rose from 0.16 per cent in FY22 to 0.48 per cent in FY24, before easing to 0.2 per cent so far in FY25.
The refusal rate for India-origin shipments across all categories has climbed in recent years – from 0.21 per cent in FY22 to 0.41 per cent in FY24, before easing slightly to 0.36 per cent so far in FY25.
In the ongoing US fiscal, India accounts for 17 per cent of all FDA refusals – second only to Sweden at 18 per cent. Swedish shipments, largely consisting of tobacco products, had a notably high refusal rate of 1.7 per cent. China followed with a 12 per cent share of total rejections, but its overall refusal rate was just 0.01 per cent.
Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Naruvi Hospitals, The Hindu to jointly host webinar on management of GERD
Naruvi Hospitals, Vellore, in association with The Hindu, is presenting a webinar on 'GERD-Free Living: From Burn to Balance', at 11.30 a.m. on July 20. This is a part of the 'Healthy India, Happy India' webinar series — a 15-part initiative on the theme of 'Prevent Illness, Promote Wellness'. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is an increasingly common lifestyle disorder that affects individuals across all age groups. This webinar aims to raise awareness of GERD by addressing its early symptoms, methods of accurate diagnosis, available treatment options, and sustainable lifestyle changes to effectively manage and prevent the condition. This 15th session in the series brings together a panel of doctors who will share their insights on GERD: E. Rabindranath, consultant gastroenterologist, Naruvi Hospitals, Vellore will speak on 'Diagnosis, Lifestyle Changes and Managing GERD', while Jacob Raja A. S, consultant gastroenterologist, consultant in infectious diseases, Naruvi Hospitals, Vellore will speak on 'Introduction and Symptomatology of GERD'. A. C. Arun, clinical lead, gastroenterology, Lily Mission Hospital, Madurai, will elaborate on the 'Treatment of Refractory GERD'. Soma Basu, Senior Deputy Editor, The Hindu will moderate the session. E-certificates will be issued to all those who register for the webinar. To register, visit or scan the QR code.


Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Popular Power Stick deodorant pulled from Walmart, Amazon shelves in major recall
Over 67,000 cases of Power Stick deodorants are being pulled off shelves nationwide after the FDA flagged serious manufacturing problems. A.P. Deauville, the company behind the products, started the recall on July 10 because of violations in factory safety rules, known as "cGMP deviations." While the FDA hasn't detailed exact risks, such issues can mean contamination, unapproved ingredients, or poor quality control. The recalled roll-ons were sold at Walmart, Dollar Tree, and Amazon, putting shoppers across the U.S. at potential risk. If you've bought any Power Stick deodorant recently, stop using it immediately and check if your lot number matches the recall list. The recall targets three specific Power Stick varieties: the "Power Fresh" scent for women, the "Spring Fresh" Invisible Protection line, and the Original Nourishing version. Each comes in a 1.8 oz roll-on bottle. Affected lot numbers include 032026B011 (Power Fresh), 031726A991 (Spring Fresh), and 101225D781 (Original), among dozens of others listed by the FDA. Roughly 21,000–23,000 cases per product are involved, totaling 67,214 cases. The deodorants lack expiration dates, so identifying them relies solely on UPC codes and lot numbers printed on packaging. No injuries have been reported yet, but the FDA stresses that manufacturing flaws could cause skin irritation or infections. Consumers with any recalled Power Stick deodorant should discontinue use right away. To check if your product is unsafe, locate the lot number on the bottom or side of the bottle and match it against the FDA's enforcement report or retailer announcements. If it's on the list, contact Walmart, Dollar Tree, or Amazon for a full refund or replacement. You can also reach out to A.P. Deauville directly through their website for guidance. Even if you've used the product without issues, return it, unseen problems like chemical contamination may still pose hidden dangers. This isn't just about deodorant, it's about trust. A.P. Deauville's Pennsylvania factory claims to be "FDA-regulated," yet it failed basic safety standards designed to protect consumers. Such oversights can lead to nationwide scares, as seen here with products shipped to major discount chains and online giants. The company also makes shampoos, body washes, and facial wipes, though those items aren't part of this recall. The FDA continues investigating, urging public vigilance. Always check recall updates on their website, especially for everyday items applied directly to your skin.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Power Stick Deodorant Recall: How to return and get refund? See product types, quantities, affected lot numbers, fda report, recall reason, retail stores
A.P. Deauville has recalled over 67,000 cases of its Power Stick deodorant products. The recall was announced by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after the company reported deviations from current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). The affected products were sold at major retailers including Walmart, Dollar Tree and Amazon. Power Stick Deodorant Recall Types and Quantities The recall includes three types of Power Stick roll-on antiperspirant deodorants. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Management Artificial Intelligence Public Policy Degree Project Management Data Science healthcare Others Finance Digital Marketing Operations Management Leadership Healthcare MBA CXO others PGDM Design Thinking Technology Data Science Data Analytics Product Management MCA Cybersecurity Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta CERT-IIMC APSPM India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK GMPBE India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK General Management Programme India Starts on undefined Get Details Power Stick for Her Roll-On Antiperspirant Deodorant Powder Fresh (1.8 oz/53 mL): 21,265 cases Power Stick Invisible Protection Roll-On Antiperspirant Deodorant Spring Fresh (1.8 oz/53 mL): 22,482 cases Power Stick Original Nourishing Invisible Protection Roll-On Antiperspirant Deodorant (1.8 oz/53 mL): 23,467 cases Power Stick Deodorant Recall Affected Lot Numbers Power Stick for Her Roll-On Antiperspirant Deodorant Powder Fresh: 032026B011 032226B031 051626C241 061526C882 071226D371 071226D381 082526E341 082826E402 Power Stick Invisible Protection Roll-On Antiperspirant Deodorant Spring Fresh: 031726A991 041226B561 062026C901 062026C911 071026D351 071026D361 071326D391 111626G231 Live Events Power Stick Original Nourishing Invisible Protection Roll-On Antiperspirant Deodorant: 101225D781 032926B281 032826B221 041126B531 062226D011 070626D301 070626D333 111026G051 111326G091 111626G221 Power Stick Deodorant Recall FDA Report and Recall Reason The recall was listed in an FDA enforcement report. It noted the reason for the recall as 'cGMP deviations.' This means the products were made outside the standards outlined by the FDA's Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations. The recall was initiated on July 10, 2025. Also Read: Who fired Maurene Comey and Why? See ex-FBI Director daughter's high profile cases and what happened on day of departure Which Stores Sold These Products? The deodorants were shipped across the United States. They were available for purchase at Walmart, Dollar Tree and on Amazon. The products were manufactured at A.P. Deauville's factory in Pennsylvania, which the company says is FDA-regulated. Company Background and Additional Products A.P. Deauville is based in Easton, Pennsylvania. The company manufactures personal care products including shampoos, conditioners, body washes, lotions and facial wipes. It reported the issue voluntarily to the FDA and initiated the recall process. Also Read: Tomorrowland 2025: Will festival go as planned? See organizers statement, event schedule, venue, expected visitors and full list of performers How to Return and Get Refund? Consumers who have purchased any of the affected Power Stick deodorant products are advised to stop using them immediately. They should contact A.P. Deauville for guidance on returns, refunds, or disposal of the items. FAQs What should I do if I purchased a recalled Power Stick deodorant? Stop using the product immediately and contact A.P. Deauville for return instructions or refund. Where were the recalled deodorants sold? They were sold nationwide at Walmart, Dollar Tree and Amazon.